September 11, 2005

paid content is a mug’s game

From Seth Godin:

The first les­son is that free ebooks spread FORTY times fas­ter than ebooks that cost money. That should give you pause if your goal is to spread your ideas. It seems to me that it’s really dif­fi­cult to ima­gine that the $9 or $12 you can charge for an ebook is more effec­tive than reaching forty times as many as peo­ple for free.

I con­cur with Seth com­ple­tely. Unless you’re at THE VERY TOP of the foodchain (cele­brity, NBC anchor­man, rock star etc), paid con­tent is a mug’s game.
Forty. Wow. That’s a lot.
[Loo­sely Rela­ted:] I just finished rea­ding his new e-book, “Who’s There”. All to do with blogs and how it affects your busi­ness etc. It looks like it was writ­ten for peo­ple who don’t know a lot about blogs, or why blogs are impor­tant. Not a bad read at all. If you’re new to this whole blog­ging thing, I’d cer­tainly recom­mend down­loa­ding it etc.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

13 Responses to “paid content is a mug’s game”

  1. Rich...! says:

    Don’t you think though, that while peo­ple are more likely to down­load it, they’re not more likely to read it?
    I find that peo­ple are more likely to read something that they attach value to i.e. they paid for, some­ti­mes free isn’t the best plan.
    For exam­ple, and I know that this is a sur­vey of one, I read every one of Seth’s books after I bought them. I’ve not yet read “knock knock” or “who’s there”.
    I down­load a ton of change this mani­fes­tos, I’ve read 3.
    I wrote a post about this here:
    http://www.helloworldblog.com/2005/08/free_blogger_tr.html
    My point basi­cally is that you cant gauge the suc­cess of con­tent by the downloads…!

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Sure Rich, but I can think of a ton of books that get bought but never get read (espe­cially by me).
    Point taken, though.

  3. hugh macleod says:

    PS I pre­fer just pos­ting things up on my blog, via HTML.
    “How To Be Crea­tive” was read on my web­site by how many peo­ple? Half a million? A lot, any­way.
    Seth has an penchant for PDF I don’t share, but hey, dif­fe­rent stro­kes for dif­fe­rent folks.

  4. Rich...! says:

    I think the only pro­blem with pos­ting things on your blog vs the pdf route is that blog posts while still there in your archi­ves, often become like yesterday’s news­pa­per. I often find new blog­gers I like, I subsc­ribe to their feed, but rarely go through their archi­ves. Howe­ver if they had a link to a spe­ci­fic bit of con­tent as a down­load, I just might.
    Of course whether I read it or not is another ques­tion altogether…!

  5. hugh macleod says:

    The way to get old posts read is to link back to them often, or have them on your side­bar… like me and The Hugh­train.
    Of course, I had my stuff pos­ted in HTML and a PDF (via Chan­geThis) so I had both bases cove­red.
    The one thing I didn’t have is money nee­ding chan­ged hands.

  6. Piers Fawkes says:

    As an all but full time ‘blog­ger’ who’s expe­ri­men­ting with the paid con­tent model, I find this all very inte­res­ting. One of my blogs IF is a fil­ter of all mar­ke­ting ideas great. Much of the con­tent is only avai­la­ble to paying subsc­ri­bers.
    The argu­ment above sug­gests that my blogs will be truly suc­cess­fuil only if all con­tent should be free — but when do I start ear­ning? Through con­sul­tancy from repu­ta­tion ear­ned by con­tent?? For IF, con­tent and con­sul­tancy are no lon­ger sepe­rate though.
    The big ques­tions are: When does con­tent end and my job as a con­sul­tant start? Is con­tent in fact my job? Is con­sul­tancy in fact con­tent?
    I’m thin­king aloud really, but if con­tent should be free and my job is to create con­tent, how do I get paid for what I do?

  7. hugh macleod says:

    Who says your job is to create con­tent for money? ;-)
    Of course, there’s no law saying con­tent has to be free. But methinks the draw­backs of paid con­tent are not as well documented/understood as the advantages.

  8. Josh says:

    I’ve read a lot of of Hugh’s stuff for free, and think the lin­king on the side to impor­tant posts works nicely. I think the free thing works very well, as anci­llary things pre­su­mably add up. As, for exam­ple, I recently recei­ved my newly orde­red Gaping Void Tshirt.

  9. Jon says:

    Hugh, you avoi­ded Piers’ ques­tion. I am won­de­ring the same thing!
    How do you make money if all your con­tent is free? Par­ti­cu­larly if what you have of value to offer is your con­tent!
    AdSense to the res­cue? Adverts? Affi­lia­tes?
    Seems like small money…

  10. hugh macleod says:

    Jon, I didn’t avoid Pier’s ques­tion.
    “If what you have of value to offer is your con­tent” is an arti­fi­cial, self-imposed limi­ta­tion. It has nothing to do with reality.

  11. jon says:

    Huh? I still don’t get it!
    You sell either pro­ducts or ser­vi­ces. If your pro­duct is infor­ma­tion (e.g. wri­ter, teacher) or your ser­vice is pro­vi­ding per­so­na­li­zed infor­ma­tion (e.g. con­sul­tant, coach), then where do you make money if you give said infor­ma­tion away free?
    Are you saying that infor­ma­tion deli­very itself is not a suf­fi­cient pro­duct or ser­vice?
    Sorry for being so obtuse, but I would love to unders­tand what the heck you are get­ting at! Please pro­vide me with some free infor­ma­tion! Ha, ha! :-)
    Thanks!

  12. hugh macleod says:

    Jon, your argu­ment assu­mes that what’s being sold and what’s being bought are the same thing.
    The world doesn’t work that way.

  13. Jon says:

    .
    “Ahhh, I am begin­ning to see the light,” said Jon brightly.
    _