August 27, 2005

commodities galore. commodities forever.

zzzzaxxxx08.jpg
A word that rolls off my ton­gue a lot these days is “Com­mo­dity”.
Not sur­pri­sing. We live in a era where China does the making, and Wal-Mart does the selling. In this game mar­gins are wafer-thin, so for every hun­dred dollars of inven­tory you sell, you’ll be lucky to clear the price of a can of beer as pro­fit. And next year you’ll be lucky to clear half a can of beer etc.
Because your sha­rehol­ders want more than a few cans of beer in return for their invest­ment, you’re going to have to sell a lot of stuff to keep them happy. Billions of dollars worth.
So to sell all these billions of dollars’ worth, you’re going to have a build a big com­pany full of fac­to­ries and cubic­les and cor­ner offi­ces and mee­ting rooms and warehou­ses and fax machi­nes and water­coo­lers and bad cof­fee, with legions of business-casual meat­pup­pets run­ning around dro­ning & num­ber crunching.
It’s not pretty, but it’s what we got. Com­mo­di­ties galore. Com­mo­di­ties fore­ver.
Luc­kily, some of these com­mo­di­fied meat­pup­pets earn lots of money. And as an anti­dote for all that com­mo­di­fi­ca­tion they’ve been doing during the week, during the wee­kends they’re going to want the exact oppo­site, and they’re willing to pay for it.
So they’ll spend their money on “non-commodity”, in other words, “Bes­poke”. That could mean anything. Hand­made suits or desig­ner ice cream or yup­pie fur­ni­ture or woo­den sail­boats or Laura Ash­ley cur­tains or Tif­fany nec­kla­ces. Anything that makes them feel spe­cial and uni­que. Anything to wash off the stink of the day job.
The more intense the WalMart-China com­mo­di­fi­ca­tion curve beco­mes, the more demand there will be for bepoke pro­ducts i.e. the more intense the demand for an anti­dote will become.
And yeah, blogs are really good at selling bes­poke. Which explains why, as a mar­ke­ting blog­ger, I’ve got­ten so inte­res­ted in bes­poke pro­ducts, like $4000 suits or $10,000 jewelry.
It may also explain why I con­ti­nue to live in a wee cot­tage in the English boo­nies, as oppo­sed to doing what I always thought I’d do even­tually i.e. move back to New York.
I love New York, but the more I think about it, the more I believe it’s a com­mo­dity town (just ask any over-thirty sin­gle per­son who lives there if you have any doubt). If I lived in New York, I’d have to go work for The Man again, just to pay the rent. I’d have to go play the com­mo­dity game again. Madi­son Ave­nue. Mana­ging the Sui­cide Pact bet­ween Big Busi­ness and Big Media for fun and pro­fit.
Sure, I could pro­bably try my hand at being one of these “post-Cluetrain cor­po­rate guys who gets it”, but that wouldn’t last long. The boys with the red-hot pokers would find a way to come after me even­tually, they always do (I don’t know if it’s true or not, but I’ve been told that Steve Rubel no lon­ger blogs during office hours. I’m gues­sing the red hot pokers have been out. Exactly.).
Don’t get me wrong. Some peo­ple do fine in with com­mo­di­ties. Some peo­ple hold down cool jobs at com­pa­nies like Mic­ro­soft or Gene­ral Motors. Some peo­ple can live quite com­for­tably on 0.00001% pro­fit mar­gins.
But most peo­ple I know aren’t like this. We weren’t made to emu­late machi­nes, sad but true.
So I believe the big­gest issue my peers are facing at the moment is, how the hell do we free our­sel­ves from the com­mo­di­fi­ca­tion of everything around us? How do we find our own ver­sion of “Bes­poke”?
I guess this is why me, you and so many other peo­ple are blog­ging. Because if the ans­wers aren’t in the blo­gosphere, where the hell are they?
We live in inte­res­ting times.
[REQUIRED READING:] “Small is the new big.”

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

9 Responses to “commodities galore. commodities forever.”

  1. Claire says:

    It used to be that qua­lity of life (or bet­ter qua­lity of life) was mea­su­red by how much stuff you had. Now ever­yone has all the stuff they could pos­sibly need (and a huge debt dri­ven by the belief that they are ENTITLED to everything) the only way to dif­fe­ren­tiate is to go bes­poke. This in itself was a move for­ward from “kno­wing one’s place” and accep­ting that not ever­yone was going to achieve the same things and the­re­fore they wouldn’t receive the same rewards, but I digress.
    The­re­fore I have all the same stuff you do, but my stuff is uni­que and it fits me and my life bet­ter; the­re­fore I am top of the heap (or my life is more worth living than yours, etc.). It’s sad that we have this desire for stuff and the asso­cia­ted sense of entit­le­ment (which is quin­tes­sen­tially point­less and use­less, doesn’t make us feel bet­ter and dri­ves us to horribly bag­ga­ged exis­ten­ces), but we’ve got­ten to such a point that society dri­ves us all that way, so we may as well have BETTER.
    The same applies to Bes­poke suits, orga­nic veg and farmer’s mar­ket meat — all nor­mal things 150 years ago, but in the days of everything a luxury because every­body doesn’t have them. It’s a new sense of what is impor­tant and one that also ties into the sense of bac­klash that is buil­ding in some quar­ters.
    It stri­kes me that the bes­poke busi­ness will be less affec­ted by anti-consumerist acti­vi­ties than a big­ger con­glo­mo­rate (the china/walmart) might be…

  2. Nia says:

    »»»»the big­gest issue my peers are facing at the moment is, how the hell do we free our­sel­ves from the com­mo­di­fi­ca­tion of everything around us? How do we find our own ver­sion of “Bes­poke”?<
    You are the mar­ke­ting expert, but my guess is that the next step is time. Hob­bies, for exam­ple. Peo­ple who spend five days a week making money selling crap use that money to buy bes­poke, right?
    Some of those peo­ple think that they give five days of their week to stuff they don’t care much about and the other two to things they do care about. pre­fe­rably, hob­bies that require a lot of time and patience and have a very small com­pe­ti­tive com­po­nent, so that they can mea­sure their exper­tise and get satis­fac­tion from it without fee­ling too threa­te­ned.
    The exam­ple that I know first hand is belly­dance, which tends to attract two types of women: the ones that want to lose weight and pro­fes­sio­nal ones from the sort of sou­lless com­pe­ti­tive envi­ron­ment you desc­ribe. The ones that spend ten hours a day chai­ned to a desk tend to be bri­lliant dan­cers because they trea­sure their daily hour of practice.

  3. Clas­sic silo-based (in this case mar­ke­ting) thin­king. Not heard of pro­duct lifecycle mana­ge­ment, pro­duct deve­lop­ment? Isn’t there an assump­tion there is no inven­tion in this cons­tri­ned model? Isn’t that part of Cluetrain/Hughtrain thin­king? There’s nothing new here that hasn’t exis­ted for 00’s of years. I won­der what the cof­fee and tea swi­llers of Old Lon­don Town thought in the 17th century…

  4. Shirazi says:

    Today, I read your post how to be crea­tive. I know that you are CREATIVE. I am lear­ning here. Thanks.

  5. hugh macleod says:

    “Isn’t there an assump­tion there is no inven­tion in this cons­trai­ned model?“
    Oh, there’s always room for inven­tion, Den­nis ;-)
    But go to Wal­mart or ASDA and count how many brands on sale are res­pon­ding to the ever-increasingly crow­ded shelfs­pace by making their brands more remar­ka­ble, ver­sus the num­ber of brands that are res­pon­ding by just making short-term deals (i.e. making their stuff chea­per) or adding unre­mar­ka­ble line exten­sions i.e just adding more clut­ter.
    Inven­tion is great, but not all cor­po­rate cul­tu­res are gea­red up for it.

  6. Below Belief says:

    Small is the new Big

    Read these: Small is the new big — Seth Godin Com­mo­di­ties galore. Com­mo­di­ties fore­ver — Hugh Mac­leodb I work for a small dot com. We have 18 emplo­yees. The busi­ness brings in £1.8 m. It’s gro­wing strongly. We pride ourselves…

  7. Vy Blog says:

    Com­mo­di­tize

    Here’s a word: com­mo­dity Or, com­mo­di­ti­zed. As in, Cell pho­nes have become fully com­mo­di­ti­zed. If you look it up, a com­mo­dity is an ins­tru­ment of trade — usually a hard good, often agri­cul­tu­ral, that’s sold or tra­ded through futu­res contracts.

  8. Dig Tank says:

    Web Dig­gings

    Some great post from other blogs that are worth your rea­ding time.. 10 Steps to a Hugely Suc­cess­ful Web 2.0…

  9. Maigh says:

    Strug­gling with all of this myself, you couldn’t have writ­ten this at a bet­ter time for me. Big­ger thin­king, dif­fe­rent angles and dee­per caverns to con­si­der.
    Love your stuff and the insight it offers inte­llec­tually and while appea­ling to my need for laughter.