August 9, 2005

the ignorance premium (cont.)

zzzzazzdggg13.jpg
Good point from Doc Searls:

As a cus­to­mer, I want to pre­sent myself to a mar­ket­place and have pro­vi­ders there com­pete for my busi­ness. I want to say to the mar­ket­place (and not just to an inter­me­diary like Orbitz or Tra­ve­lo­city) “I’m loo­king for a nons­mo­king hotel room with high speed Inter­net ser­vice in down­town Atlanta from Sep­tem­ber 3rd to 5th. Who’s got that?” … and have something hap­pen.
If we want to make the con­ver­sa­tion a bit more nuan­ced, I’d like to say what I’m willing to pay and what fre­quent slee­per (or flyer or dri­ver) mem­bership clubs I belong to. And that’s all before revea­ling exactly who I am.
Why is this pie still so damn high in the sky? 

Why, Doc? Sim­ple. It’s called the “Igno­rance Pre­mium”.

With the Igno­rance Pre­mium, you’re paying extra for not kno­wing. Ins­tead of MICRO know­ledge, your basing your choice on the coo­ler, hip­per MACRO Brand Metaphor. Bran­ding is all about about being cool and hip, because bran­ding is all about prop­ping up the Igno­rance Premium.

The less you know, the more they can charge you. So it’s in their inte­rest to keep you in the dark as much as possible.

9 Responses to “the ignorance premium (cont.)”

  1. Gary Potter says:

    If it’s busi­ness as usual, the igno­rance pre­mium pro­bably applies. I think the first to address Doc’s rant will have a huge advan­tage, regard­less of the ver­ti­cal they ope­rate in. Tra­vel is perfect.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    I totally con­cur, Gary.

  3. Howard Mann says:

    Is that not the model for Priceline.com from 5 years ago until…now?
    It met with a fair amount of suc­cess and still has a loyal follo­wing.
    Not so pie in the sky.
    A vic­tim of the .com bubble..although one that sur­vi­ved. Ulti­ma­tely, they have stradd­led the fence to com­pete with the rest of the flock in regu­lar online tra­vel service.

  4. ark says:

    Well that’s sort of the model Howard although out of neces­sity they now offer a more tra­di­tio­nal retail path as well.
    Doc did men­tion naming your price but really most of what he is loo­king for isn’t avai­la­ble at pri­ce­line either. Which is to say a con­su­mer expe­rience that is radi­cally sha­ped by the needs of the con­su­mer. For ins­tance, you can’t pick from a list of must have fea­tu­res like his Inter­net access exam­ple before naming your price.
    At least you can’t now. I can’t speak to what the site was like in the early years.

  5. frosty says:

    Not sure what Howard’s trying to say, but Priceline’s busi­ness model was/is taking advan­tage of con­su­mer dis­so­nance, spe­ci­fi­cally the com­mon and inco­rrect belief that the cus­to­mer has an advan­tage when he names his price.
    I think what Doc’s tal­king about is more the idea of broad­cas­ting your­self as a cus­to­mer and get­ting very spe­ci­fic offers, with more trans­pa­rency and more spe­ci­fi­city.
    I’m in the throes of trying to book a tran­sat­lan­tic flight right now, and once again I see what a mess the whole sys­tem is. Talk about fai­ling to ful­fill the poten­tial of the inter­net!
    With the air­li­nes, there’s the pro­blem of opa­que price struc­tu­res. Outside the chea­pies it’s still nor­mal to charge four times as much for one-way as for round-trip. And the free sto­po­ver in Paris which I *know* I can get at the tra­vel agent is una­vai­la­ble on the Air­France site (which is a night­mare among night­ma­res any­way). So for the big air carriers, I think the stum­bling block is their anti­qua­ted, customer-hating men­ta­lity.
    With things like hotels, where there’s a lot more com­pe­ti­tion and a lot more small pla­yers, I think it’s a very sol­va­ble pro­blem. The pro­blem there is get­ting a *lot* of pro­prie­tors who are only mar­gi­nally aware of the Inter­net to pro­vide relia­ble real-time data. But at least there, I think most peo­ple at least want it to work bet­ter, whe­reas the air­li­nes really don’t want any honest com­pa­ri­son shop­ping going on.
    The first per­son to really crack this nut will make it big, that’s for sure. But it’s har­der than it looks. Where you already have a lot of ready data, you have strong resis­tance to trans­pa­rency. And where you have open­ness to trans­pa­rency, you have a beau­ti­fully “long tail” with very little techi­cal know-how.

  6. frosty says:

    As long as I’m in pala­ver mode…
    Link with some basic info on the Pri­ce­line issue, though I honestly have no idea whether they still work this way:
    http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/Articles/TheStandard/priceline.html
    One com­pany that’s trying to do searcha­ble tra­vel aggre­ga­tes, though as far as I can tell the air­li­nes (only thing I tried) are thro­wing in a lot of FUD:
    http://www.kayak.com/
    I know a lot of peo­ple in the res­tau­rant biz and a few in the hotel/B+B biz, and unfor­tu­na­tely very few of them intui­ti­vely “get” the advan­tage of the kind of search Doc wants. (Yes, I’ve evan­ge­li­zed…) But I stand by my point that with most of the hos­pi­ta­lity industry the hurdle is hand-holding and edu­ca­ting, not so much con­cep­tual.
    OK, I’ll shut up now. Blame the Medina wine (Serbo-Hungarian, not Saudi). ;-)

  7. frosty says:

    Hmm, bro­ken com­ments thin­gee again… strange bug… Mena says Hugh must define a Template…

  8. frosty says:

    OK, here’s the error mes­sage:
    An error occu­rred:
    You must define a Com­ment Pen­ding tem­plate.
    Giving up on my follow-up, but anyone who wants refe­rence links for the pala­ver above can con­tact me via my blog. Ah, software…

  9. Nia says:

    In an attempt to des­troy the igno­rance pre­mium, at least locally, I finally made up my mind: the belly­dance blog in Spa­nish is up and run­ning and it’s all your fault.