November 10, 2005

the stormhoek label design: “why shouldn’t a small wine company see apple or google as its competition?”

zzzzzz7654231.jpg
So here’s where we are with Stormhoek.
We’ve got a great litte wine from South Africa, which I’ve been blog­ging about.
Then we sent out some bott­les to other blog­gers, no strings attached, to see what they had to say about it. As they’re fond of saying in the blo­gosphere, to start a con­ver­sa­tion.
I did this not because I wan­ted to turn blog­gers into wine pimps, but because, hey, I thought it would be fun. I thought it would be disup­tive. I thought it would be my kind of thing.
So far it’s wor­king. The groovy cats at Stormhoek are happy. By inte­rac­ting with the blo­gosphere [I call it “Taking the Clue­train seriously”], it’s chan­ging the way the com­pany see them­sel­ves, and the the way the wine trade sees them.
It’s chan­ging the brand. It’s evol­ving the brand. Sales are up. Good things are hap­pe­ning, whether they want them to or not.
So what’s next?
The bottle design.
99% of peo­ple who go into wine shops do not read blogs. They’ve never heard of Stormhoek. A very small per­cen­tage may have read about it in the mains­tream press (a lot of Bri­tish wine wri­ters like it, hap­pily for us), but who can remem­ber all those wine names you see in the Sun­day papers? Sure, all the Cluetrain/Hugh­train stuff I’m doing for them is great for “The Inter­nal Con­ver­sa­tion” and “The Porous Mem­brane” etc etc, but as I’ve said again and again, 95% of Stormhoek’s mar­ke­ting to the cus­to­mer hap­pens on the super­mar­ket shelf, in three seconds or less.
We need a new bottle design. A new label. Something that JUST. ISN’T. ABOUT. THE. FRICKIN’. WINE.
[btw: This is what the current bottle designs look like.]
I told Nick Dymoke-Marr the Mana­ging Direc­tor of Stormhoek: “You’re not com­pe­ting with Jacob’s Creek or Blos­som Hill. You’re com­pe­ting with Goo­gle and Mic­ro­soft and Apple and Skype.
Yes, the pro­duct cate­gory is always irre­vel­vant. It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it etc etc.
So I’m now on the hunt for a label & bottle design that bet­ter reflects the whole post-Cluetrain/Hughtrain sch­tick that Stormhoek is slowly beco­ming inter­nally, that tele­graphs this ins­tantly to the exter­nal mar­ket.
Why shouldn’t a small wine com­pany see Apple or Goo­gle as its com­pe­ti­tion? Think how more inte­res­ting the world would be if more small, non-techie com­pa­nies thought the same.
I’m loo­king for a new “look” for the bottle that sits there on the super­mar­ket shelf. The look may require a new label a new bottle, or both. Something that con­veys everything I’ve been tal­king about above.
Something that con­veys what the brand is beco­ming in this crazy, post-Cluetrain, wired age of ours.
So here’s the deal. Ins­tead of the usual going to a graphic desig­ners and giving them a for­mal “Cluetrain-savvy” brief (which 95% of them wouldn’t unders­tand proeply, any­way) I thought I’d start the con­ver­sa­tion by asking The Blo­gosphere if they have any ideas.
No, you don’t have to be a graphic desig­ner. An idea that works on the back of a cock­tail nap­kin is just fine by me.
It’s the idea, not the exe­cu­tion, that inte­rests me at the moment.
Any­body who comes up with the win­ning idea, an idea we can actually run with, we’ll pay them 

64 Responses to “the stormhoek label design: “why shouldn’t a small wine company see apple or google as its competition?””

  1. A friend pos­ted this spot to me, so i deci­ded to for­ward a thumb­nail of an idea. Trying to do the exact oppo­site of what most wines I have seen do.
    Its an inte­rac­tive .swf so when you roll over ele­ments, an expla­na­tion pops up.
    http://66.90.104.220/stormhoek.swf

  2. Labe­lling can be good…

    It’s funny what hap­pens when you start actually having a con­ver­sa­tion with peo­ple… We star­ted tal­king about the stuff that mat­ters to us and lots of peo­ple have joi­ned in. Stormhoek has been a catalyst for a lot of interesting…

  3. tetra­pack? fric­king tetra­pack. jesus christ — the bane of land­fill. save more than it costs? tell that to the rub­bish mountain.

  4. Further to James’ point about the envi­ron­men­tal impact of dis­car­ded Tetra Pak con­tai­ners: http://perc.ca/PEN/1991 – 10/fleischer.html

  5. Estelle says:

    Hello Hugh!
    Thanks for the cha­llenge and for sha­ring all the exci­ting adven­tu­res!
    I hope you will for­give a poor english…
    Few things I would like to say first about STORMHEAK:
    –I don’t know the wine
    –I have heard about it because you’ve tal­ked about it
    –I don’t feel like going back to their blog, but I like what YOU are saying about the blog­ging around their wine
    –I like the idea that the impor­tant is telling sto­ries others will like telling others..
    –I like thin­king peo­ple all around the world will taste this wine just because they’ve heard about it by Word Of Mouth
    –I like being able to “trace” the sto­ries so we get lin­ked together
    –At the end I would like to have a bottle of Stromheak for my next din­ner so I can tell that story to my friends! I will tell them about all the ideas and everything on your blog…and if by any chance I have the right friends then we’ll be right on the spot for a very very nice con­ver­sa­tion fee­ting right close to our needs?!
    Ok, here is what I thought could be inte­res­ting:
    (I wish I could show you that on a table cloth, that would be easier for me, I tell you!)
    FRONT OF THE BOTTLE
    –STORMHEAK
    WINE MADE OF WOM*
    (*Word Of Mouth)
    –MAP OF THE LINKS made by / towards blogs tal­king about the wine (I think it is pos­si­ble to visua­lize!)
    The map is like visua­li­zing the “cha­teau” were the wine was made. The “cha­teau” is everywhere but can be visua­li­zed and reached.
    And then, a pre­ci­sion (very impor­tant!): BEST LINKED BY “the name of the blog” in 2005
    –on the bot­tom, a fine line:
    WOM made this wine very popu­lar
    or sometnhing around the Mouth­full…
    –Every year or every cycle you can come up with (we never know with you!) makes a DIFFERENT COLOR on the top of the bottle and means dif­fe­rent things like: “bet­ter drink it before they change their mind!” etc.
    BACK OF THE BOTTLE
    –TELL THE STORY
    YOURS
    AND REWARD BLOGGERS FOR COMPETING WITH GOOGLE
    (his pic­ture? the adress of his blog?…
    the one who best lin­ked…)
    Well, I hope It is clear enough to talk about it!
    Have a good one
    And thank you again!
    Estelle

  6. FWIsW, I like the above idea of por­traits (all in B+W maybe?) with “I drink this wine” — simple, fun and direct, perhaps with a brief biog. Could induce nau­sea if too smi­ley, beau­ti­ful or aspi­ra­tio­nal (“I’m a dj / archi­tect / roc­ket scien­tist and have recently had my first novel published” would really turn you off in your local 7 Ele­ven on a rainy Wed­nes­day eve­ning) but other­wise has great poten­tial. I also like Estelle’s ideas, tho’ I can’t follow them all. Finally, it is inte­res­ting to note how many com­ments refer to wines the names of which the com­men­tee (?) can­not remem­ber…
    Sorry not to have ideas of my own yet — I’m wor­king on them over a glass of Oys­ter Bay (cho­sen because of its taste, I ori­gi­nally tried it because it comes from New Zea­land which seems to pro­duce con­sis­tently more inte­res­ting and tasty wines than other coun­tries, though maybe this too is all in the marketing).

  7. michelle says:

    Just a few quick com­ments — most peo­ple pos­ting here have no idea about the lega­li­ties of wine labels. Every country you want to sell your wine to will have rules — like the size of the font and font size rela­ti­vi­ties bet­ween dif­fe­rent things (e.g region to pro­duct name to vin­tage), the size of the label, the detail on the front and rear labels, etc, etc. As I ran my eye over the posts I noti­ced things like “use an enve­lope ins­tead of a label” — but a lot of coun­tries have very strict rules about having all the info stuck (ie not remo­va­ble). Plus you need to con­si­der the prac­ti­ca­li­ties and costs asso­cia­ted — the minute you move to labels with cut-outs, or etching on the bottle, or any of that flash stuff the pac­ka­ging costs sky­roc­ket. Wine­ma­kers will also have a lot to say about the colour of the bottle — the dar­ker the bet­ter to reduce the effect of heat and sunshine on the wine. And ulti­ma­tely, if you’re after repeat sales it doesn’t mat­ter what the label looks like — it’s what the wine tas­tes like that mat­ters.
    So sorry Hugh, don’t want to burst your bub­ble — but you pro­bably should have given peo­ple some boun­da­ries to work within. I work in the wine industry and the label is one of the most regu­la­ted areas in the industry. The last thing you want to do is spend time and money on a label only to find it won’t be appro­ved for sale in say the UK or US!! It’s all well and good to think outside the square — but it’s worth kno­wing your limi­ta­tions too.
    For more info check out your country’s wine industry board for all the rules — e.g. in Aus­tra­lia go to http://www.awbc.com.au.

  8. Kirill Smirnov says:

    I’m not quite com­for­ta­ble with wiki, so I post here as well.
    I’d rather sug­gest to try something inex­pen­sive ins­tead of chan­ging the shape of the bottle or making indi­vi­dual labes for every new bottle. Why not to wrap com­ple­tely every bottle with chea­pest paper, like a gift wrap­per? Two rea­sons a) you can use more sur­face as a label and it makes you very fle­xi­ble in imple­men­ting new designs (if you actually need any) and b) why not? create a legeng (peo­ple tend to love things like this) that this is the only wine which first meets day­light in your glass, which pre­ser­ves… wha­te­ver you want to pre­serve in good wine. And by the way, I would agree with Brock Tice — the bottle should be trans­pa­rent. Nothing to hide, true. But if you have to pro­tect your wine (I have no glue, do they have to?) paper wrap­per can do the job.
    When I stare at the end­less wine lines in a super­mar­ket I would pre­fe­rably notice bott­les which look dif­fe­rent, and I’d rather believe that the bottle which looks outs­tan­ding has something outs­tan­ding inside. So why waste time and money in crea­ting new labels (who said you can create something truly fresh and con­vi­nient simul­ta­neously) if you can change the way it looks and the way it per­cepts? When last time you were loo­king for a bottle of wine as a gift or just for something new besi­des this same loo­king mer­lots and sovig­nons, weren’t you loo­king for something outs­tan­ding? Er?

  9. Johnny K says:

    I like your site very much, but I’m not sure about the idea of get­ting some pro­duct design for $2000. I live in the US but I read this Lon­don blog as well. http://noisydecentgraphics.typepad.com

  10. hugh macleod says:

    Thanks for all the great fee­back, Every­body.
    Me and the groovy cats at Stormhoek spent the wee­kend going through your ideas, and have moved the con­ver­sa­tion for­ward to here:
    http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/002020.html
    So I’m clo­sing down this com­ment thread, and moving on to Phase Two. Thanks again.

  11. News Flash: Most wines do not get bet­ter with age.

    “Fresh­ness”, a key idea behind Stormhoek, is not a gim­mick, nor is it simply a sales tool. It is a cri­ti­cal indi­ca­tor of wine qua­lity, par­ti­cu­larly in whi­tes. Please for­give me for the long post, but for those who are…

  12. Microsoft’s real com­pe­ti­tion: Stormhoek

    Inte­res­ting to see that Stormhoek are com­pe­ting against Mic­ro­soft. Oh, you gotta read Hugh Macleod’s blog to get this one. But, there’s a lot of truth to this. Let’s say you have $400 bur­ning a hole in your poc­ket. You…

  13. Collec­tive wisdom

    Our Pac­ka­ging Update and Please don’t tell the com­pe­ti­tion I Spent a bit of time at the LIFT con­fe­rence last week and there was some really good dis­cus­sion on the sub­ject of open source design. It remin­ded me that we…