August 27, 2005

the 800-pound gorilla

zzzzzz7654210.jpg
Kind words about English Cut from Shel Israel, cour­tesy of BL Och­man:

The Best Blogs Have Pas­sion and Autho­rity
After doing more than 100 inter­views with blog­gers cer­tain trends emerge. “The blog­gers that we find to be the most inte­res­ting dis­play pas­sion and autho­rity. The great pos­ter child is the English Cut guy. Tho­mas Mahon star­ted English Cut and we all went to it. At first,” Israel says, “ever­yone was fas­ci­na­ted about thread counts, how they tai­lor a suit, whether guy dres­ses right or left. In a mat­ter of a cou­ple of months, Mahon became the world’s autho­rity.”
Peo­ple wan­de­red away from the English Cut blog because there is only so much they want to know about how to make a $4000 suit. But, says Israel, it doesn

6 Responses to “the 800-pound gorilla”

  1. Peter Cooper says:

    No, it’s not fair, and long-term I don’t think it’s sus­tai­na­ble.
    I disa­gree, unless you’re hin­ting that he, perhaps, should work har­der at get­ting his own sales to “cut out the midd­le­man”.
    It’s cer­tainly fair though. He wants to make suits, and make a hand­some sum doing so. You want to sit in your paja­mas, blog, and come up with uni­que ways of selling stuff. You both do what you want, ever­yone wins. Being a gym­nast or a foot­ball pla­yer is har­der work than being a tai­lor too, but you can’t think for a second how unfair it is that they have to put in more effort than their managers.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    I am cer­tainly not hin­ting that, Peter. I’m happy as a bug in a rug, selling his work… with him sewing like a maniac.
    But Jeeze Louise, the amount of new busi­ness that has come in during the last few weeks has just been silly… I guess there’s worse pro­blems to have.

  3. James Kew says:

    “The big ini­tial rush of traf­fic that came English Cut’s way wasn’t peo­ple wan­ting to buy suits, but peo­ple who found the busi­ness model fas­ci­na­ting, and wan­ted to see how it could apply to what they’re doing.”
    The first half of that rings true: I sus­pect many visi­ted English Cut purely out of cat-walking-on-hind-legs fas­ci­na­tion at the idea of a blog­ging tai­lor, with the jux­ta­po­si­tion of old-world skills and new-world tech­no­logy that implies.
    But the idea that all of the early visi­tors were fellow mar­ke­ters loo­king for ideas seems a little too ego­tis­ti­cal to me. I know I visi­ted fairly early and had no inte­rest in the busi­ness model; my ini­tial inte­rest was sheer novelty, and I remain subsc­ri­bed because the con­tent is inte­res­ting and well-written.
    Would English Cut have suc­cee­ded if the wri­ting (which is Tom, right? com­ments about “him run­ning around like crazy while I blog away in my pyja­mas” make me won­der about ghostw­ri­ting) were pedes­trian and plodding?

  4. hugh macleod says:

    James, of course, the fact that it’s well-written is key. Had it been pedes­trian and plod­ding, I doubt it would’ve have got­ten so much atten­tion.
    But nobody who knows Tho­mas would accuse him of being pedes­trian and plod­ding, so it was never really an issue.
    I’m not sure if I agree with you 100% on your second point. I think the busi­ness model gene­ra­ted a lot of ini­tial inte­rest among the non-suit buyers. It’s cer­tainly that which got the atten­tion of the mains­tream media. You may not inc­lude your­self on that list, but that’s OK.

  5. teeveedubya says:

    NPR and BBC4? Con­gra­tu­la­tions. That neither of them do com­mer­cials is espe­cially sweet. enjoy the ride hugh!

  6. Hugh: Why not put your pri­ces up a $K or two?