September 14, 2005

“blame enron”

hjsdert12.jpg
From Megan McArdle:

It also sup­ports the theory that one of the rea­sons for lin­ge­ring unem­ploy­ment in the current reco­very is that job los­ses in this reces­sion were struc­tu­ral rather than cyc­li­cal– which is to say that your whole industry became a per­ma­nently less attrac­tive place to work, rather than suf­fe­ring a tem­po­rary down­turn in demand that ends when the reces­sion does.

That would explain a lot, espe­cially in the adver­ti­sing busi­ness.
[NOTE TO SELF:] What’s with the “Die, Adver­ti­sing, Die” kick you’ve been on these last few days? Jeeze Louise.

3 Responses to ““blame enron””

  1. Alexoid says:

    “Last few days?” — More like last few months, and I haven’t been around for that long so it could be lon­ger. :)

  2. Thomas says:

    The struc­tu­ral chan­ges have been pre­dic­ted for a while, I am thin­king of some of Tom Peters work from 10 years ago pre­dic­ting the net and com­pu­ters would do to white collar ranks what robo­tics did to the blue collar in the 70/80s.

  3. Keith says:

    Hugh:
    Thanks for pos­ting that little nug­get of wis­dom. The big ques­tion is… what does a 47 year old tv/film pro­du­cer (i.e. me) do now?