August 4, 2005

film blogging

zzzzsteak03.jpg
Con­gra­tu­la­tions to Gia for lan­ding the film blog­ger job. And it’s a pro­per Holly­wood movie, not some local indie thing.
Fun­nily enough, I knew the pro­du­cer of the film (who also pro­du­ced “Trains­pot­ting” and “The Beach”) when I was a kid in Edin­burgh– I wrote about that in early 2004.
Also around the same time, I wrote something called “10 Rules for Pro­fes­sio­nal Movie Blog­ging”. Some of it still holds up; I espe­cially like Num­ber Seven:

7. Start early. To build awa­re­ness of the movie pro­perly needs at least least a year, pre­fe­rably two. It’s not about telling millions of peo­ple at once. You talk to a few thou­sand at a time. Let the word spread gra­dually. Give it time to seep into the Zeit­geist, like absinthe on a sugar cube.

Good news for Gia. Rock on.

6 Responses to “film blogging”

  1. gia says:

    Thanks so much, Hugh! xxxxx

  2. frosty says:

    Cool. Hugh’s Movie Blog­ging post is one of my all-time favo­ri­tes.
    Slightly scary though… I love Danny Boyle, but the synop­sis just makes me pray it’s a comedy:
    “Plot Out­line: A team of astro­nauts set out on a mis­sion to re-ignite a part of the dying sun. Another team was sent out before them, but was never heard from again.”
    Hmm… nuc­lear bombs… aste­roids…
    Seriously though, con­gra­tu­la­tions Gia.
    I hope this works so well that blog-like movie pro­mo­tion per­ma­nently dis­pla­ces all those ten-gigabyte Flash mons­ters ram­pa­ging on the Hollyweb.

  3. Jack Yan says:

    Two years sound rea­so­na­ble. For about half a year, I’ve been tal­king about one film in which Lucire might appear, called Two for the Money, and it still hasn’t see­ped in to the Zeit­geist yet. Still hope the movie does well but it may get one of those more boring Holly­wood pushes. And in 2005, I’m not totally con­vin­ced that it works. I really would rather down­load a trai­ler myself, given an incen­tive to do so. Wor­ked for King Kong, and that was tal­ked about and blog­ged for years. (Go back to 1999 and someone uploa­ded an early script.)

  4. frosty says:

    I don’t think anyone wants to do away with trai­ler down­loads. If anything, more and bet­ter trai­lers is the trend (think Pixar).
    The great thing about the blog­ging angle is it gives the audience more of the inside/back story. Film is gla­mo­rous, even in its drud­gery. I don’t really care whether Brad and Angie hook up, but I’d defi­ni­tely go look at their phone-cam shots of pro­duc­tion. And I’d *really* like to see infor­mal thoughts from the direc­tor and cine­ma­to­grapher.
    With this you can keep peo­ple coming back to the site, keep them inte­res­ted, get them tal­king about the movie. If the movie doesn’t suck (howe­ver you want to define that) then it will surely help.
    Also, the bud­get for this type of thing is *negli­gi­ble* in the world of even serious indies, let alone Holly­wood num­bers. Whe­ne­ver I think about it I won­der how the film busi­ness can be so clue­less about the whole topic… but once in a while I talk to some ran­dom alien from Holly­wood and am remin­ded what a dif­fe­rent world they live in.
    Any­way, yeah, defi­ni­tely trai­lers. And defi­ni­tely blogs. And please OH GOD PLEASE no Flash simu­la­tion of the explo­ding sun!

  5. Blogspotting says:

    Who Would have thunk it: Pro­fes­sio­nal Film Blogger

    Gaping­void wri­tes a pro­fes­sio­nal film blog­ging job, which sounds really great. Are there other uni­que blog­ging jobs out there?

  6. gia says:

    Frosty, it’s writ­ten by Alex Gar­land and direc­ted by Danny Boyle… it wouldn’t be pos­si­ble to be anything *like* Deep Impact :) Thank fuck it’s not direc­ted by Michael Bay…