August 19, 2005

flow and the new dimension

zzzmkghilkj25.jpg
Fed Wil­son is loo­king for a new dimen­sion to the inter­net:

Infor­ma­tion over­load? No, we were over­loa­ded ten years ago. What we are today has no word for it because we are too busy chec­king our non stop email deluge to think of one.
We

12 Responses to “flow and the new dimension”

  1. i had been thin­king about infor­ma­tion buli­mia at the cor­po­rate level, but I guess it is just as rele­vant to the indi­vi­dual
    I call it “infor­ma­tion buli­mia”, a disor­der com­mon amongst infor­ma­tion inter­me­dia­ries, cha­rac­te­ri­zed by epi­so­dic binge data collec­tion follo­wed by uncon­tro­lla­ble vomi­ting and pur­ging, lea­ding to infor­ma­tion lea­kage and theft.”

  2. hugh macleod says:

    “Infor­ma­tion Bulu­mia”. HA!!!! Good one.

  3. My thoughts have been more about “orga­ni­za­tion ano­re­xia” as a result of obses­sive cost con­trol as a repla­ce­ment for flow/throughput mana­ge­ment. More at http://www.focusedperformance.com/2005_08_01_blarch.html#112445463524783762

  4. hugh macleod says:

    Wow. Both are very cool links. Thanks Guys =)

  5. Stace says:

    Reminds me of the Metaphy­sics of Whi­tehead (http://www.hyattcarter.com/whitehead’s_metaphysics.htm) — In a sum­mary barely reca­lled from my under­grad dyas, big pic­ture thin­king is nec. to unders­tand what is per­ti­nent to our unders­tan­ding of the/a universe.

  6. sig says:

    Bill, inte­res­ting link!
    Liked the “He wants to move beyond space — to time. David Gelern­ter is loo­king for his pipe.” :)
    But what hap­pe­ned to the “Lifes­treams” pro­ject? Last I found was an update from 2000…

  7. rele­vancy

    Link to Fred Wil­son via Hugh, but I quote: We’ve lar­gely sol­ved the ‘auto­mate and pro­cess’ pro­blems. But we haven’t begun to scratch the sur­face of the rele­vancy pro­blem. This is abso­lou­tely right. If anything is going to keep me…

  8. Jon Husband says:

    *Func­tio­ning effec­ti­vely in the flow* has been a regu­lar topic of dis­cus­sion amongst me and my collea­gues for a cou­ple of years now … we’d best all get used to adap­ting as best we can.
    It’s a huge issue … we’ve got a cen­tury of men­tal models and struc­ture in all of our impor­tant (or should I say omni­pre­sent ?) ins­ti­tu­tions that have socia­li­zed us into thin­king things are *sta­tic*, and that the next change .. in stra­tegy, or a re-structuring, or a policy or pro­gram .. will *get it right* THIS TIME. ;-)

  9. Jon Husband says:

    And .. as David Wein­ber­ger said not too long ago ..
    “The cure for infor­ma­tion over­load is (para­do­xi­cally) … more information”

  10. Bill de hOra says:

    The Lifes­treams model is very beau­ti­ful.
    On the down­side, the com­pany that tried to bring this idea to mar­ket, Sco­pe­ware, didn’t make it. It was a desk­top client that visually expres­sed the time stream metaphor in 2.5D which I don’t think works, aside from the fact it’s hard to get pene­tra­tion via rich clients. Also, in the way many great ideas fail, it fai­led because it was too dif­fe­rent from what exis­ted. IMO search­bo­xes and tag­ging get it right by buil­ding on exis­ting metaphors rather than sup­plan­ting them.
    I think another David is where to look now if you’re inte­res­ted in data streams, namely David Allen. His GTD work­flow seems to appeal *enor­mously* to soft­ware types (that or soft­ware types have recently figu­red they need to get their act together just like ever­yone else does ;) . Even­tually some hac­ker with an ounce of taste will pro­duce a killer work­flow app on top of todo-lists/calendars (they all suck), and I bet it will look like GTD.
    What lifes­treams did for me per­so­nally was get me to to give up on clas­sif­ying my digi­tal stuff into dif­fe­rent buc­kets — it doesn’t help much later on. Now I only sort infor­ma­tion where search is ina­de­quate (like in email). It’s great that Goo­gle are tac­kling all the world’s infor­ma­tion, but I have a ton of stuff right here already. I could really do with a Goo­gle mini­box that fits on a USB key.

  11. More pri­vacy legi­sa­tion: why I like the new HDS blog

    It takes cojo­nes to cri­ti­cize a poten­tial cus­to­mer in public. Its one thing for a blog­ger, or industry analyst to do so, but quite another for a senior exe­cu­tive enter­prise IT sup­plier to make the per­so­nal so political… Criticise a competit…