November 18, 2005

intoxicated

yyyyyyy765115.jpg
The groovy cats at Craven’s, a medium-sized ad agency in New­castle just com­mis­sio­ned me to draw some car­toons for their web­site and in-house colla­te­ral.
Pro­bably the coo­lest thing were the new busi­ness cards. The staff could indi­vi­dually pick any design they wan­ted from the twenty or so dra­wings I did for them. Private-label blog­cards, as it were. The car­toon above is one of them.
Jamie Warde-Aldham, the Crea­tive Direc­tor is a good friend of mine, who I occa­sio­nally free­lan­ced for during my pre-blogging days. Craven’s and I go back a long time. Rock on.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

13 Responses to “intoxicated”

  1. frosty says:

    For­give my lack of mar­ke­ting voca­bu­lary, but…
    What is “in-house collateral?”

  2. Simon says:

    Well done on get­ting a gig out of your hobby and all that, but loo­king at their site, something feels wrong.
    I’ve seen lots of your car­toons, and their gene­ral feel seems to be high­ligh­ting faults in the adver­ti­sing and media indus­tries, or cha­rac­ter flaws of the peo­ple invol­ved in them.
    Having seen Cra­vens’ front page, my first thought was “who is this car­toon poking fun at?”. Appa­rently nobody, which is dis­con­cer­ting in itself. It’s like Chris Evans being on Radio 2.
    I don’t know much about adver­ti­sing, so I can’t say how dif­fe­rent Cra­vens are to the dino­saurs you usually mock. They seem to offer solu­tions rather than ope­ning up con­ver­sa­tions, and they don’t appear to men­tion blogs, other than that they read yours. Maybe it’s just easier to appear to be pro­gres­sive by having your car­toons on their site.
    Loo­king at the “peo­ple who pay their wages” sec­tion, I read: “every piece of Aqua Sphere’s com­mu­ni­ca­tion to the mar­ket — inc­lu­ding pro­duct ads — has to be a brand buil­ding ad too.“
    Remem­be­ring that you main­tain that bran­ding is dead, I won­de­red why you agreed to work for Cra­vens.
    I searched your site for blog posts about bran­ding being dead, and found: “Besi­des, nobody is currently offe­ring to pay me the big bucks to help keep the ever-drearier Brand Metaphor alive on their behalf”.
    So, did you work for them because you’re proud to be asso­cia­ted with them, or because they offe­red you the big bucks?

  3. tony.dowler says:

    Nice :) It must be a great fee­ling seeing your dood­les spreading.

  4. hugh macleod says:

    “So, did you work for them because you’re proud to be asso­cia­ted with them, or because they offe­red you the big bucks?“
    Heh. You assume my moti­va­tions were limi­ted to just pride and/or greed. Interesting.

  5. hugh macleod says:

    “in-house colla­te­ral”… brochu­res, busi­ness cards, com­pli­ment slips, sta­tio­nery for them­sel­ves, that kind of thing.

  6. Alexoid says:

    The site looks abso­lu­tely great. Very cool stuff.

  7. AdPulp says:

    Pitch Or Perish

    Hugh Mac­Leod has pro­du­ced some dood­les for his friends at Cra­vens Adver­ti­sing in New­castle, England. While snoo­ping around their site, these ety­mo­lo­gi­cal gems sur­fa­ced. I’ve been rea­ding “Which Lie Did I Tell” by William Gold­man (the guy who wrote Butc…

  8. marium says:

    this is bri­lliant… and very very “i will also get back into using my black poin­ter phase“inspirational thing. way to go!!!!:)

  9. Simon says:

    “You assume my moti­va­tions were limi­ted to just pride and/or greed. Inte­res­ting.“
    Yes, I sup­pose I did assume something like that, which I shouldn’t have — sorry.
    So if it was neither of those, does that mean they’re ok, and not the sort of agency that you would usually draw car­toons about? If so, then fine, I’ll remem­ber their name, and I’ll get in touch with them if I need an agency. If not, I’d be inte­res­ted to know why you’d want to be invol­ved with them.

  10. hugh macleod says:

    Simon, Jamie Warde-Aldham is a capi­tal fellow, and I was deligh­ted to have the oppor­tu­nity to work with him. I also hap­pen to think highly of his collea­gues.
    Nice com­pany, great peo­ple, plus the have a huge aver­sion to the nor­mal agency bullshit I des­pise.
    The other thing: because they’re based in the North, it saves them mas­sive overheads, com­pa­red to Lon­don. A man without fear is less likely to lie to you.

  11. blahgKarma says:

    Faux blahg­Kards…

    Faux blahg­Kards

  12. Simon says:

    Cool. Thanks for clea­ring that up for me.

  13. pieman says:

    That’s hila­rious. When I left college many years ago, I had my first and only ever ad com­pany inter­view with Cra­vens in Lea­ming­ton Spa. It didn’t appeal at that time. But — inte­res­ting that it’s a com­pany you rate, in a sphere you don’t. Maybe our paths would’ve cros­sed.
    BTW — you still you loo­king to rejoin the dating game? I know someone who may be inte­res­ted and is very inte­res­ting. Email me if you’re game.