October 11, 2005

the global microbrand rant

zzzzzz7654107.jpg
[UPDATE: My “Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand” archive is here. Thanks.]
Since I first used the term here in Decem­ber of last year, I have been totally besot­ted with the idea of “The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand”.
A small, tiny brand, that “sells” all over the world.
The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand is nothing new; they’ve exis­ted for a while, long before the inter­net was inven­ted. Ima­gine a well-known author or pain­ter, selling his work all over the world. Or a small whisky dis­ti­llery in Scot­land. Or a small cheese maker in rural France, whose pro­duce is expor­ted to Paris, Lon­don, Tokyo etc. Ditto with a vio­lin maker in Italy. A clas­si­cal gui­tar maker in Spain. Or a small English firm making $50,000 shot­guns.
With the inter­net, of course, a glo­bal mic­ro­brand is easier to create than ever before. A com­mer­cial sign maker in New England. Or a sheet metal entre­pre­neur in the U.K.
And with the advent of blogs this was no lon­ger just limi­ted to peo­ple who made pro­ducts. We saw that any ser­vice pro­fes­sio­nal with a bit of talent and something to say could spread their mes­sage far and wide beyond their imme­diate client base and local mar­ket, without nee­ding a high-profile name or the good­will of the mains­tream media. Peo­ple like Jen­ni­fer Rice, John­nie Moore and Evelyn Rodri­guez come to mind.
But it’s not just limi­ted to cot­tage indus­tries. The great Tom Peters talks about “Brand You”, a per­so­nal brand that trans­cends your orga­ni­sa­tion or job desc­rip­tion. The grand-daddy of this space is pro­bably Robert Sco­ble, who may work full-time for Mic­ro­soft, but whose brand is much, much lar­ger than any job desc­rip­tion they could give him; that’s worth far more than anything they’re ever likely to pay him.
Once I crea­ted my own fled­gling glo­bal mic­ro­brand (i.e. via this weblog) I star­ted hel­ping other peo­ple do the same. A bes­poke Savile Row tai­lor. A Mas­ter Jewe­ler. A small vin­yard in South Africa. It was something I really wan­ted to know about. It was pro­fes­sio­nally the most com­pe­lling idea I had ever come come across. I was hoo­ked.
Of course, “The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand” is not con­cep­tual roc­ket science. You don’t need a Nobel Prize in order to unders­tand the idea. What exci­tes me about it is the fact that I now live in a small cot­tage in the English boo­nies, and career­wise I’m get­ting a lot more done than when I lived in a large apart­ment in New York or Lon­don, for a fifth of the overheads. For one fif­tieth of the stress levels.
This year I’ve been spen­ding a lot of time in Lon­don. Any more than 2 – 3 days down there I start fee­ling really stres­sed out. For years I thought it was just me. No, actually, ever­yone down there is really stres­sed out. It’s just con­si­de­red nor­mal. And the same applies in all the other big cities I know well.
I was tal­king to a friend on the phone about this yes­ter­day.
“There’s only two ways to deal with life in the big city,” he says. “Alcohol and high pri­ces. Immer­sing your­self in high rent, luxury items, trendy, over­pri­ced cock­tail bars, flashy res­tau­rants, tall leggy blon­des who don’t give a damn about you, just to act as a buf­fer zone bet­ween you and the abyss.”
“Which you pay a lot for,” I say.
“Which you pay a hell of a lot for,” he says.
It seems to me a lot of peo­ple of my gene­ra­tion are loc­ked into this high-priced cor­po­rate, urban tread­mill. Sure, they get paid a lot, but their overheads are also off the scale. The minute they stop tap­dan­cing as fast as they can is the minute they are crushed under the wheels of com­merce.
You know what? It’s not sus­tai­na­ble.
Howe­ver, the Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand is sus­tai­na­ble. With it you are not behol­den to one boss, one com­pany, one cus­to­mer, one local eco­nomy or even one industry. Your brand deve­lops rela­tionships in enough dif­fe­rent pla­ces to where your per­ma­nent address beco­mes almost irre­la­vant.
With English Cut, both Tho­mas and I are selling $4000 suits to Ame­ri­cans, Cana­dians, Aus­tra­lians, Euro­peans, Asians, Arabs etc. Neither one of us cares much for the high-maintenance lifestyle. Sure, we tra­vel all over seeing clients and spea­king at con­fe­ren­ces, but the day-to-day is far more low key. We go to the pub twice a week, we go to the local cheap-and-cheerful Chi­nese res­tau­rant once a week, we have dumb hob­bies we like to do, like taking the sail­boat out on the wee­kend, or dra­wing wee car­toons. We both drive second hand cars and pay cheap-as-hell rent.
Again, it’s not roc­ket science. But as long as we keep blog­ging, avoid high overheads and keep making the best suits in the world, nobody can take it away from us.
And the same prin­ci­ple applies to the other pro­jects I work on.
Frankly, it beats the hell out of com­mu­ting every mor­ning to the cor­po­rate glass box in the big city, something I did for many years. Just so I could make enough money to help me for­get that I have to com­mute every mor­ning to the cor­po­rate glass box in the big city.
There are thou­sands of rea­sons why peo­ple write blogs. But it seems to me the big­gest rea­son that dri­ves the blog­gers I read the most is, we’re all loo­king for our own per­so­nal glo­bal mic­ro­brand. That is the prize. That is the tic­ket off the tread­mill. And I don’t think it’s a bad one to aim for.

70 Responses to “the global microbrand rant”

  1. here is wis­dom — the “glo­bal microbrand”

    Quite inte­res­ting — nice work if you can get it — good insights,
    yet I’m con­cer­ned about those who really can’t run the shop mostly online.…
    gaping­void: the glo­bal mic­ro­brand rant
    I was tal­king to a friend on the phone about this yes­ter­day.

  2. Sandra says:

    Hi Hugh,
    I com­ple­tely agree with you that the current “big-city” lifestyle is not sus­tai­na­ble. For me 9/11 was also a wake-up call in this res­pect. I was not living in NYC but when I saw all these pic­tu­res of young, talen­ted and in the world’s eyes “highly suc­cess­ful” peo­ple, I was thin­king: it is not your boss at your office that is stan­ding there with your pic­ture and loo­king for you. It is your friends and family whom you hardly ever see because you were wor­king crazy hours and com­mu­ting 2 hours a day, who are stan­ding there. And I was thin­king, it is just not worth it.
    Sandra

  3. Niall Cook says:

    Nice rant, Hugh.
    But isn’t what you’re desc­ri­bing just called being self-employed? There’s millions of peo­ple who do it, and I’m sure they all enjoy many of the bene­fits you dis­cuss.
    Surely the blog is just a method of hel­ping you enter the mar­ket (with a bang, in your case) and con­verse with your cus­to­mers, because they’re no lon­ger on your doors­tep but on your desktop?

  4. Geoff says:

    Well said ’ Hugh and a good analy­sis in my opinion.

  5. shtikl says:

    @Hugh: Grand text. It is one of those fan­tas­tic works where one goes “yeah, I thought of that too”. But one never really did. After every para­graph I nod my head. So clear and pre­cise thin­king in this.
    @Neil: Tech­ni­cally and for the tax autho­ri­ties it may be “self emplo­yed”. Cul­tu­rally I think it is something new, I’d call it “web emplo­yed”. (The domain webemployed.com is for sale at 199 US$. I chec­ked before pos­ting this ;-) , but .org ist still available…)

  6. glo­bal micro brand ! G-M-B as you have said is a very, micro brands have been there since ages and with the advent of inter­net … the birth of G-M-B has begun.
    blogs are in the same direc­tion as well.
    http://www.ziceholidays.com

  7. Scroobious says:

    Niall, there’s self-employed and then there’s self-employed. Plenty of SE folk are still stuck in the city rut. The inter­net adds that extra layer of pos­si­bi­lity.
    I think it’s part of a wider shift — for wha­te­ver rea­son, fewer peo­ple are willing to con­ti­nue tap­dan­cing on the edge. How many artic­les have you read lately about “sun­ligh­ting”, fle­xi­wor­king, downshif­ting — any num­ber of names for the same idea: work less, live more? Web employ­ment — if you will — isn’t neces­sary to expe­rience this shift, but it helps. A lot.
    And the glo­bal mic­ro­brand (a gor­geous idea, thanks Hugh) is yet another facet. As a goal, it offers (or makes more via­ble) the pos­si­bi­lity of work that isn’t alie­na­ting. I’ll put that on my To Do list, for sure.

  8. Jeremy Heigh says:

    It’s more than emplo­yed … right? It’s more than blog+suits=pastoral … isn’t it?
    It’s that the guy with the bee­mer, who works in the top floor office, and wears a Tho­mas Mahon suit is straight-jacketed by the brand he works for. He can’t choose; there’s no time and no room. He must do. If he stops “doing” for a second … he’s gone.
    A truly glo­bal mic­ro­brand gives you more than pas­to­ral sans glass box. It lets you roar. Spread-out, bicep fle­xing, head-thrown back roa­ring in a way untouched by cor­po­rate pro­to­col or urban ethic. A per­fect expres­sion of poten­tial that’s only pos­si­ble if abso­lu­tely unfet­te­red by arti­fi­cal cons­traint.
    This used to be the exc­lu­sive field of CEOs and rocks­tars. The bar­ba­rians hop­ped the gate.
    Now, the meaty ques­tion: We’ve got the foun­da­tion (net), tools (blogs), mate­rial (experience/passion) … what’s this beauty going to look like?

  9. Keith says:

    Hugh:
    Your most pro­found entry yet. I’ve prin­ted this one and I’m pas­sing copies to all of my friends.
    Hey, you get it

  10. Jose says:

    The Glo­bal Micro Brand is so much more than being self-employed or even put­ting your­self on the web. It is all about fin­ding the one thing that makes you dram­ti­cally dif­fe­rent, that one story that you can tell bet­ter than any one else. The beauty is that we all have that power to do one thing really well and gather an audience that is loo­king to hear that story.
    As the glo­bal audien­ces become more savy on fin­ding the one niche they are loo­king for, and the web 2.0 tools make it easier to find that one indi­vi­dual, the Glo­bal Micro Brand will become more and more power­ful.
    Thanks Hugh, this is great stuff. And I can’t say how strongly I rec­co­mend that you read Tom Peter’s poc­ket book on bran­ding your­self “the brand you 50″. It is the tool­box to help you on your way to being a Hugh Mac­Leod.
    Jose
    thinkjose.com

  11. Al says:

    Nice sum­mary Hugh, brin­ging lifestyle back into the equa­tion is key, this fits nicely with your mic­ro­brand idea.

  12. I was never mind­ful of the idea of beco­ming a glo­bal mic­ro­brand. But, it seems to explain everything per­fectly to me.
    My only con­si­de­red take on the idea of a blog to sup­port our tiny little job shop was that it appea­red so dia­me­tri­cally oppo­sed to what most folks would con­si­der a worthy com­pany to start one. We still have peo­ple in our line of work refu­sing to go metric.
    But, as we can see, the more dis­tan­ced from the wibbly wobbly way the real com­pany appears to be, the more it seems to attract its inte­rest.
    Still, it’s only a cer­tain sec­tion of the PR/marketing fra­ter­nity who would start frothing at the gills over the idea of having a con­ver­sa­tion in the first place. It’s only adding the per­so­nal and infor­mal to the imper­so­nal and for­mal.
    Now whilst our firm’s reach round the inter­net is a little exces­sive, I sup­pose it and I have become a glo­bal mic­ro­brand by proxy. And that’s fuc­king ridi­cu­lous, but something we’ll gladly accept.
    Although, we had a guy only last week ring us up after fin­ding us on the inter­net who was less than 200 yards away from us. Nothing par­ti­cu­larly asto­nishing in that apart from the fact that he has to drive past us every­day — twice.
    And we do all this from the elec­tri­city cup­board of an old disu­sed foundry and my bedroom.
    You can decide where I have to dodge the rats and where I receive rather sharp shocks to the tem­ple when I drop a pen down the beck of my desk.

  13. think jose says:

    What is your per­so­nal brand?

    Every­body has something that makes them brand worthy and a story that other peo­ple want to hear. Crea­ting a Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand sounds like a daun­ting task but Hugh Mac­leod over at gaping­void paints the unsett­ling pic­ture of the alter­na­ti­ves and the beau…

  14. Fear of change

    Tom Peters will stick this on his laptop.…

  15. Dave Goodman says:

    I disa­gree.
    Change is death! That which was, is no lon­ger. But after death comes new life.
    Fear of death is the end of living. We must be willing to give up the life we have to live the life that’s wai­ting for us. (To paraph­rase Joseph Campbell.)

  16. john t unger says:

    Nicely said, Hugh. I’ve been kinda mis­sing the big phi­lo­sophi­cal biz rants that were more com­mon last year.
    I’m not quite sure how you and Tho­mas find time to pur­sue hob­bies while doing the glo­bal mic­ro­brand thing… I’ve been busy pretty much 24/7/365 since I got on the Hugh­train. But then, on the other hand, I’m doing what I love, so who carees right? And besi­des, rela­xing makes me tense…
    Any­way, glad to have a nice litttle rant to read this AM.

  17. Thomas says:

    I sus­pect this prin­ci­pal was on my laundry list of rea­sons to lea­ving the DC back for Flags­taff (medium sized moun­tain town) 3 years ago, and while it hasn’t com­ple­tely been achie­ved I com­ple­tely see what you mean.
    Great Post Hugh.

  18. hugh–
    spot.on.
    the funny thing is, step­ping off the tread­mill seems hard. it seems scary, without secu­rity, risky.
    well, so is cros­sing the street.
    but sta­ying on the tread­mill is worse. it’s not risky. it’s cer­tain soul-death.
    well put, friend.
    best,
    c

  19. quicklinks says:

    change is not death — fear of change is death

    change is not death — fear of change is death…

  20. Dave Wheeler says:

    Hugh,
    GREAT POST! The whole GMB idea is really easy to grasp and it sounds like you are deve­lo­ping some valua­ble expe­rience on how to make it PAY! I look for­ward to future posts (espe­cially on the nuts and bolts of the “making it pay” part)!
    Dave

  21. Exce­llent. After two years, my friends in New York, Atlanta, LA, and Van­cou­ver still won­der why I’m in Gal­ves­ton. I’ve explai­ned, but they think it’s just an indi­vi­dual quirk, and that I’ll get over it. What I’ve got­ten over is New York, Atlanta, LA, and Vancouver.

  22. Tim Hastings says:

    A great post! I love your GMB term and that you define it using exam­ples of phy­si­cal pro­ducts… I’m off to build my GMB! :-)

  23. Quo­ta­tion of the Day: “Have you been rea­ding my diary?” Edition

    There are thou­sands of rea­sons why peo­ple write blogs. But it seems to me the big­gest rea­son that dri­ves the blog­gers I read the most is, we’re all loo­king for our own per­so­nal glo­bal mic­ro­brand. That is the prize. That

  24. A Small Busi­ness with Glo­bal Reach

    Hugh Mac­Leod dis­cus­ses the ‘Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand’, a small busi­ness with a glo­bal reach, thanks to the power of the inter­net.

  25. sandra says:

    You’re very right…and I think the minute a per­son beco­mes more sca­red of change than of allo­wing them­self to be caught up in something that makes them happy…well, it’s a bad minute.

  26. Hugh, thanks for the nod. Funny, I live in one of the most expen­sive pla­ces in the U.S. — Silicon Valley — and also own a second-hand car and pay dirt-cheap rent ($500/mo in US is dirt cheap). It helps that I’m not asha­med to park next to a Bee­mer or buzz past multi-million dollar homes around me.
    When I moved to Sili­con Valley three years ago, I was invi­si­ble. I intui­ted that blog­ging might be a way to express and share my ideas more widely as well as indulge my unca­reer (wor­king when I want to, taking on pro bono cau­ses when I want to, and slac­king when I want to ;-) etc.)
    Thanks for the thought­ful post.

  27. You’ve pro­bably spot­ted this blog: My Career, Sans Lad­der, http://sansladder.blogspot.com/
    Adam links to these folks under “Ladder-less Careers:”
    Seth Godin
    Hugh Mac­Leod
    Mike Matas
    Kathy Sie­rra
    Evelyn Rodri­guez
    Adam Green­field
    Po Bron­son
    Mark Cuban

  28. Michael Wong says:

    Good post Hugh. What you’re tal­king about is THE 21st cen­tury revo­lu­tion. And every sin­gle per­son and busi­ness trying to make money online is a Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand, whether they know it or not.
    The Inter­net offers a vir­tually level pla­ying field to every sin­gle per­son on the pla­net, as it brings the cost of mar­ke­ting to an unpre­ce­den­ted world­wide audience to vir­tually zero.
    The pro­blem is that most peo­ple (and busi­ness owners) are far too com­for­ta­ble to dare step out of their com­fort zone, which one has to do if they want to change. They simply aren’t inte­res­ted in a tic­ket off the tread­mill — apart from win­ning the lot­tery.
    And peo­ple will give every excuse ima­gi­na­ble to avoid step­ping out of their com­fort zone. The most used one is “I don’t have the time.” The sim­ple fact is one can find the time, if it’s impor­tant enough (think about that the next time you use that as an excuse). And lets not for­get that some peo­ple are happy run­ning the tread­mill every­day, for that is all they know.
    Michael — GoDefy.com
    (I had to reduce this post subs­tan­tially because the soft­ware wouldn’t accept the ori­gi­nal full length post)

  29. Gordon says:

    Great post Hugh! Your blog has been an ins­pi­ra­tion and I always check it out when I get a bit scun­ne­red with my own blog­ging ende­vours! Keep up the good work!

  30. Avin says:

    I agree, now all i gotta do is find something i can do from down here in Jakarta, Indo­ne­sia and blog about.

  31. frosty says:

    I second (27th?) the “great post” sen­ti­ment! Defi­ni­tely the best one in a while, and a good remin­der why I keep coming back here.
    I abso­lu­tely love the Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand idea, but I won­der: if Hugh truly “arri­ves” GMB-wise, does he become a Glo­bal Mic­ro­car­too­nist, or is it Gaping Void, or mar­ket con­sul­ting, or what? (Hugh, get that book out!)
    Niall, I’ve been mostly self-employed for years now, and I do think there’s a dif­fe­rence. With GMB your cus­to­mers are geo­graphi­cally scat­te­red, so within rea­son you can be whe­re­ver you want to be. That’s the G part. The B part is that it’s a *brand* — you’re selling something and acti­vely atten­ding to its (geo­graphi­cally unleashed) repu­ta­tion. Even if it’s just you that you’re selling (though hope­fully not your soul). The M part, as I see it, is just that small pla­yers have almost exactly the same tools the big pla­yers have, so (in many cases) you can get at your small mar­ket for fancy suits at least as effec­ti­vely as, say, Dis­ney gets at its giant mar­ket for vapid enter­tain­ment. (OK, it’s not that level yet, but maybe soon… video iPod­Ver­ti­se­ment anyone?)
    Your GMB types are very likely to be SE types, but SE does not get you GMB by itself.
    One thing about the rural/urban ques­tion: what exci­tes me about the GMB idea is that you live where you want to live, within cer­tain cons­traints (mostly the infras­truc­ture nee­ded to pro­duce your Brand of wha­te­ver). For some that may be rural England, for others it might be Tokyo or New York. I don’t think it makes a dif­fe­rence whether you GBM your­self into the sticks or into the metro­po­lis, the point is to be where you really want to be.
    (BTW, I’m typing this from a quiet, plea­sant town in Sili­con Valley where a decent house costs a million bucks. And it’s not one of the fancy towns.)
    Again, great post. Obviously got ever­yone thinking.

  32. Adam says:

    @ Evelyn
    Thanks for the digi­tal shou­tout, inte­res­ting to see the almost direct corre­la­tion to ladder-less careers and GMB creators…question is, which comes first — the brand or the cou­rage to step off the ladder?

  33. Once again you have nai­led it. This is exactly what many of us have been trying to create, without naming the con­cept correctly.
    I agree that we are all loo­king for our own per­so­nal glo­bal mic­ro­brand. Get­ting there is a cha­llenge and a reward, all in one.
    The best part of all is that pro­fes­sio­nal acti­vity beco­mes com­ple­tely por­ta­ble! We can work anywhere there is an inter­net con­nec­tion.
    That chan­ges the real estate equa­tion com­ple­tely. A sleepy little town with high speed inter­net beats Sili­con Valley, New York, or Lon­don as a place to make waves.
    Great article.

  34. Great article! (although i think you mean Glo­bal and not Gobal (title))
    I have expe­rien­ced something simi­lar: having been bought up in subur­bia and des­pe­ra­tely trying to scape it most of my life, Lon­don see­med for many years to be the ‘cure’.
    Then 2 years ago i met a won­der­ful Swe­dish woman, living in Lon­don, who i married and then deci­ded to move to Swe­den with (bit of a fast for­ward there). We now live in Stockholm — surroun­ded by water (essen­tial for kaya­king), a short (etha­nol powe­red) bus­ride from the research stu­dio i work at and only 30 minu­tes drive from the archi­pe­lago (thou­sands of gra­nite islands grou­ped around stockholm and acces­si­ble by ever­yone). Life is more rela­xed, more focu­sed and remar­kably less clut­te­red.
    I would just add that in retros­pect, i feel that Lon­don ‘pro­mi­ses’ everything; what i didn’t rea­lise is i don’t need everything.

  35. Hugh,
    You are an ins­pi­ra­tion to us all!! Thank you for that. And, thanks for the great post. I think you are exactly dead spot on with your opinion/point. Your idea(s) for blog­ging and the Glo­bal Micro Brand do and will suc­ceed because they are “higher pur­pose”, IMHO. The rat race is a dead end and devoid of “pur­pose” by con­trast. And, while I may not be able to do witty/irreverent/alternative busi­ness cards, or even come across as 1/10th as crea­tive as you do, the “right and pro­per” goal…the “higher pur­pose” goal…is to try.
    Thanks again…

  36. hugh macleod says:

    Thanks for all the kind words, Every­body.
    To ans­wer Niall’s ques­tion, no, it’s not just about being self-employed. My blog was a fairly suc­cess­ful glo­bal mic­ro­brand last year, even though it wasn’t making me any money.
    Robert Sco­ble, like I said, the grand-daddy of all one-man glo­bal mic­ro­brands, isn’t self-employed, either.
    Secondly, English Cut is not an e-commerce site, we still have to go and meet clients. Often that means get­ting on a plane and tra­ve­lling thou­sands of miles, so desc­ri­bing my cus­to­mers as “no lon­ger on my doors­tep but on my desk­top” doesn’t really apply.
    But yeah, there are over­laps. It depends on what you’re trying to achieve. Depends what seman­tics and metaphors you’re wired into.

  37. Anne says:

    The beauty of the Web is that I can write a book, self-publish a book, pro­mote and sell it online.
    The pro­blem with the Web is that millions of others can do the same.
    How to make your glo­bal brand stand out?
    We may live in sec­lu­ded towns, but it’s get­ting very crow­ded online.

  38. Mark Lloyd says:

    I love the idea of “The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand” but I am con­cer­ned that it isn’t neces­sa­rily sus­tai­na­ble in all its forms. I can see it would work for say, you, and someone like Seth Godin. But I won­der whether someone like Tho­mas might be a vic­tim of his own suc­cess.
    On the assump­tion he was making suits before he star­ted his blog he only had a cer­tain amount of capa­city. Now, he appears to be inc­re­dibly busy. How does he manage it? How many suits can he actually make at any one time? Will he sub-contract out more and more of the work as time goes on? Will he then have to start mana­ging more and doing less of the work he actually loves. Does he then inc­rease pri­ces to try and limit demand? And with all this tra­vel and work, will he still be able to go to the pub and the local Chi­nese in two years time? Isn’t it more likely that he will be busy run­ning a much lar­ger busi­ness — which he might enjoy — and dea­ling with the pro­blems of “suc­cess” whe­ree­ver that might be?

  39. Thomas says:

    Avin, I think having the idea in Jakarta is great. So figure out what thew world doesn’t know about Jakarta and take it from there…

  40. Piers Cawley says:

    I like the exam­ple of Char­les Mar­tell, the guy who makes Stin­king Bishop cheese. He’s just had the kind of pro­duct pla­ce­ment that money can’t buy in the latest Wallace and Gro­mit movie. Demand has already jum­ped by 100% and his res­ponse?
    “I’m quite happy with what I’ve got at the moment. I don’t need more money. I can only wear one suit at a time, or drive one car. And I cer­tainly don’t want fame.”
    Having loved his cheese for about 5 years now, I’m deligh­ted to hear it. I’m just going to have to get used to paying a bit more for it and hoping that the demand tails off even­tually (and it will, SB is something of a take no pri­so­ners cheese).

  41. Noel Guinane says:

    Thought you might enjoy this car­toon, Hugh.
    My thoughts on Squidgy.

  42. George Allan says:

    Great post Hugh; enligh­te­ning as always.
    I won­der if the Glo­bal Micro Brand that most peo­ple are trying to ‘sell’ on the net isn’t just them­sel­ves. I mean most blogs are elec­tro­nic per­so­nal jour­nals and we’re just tal­king about who we are. So then you have this whole thing of “Who am I and why would anyone care”? Doesn’t really mat­ter where you live, you still have to face up to that ques­tion, don’t you think?

  43. Noel Guinane says:

    Beg­ging your par­don again — You can read the whole Squi­doo debate here:
    http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/10/squidoo/#comment-9915

  44. Eric Swayne says:

    Hugh,
    I found this post has come to me at an ideal point in my life. I’ve recently been laid off from the adver­ti­sing field, and am trying to find where to re-establish myself. Even while I was on “the tread­mill”, I felt the strong long-nose call of Godin, that all of us mar­ke­ters were liars, that we were using our gifts for wrong. The GMB is a way to be honest with your­self, with the world — to pre­sent what you can do and how you can do it in an honest, “Hugh­train” style. It’s posts like these that encou­rage me to find my own GMB, and while I will have to enter some cor­po­rate glass box to sup­port myself and my family (see “Sex & Cash Theory), this pro­ves to me that you can still work for The Man and yet keep this crea­tive, vibrant, essen­tial part of your life on fire. And perhaps, once it grows big enough, you can leave the tread­mill behind for good.

  45. cathy says:

    bri­lliant. thank you.

  46. Tom says:

    Hugh:
    1) Great post. “Com­mu­ting to the cor­po­rate glass box in the big city” is one of those ima­ges that give me the chills…it’s why my part­ner and I star­ted our own little mic­ro­brand 11 years ago.
    2) Could I get the “Fear of Change is Death” car­toon as a blogcard?

  47. Andy says:

    Great bum­ping in to you again Hugh, this shifts alot of what we were tal­king about into pers­pec­tive, very inte­res­ting indeed!
    Eye candy rots your teeth. Yep you’ve cer­tainly got me thin­king…
    til next time.
    Andy