August 29, 2005

social vs. socialised



Loic won­ders why more Bri­tish peo­ple aren’t sig­ning up for Our Social World.

I won­der how a country like U.K. can have so few par­ti­ci­pants inte­res­ted in a blog/social soft­ware con­fe­rence such as Our Social World on Sep­tem­ber 9th. Wake up! It should be a good con­fe­rence, you can still sign up.

I’m gues­sing two rea­sons.
1. It’s not in Lon­don. Peo­ple most likely to be inte­res­ted in this kind of stuff can’t be bothe­red get­ting up to Cam­bridge for an 8.30am start.
2. It’s in the U.K. The Brits hate any kind of new “social” media. They pre­fer “socia­li­sed” media, thank you very much. They still equate media with gla­mor, autho­rity, pri­ve­lege and the domain of the esta­blish­ment. The idea that JUST ANYONE can have a voice they find vul­gar and offen­sive. Which is why these tur­keys can still make a living.
Well, I’m spea­king on the day. Something to do with how mar­ke­ters are going to have to start beha­ving more like techies, less like “crea­ti­ves”. It should be a fun and inte­res­ting day for all con­cer­ned; I’m worried less about how many peo­ple actually show up.
The Clue­train is hap­pily chug­ging away. Get­ting a seat on it is not a God-given right, it’s an indi­vi­dual deci­sion.
It has nothing to do with who you know, what school you went to, who your tai­lor is, what pub you drink in, or what poli­ti­cal party you voted for. Which is why most Brits don’t see it.
But the ones that do, of course, are star­ting to have the time of their lives.

30 Responses to “social vs. socialised”

  1. Nicole Simon says:

    Well, some of the pre­sen­ta­tion are already avai­la­ble on the net, so peo­ple inte­res­ted might have figu­red that it is easier to follow that.
    For the peo­ple not in the UK, it is not so easy to get to Came­bridge. ;) )
    Besi­des that — the brits really seem to be quite dif­fe­rent to the rest of the world. I encoun­ter this at the moment with Pod­cast­con UK; which _is_ called UK, most of the peo­ple coming are from the UK but still — there are Euro­pean peo­ple coming too. And ‘we’ do see this more as an Euro­pean event — but there is no way to get those brits to talk about it that way. It is just UK.
    Com­bi­ned with your remarks about them being snob­bish (you did not call it that way, but …), I am curious how it will go out. :) ))
    Funny folks on that island. ;)

  2. Who Do These Peo­ple Think They Are?

    I don’t know if Hugh is right about this spe­cu­la­tion, but I believe he’s on to something: Loic won­ders why more Bri­tish peo­ple aren’t sig­ning up for Our Social World.I won­der how a country like U.K. can have so few

  3. Adrian Howard says:

    3. lousy publi­city. This is the first time I can recall hea­ring about the fard­ling event.
    Since I read a goodly num­ber of the various spea­kers blogs (inc­lu­ding your good self :-) Maybe they should prac­tice a little more of what they preach.
    Hell, I’d have pro­bably gone too. Too late now.

  4. Broad­band and the Clue­train: Cam­bridge blue(s)

    Hmm … (via Loïc Le Meur). Add to this the poor take-up rate for Our Social World (‘Our Social World is about brin­ging busi­ness lea­ders of today into con­tact with the visio­na­ries and tools that are crea­ting a new social

  5. Bazaarz says:

    Our Social World — a flop in the making?

    Loic, Hugh and David are pun­ting Our Social World but with only 35 dele­ga­tes sig­ned up (the last time I loo­ked.) I sug­ges­ted to Loic it is because of loca­tion, cost and con­tent. But there’s more. Loca­tion: Arri­ving by train.…

  6. Be con­tro­ver­sial, be enter­tai­ning, but please don’t par­to­nise Brits with swee­ping statements…it may be amu­sing but it sure as hell pis­ses off folk (like me) who’d actually like to see this thing go forward.

  7. I’d be there but for the fact that I’m hea­ding for sun­nier cli­mes. I hope it goes well.
    Patrick

  8. hugh macleod says:

    Sure, Denn­nis, you just tell me which point you disa­gree with and I’ll gladly dis­cuss it further ;-)
    PS. What’s wrong with making swee­ping sta­te­ments? Without it, there’d be no such thing as Bri­tish comedy ;-)

  9. IF from PSFK says:

    Event: Our Social World, Cam­bridge UK

    Our Social World is an event in Sep­tem­ber desig­ned to bring busi­ness lea­ders of today into con­tact with the visio­na­ries and tools that are crea­ting a new social envi­ron­ment: “one which spans con­ti­nents, time­zo­nes and cul­tu­res… our Social World is…

  10. LSF says:

    Some peo­ple would have been put off by the inc­lu­sion of spea­kers from ecademy.

  11. gia says:

    The get­ting up for an 8.30 start in Cam­bridge is cer­tainly an issue… also it being on a week­day right after ever­yone has used up their holi­day… But will be loo­king for­ward to the transcripts/audio/videos…

  12. hugh macleod says:

    Get­ting Bri­tish busi­ness folk out of Lon­don on a week­day is easy– all you need is some hun­ting, shoo­ting and fishing ;-)

  13. Stuart Bruce says:

    Cam­bridge is cer­tainly a major fac­tor for me, although for a lot of peo­ple (inc­lu­ding those who live in cot­ta­ges in Cum­bria!) you tra­vel down to Cam­bridge. There is life outside Lon­don, but it’s about it being in Cam­bridge which is a pain to get to. Bir­mingham, Manches­ter, Leeds, Lon­don — any of those pla­ces make sense.

  14. A good punt!

    Loics wake up call promp­ted Den­nis How­lett of Bazaarz to came out with a cri­ti­que of the Our Social World con­fe­rence in his post “Our Social World — a flop in the making?”
    His argu­ments are that Cam­bridge is the wrong place (to inaccessib…

  15. Plus it’s not aimed at “Brits”, it’s aimed at busi­ness peo­ple.
    Look at the tag line “Ena­ble Con­ver­sa­tions with your cus­to­mers”.
    So it’s aimed at the pon­cey pony­tail set, who don’t know what 8:30 looks like because they’re still get­ting over the coke endu­ced haze from the night before. You may be right when you say they have to move towards techie­dom, but you’re going to have to mar­ket geek chic bet­ter before that happens.

  16. hugh macleod says:

    Ha. The poncy pony tail set embra­cing geek chic. As if that will ever hap­pen.
    More fun just watching them being con­sig­ned to the dust­bin of history.

  17. dont patro­nise brits?
    this from den­nis how­lett, a man that can’t bear to live in the UK because the weather is shit and the liquor is expen­sive.
    give over mr how­lett — you aren’t a Brit any more, you’re a Euro­pean…
    my rea­son for pro­bably not coming is pretty sim­ple. the list is same old same old. i know the thin­king of the head­li­ners. i might come to see them per­form live, but i already have the album…

  18. Geoff says:

    Barry what a large gaping void there is! In my past life of run­ning a UK based busi­ness I would never have asso­cia­ted, busi­ness peo­ple = pon­cey pony­tail set.
    I guess its what hap­pens when you cut your­self off in Soho.

  19. Matt says:

    For true hila­rity, read this inter­view with Saatchi & Saatchi’s UK chairman/CEO Lee Daley on the “future” of adver­ti­sing. It con­tains more mea­nin­gless buzz­words per square inch than maybe anything I’ve read – and NOTHING about how tech­no­logy lets mar­ke­ters l-i-s-t-e-n to and con­verse with cus­to­mers.
    http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/08/26/lee.daley.transcript/

  20. Our Social World

    Hugh talks about why peo­ple aren’t floc­king to Our Social World. I agree with him that (to quote the Open Space man­tra) the peo­ple who come are the right peo­ple. I also have a fee­ling that blog­ging is just starting…

  21. Peter Cooper says:

    I run a fun­ded busi­ness in the RSS sec­tor in the UK and I’m not going for a num­ber of rea­sons.
    it’s down South and I can’t be arsed, I’m too busy wor­king on cool stuff to go, and the con­tent sounds pain­fully dull .. does anyone who knows their arse from their elbow need a “brief his­tory of blog­ging” or “how mar­ke­teers are going to have to act more like techies”? These are topics for new­bies and mar­ke­teers rather than techies or peo­ple on the cut­ting edge.
    The pro­blem is, the peo­ple rea­ding blogs like yours ARE the techies, industry geeks, and peo­ple on the cut­ting edge. This con­fe­rence is clearly for peo­ple who have no idea about the topic or have heard “a little” about it. That’s the pro­blem with con­fe­ren­ces.. they’re not for the hard­core. Up with geek din­ners instead.

  22. Nicole Simon says:

    While his­tory of blog­ging seems dull at first, it was quite a pre­sen­ta­tion to lis­ten to and Ben is fun to watch. You could give it a lis­ten through the reboot recor­dings of that spe­cial ses­sion.
    I can’t ans­wer the ques­tion if you are inters­ted in the social impacts of daily inter­net life, but the ques­tion put up by that sin­gle pre­sen­ta­tion still “haunt” me two months later.

  23. I did post a num­ber of per­fectly valid rea­sons why this is not such a great idea at http://www.bazaarz.com/archives/2005/08/our_social_worl.php. And the fact I live offshore wouldn’t stop me coming…if the con­tent was com­pe­lling enough. And it isn’t.

  24. hugh macleod says:

    I don’t go for the con­tent, Den­nis. I go to meet peo­ple.
    (A) It’s a lot of fun and (B) a lot of busi­ness is star­ting to get done at these things. At least for me.

  25. Peter Cooper says:

    You can meet peo­ple at the geek din­ners and other less for­mal events. I meet peo­ple by net­wor­king with them online and then moving it offline. The extra cost of these big­ger con­fe­ren­ces is going into the pre­sen­ta­tion and deli­very of con­tent, so I’d say it’s a pretty big part of the lar­ger con­fe­ren­ces. If it was all about mee­ting peo­ple, there’d be a lot more geek din­ners and the like :) The most pro­duc­tive extra curri­cu­lar acti­vity I went to was a “con­fe­rence” in a pub(!) full of SEO experts ;-)

  26. Hugh — I’m in Cam­bridge and it sounds quite inte­res­ting but:
    1 — it’s on a week­day and I don’t have much holi­day left
    2 — it’s

  27. Ian Fenn says:

    If you’re con­si­de­red a ‘cor­po­rate’, the fee is

  28. Ian Fenn says:

    Sud­denly I’m con­si­de­red an ‘indi­vi­dual’. Never a truer word said.
    Hugh, see you there — I’m loo­king for­ward to it.
    All the best,

    Ian

  29. Loo­king for­ward to going. I believe the real value of this is net­wor­king and to that end I am also loo­king for­ward to mee­ting Hugh in the flesh. Not to men­tion I am also inte­res­ted in his talk and most peo­ple con­si­der me at least part geek.

  30. Our Social World

    Our Social World is now one atten­dee big­ger, as I have mana­ged to find time to get there. I notice a lot of talk regar­ding nega­tive com­ments abound howe­ver I think this is a bit pre­ma­ture. I’m going to wait…