October 19, 2005

global microbrands 10/19/05

PeopleCall.com is a small Spa­nish com­pany that sells low price telephone ser­vi­ces… in 53 coun­tries. The CEO, Herme Gar­cia also has a Spa­nish blog.
Martin’s Cages. A small firm that makes pet cages for gui­nea pigs and what­not. Since dis­co­ve­ring the inter­net their busi­ness has appa­rently explo­ded. [Link: Mar­cus Grimm]
English Cuf­flinks. A team of English jewelry desig­ners that make high-quality cuf­flinks. No rela­tion to English Cut.
Avin wri­tes about a fic­ti­tious mic­ro­brand: a small olive oil com­pany.
Andyt13: Art, music, poetry, sex…
Rogue Pro­ject. Orien­ted towards ser­ving a loosely-connected group of tech­no­logy deve­lo­pers and pro­gram mana­gers from the US Depart­ment of Defense, NASA and rela­ted industries.

21 Responses to “global microbrands 10/19/05”

  1. I had a look at Martin’s hamster/gerbil hou­sing, and some of the models have wire floo­ring. Feet slip through wires, and legs break. Bad.
    At least he’s got the good sense not to sell wire wheels…
    –Milan

  2. Dave Wheeler says:

    Hugh,
    This is actually a com­ment on Avin’s post, but he brings up an aspect of GMB’s that might be of inte­rest to you (and your rea­ders).
    How much does loca­tion mat­ter? In Avin’s post he talks about Luigi the olive oil pro­du­cer. If Luigi was based in Flo­rida (USA) ins­tead of Italy, would the brand have the same impact glo­bally? I don’t think so. Or perhaps it would create a dif­fe­rent type of brand in Flo­rida.
    My point is that .… Loca­tion mat­ters.
    We all have pre­con­cep­tions based on loca­tion (or as Seth Godin says in “All Mar­ke­ters are Liars”, our own “world­view”) and these pre­con­cep­tions influence how we value cer­tain pro­ducts.
    Having said that, as mar­ke­ters we need to recog­nize what pre­con­cep­tions exist in our loca­tion and which ones, perhaps, might hold us back.
    For exam­ple, I have a note card com­pany that makes limited-edition, high-priced note cards based on con­tem­po­rary art. The high-priced part could leve­rage the fact that they are made in Con­nec­ti­cut USA (near Green­wich). The con­tem­po­rary art could leve­rage New York City.
    Of course both of these sta­te­ments are “in theory”, since I still need to take my own advice and revamp my web site, http://www.notewordy.com, but that is another story for another day.
    Hope this adds to the con­ver­sa­tion about Glo­bal Micro Brands !
    Dave Whee­ler
    Foun­der, Note­Wordy Cards
    Wri­teOn! blog: http://www.theshot92.blogspot.com

  3. Adrian Lee says:

    Hugh, do you define a dif­fe­rence bet­ween a niche mar­ket and a GMB? It seems to me it’s jsut another word for the same thing, and peo­ple have been doing it for a long time.
    Does a firm have to be very small to class as a GMB? In the Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand Rant you men­tion Stormhoek, at least I assume that’s the small South Afri­can Vine­yard you men­tion, but are they that small? I would think to be suppl­ying chains like Sainsbury’s they much have a decent out­put, require more than a cou­ple of staff. And is selling wine a mic­ro­brand?
    If so, I won­der if the com­pany I pre­sently work for, of 30 peo­ple, selling Edu­ca­tio­nal Soft­ware counts as a GMB?
    Now we’re a ltd com­pany, not the kind of thing I think you’re really on about, but it is a rela­tive niche mar­ket, edu­ca­tio­nal esta­blish­ments cover something like 90% of our busi­ness.
    So really I’m just won­de­ring how broad the idea of a GMB can be.
    What sepe­ra­tes the likes of Stormhoek and English Cut from any other com­pany selling wine or suits suing the Internet?

  4. hugh macleod says:

    My point isn’t that a GMB is new. My point is with the inter­net (and espe­cially with a blog) a GMB is easier and chea­per than ever to build.
    When I star­ted English Cut, the plan was to create a GMB. That’s what I called it. I didn’t call it a “niche mar­ket”. I could have. Why didn’t I? I’ll let you figure that one out ;-)
    Also, Stomrhoek is a small vin­yard of about 250 acres. Pretty micro com­pa­red to the tens of thou­sands of acres Gallo and Jacob’s Creek command.

  5. Does a GMB have to be a pro­du­cer / manu­fac­tu­rer? How about stoc­kists / dis­tri­bu­tors? A small busi­ness like Ate­lier de Beaut

  6. Does a GMB have to be a pro­du­cer / manu­fac­tu­rer? How about stoc­kists / dis­tri­bu­tors? A small busi­ness like Ate­lier de Beaut

  7. Does a GMB have to be a pro­du­cer / manu­fac­tu­rer? How about stoc­kists / dis­tri­bu­tors? A small busi­ness like Ate­lier de Beaut

  8. Does a GMB have to be a pro­du­cer / manu­fac­tu­rer? How about stoc­kists / dis­tri­bu­tors? A small busi­ness like Ate­lier de Beaut

  9. Does a GMB have to be a pro­du­cer / manu­fac­tu­rer? How about stoc­kists / dis­tri­bu­tors? A small busi­ness like Ate­lier de Beaut

  10. Does a GMB have to be a pro­du­cer / manu­fac­tu­rer? How about stoc­kists / dis­tri­bu­tors? A small busi­ness like Ate­lier de Beaut

  11. Eric Lechner says:

    English Cuf­flinks has both a great pro­duct and great cus­to­mer ser­vice. I’ve purcha­sed a cou­ple sets from them. They’ve got some stun­ning cuf­flinks.
    When one set arri­ved scratched (they fell out of the hol­ding elas­tic in the mail), they offe­red to ship them back and replace them, all at their cost, to pay for having them repo­lished, or wha­te­ver else would work out for me. I wound up taking them to a local golds­mith in Santa Cruz, Tho­mas Mantle, who polished them up at no charge and sent me on my way.
    And then, Mr. Mac­far­lane (of English Cuf­flinks) sent me a free pair of cuf­flinks. No war­ning or anything; they just sho­wed up in my mail­box. Nice!
    (If it weren’t for the bri­tish pos­tage, I’d never know that I was get­ting per­so­nal ser­vice from someone 6000 miles away.)

  12. This is asto­nishing — there I was (I’m the above men­tio­ned of English Cuf­flinks) quietly chec­king the com­ments on this post when one of our cus­to­mers from some time back remem­bers us and sho­wers us with glo­wing praise (thank­you Mr Lech­ner). This is really what Glo­bal Micro Bran­ding is all about and what the self regu­la­ting blo­gosphere is at too. If I had trea­ted my cus­to­mer badly (perish the thought) it could easily have come back to haunt me. GMBs the­re­fore have to build a repu­ta­tion of trust. And if one treats people…well, like peo­ple then this trust builds, Glo­bally. It also helps me sleep at night.

  13. shtikl says:

    Didn’t IBM talk about this kind of mar­ke­ting in their TV-ads back in the Dot­com boom? I remem­ber ima­ges of some kind of ita­lian pro­du­cer selling their classy and very loal stuff world­wide thanks to their IBM soft­ware. (I don’t know if the ads are still on, it’s some time that I had a TV.)
    In any case I am wrec­king my mind on how to turn my car­toon site http://www.shtikl.com into a GMB, actually gai­ning more than lots of com­pli­ments — and maybe lea­ving the bea­ten path of the usual Cafepress-Attempts.
    (I came to like Hugh’s manie­rism of ending sen­ten­ces with an “etc”. I hate the “…”, but “etc” is good. Seriously con­si­de­ring pla­gia­ri­zing the “etc” ;-) )
    Keep it up etc.

  14. Adrian Lee says:

    “My point is with the inter­net (and espe­cially with a blog) a GMB is easier and chea­per than ever to build.”
    Fair point, I’d cer­tainly agree with that con­si­de­ring the tools around these days.
    I’m gues­sing ‘niche’ doesn’t cause the ‘mar­ket dis­rup­tion’ you like, it’s a term peo­ple are fami­liar with and so doesn’t illi­cit the same res­ponse as a new name for the same thing ;) Or maybe I’m just cyni­cal there, heh.
    If Stormhoek were to grow, and unlike with English­Cut which is all about Tho­mas, I ima­gine there’s the pos­si­bi­lity there for them to do that, would they stop being a GMB?
    I’m sure Jacob’s Creek were a lot sma­ller when they star­ted, so given the abi­lity to sell glo­bally they could’ve been a GMB as well.
    Not cri­ti­si­sing the idea, I like it :) Just trying to work out how you are defi­ning it. A small pla­yer in a much lar­ger industry, making the most of itself to sell around the world, seems to be along the right lines?

  15. hugh macleod says:

    Adrian, I think making GMBs and “niche busi­nes­ses” synony­mous is too sim­plis­tic. There are a lot of GMBs that don’t make any money, that aren’t even busi­nes­ses. Gaping­void, for example.

  16. Adrian Lee says:

    Point taken, good exam­ple.
    I think I’m get­ting at least some of the dif­fe­rence bet­ween a ‘niche’, which would be a tightly focus­sed product/service, as oppo­sed to a GMB which would be more a small scale ope­ra­tion sprea­ding it’s mes­sage as wide as pos­si­ble (con­ver­sing with as many peo­ple as pos­si­ble) and igno­ring as many phy­si­cal boun­da­ries as pos­si­ble.
    Which is made a lot easier with tools, like blogs (as the overheads are much redu­ced com­pa­red to more tra­di­tio­nal means), to communicate.

  17. Herme Garcia says:

    Hugh,
    Thanks a lot for the mention !!!

  18. Yes me too, thanks Hugh. I got a whole bunch of traf­fic from your link.
    –AndyT13

  19. Per­fect name for a sweet con­cept. Don’t mind if I quote you from time to time.
    http://thebrandbuilder.blogspot.com/2005/10/microventures-global-microbrands.html

  20. Sean says:

    I couldn’t agree more.