August 22, 2005

apple mafia

zzzzazzdggg12.jpg
Inte­res­ting. Shel talks about the time he met Steve Jobs, the CEO of Apple back in 1980:

He [Jobs] sta­red at me for a second then asked me what I did for a living. I stam­me­red that I loved to write, and right now I was wor­king for a PR agency until I could find something mea­ning­ful. “My PR flack is Regis McKenna,” he snap­ped, more than a little impa­tiently. “Go work for him.”
In fact, that’s exactly what I did. But I never really wor­ked much on the Apple Account. As it tur­ned out, that was a good thing. And I lear­ned something about Jobs that seems to be true all these many years later. He’s much more appea­ling when he’s stan­ding in front of 500 peo­ple than he is close up.

What’s always amu­sing with posts like this is rea­ding the usual com­ments left by the “Apple Mafia”:

After you do that, give cre­dit to Jobs for having clair­vo­yantly spot­ted a bad wri­ter long years ago. And you’re still so ungra­cious about the fact that he actually bothe­red to give you advice on what you should do? Then ask your­self why a man in his posi­tion owes *you* the time of the day? 

Clair­vo­yantly? Oh yeah, I for­got, Steve Jobs has super­na­tu­ral powers as well. Even more rea­son to worship etc etc.
[SEE ALSO:] “Why I pre­fer Win­dows to Macin­tosh”.

10. When I was in high school, peo­ple who were overly into hips­ter brands were rou­ti­nely taken behind the bike sheds and sava­gely pum­me­led. That is the natu­ral order of things.

23 Responses to “apple mafia”

  1. shel israel says:

    Thanks Hugh. I nee­ded this.

  2. Amy says:

    Ugh, those com­ments are pathe­tic. You and your friend Shel bet­ter watch your backs in case some dork dri­ving an Apple logo bedec­ked Pas­sat tries to run you down.
    I think it’s time to repost your “Why I Pre­fer Win­dows to Macin­tosh” entry.

  3. Steve says:

    RE: Then ask your­self why a man in his posi­tion owes *you* the time of the day?
    Com­ments like this always make me laugh on the inside. Jobs is no more spe­cial than you or I.

  4. Israel Alvarez says:

    First off, let me just start off by saying that while I’m a fan of Apple pro­ducts, I’m not par­ti­cu­larly a fan of Steve Jobs. It’s hard not to admire the guy’s busi­ness abi­lity (Apple’s and Pixar’s suc­ces­ses are *really* dif­fi­cult to argue against), but even from the early days he’s always struck me as more than just a little bit of a prick.
    Then again, it stri­kes me that this Shel Israel guy walks up to a suc­cess­ful, semi-famous per­son, fawns all over him, actually gets a res­ponse and busi­ness tip from the said famous per­son that — to many folks — could be seen as launching his career, and then *com­plains* that said per­son offe­red the help in a “more than a little impa­tient” man­ner. What kind of a lame entit­le­ment society do we live in where ever­yone thinks they’re owed ever­yone else’s atten­tion. Get over your­sel­ves kids.
    Sort of begs the ques­tion of how many peo­ple Shel Israel has hel­ped out through the years, how he treats folks who come up to him as he’s wal­king out of a con­fe­rence on his way to din­ner with his loved ones and ask for help star­ting their careers, or even how he treats the mail­room staff at work.

  5. Bob Jones says:

    Macs (and OS X) are not for ever­yone, there are plenty of valid rea­sons to not want to own/use them. Your rea­sons mostly based on the dis­like of trendsters/hipsters and the pro­ducts they enjoy/endorse. I guess this is the oppo­site of peo­ple who only lis­ten to inde­pen­dent music…
    It stri­kes me as being pretty petty and moro­nic to rule out Macs just because you don’t like the vast majo­rity of the users, so what? No one’s for­cing you to join a Mac User Group or to wear jeans and black turt­le­necks. Some of are simply con­tent to use the best tool for the job, which may or may not be a Mac.

  6. hugh macleod says:

    I haven’t ruled Mac out. I only said I pre­fe­rred Win­dows. But OF COURSE the Mac users infer that to mean “I hate Mac”.

  7. Bob Jones says:

    Oh, I must have mis­sed the parts where you enligh­te­ned peo­ple on the posi­ti­ves of Macs/OS X in bet­ween the vitriol.
    In that ‘rant’ you gave no opi­nion to the con­trary so it’s sort of natu­ral to assume that you dis­like, perhaps even hate, Macs.

  8. Eric says:

    I’ve always been pretty strongly anti-apple just because of the (unne­ces­sa­rily high) price, but I never com­plai­ned when I got stuck on a Mac at work. Until OS X came along that is. Run­ning 10.0 and 10.1 on anything but the very latest hard­ware was an expe­rience I’d not wish on anyone, and this was almost the final nail in the cof­fin for my opi­nion of Macs. But they’ve tigh­te­ned things up sig­ni­fi­cantly in the last 2 ver­sions, to the point where I can run 10.3 on an old G3 Pismo power­book without any noti­cea­ble lag (well, except when decom­pres­sing MPEG4 video). As for the “Think Dif­fe­rent / I’m so crea­tive!” atti­tude that you get with a lot of the Mac faith­ful, well… if it wasn’t their com­pu­ter, it would be their clothes, music, car, hairstyle, brand of cof­fee, makeup, favo­rite type­face, etc, etc, etc. So I don’t think you can blame Apple for that. I’d com­mend them for ser­ving the hips­ter niche so well, in fact.

  9. Scottie says:

    I’m a mac user because I hate macs only slightly less than i hate windows.

  10. Matt says:

    Here’s why I like Macs:
    I used to work as a desk­top sup­port tech for an aca­de­mic ins­ti­tu­tion, half of a staff of 2 for the 300-person institution’s tech sup­port. 80% of our users were on Macs, and 20% of our users were on Win­dows. Yet, the Win­dows users used 80% of our time and resour­ces.
    The second rea­son is, that supe­rior atti­tude to scorn? It leads to bet­ter soft­ware. Poorly-written, poorly-designed soft­ware doesn’t sur­vive on the Mac; the qua­lity stan­dards are that much higher. There are so many more pro­grams I have on my Mac at work that I wish I could run on my Win­dows box at home than vise-versa. I can supply a list if you’d like.
    I type this from a little Ath­lon PC I built myself a year ago for $500; but, were I in the same posi­tion now, I’d pro­bably buy a Mini. Why? The design of a Mac feels like some­body actually GIVES A SHIT about how the thing works. I have never pic­ked that up from my PC.
    Am I a hips­ter? I ride public tran­sit, I shop at Mervyns and Tra­der Joe’s, I get a buzz-cut, and my favo­rite type­face is a self-customized cleaned-up ver­sion of a $30 sha­re­ware face I got off of myfonts.
    Here’s what I’m not doing: I’m not buying $4000 suits. I don’t buy alchohol. I’m not giving a shit about what Steve Jobs does, so long as it doesn’t affect Mac qua­lity stan­dards. Am I a hips­ter? You seem to think I am, soley because of the com­pu­ter I pre­fer to drive, even when that deci­sion is made for the same rea­son peo­ple choose to buy $4000 suits.
    Thank you, Hugh, for pro­ving how sha­llow even other­wise deep thin­kers like you can be.

  11. Another Rea­son To Dis­like Apple

    So, aside from their strong-arm legal tactics ,

  12. hugh macleod says:

    Hey Matt,
    “The lady doth pro­test too much, methinks.”
    –William Shakespeare

  13. Michael Barrett says:

    So let me get this straight.
    A self-righteous prick, with an over­de­ve­lo­ped sense of entit­le­ment, grou­ses about the fact that a very busy CEO of a famous com­pany actually bothers to give him the time of day, but doesn’t stop to suck his c – . So the self righ­teous prick is, unders­tan­dably, a little upset.
    A second self-righteous prick, with delu­sions of teh Ans0rz for all things mar­ke­ting, has a hard on/off for the com­pany of the said CEO and quo­tes the bia­sed record of this exchange (which can­not in any way be subs­tan­tia­ted) with a flame-baity blog troll. This ser­ves to further engorge the pre­viously men­tio­ned hard on (by suc­ke­ring rea­ders into making emo­tio­nally char­ged com­ments, which can be “cle­verly” dis­mis­sed with quo­ta­tions.)
    The com­pany in ques­tion, has enjo­yed a recent resur­gence of atten­tion and finan­cial suc­cess by selling to its dedi­ca­ted core cus­to­mer base, and expan­ding its cus­to­mer base via pro­duct deve­lop­ment and design, cle­ver – but tra­di­tio­nal – tele­vi­sion and print adver­ti­sing, slick pac­ka­ging, and a simi­larly slick retail pre­sence. This flies in the face of the uni­fied con­ver­sa­tio­nal theory of blog­ging as the new world order of tag­ga­ble post-dot-bomb clue-less-train adver­ti­sing, thus agi­ta­ting the hard on, neces­si­ta­ting this post.
    Did I miss anything?

  14. hugh macleod says:

    I think you mis­sed the bit about pro­ving my point, Michael.
    Wow, you really wal­ked into that one. ;-)

  15. Michael Barrett says:

    Oh. Yeah. I took the bait. It’s fun.
    There are a few inter­nets dis­cus­sions that will never die:
    1. I love/hate macs
    2. He/She/It is a nazi
    3. I hate those popu­lar girls/boys in high school/college/in my dorm/ at work.
    It’s a mat­ter of duty to keep them going
    I will offer as a coun­ter point — would it be use­ful for someone in your line of work to dis­cern what is it that makes the Mac fan­boi so fana­ti­cal?
    I mean if some one in adver­ti­sing could dis­till that into it’s pure form and apply it…wouldn’t that be. I don’t know. Useful?

  16. hugh macleod says:

    Apple is such a sym­bol for per­so­nal empo­wer­ment for some folk, so when they see it being attac­ked, they see their own per­so­nal power being attac­ked.
    Lots of pro­jec­tion going on, with both Win­dows and Mac. Not all of it is healthy.

  17. Michael Barrett says:

    This is true of anything peo­ple feel pas­sio­nate about.
    The mac/windows/linux thing is easy to poke fun at — because on the sur­face it seems silly. But if you think about it. Peo­ple and com­pa­nies invest a lot of money and time into these dumb little boxes, why shouldn’t someone take it per­so­nally?
    Think about the ori­gins of this post…the ori­gi­nal quo­ted blog entry.
    Replace “Steve Jobs” with any other cul­tu­ral figure that peo­ple have strong fee­lings about. George Bush, Tony Blair, Paris Hil­ton, Jesus (no rela­tion) Make a few snotty remarks about these folks (or what they repre­sent) and see what sort of reac­tion you get.
    If it weren’t the Apple Mafia, it would have been the Paris Hil­ton Ges­tapo. (or something)
    This post and your ear­lier post (“10 rea­sons I pre­fer Win­dows”) is every bit as impas­sio­ned. Just in the oppo­site direc­tion.
    I think it’s only fair to point out there’s a little pot-kettle black calling.
    But more importantly…aren’t the crazy mac fan­bois par­ti­ci­pa­ting in the very same kind of con­ver­sa­tion that you talk about when wine or suit blog­ging?
    If not…how is it different?

  18. hugh macleod says:

    Who said it was dif­fe­rent? Both the suit and the wine biz attract their fair share of issue-infested saddo’s.
    Part of the job is kee­ping them at arm’s length ;-)

  19. Michael Barrett says:

    No one said it was dif­fe­rent. I assu­med a level of cli­ni­cal disin­te­res­ted­ness.
    Kee­ping at arm’s length is pro­bably wise, but not enough. It’s contagious.

  20. Israel Alvarez says:

    Hm. Let me just step back and point out something here — it appears that this post (and Shel Israel’s) have accom­plished their goal: to wit — these past few days have pro­bably seen more traf­fic at these two sites than in the past month. I’m of the opi­nion that many who post on con­tro­ver­sial topics (attack Mac/Windows/FreeBSD/George Bush/Hillary Clinton/Muslim Fundamentalists/Flying Spaghetti Mons­ter) aren’t really bothe­red by the con­tro­versy they’re cer­tain to gene­rate, since it dri­ves traf­fic to their sites. I’m sure in some cases it’s part of the ori­gi­nal intent.
    “Pro­test too much” indeed, nacht?

  21. Inte­res­ting how many folks con­fuse Jobs with Apple. Not a great long-term pros­pect for Apple if
    ever­yone does. Any­way, I’ve heard Jobs has an impa­tient holier-than-thou streak. Although I shud­der to think what peo­ple that met me five years ago say about me; I’m a com­ple­tely dif­fe­rent per­son. And I’m still a work in pro­gress. I was pro­bably more self-absorbed than Jobs. Peo­ple change. I truly sense that in Job’s recent com­men­ce­ment speech.
    “Sort of begs the ques­tion of how many peo­ple Shel Israel has hel­ped out through the years…”
    I’ll come to the defense. I first noti­ced Shel as one of the few PR blog­gers that was hel­ping to bring atten­tion to tsu­nami relief efforts. Then he wrote a post a few months back trying to find a friend of a friend that was lost in the Van­cou­ver moun­tains. (We emai­led offline about his quest to find him too.) At the Blog­Bu­si­ness­Sum­mit Shel went out of his way to intro­duce me (with abso­lu­tely no bene­fit to him­self) to other PR exe­cu­ti­ves. He’s really an extraor­di­na­rily com­pas­sio­nate person.

  22. anon says:

    Ok now, I pos­ted this over at his site, and I’m put­ting it here as well. Just my 2 cents. I think this is a big non-issue.
    “Honestly man, let’s review the story:
    You go up to someone who’s likely cons­tantly houn­ded by folks he doesn’t know who want one thing or another from him.
    You ask him for a job, which HE GIVES YOU ON THE SPOT!
    And you think he’s ungra­cious because he doesn’t take the time to sit down and have a beer with you?
    Sounds like hubris to me.”