November 15, 2005

stormhoek label update

yyyyyyy765114.jpg
[The back label of a Stormhoek bottle, with the wee semi­circle “Fesh­ness Indi­ca­tor”.]
A cou­ple of days ago, in order to drive the thin­king about the Stormhoek pro­ject for­ward, I star­ted a little impromptu “New Label Design” con­test.
Wow. It gene­ra­ted over fifty com­ments and about two dozen e-mail sub­mis­sions.
Thanks a lot for ever­yone who con­tri­bu­ted to it. Seriously.
One per­son, Miche­lle, left a pretty inte­res­ting com­ment:

So sorry Hugh, don’t want to burst your bub­ble — but you pro­bably should have given peo­ple some boun­da­ries to work within. I work in the wine industry and the label is one of the most regu­la­ted areas in the industry. The last thing you want to do is spend time and money on a label only to find it won’t be appro­ved for sale in say the UK or US!! It’s all well and good to think outside the square — but it’s worth kno­wing your limi­ta­tions too.

Well the good news is, we know all about wine label regu­la­tions and know how to work within them. But the pur­pose here wasn’t to save money on lable design– the pur­pose here was more of an inte­llec­tual exer­cise bet­ween my rea­ders and myself in order to shake things up a bit.
It’s hard to know what other peo­ple are thin­king unless you ask them first.
So where are we now? We’re still sif­ting through all the great ideas we recei­ved. Lots to think about. But this is what we’re currently thin­king:
At the back of every bottle there’s a wee semi-circle called “The Fresh­ness Indi­ca­tor” (It’s that little green & yellow thing in the photo). Basi­cally it tells you the dates when the wine is at its best to drink, i.e. when it’s at its freshest. Ins­tead of saying “Best before Octo­ber, 2006″, it tells you “Best drunk bet­ween Febu­rary and Octo­ber, 2006″. It’s a nice little device that works, and works well.
A few weeks ago we were at a con­su­mer wine show, pou­ring out free sam­ples (Yay! Free Alcohol!), telling peo­ple all about the wine, and the Fresh­ness Indi­ca­tor is the part of the story every­body see­med to click on right away.
There are only three snags.

1. It’s small. Almost invi­si­ble. And yet it’s so cen­tral to what the whole “Fresh­ness Mat­ters” sch­tick is all about.
2. It’s on the back of the bottle. You don’t see it until you’ve got the bottle in your hand and are already rea­ding the back label.
3. It’s not exactly a [cough] classy design.

So we are thin­king:

1. Make it big and easy to read.
2. Make it the cen­tral motif on the front wine label.
3. Make the design more plea­sing to the eye. Classy and enga­ging etc. After all, even at the $10 price point, wine is aspirational.

At the wine show, we were telling the Stormhoek story the Fesh­ness Indi­ca­tor etc, and peo­ple liked it. But it was taking thirty seconds to ver­bally trans­mit.
We need to visually tell the same story, in the super­mar­ket aisle, in three seconds or less.
Is it a risky stra­tegy? Of course. Maybe peo­ple won’t dig it, espe­cially the wine snobs/geeks. But maybe there’s more peo­ple out there who are loo­king for the “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion” thing, than are out there trying to do the wine-snob geek thing.
But a wee voice tells me if this works, it’ll REALLY work. Far bet­ter than the stan­dard cutesy-designer-aspirational wine label you nor­mally see.
And if not, we’re scre­wed. But hey, that’s usually the way.
Regard­less, the con­ver­sa­tion moves for­ward. The Label Design pro­ject with the blo­gosphere moves to Phase Two. Any thoughts?

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

27 Responses to “stormhoek label update”

  1. Dave Wheeler says:

    Hugh,
    It may be stretching the “good time to drink” con­cept a bit, but how about a label that actual “tells time”? It could “mea­sure” fresh­ness … sort of like some of the gau­ges that they build into dis­po­sa­ble bat­te­ries. Such a label would likely cost more than a “nor­mal” label, but it would cer­tainly be worth tal­king about ! And I’m gues­sing the tech­no­logy is pos­si­ble (with new cir­cuitry on fle­xi­ble subs­tra­tes)!
    Dave (Mr.GadgetUSA)

  2. Ben says:

    Reminds me a little too much of the Bud­wei­ser “Born-On-Date” fresh­ness thing. Anyone who knows anything knows Bud­wei­ser is going to taste like the same watery beer whether it’s 2 hours, two weeks, or two years, or two deca­des old. Of course it’s dif­fe­rent with wine, but the con­cept seems to simi­lar to me. I’m not a wine snob by any stretch of the ima­gi­na­tion, but over­pla­ying the “best dates to drink” would pro­bably turn me off.
    If I’m buying a $10 bottle of wine, it’s to drink tonight or within a week. If it’s on the shelf, it bet­ter be best to drink it then.

  3. hugh macleod says:

    D’accord Ben, but wine is dif­fe­rent than beer.
    Beer is best drunk ASAP after its bott­led (Drink Carls­berg in Copenha­gen, where its made, if you don’t believe me). But each wine will have its own “best” win­dow depen­ding on a WHOLE host of fac­tors. And frankly, not a lot of tho­guht and effort goes into telling the cus­to­mer when that win­dow is.

  4. pieman says:

    I agree with Ben in that most wine buyers are pro­bably like me. They buy a bottle for that night, the wee­kend or wha­te­ver. they’re not really that inte­res­ted in when it is the ‘right’ or ‘best’ time to drink it.
    I guess at a Wine show you don’t meet peo­ple like Ben and me. You meet peo­ple who know alot about wine and are pro­bably bored of the same old labels etc. So they’re bound to be inte­res­ted in soemthing a bit whacky.
    The fresh­ness thing is a nice gim­mick, but I think there’s a sig­ni­fi­cant dan­ger that that’s all it will end up being — even if it is beau­ti­fully desig­ned. Buyers are still gonna drink the wine a few hours or days after they buy it regard­less.
    So it is a risky stra­tegy in that Stormhoek could well wind up being the “Oh that’s the wine with the gim­mikcy label” thing.

  5. ninefish says:

    from what you and Stormhoek have said pre­viously, at this end of the price range, i’m gues­sing that the wine snob isn’t inte­res­ted in Stormhoek. and so i think the sup­port aspect [for the novice] is cru­cial.
    drink this when?
    best drunk in the next five minu­tes, five days, before the wee­kend, before the year’s end.
    got chic­ken in your bas­ket? get some of this char­do­nay, chill it for as long as your chic­ken is roas­ting and drink it before your gravy has con­gea­led.
    is that beef in your tro­lley? buy this robust mer­lot and don’t be afraid the broc­co­lli will over­po­wer your wine.
    if fresh­ness mat­ters tell them on the front of the bottle, and edu­cate them as to why it mat­ters, sel them the brand on the back once they’ve pic­ked it up.
    when all the wines on that shelf are pri­ced within the same range what is it that makes you choose? you’ve either had it before [and remem­ber it being OK] or the label catches your eye. after all they’re pro­bably all the same colour [bott­les or wine] and the only dif­fe­ren­tia­tion bet­ween them is the label. star­ting the con­ver­sa­tion by hel­ping has got to be bet­ter than trying to bluff them with another sty­lish label that speaks expense and deli­vers plonk. be honest, don’t bluff, but do let ever­yone know the infor­ma­tion: drink now, best with…
    it’s not a gim­mick when it’s a help, or has the inte­grity to know it’s place. that would be fresh ideas… honesty in adver­ti­sing :-)
    keep things sim­ple, ans­wer the ques­tion that the cus­to­mer has on the tip of it’s ton­gue, and don’t do what the others are doing other­wise you’ll get their clients
    Adrian

  6. frankp says:

    Can we see a bet­ter scan of the current indi­ca­tor to see how it currently works…?

  7. Geert says:

    I would still keep the indi­ca­tor on the back of the bottle and ‚indeed make it big­ger. Something I saw this wee­kend in a Deli in Brus­sels (www.lepainquotidien.com) was a wine bottle with a black & white photo on the cover(which you don’t see that often) and under­neath it said something like: ‘best wine for a Pic­nic”. It comes close to the idea of giving peo­ple info on when to buy because you’re telling him for what occa­sion you can buy it. Just a tought.

  8. McFilter says:

    How Fresh?

    A while back, I sig­ned up for the Stormhoek blogger’s wine free­bie. Not the ini­tial round, as I’m not that into wine, but there’s a limit to the amount of time I can pass up free alcohol… I ended up…

  9. john says:

    1) you assume this con­cept of fresh­ness mat­ters to peo­ple, there’ll be some who don’t care and others who asso­ciate it with overly young wine. Once they’ve tatsed the wine they’ll make their own jud­ge­ment.
    2) By focus­sing on fresh­ness, you’re focus­sing on one pro­duct attri­bute — that reeks of old style mar­ket seg­men­ta­tion to me and is at odds with where this pro­ject started.

  10. john says:

    Being remar­ka­ble is not about being remar­ka­ble at one pro­duct aspect — it’s about being remar­ka­ble in everything asso­cia­ted with the product.

  11. hugh macleod says:

    “Being remar­ka­ble is not about being remar­ka­ble at one pro­duct aspect — it’s about being remar­ka­ble in everything asso­cia­ted with the pro­duct.“
    Actually, John, being remar­ka­ble is about being easy for others to remark upon. QED.

  12. Ken Dyck says:

    “Best drunk bet­ween Febu­rary and Octo­ber“
    Now there’s something I could get tatooed on my ass.

  13. Matt says:

    Fresh­ness and qua­lity wine just don’t go together in the minds of most $10/bottle-wine drin­kers. We are all taught that wine must be pro­perly aged, and that old wine is bet­ter wine (whether or not it’s true). I think saying a wine is fresh is the same as screa­ming “Cheap Wine!“
    If it were my label, I’d say “Pro­perly Aged” or “Time to Drink” or “Blow the dust off this baby and enjoy.“
    Orson Welles infa­mously shi­lled: “I sell no wine before its time.” Yes, it’s pla­yed, but it’s a bet­ter message.

  14. Tom says:

    Hi Hugh
    I would put the indi­ca­tor at the top of the bottle. That way, it is visi­ble at almost every angle. If the win­dow of fresh­ness is a few months, you might even do a sea­so­nal theme (e.g., peo­ple in the suburbs tend to hang sea­so­nally appro­priate deco­ra­tive flags out every few months).
    The cha­llenge with the fresh­ness indi­ca­tor is that it might limit the shelf life of the bottle. Howe­ver, since Stormhoek is not on the shelf of my favo­rite liquor store, this is not too much of an issue yet.
    I had another unre­la­ted thought. I tend to drink $10 wine and give $20 – 25 wine as gifts. For the $10, the screw top is much more con­ve­nient. I would want a cork in any bottle I would give. Not sure where your client’s price lands.

  15. Shaded says:

    How about a tem­pe­ra­ture sen­si­tive por­tion on the label and inc­lude that in the fresh­ness indi­ca­tor. The label would change color if high or low tem­pe­ra­ture thresholds are excee­ded.
    I’m sure Stormhoek is fami­liar with ven­dors offe­ring gua­ran­teed sale of stock. The­re­fore sto­res should not be worried about pro­duct going bad if the dis­tri­bu­tor is taking the bulk of the risk.
    http://www.rhvactools.com/weekly/serviceaid.htm
    the above is not a food pro­duct exam­ple but these labels can be chan­ged a num­ber of ways che­mi­cally to fit an appro­priate threshold.
    .… damn, someone beat me to the idea:
    http://italianwinelabels.com/articles/04/ink.html
    I still liked what you said before. Something dis­rup­tive. Somethign to talk about. Something that is not about the wine.
    How about a label with a light­ning bolt on it?
    http://images.google.com/images?q=lightning
    Or something else stormy:
    http://images.google.com/images?q=storm+cloud
    “Enjoy the storm.“
    If you are shoo­ting for the untap­ped cus­to­mers who don’t unders­tand and don’t usually drink wine… (mainly me) you have to be loo­king for someone who walks down the isle loo­king for down to earth pro­duct that will offer an alte­red state with a sense of class. Someone who is loo­king to broa­den their hori­zons, ins­tead of buy another pack of Becks.
    I have about as much hope of beco­ming a hoi­dee toi­dee wine selec­tor, with this fancy word or that, as I do desire. (which is to say, none at all)
    Howe­ver, I love a good thun­der storm when it does not overs­tay its wel­come.
    And I like Stormhoek because it sounds like the wine vikings used to drink before wadeing into the fray.
    http://www.google.com/search?q=%22clangor+of+sword+and+axe%22

  16. ted says:

    hugh -
    i mis­sed out on the ope­ning round of this blog­gosphere design pro­ject (but read and tho­roughly enjo­yed the feed­back you got) so let me start with what i might have said:
    i’m living on a tight bud­get and rarely buy wines cos­ting over $10, but i come from a wine-snobby back­ground (my dad is that guy with the pda/cell-phone who looks up ratings every time he opens a restaurant’s wine list)…as such i actually know a little bit about wine, enough to know how to desc­ribe what kind of fla­vors i like, at least. so when i’m loo­king for a bottle, i want the label to give me a short, accu­rate desc­rip­tion of how the wine tas­tes. and i don’t mean just some gene­ric bullshit like “full-bodied with a hint of citrus.” i want spe­ci­fic fruits and other fla­vors, indi­ca­tions of spi­ci­ness or aci­dity — data that actually lets my ima­gi­na­tion create a spe­ci­fic taste, and at the same time assu­res that the wine-maker has craf­ted a uni­que pro­duct and is com­pe­tent enough to tell me about it. so for what it’s worth, there’s my con­ver­sa­tion. it really annoys me that these desc­rip­tors are absent from a lot of wines, and almost always in tiny print on the back of the label when they are inc­lu­ded, because to me, everything else about the label is secon­dary.
    i agree with ben’s fee­ling that making ‘fresh­ness mat­ters’ the cen­tral label motif would bring in bud­wei­ser asso­cia­tions that would turn me off imme­dia­tely. put it on the front label, and make it big­ger, by all means — but don’t let it domi­nate the design.
    what really sur­pri­sed me about your res­ponse to blog­gosphere label design round 1 was that you don’t seem to have latched onto some of the most inte­res­ting, and inte­rac­tive, ideas that were put for­ward. my favo­ri­tes were the one fea­tu­ring pic­tu­res of actual satis­fied stormhoek cus­to­mers, and the label-as-letter-and-feedback-form (although the desc­ri­bed snail-mail imple­men­ta­tion seems almost self-defeatingly archaic) [these sug­ges­tions were pos­ted by JJeffr­yes and Lau­ren Kozak, res­pec­ti­vely]. i would love to see a mer­ging of these ideas: each label fea­tu­res a dif­fe­rent customer’s own photo of them­self enjo­ying a bottle of stormhoek, their own con­cise (one sen­tence) desc­rip­tion of why the wine appea­led to them (taste-wise i mean) — both sub­mit­ted through a Stormhoek web­page — and an exhor­ta­tion from Stormhoek to the poten­tial buyer to visit a web­page where they can a) read more cus­to­mers’ opi­nions; and b) after they’ve tried the wine, sub­mit their own photos/opinions for use on future labels. this allows the label to ini­tiate a con­ver­sa­tion not just bet­ween the vint­ner and the buyer, but bet­ween pre­vious cus­to­mers and the buyer, and makes it easy for the buyer to talk back.
    and spea­king of web­pa­ges — i unders­tand that stormhoek has deci­ded to tie itself inex­tri­cably to the blog thing, but it’s simply infu­ria­ting that there’s no spe­ci­fic infor­ma­tion on any of the wines them­sel­ves at stormhoek.com. am i mis­sing something, or is that page *just* a blog — and if so, why the hell doesn’t it at least link to some exter­nal site where you can easily find out more about the actual pro­duct? it doesn’t even tell you what varie­ties they make! defi­ni­tely not hol­ding up its end of the conversation.

  17. Nigel says:

    Igno­ring your con­cept of making it the cen­tral motif on the front I, like Tom, thought of having it up top. Perhaps on the neck label as they’re effec­ti­vely redun­dant on so many other brands as they’re just a wate­red down logo.
    Unfor­tu­na­tely that’s pro­bably not the kind of ‘solu­tion’ you want to hear.

  18. Garrett says:

    Hi Hugh
    Irres­pec­tive of the rele­vant and edu­ca­ted res­ponse from peo­ple, there’s one thing that stands out, or rather, doesn’t. I can’t really see the fresh­ness logo

  19. hugh macleod says:

    Thanks, Garret. Yeah, it’s around the $10 mark.

  20. Shaded says:

    BTW I rea­li­zed why so many peo­ple may not see “Enjoy the storm” as much as I do…
    … I’m from Southern Cali­for­nia, so rain is almost a relief when it comes.
    Tech­ni­cally the area I live in is a desert, and put in pers­pec­tive the rains are fairly gentle. No floo­ding no lands­li­des or such near my home.
    So I’m sure it was clear why my idea wasn’t the best for some rea­son I felt com­pe­lled to shoot down my own idea.
    I would like to echo Garrett’s com­ments to you Hugh, good luck.
    Regards,
    Shaded

  21. I guess a worm in the bottle wouldn’t do it?
    I’m kinda fallin’ on the side of the argu­ment here that wants to ignore the ‘fresh­ness mat­ters’ thang, in any direct way at least. Keep it on the back of the label.
    Wine is sac­ra­ment or romance. Not dairy and beef, for chris­sa­kes. What are you gonna do put it put it in a glass dairy bottle, with a peel away (collec­ta­ble) lid? Collect all four and win a trip to South Africa? Hang a sam­pler of cheese from the neck? If the cheese is a little mouldy, con­tact sales clerk?
    ’Fresh­ness mat­ters’ is a thirty second message/argument to begin with. Leave it there. A con­ver­sa­tion bet­ween merchant and pro­du­cer.
    You’ve got three seconds, to quote a sage.
    Throw an abs­tract photo of a naked cou­ple ent­wi­ned on the label. Or a Viking with a big woody. Or have a screw cork/twist top with horns ‘fer easy ope­nin’ on the high seas’/. When you’re in the moment. Or the boot in the mud from their blog. Some pride of place.
    Res­tra­te­gize. Send it back for revi­sions.
    It’s too fuc­king ear­nest.
    I buy red to feel like Jesus. With a little fish and a half hour of Jeo­pardy I’m on top of the world.

  22. Andr says:

    Last night I read Hugh McLeod

  23. Andr says:

    Last night I read Hugh McLeod

  24. Andr says:

    Last night I read Hugh McLeod

  25. Andr says:

    Last night I read Hugh McLeod

  26. Andr says:

    Last night I read Hugh McLeod

  27. Andr says:

    Last night I read Hugh McLeod