December 2, 2005

stormhoek rant

zzzzzz7654151.jpg
I had just had a big ol’ rant over at the Stormhoek blog:

BOGOF (Buy One Get One Free) is the UK wine industry

7 Responses to “stormhoek rant”

  1. frosty says:

    Really, 20%?
    Um… if Gallo has only 2% then I seriously doubt Stormhoek could pro­duce (much less sell) enough wine to cover 20% of the US mar­ket in any price cate­gory. Even if the 2% is glo­bal mar­ket share.
    Care to break down those num­bers a bit?

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Gallo has an ove­rall 2% mar­ket share of the entire wine mar­ket in the UK, in terms of cases sold.
    Stormhoek has a 20% mar­ket share in the UK of all wines that (A) are from South Africa and (B) retail for more than

  3. Great news, Hugh
    Out of inte­rest (we’re begin­ning work for a winery in Onta­rio) do you know that entire mar­ket share for wines from SA?

  4. hugh macleod says:

    Sadly, Andreas, I do not. (I know, I know, I should etc). What I do know is this:
    “Small, but gro­wing very fast overall”.

  5. hugh macleod says:

    P.S. Con­grats on the winery gig =)

  6. The pod­cas­ting Penguin

    Pen­guin the book publisher has star­ted pod­cas­ting The Guar­dian blog says Pen­guin is the first of the UK’s major publishers to jump on the pod­cas­ting band­wa­gon , with the Pen­guin Pod­cast , and they are making a pretty good fist

  7. Steve Lang says:

    A few questions/comments:
    1. I really like the pro­ject, great way to get a bunch of heads together to work on something that is typi­cally very inter­nal (within a com­pany.)
    2. In rea­ding the Part1/Part2 posts, I don’t com­ple­tely buy the ‘vibe’ you are shoo­ting for. Apple? Goo­gle? I agree that something out of the box is called for, but this doesn’t sound like the right lan­ding point.
    After all, at the end of the day it is still about the wine, right? Great mar­ke­ting is more than cate­ring to some lifestyle (real or fan­tasy), it is first about infor­ming the cus­to­mer of the actual pro­duct or ser­vice being offe­red. To say other­wise is a disc­re­dit to the com­pany IMO, and a disc­re­dit to the Clue­train Mani­festo.
    3. That being said, there is a great oppor­tu­nity to dif­fe­ren­tiate Stormhoek via new mar­ke­ting methods, rather than a new label that is uber-blogosphere.
    Perhaps I am rea­ding too much into your com­ments about this…
    In going to Stormhoek’s site, I see the blog but not sure it’s so much to get gee­ked up about, or if it sig­ni­fi­cantly affects my per­cep­tion of Stormhoek. Actually, some more site orga­ni­za­tion or per­sis­tent links to cer­tain pages would help (link to fresh­ness post, mem­ber bios, pho­tos of the com­pany, how we make wine, etc…)
    BTW– The mani­festo is pretty nice, and I lar­gely buy it. But I want Stormhoek to show me, not just tell me. Other­wise it will be no diff­fe­rent than so many other mis­sion sta­te­ments. If you show me, then I might actually feel the pas­sion for the com­pany that you are trying to impart.
    4. Besi­des the atti­tude of the com­pany, what exactly dif­fe­ren­tia­tes them from other wines? Or perhaps a bet­ter ques­tion is what dif­fe­ren­tia­tes SA wine from other wines? That would seem like a poten­tially good dif­fe­ren­tia­tor.
    The other main dif­fe­ren­tia­tor I see is the fresh­ness thing, as the com­pany seems to be pushing it pretty hard on the label and in their blog. I would rather drink a bottle of fresh wine (if I know it mat­ters), than a bottle of blog­ger wine. The inter­net and blogs are are great mar­ke­ting tools, but not neces­sa­rily a great brand hook (have I beat this one to death yet?)
    So I think a graphic design that empha­si­zes fresh­ness might be a good pos­si­bi­lity. A catchy label of course to grab customer’s atten­tion, and further enhan­ced by wha­te­ver inter­net mar­ke­ting tools you want to use.
    5. Dis­tri­bu­tion– if a huge com­pany like Gallo only has 2% share, perhaps there are some dis­tri­bu­tion fac­tors in play? It would seem that mar­ke­ting to the buyers for the sto­res would have a large role in this, and there might be some novel mar­ke­ting approaches there too.
    6. One rea­son why peo­ple for­get the brand of the $8 bottle they drank last nite (even if it was good) is that they just don’t care that much. Even a catchy label can be iffy. I might remem­ber the label, but not remem­ber if that was the good bottle I just had, or the bad one (this has hap­pe­ned to me at Tra­der Joe’s.)
    7. I would make the http://www.stormhoek.com pro­mi­nent somewhere on the label (of course.) But in addi­tion, you might want to get a easier-to-remember domain name (freshnessmatters.com, etc.) because no one is going to remem­ber Stormhoek.com (spe­lling is too hard.) BTW– freshnessmatters.com is actually avai­la­ble, believe it or not…
    In that 3 seconds, a con­su­mer will lar­gely be making a gut reac­tion from a tiny label whether to pick up that bottle and maybe buy it. A catchy graphic might help con­vince the cus­to­mer to pick the bottle up, a catchy domain might help con­vince the cus­to­mer to check out the web site later (perhaps even if he/she didn’t pick up the bottle.)