October 21, 2005

english cut and american growth

zzzmkghilkj27.jpg
English Cut just wrap­ped up its third, and by far its most suc­cess­ful U.S. visit. Poor Tom and Lucy are exhaus­ted. Heh.
While he was there, Tom was inter­vie­wed by Businessweek’s Stephen Baker, for an upco­ming pod­cast. He was also inter­vie­wed by Public Radio’s “Mar­ket­place” for an upco­ming seg­ment. Full cre­dit goes to our PR man in New York, Dave Par­met for set­ting those up.
Meanwhile, yes­ter­day English Cut was briefly men­tio­ned yes­ter­day in the same breath as The Manolo Shoe Blog­ger (one of my favo­rite blogs) in The Guar­dian. I was so happy. [You can see the print ver­sion here. Thanks to Phag­nat for scan­ning it.]
The Manolo, of course, is an anonymously-written cha­rac­ter blog based on the famous shoe desig­ner, Manolo Blah­nik.
So it turns out the real Manolo’s press sec­re­tary isn’t too plea­sed with her good emplo­yer being paro­died, as writ­ten here in the Lon­don Times:

It�s a good thing that I chec­ked with Les­ley, Manolo Blahn�k�s trus­ted press sec­re­tary and right-hand woman, that Manolo, sorry Mr Blahn�k (she calls him this), isn�t in fact the same Manolo who desc­ri­bed John Galliano in his online blog as a �freaky little fashion troll�, or cap­tio­ned a pic­ture of Hugh Hef­ner loo­king old in a Hawaiian shirt with the words �someone call the coro­ner�. That Manolo, says Les­ley, is an impos­tor, some guy in New York who is obses­sed with shoes and uses the pseu­donym �Manolo the Shoe­blog­ger� to launch his bitchy sar­to­rial bombs.

If English Cut ever got around to buying adver­ti­sing, would we buy space in a maga­zine? A new­pa­per? TV and Radio? No way. It would be a blo­gad on the Manolo Shoe Blog. No ques­tion.
The amu­sing thing is, a cer­tain tai­lor I know (I won’t say who) used to cut suits for the real Manolo Blah­nik, back in his Ander­son & Shep­pard days. Small world.
Yep, so there’s been plenty of English Cut stuff hap­pe­ning recently. That’s always the case when Tom’s in Ame­rica.
The good thing is, we’re not trying to com­pete with the desig­ner labels. Let them worry about the fac­to­ries in China, the $40K maga­zine ads, the cele­brity free­bies, the poli­tics invol­ved with get­ting Bloomingdale’s to carry their lines, their ever-more hollow methods of trying to con­vince the une­du­ca­ted that their stuff is the real deal.
In Ame­rica, the com­mon per­cep­tion (and an erro­neous per­cep­tion, in my opio­nion) is that the Ita­lians make the world’s best suits. We’ve crea­ted a niche for peo­ple who beg to dif­fer. We’ve crea­ted a niche for peo­ple who are anti the gene­ric glo­ba­li­sa­tion of fashion.
And Ame­rica is easy for us. You turn up, you attend to your appoint­ments, you sell some suits, you return to England a few days later, you make the suits, a few months later you get back on a plane, you try the finished suits on your cus­to­mers, and you keep repea­ting the pro­cess.
Whether we sell twenty suits or two hun­dred on a sin­gle U.S. tour, it takes about the same time i.e. 7 – 10 days. Then it’s just a ques­tion of get­ting back to England and get­ting the suits made in time for the next trip.
But when the Lon­don busi­ness gets busy, things are far more dis­rup­tive. Sud­denly Tom is spen­ding half his time on the Lon­don train (a four hour jour­ney), going back and forth bet­ween Savile Row and his tai­lo­ring stu­dio here in Cum­bria, sta­ying over­night in a hotel. In short, the Lon­don selling pro­cess doesn’t scale as well, and at least when it gets busy, it seriously delays his U.S. deli­very sche­dule.
So the imme­diate plan is for English Cut to spend more time buil­ding our trade in the USA, and less time worr­ying about the other mar­kets, inc­lu­ding Lon­don.
Of course, we’ll still keep a regu­lar foothold on Savile Row. Tom is a Savile Row tai­lor, and needs to be there, period. But that doesn’t mean that’s where all the busi­ness’ growth has to come from.
Ah, the joys of crea­ting a Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand. I highly recom­mend it.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

4 Responses to “english cut and american growth”

  1. Thus Bes­poke Zarathustra*

    Tho­mas Mahon just wrap­ped up another block­bus­ter U.S. trip.
    Yes­ter­day (after he mar­ked up my new suit and insis­ted on taking it back to the U.K. for more twea­king… damn the guy is worse than George Lucas!) we sat down with Stephen Baker of Bus…

  2. Martin says:

    Hugh, you men­tion sca­la­bi­lity.
    For how long can Tho­mas con­ti­nue to make the suits him­self? If the inten­tion is to even­tually really scale, surely he needs to start dis­tan­cing him­self from the notion that he needs to spend a pro­por­tio­nate amount of time for each penny he brings in?
    Or is the inten­tion to remain a dedi­ca­ted sin­gle tai­lor, in the true spi­rit?
    Just wondering…

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Mar­tin, Tom doesn’t make the suits all by him­self. He’s the “cut­ter”. He mea­su­res and designs, then cuts the actual cloth. Three other tai­lors– the coat­ma­ker, the trou­ser­ma­ker and the finisher (the per­son who sews the but­tonho­les etc) do the actual sewing/putting the coat together. All free­lan­cers. That’s the nor­mal way of doing things on Savile Row.
    But for a small, two-man busi­ness with hardly any overheads, it sca­les fine. We make a very good living.
    We want to stay hard­core tra­di­tio­nal tai­lors. The more hard­core, the better.

  4. La BellaDonna says:

    “The Manolo, of course, is an anonymously-written cha­rac­ter blog based on the famous shoe desig­ner, Manolo Blah­nik.“
    I’m all in favor of any blog that advo­ca­tes good English tai­lo­ring, but I do want to draw your atten­tion to the above quote.
    While The Manolo does work in the fashion industry, and while he proc­laims his admi­ra­tion for Manolo Blah­nik, he does not nor has he ever based his blog on Manolo Blah­nik; there are disc­lai­mers on every page of his blog to the effect that no, he is NOT Manolo Blah­nik.
    As far as we, his loyal rea­ders, can tell, The Manolo is of Spa­nish extrac­tion, and in Spain, Manolo is a com­mon name. It’s as if someone were to get snarky because Tom Mahon uses the name “Tom;” it’s just not that uncom­mon a name. (Or even if someone were to get snarky because Hugh uses “Mac­Leod;” that’s a name that’s pretty well-known in the U.S. thanks to the tele­vi­sion series.) I ima­gine that The Manolo posts under his first name in an effort to retain some of his pri­vacy, and not to see his work cre­di­ted to others, or to see him­self accu­sed of misrepresentation.