November 7, 2005

long-term value

zzzmkbhvg03.jpg
A con­ver­sa­tion I’ve been having with a lot of peo­ple recently:

The long-term value of English Cut comes not from the pro­fit mar­gins of each $3,000 suit, or how brisk sales were last month. The real value comes from happy cus­to­mers, who con­ti­nue to dig what we do over the long haul. It is not uncom­mon for an esta­blished Savile Row cus­to­mer to spend twenty, fifty, a hun­dred thou­sand dollars on a war­drobe over time. A good Savile Row tai­lor will easily have a few hun­dred cus­to­mers on his books, by the time he’s esta­blished his repu­ta­tion. Do the math.

Another thing I’m fond of saying:

Blogs, when they work, are cheap and easy.

But of course, society has taught us you can “only” make money by doing stuff that is expen­sive and dif­fi­cult. To me, this explains the cul­tu­ral resis­tance blogs first encoun­te­red. Too many peo­ple had little buzzword-infested, top-down fief­doms to pro­tect.
Sure, making a hand-made suit from scratch is a pretty com­pli­ca­ted busi­ness. But does that mean the mar­ke­ting & com­mu­ni­ca­tion has to be?
[Spea­king of long-term value:] Accor­ding to the logs, Goo­gle dri­ves roughly 5 times as much traf­fic to English Cut than Yahoo. Rock on, Google.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

6 Responses to “long-term value”

  1. Ed Byrne says:

    I think you can ‘only’ make money by doing things that (as Tom Peters says) are insa­nely great.
    That means your pro­ducts must be exce­llent, your ser­vice must be fan­tas­tic, and yes, your mar­ke­ting must also be ama­zing.
    Howe­ver, ama­zing mar­ke­ting does not equal expen­sive mar­ke­ting. Great mar­ke­ting for me is get­ting your ‘idea virus’ to spread, not coming up with million dollar ad campaigns.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Yeah Ed, I’m with you on that one. Good points you made, thanks.

  3. Lee White says:

    One phrase in this post really caught my atten­tion,
    “Too many peo­ple had little buzzword-infested, top-down fief­doms to pro­tect.“
    Buzzword-infested stri­kes at the heart of why we ope­rate in such a dys­func­tio­nal world. The 20th cen­tury para­digm is to pro­tect your terri­tory, your spe­cial know­ledge. We do this with jar­gon. Know­ledge is best used when sha­red, but the spe­cial lan­guage ever­yone crea­tes pre­vents this.
    This post aligns well with Seth’s post “Mine, ours, everyone”

  4. Andreas says:

    Sure, making a hand-made suit from scratch is a pretty com­pli­ca­ted busi­ness. But does that mean the mar­ke­ting & com­mu­ni­ca­tion has to be?
    Do you think put­ting together a mar­ke­ting cam­paign is less com­pli­ca­ted than tai­lor making a suit? If anything, I would say the two are related.

  5. Mack Collier says:

    “But of course, society has taught us you can “only” make money by doing stuff that is expen­sive and dif­fi­cult. To me, this explains the cul­tu­ral resis­tance blogs first encoun­te­red. Too many peo­ple had little buzzword-infested, top-down fief­doms to pro­tect.“
    As a mar­ke­ting tool, I think the rea­son why blogs are mee­ting with resis­tance is because com­pa­nies haven’t figu­red out how to con­trol the mes­sage yet. Even­tually, when they rea­lize that the beauty of blogs is that the mes­sage goes where the blog­gers take it, they will either:
    1 — Accept the poten­tial of blogs, and work on ways to imple­ment them into their mar­ke­ting stra­tegy
    2 — Say ‘Hell no!’ and run away as fast as they can.
    The com­pa­nies that do #2 are the ones that can’t be trus­ted ;)

  6. teeveedubya says:

    “buz­zard infes­ted fief­doms” more like!
    the media genie is out of the bottle and can­not be “con­tro­lled”. hurrah!