November 2, 2005

powerlaw, schmowerlaw

hjsdert06.jpg
One of the great blog visio­na­ries and a terri­fic guy to boot, Joi Ito has drop­ped off the Tech­no­rati 100:

My Tech­no­rati ran­king has become #104 and I’ve offi­cially fallen off the Tech­no­rati top 100. Power­law, sch­mo­wer­law. If you don’t blog often or main­tain a stream of inte­res­ting con­tent your ran­king will quickly drop.

I would agree with that. There are a lot of great blog­gers out there. Joi was an very early adap­tor of bogs, I assume he’s moved on, early-adapting something else with equal vigor. It’ll be inte­res­ting to see his next move.
2005 was a watershed year for blog­gers.
2005 was the year blogs hit the mains­tream.
2005 was the year when making money via blogs became a no-brainer.
2005 was the year when the blo­gosphere became too darn big.
Yes­ter­day I was tal­king to Phil Torrone, the edi­tor of O’Reilley’s MAKE blog.
He is, like myself, a full-time pro­fes­sio­nal blog­ger.
The sub­ject of our con­ver­sa­tion: How kee­ping up with the blo­gosphere now feels like a full-time job. How actually wri­ting the blog in com­pa­ri­son is a piece of cake.
But yeah, I’m glad the whole thing has explo­ded. A lot of us bet our entire future careers on the fact that it would.

5 Responses to “powerlaw, schmowerlaw”

  1. nick davis says:

    Hugh — Don’t fall into the “Have to Blog Every­day” trap

    In this post Hugh won­ders about the blog­ging “power­law”, and says that to stay at the top you must blog cons­tantly.
    I don’t know about other peo­ple who digest their blogs through an aggre­ga­tor, but that’s pro­bably the fas­test way to get taken out of my ag

  2. Andres B says:

    The ques­tion that springs to mind is what’s the next step.
    Is “the whole thing” going to fade away? Thus your bet on the future goes south.
    Or is it going to evolve? Allo­wing you to grow along with it (or making it grow).
    Does anyone know? Can anyone know?

  3. Vinu says:

    I think it may also be because blogs have gone mains­tream — the things that are inte­res­ting is dif­fe­rent for the com­mon peo­ple. That means what was inte­res­ting for the blog­gers in 2004 is no lon­ger inte­res­ting for peo­ple in 2005 ( I mean the new peo­ple!!)
    Con­tent and cons­tant update may have nothin to do with that … or they may be highly correlated!

  4. Jack Yan says:

    Mains­tream also means that the blog-abusers will get more plen­ti­ful. You already find blog-spam in Tech­no­rati: peo­ple with fake blog posts flogging pro­ducts. Others are doing comment-spam. There is a dan­ger as blogs can become deva­lued now.

  5. Bet­ting the Farm on Blog­ging Pays Off For Some

    The bri­lliant Hugh Mac­leod, who colla­bo­ra­ted with me on the mains­tream blog pro­ject Up Your Bud­get notes that kee­ping up with the blo­gosphere feels like a full-time job now. “But yeah,” Hugh wri­tes, “I’m glad the whole thing has explo­ded. A lot of us b…