August 8, 2005

adrants


Regu­lar rea­ders will have pro­bably spot­ted my Adrants ad on my side­bar by now.
Steve Hall’s Adrants and I have been tra­ding ads for a while now. His ad on my blog, my ad on his.
Adrants is a great read. Deals with all the quir­kier [read: des­pe­rate] stuff being chur­ned out by the agen­cies. What’s even more impres­sive is Steve seems to have tur­ned the blog into a suc­cess­ful ad reve­nue gene­ra­tor for him­self. Very cool.
As far as I can tell, Adrants dri­ves over 300 peo­ple a week to gaping­void. In total, that makes over 30 thou­sand peo­ple so far.
Of course, com­pa­red to how many peo­ple a TV spot can reach, it’s a drop in the ocean. But when you’re just trying to tar­get adver­ti­sing peo­ple in a mea­ning­ful way, 30K is a hell of a lot.
Now as a result, my blog is pretty well-known in adland. Sure, it took a while. A few hun­dred every week. But after a while, it added up.
So here’s what I think my fellow blog­gers should start doing more often: Find the coo­lest blog in the industry you’re in, and see if you can’t make a deal with the owner.
Hey, it wor­ked for me.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

9 Responses to “adrants”

  1. How about if you are one of the coo­lest blogs, would you go about and allow some min­now to have an ad on your site? Would you wait for them to seek you out or go and stick up an ad for them on your own bat?
    At the moment you only have an ad for Adrants. How about pic­king some small fry and stic­king an ad for them under the Adrants one? Maybe let your rea­ders decide since they already pro­vide a wealth of infor­ma­tion on this site in the form of com­ments. I’m not brown-nosing Hugh but you have weight in the blog­gersphere now and could help out someone who deser­ves to be seen.
    Same goes for other “A-Listers”, if they all pic­ked someone small and had a free ad for them in a pro­mi­nent loca­tion for two months it would grow the other site and grow the ove­rall com­mu­nity. We all want more qua­lity in this place.
    *Hippy rant over*

  2. Loving Hugh is easy cos…

    Today seems to be a Hugh Mac­leod love-in on this blog, as for the second post in a row I link to him. Today Hugh sug­gests Find the coo­lest blog in the industry you’re in, and see if you can’t…

  3. richard says:

    I’m with the hip­pie on that on… all the big boys should pick a hand­ful of “pro­ject blogs” to pimp.
    On that note, if you have a dog that needs wal­king, Hugh; I’d do that in exchan­ges for an ad. :)

  4. Jack says:

    A while back Halley (http://halleyscomment.blogspot.com/) cam­paig­ned for the A-Listers in her cor­ner of the blo­gosphere to link to new voi­ces. I think it’s a great idea to link to the sma­ller pla­yers.
    The pro­blem isn’t lin­king, it’s lin­king to “someone who deser­ves to be seen”. The rea­son we can’t find the someone like that is because there’s too much noise out there, how much bet­ter would an A-Lister be at fin­ding that someone?

  5. frosty says:

    I love AdRants, and I doubt I ever would have found it if I hadn’t stum­bled upon Gaping Void first.
    And the pic­ture was the thing. I tune out the “Lin­kLube” sec­tion and all other “blo­grolls” out there. They’re good for Goo­gle Juice but I don’t think they have much more pur­pose.
    With the whole (lar­gely ridi­cu­lous IMO) “A-Lister” meme, I think most highly-trafficed peo­ple would at least con­si­der lin­king to your lower-traffic site if you link back and are genui­nely inte­res­ting to them. That sounds a bit like what Hugh may have done with AdRants ori­gi­nally.
    But gene­rally, I think your best bet is the high(er) road. Pro­vide great con­tent, pro­vide it free, and get your friends to link to you. Then your e-friends, etc etc. Country’ll grow.
    BTW, I lin­ked to Gaping­Void on my blog for a sim­ple rea­son having nothing to do with Goo­gle and such (with which Hugh’s fine now any­way) — my rea­son is that I really enjoy GV, and most of the peo­ple who read my blog (most of whom know me per­so­nally) would *never* find it otherwise.

  6. COD says:

    Coming soon, affir­ma­tive action for blog links. Hugh, by vir­ture of his popu­la­rity, will be legally requi­red to link to 3 unk­nown blogs per week.
    Hint — write something worth rea­ding, and the links will come.
    Also, it seems like blog­gers have lost pers­pec­tive rather quickly. If you’ve got 5 or 10 regu­lar rea­ders you are way ahead of 98% of the wri­ters that have ever written.

  7. RichW says:

    “Find the coo­lest blog in the industry you’re in, and see if you can’t make a deal with the owner.“
    What if you are the coo­lest blog in your industry and your industry still doesn’t give a rat’s ass?

  8. hugh macleod says:

    Find a new industry ;-)

  9. World­views, Trade Shows and Blogs

    Peter Jen­nings dying of lung can­cer just chan­ged my world­view on smo­king. While I’ve quit before, I now really sense the urgency more than ever and am trying to do something about it. Why Peter Jen­nings? Because he was 67