Archive for July, 2005

July 31, 2005

this the new advertising

zzznmkjh03.jpg
Here’s a per­so­nal exam­ple of why I like blogs so much. My busi­ness part­ner, Tho­mas Mahon, is one of the best tai­lors in the world. We sell suits around the $4000 mark (and we con­si­der that cheap).
In a recent post, he wrote:

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. For the money, the Bri­tish high street retai­ler, Marks & Spencer’s makes as good a suit as anyone. I rate them highly.

M&S suits cost about one tenth of ours. They’re like the Bri­tish equi­va­lent of Sears or JC Penny. Natu­rally, not ever­yone who reads his blog has a spare four grand to blow on a suit, so he was giving some advice about what to look for at a more modest bud­get.
Could you ima­gine a simi­lar piece of good, solid infor­ma­tion appea­ring in an ad for Armani or Brook’s Brother’s?
Of course not.
This the new adver­ti­sing. A world where dino­saurs­peak has nowhere to live com­for­tably.
Of course, not every­body wants to live in this new world of ours. When Tom and I launched English Cut back in January, we sent the link to a fashion jour­na­list that he knew well. The jour­na­list wrote back, saying (A) he hated the con­cept and (B) he didn’t think it was going to work.
I love watching the gate­kee­pers get­ting it wrong.
[UPDATE:] Another nail in the cof­fin of dino­saurs­peak: “Stormhoek, Kit­tens and Gay Live Aid Per­for­mers”. Thanks, Gia.
Again, can you ima­gine the words “Kit­tens and Gay Live Aid Per­for­mers” appea­ring in a Jacob’s Creek wine com­mer­cial? Again, of course not.

July 30, 2005

if you care about blogging

zzzzazzdggg47.jpg
If you care about blog­ging, please go read this.
Hell, even if you don’t “care” about blog­ging that much; even if blog­ging is only mode­ra­tely inte­res­ting to you, seriously, just go read it.
Yes. This is huge.

July 29, 2005

welcome to the future of advertising: selling wine by talking about drm

yyyyyyy765063.jpg
Gia got her Stormhoek wine today, and made a few points about DRM (Digi­tal Rights Management):

It’s Offi­cial: TV Sucks… Drink Blog­gers’ Wine Ins­tead
Please, Bri­tish Tele­vi­sion, don’t implode like the Music Industry and defi­ni­tely, most defi­ni­tely, don’t start calling ME a ‘pirate’ in the way the Film Industry does because I copy films to my hard­drive for my son to watch on the train… Last time I was in Block­bus­ters their TV channel-thingy star­ted tal­king about how “Video Pira­tes” were “invol­ved in drug and human traf­fic­king”… ????… Really? Me? Almost ever­yone I know who regu­larly copies DVDs? We are all invol­ved in drug or human traf­fic­king?? Piss off! … and the ‘Oh, no, we’re not tal­king about you we’re tal­king about the bad guys who do it, you know, the… (hushed voice) Asians’ argu­ment just won’t cut it. Unless there is a legal num­ber of times one can copy a DVD for per­so­nal use, then I’m afraid that, legally, I am tarred with the same ‘Sup­ports Human Traf­fic­king’ brush. And, you know, that really pis­ses me off.

It’s very sim­ple. When a cor­po­rate sch­moe reaches a cer­tain age and posi­tion within society, the thought of calling tee­na­gers or sin­gle mothers “cri­mi­nals” is far less daun­ting to him than the pros­pect of having have to change his tired ol’ busi­ness model.
When you spend twenty-plus years get­ting to the top of the pyra­mid, the last, last, last thing you want to hear is that nobody wants your pyra­mid any­more. Espe­cially if that’s the only pyra­mid you’ve got. So you lash out.
But cul­tu­ral entrench­ment isn’t just the domain of “the evil mana­gers”. The guys with the black turt­le­necks and iPods are fee­ling the same pain, as any wan­der around Soho on a week­day will con­firm.
[NB:] Wel­come to the future of adver­ti­sing: Selling wine by tal­king about DRM. Heh.
[DRM RELATED:] From Suw Char­man: “I will create a stan­ding order of 5 pounds per month to sup­port an orga­ni­sa­tion that will cam­paign for digi­tal rights in the UK but only if 1000 other peo­ple will too.”

the clown suit rule (cont.)

Another rea­son why The Head Lemur remains one of my favo­rite blogs.

if you can express

zzzzzz7654259.jpg
[LINK:] More thoughts on the sub­ject from Evelyn Rodriguez.

make poverty

zzzzzz7654258.jpg
(rela­ted link)

July 28, 2005

learning a lot about your market

zzzbambam04.jpg
Inci­sive thought from James Cher­koff:

I have just recei­ved a bottle of Stormhoek wine — all part of Gapingvoid’s wine blog­ging cam­paign. It’s real modern mar­ke­ting — albeit at a micro-level. Will it inc­rease sales? Who knows. Will they learn a lot about their mar­ket? Definitely.

“Lear­ning a lot about their mar­ket” is EXACTLY what mar­ke­ting should be.
To hell with “selling”. This is about something far more interesting.

hugh needs a date

zzzzaxxxx07.jpg
There’s a Lon­don Geek Din­ner for Girls on the 16th August. Visit the wiki and sign up.
Sounds like a fun eve­ning. Guys are allo­wed to attend, but only if one of the girls invi­tes them first.
[SFX:] Foot tapping…

tag pimping

Even if your heart is in the right place, Chris, trying to tell other peo­ple what tag to use kinda sorta defeats the pur­pose, don’tcha think?
Tags, not trees. Right, Sig?

July 27, 2005

the stormhoek wiki page

zzzzazzdfff11.jpg
Calling All Bri­tish Blog­gers:
If you par­ti­ci­pa­ted in the recent Stormhoek “Blogger’s Wine Free­bie”, if you could list any blog posts you might have pos­ted about it on the Stormhoek wiki page, I would really aprre­ciate it. Thanks.
Saves me having to do it later…

July 26, 2005

an open-source “craigslist” for bloggers

xxx01.jpg
PART ONE:
Megan McArdle, one of my favo­rite blog­gers told me recently that she got both her job and her boy­friend through blog­ging, which is a very cool story.
But I’m loo­king for­ward to the day when that kind of story gets a lot more com­mon, and not just with blog­gers with rela­ti­vely high traf­fic, like Megan or myself.
And I’d also like to see blog­gers not having to rely on their sto­ries being pin­ged by “A-Listers”, in order for the word to spread suf­fi­ciently.
Here’s where I think a lot of blog­gers would like to be:

1. Let’s say you nee­ded a job. So you post a “loo­king for work” post on your blog, and within days another blog­ger e-mails you and offers you an inter­view.
2. Or let’s say you wan­ted to hire some­body for your busi­ness. So you’d post something on your blog, and some other blog­gers would e-mail you, and the next thing you know you’d have a few inter­views set up.
3. You’re moving to a new town. So you blog about it, and the next thing you know a cou­ple of blog­gers from that town with apart­ments to rent send you some details.
4. Your girl­friend and you broke up a few months ago and you’re loo­king to date again. So you blog about it and the next thing you know a woman blog­ger e-mails you, and you two go meet up for cof­fee the follo­wing week.
5. You’re loo­king to buy a car. So you blog about it and the next thing you know a blog­ger loo­king to sell his 1999 Honda sends you an e-mail.
6. You’ve got a nice little free­lance busi­ness which you regu­larly talk about on your blog. Once a month or so a blog­ger e-mails you, offe­ring you good, solid work…

We’d like to be able to be more reliant on the blogger’s mar­ket, and less reliant on other mar­kets.
Because the blo­gosphere is a mar­ket that blog­gers are com­for­ta­ble with. And com­pa­red to dea­ling with the blo­gosphere (when it works), most other mar­kets are anony­mous and unplea­sant.
PART TWO:
So what is the ans­wer? How does an ave­rage blog­ger, someone who doesn’t have a lot of rea­ders, make it hap­pen?
I was very plea­sed with what hap­pend on the “Blog Desig­ners Wan­ted” wiki page. I jut put up a sim­ple, blank page on the wiki, and within 24 hours, about as com­prehen­sive a list of good blog desig­ners as you can find anywhere sud­denly self-created, as if by magic.
But blog­gers need more than just blog desig­ners. We need all sorts: jobs, wor­kers, fur­ni­ture, love, sex, friendship, apart­ments, busi­ness oppor­tu­ni­ties, the infor­ma­tion is end­less.
But what we also need, when we scat­ter our pollen, is a place where our pollen can be seen easily by others. Just scat­te­ring it everywhere is no gua­ran­tee it will land where you want.
Ergo, “The Hugh­page”. An Open-Source “Craigs­list” for Blog­gers:

This wiki is desig­ned to give blog­gers a place where they can cen­trally collate their links for wha­te­ver rea­son: Work, jobs, love, sex, net­wor­king, friendship, apart­ments, fur­ni­ture, cars, arran­ging geek din­ners etc etc. Go ahead and build, design, improve and con­tri­bute to it as you see fit, in wha­te­ver man­ner works best for you. I’ll pay for the band­width. –Hugh MacLeod

The Hugh­page wiki is up and at your dis­po­sal.
Just blog­ged that you’re loo­king for a job? Then go put the link in the jobs sec­tion.
Just blog­ged that you’re loo­king for a date? Then go put your link in the dating sec­tion.
Just blog­ged about nee­ding an apart­ment? The real estate sec­tion.
Just blog­ged about something that doesn’t have a sec­tion? Then create a new sec­tion by your­self. No need to ask first. Exactly.
Feel free to go crazy. Thanks. [NB: You might want to go check out the Blog Designer’s page just to give you an idea of how it gene­rally works etc.]
[NOTE TO SELF:] This is either a totally great idea or a totally insane idea. Maybe a bit of both etc.

microsoft. stop. being. bland.

zzzzzz7654223.jpg
Sorry Robert, I don’t much care for “Win­dows Vista”, either.
It’s the kind of name Dis­ney would come up with. Or Gene­ral Motors.
It. Is. Bland.
Mic­ro­soft. Stop. Being. Bland.
Now all you need is some uninspired-but-really-expensive Madi­son Ave­nue ad cam­paign (e.g. “What do you want your Vista to see?”) just to seal the deal. With an RSS-free, Flash-intro fake blog desig­ned by a hot­new­yorkc­rea­ti­veshop. Rock on.

July 25, 2005

british advertising continues to die (hurrah)

zzzzazzdggg14.jpg
Piers Faw­kes, a Brit living in New York, is unim­pres­sed with the Lon­don adver­ti­sing scene:

There are a few folk in the UK who are very switched on, I grant you, but a lot of agency peo­ple I met in my short visit were rather bemu­sed by PSFK and IF. Although blogs are cham­pio­ned by the Guar­dian news­pa­per — an impor­tant media read — the Bri­tish mar­ke­ting com­mu­nity seems to be dis­mis­sive of the new tools to deve­lop dia­log bet­ween brands and con­su­mers.
The con­trast with New York, where I am based, is vast. Agen­cies in New York get it — they may not be making the best attempts but they’re trying hard. It’s best to crash and burn than not not try at all, no? The buzz around new media tools is exem­pli­fied by the social net­wor­king going on here. Meanwhile in Lon­don, there seems to be an air of “well, we make the most crea­tive adver­ti­sing in the world, why should we lis­ten to what’s going on anywhere else.” Ever­yone in Soho seems to be still in the pub tal­king about the next com­mer­cials director.

I know it’s fun han­ging out in Soho and shoo­ting trendy com­mer­cials and what­not, but in terms where busi­ness is evol­ving on a glo­bal level, the Bri­tish adver­ti­sing scene has evol­ved into a com­plete irre­le­vance.
How did this hap­pen? Here’s one idea: Soho is a trendy neigh­borhood in Lon­don (like the “SoHo” in New York). Now here’s the thing– Soho is where the Lon­don ad com­mu­nity is tra­di­tio­nally based, fair enough.
Hey, guess what else is in Soho? That’s right, War­dour Street. What’s War­dour Street? That’s right, the tra­di­tio­nal cen­ter of the Bri­tish Film industry.
The Bri­tish adver­ti­sing industry and the Bri­tish film industry have always had a clo­ser day-to-day rela­tionship with each other than the Ame­ri­can equi­va­lents (Madi­son Ave­nue and Holly­wood are thou­sands of miles apart, after all).
The Bri­tish adver­ti­sing scene sees itself more as an exten­sion of the Film-TV-Entertainment industry, than they see them­sel­ves an exten­sions of their clients’ busi­ness.
Big. Mistake.

open-source hughtrain

zzzzazzdggg86.jpg
I’ve put the entire Hugh­train on the wiki.
If you can improve on it, feel free to do so. Thanks.

more stormhoek blog reviews

yyyyyyy765061.jpg
Thanks, Nick:

Being more of a drin­ker (ahem) than a con­nois­seur I can’t claim to give the this wine a fair hea­ring but within my narrow terms of refe­rence it went down a treat. The one word that does spring to mind is refreshing. What can I say? Give it a try.

And Ray Booy­sen pipes in:

The wine is an abso­lute win­ner. It has a won­der­ful crisp taste and went down very well. If only I had some more! It is a per­fect wine for par­ties and would go inc­re­dibly well with any sort of sea-food.
The only

July 24, 2005

open tags vs closed tags

zzzzazzdggg46.jpg
Good stuff from Stowe Boyd. Open tags vs clo­sed tags.
Jeff Jar­vis has a new blog design. Much bet­ter. When peo­ple new to blog­ging ask me who to read, I always sug­gest Jeff. Always. Very little hap­pens worth noting in the blo­gosphere without Jeff spot­ting it soo­ner than most.

blog designers wanted

zzzzazzdggg09.jpg
Alis­tair Shrimp­ton of Six Apart and myself are trying to assem­ble a cen­tral data­base of folk who build blogs, wikis, web­si­tes etc on a pro­fes­sio­nal basis. Please go check out the wiki and feel free to add your name (or the name of a recom­men­da­tion) to the list.
Peo­ple are always asking the both of us, “Where can I find a good blog desig­ner?” We thought it was time to come up with an easy-to-use solu­tion that any­body on the pla­net could make good use of.
If you know anyone who qua­li­fies, please spread the word. Thanks.
[BONUS LINK:] A photo of London-based uber­blog­ger Gia Mili­no­vich wea­ring one of my t-shirts yes­ter­day at Open Tech.

survival

zzzzzz7654257.jpg

seth on publishing books

zzzzwdbhu01.jpg
Seth Godin gives advice to peo­ple wan­ting to publish non-fiction books:

4. Books cost money and require the user to read them for the idea to spread.
Obvious, sure, but real pro­blems. Real pro­blems because the cost of a book intro­du­ces fric­tion to your idea. It makes the idea spread much much more slowly than an online meme because in order for it to spread, someone has to buy it. Add to that the gro­wing (and sad) fact that peo­ple hate to read. Too often, peo­ple have told me, with pride, that they read three chap­ters of my book. Just three.

A suc­cess­ful book agent I know tells me that at leat half the peo­ple he meets who are wri­ting their first book, are doing so not because they have anything par­ti­cu­larly inte­res­ting to say, but because the idea of “the writer’s life” appeals to them.
Tweed jac­kets, smo­king a pipe, sit­ting out in the gazebo and get­ting sloshed on Mint Julips, pen­si­vely typing away at an old black Reming­ton. Ban­te­ring wit­tily at all the right par­ties. Or wha­te­ver.
Any­body who wants to write books for the money deser­ves to suf­fer. And hap­pily, many of them do.

July 23, 2005

a good product

zzzzzz7654256.jpg
[NB: This is one of the car­toons in the Stormhoek brochure. Thanks to Geoff for the pic.]
[UPDATE:] The first Blogger’s Stormhoek review is in. The link is here.

The moment of truth is upon us though, how was it for us (I let my wife have some too. Gene­rous I thought!) — Jane desc­ri­bed it thus:

It was very fresh and sharp fla­vour. Very drin­ka­ble, and I think I need another glass to check my appre­cia­tion.
[Said while insis­ting I get her another glass]

For myself I would tend to agree, very dry, fresh and crisp. Lovely.
I am oft to pour another glass and see whether I can order some more…
Thanks Hugh and if you want to do the sam­ple thing again, I live in Europe and North America.

Thanks Paul, that was very kind. As far as further UK sam­plings are con­cer­ned, there’s a new Stormhoek Ros

July 22, 2005

where is the edge?

yyyyyyy765059.jpg
Kudos to Peter Cop­per for pos­ting pic­tu­res of the Stormhoek Wine Free­bie brochure that came with the bottle.
So the Brit blog­gers are get­ting their wine. Our next step is to roll the idea out to both the Uni­ted Sta­tes and Wes­tern Europe. We’re loo­king into the logi­si­tics now (ship­ping costs, lega­li­ties etc.). I’ll keep you pos­ted.
Like I said in the brochure copy:

Of course I can’t do it by myself. I need your com­pli­city if it’s going to work. No com­pli­city, no idea-virus. I can’t just write a big media com­pany a che­que and make the mar­ke­ting pro­blem go away. Those days are gone.
What do you get out of it? A free bottle of wine and a chance to play a part in scre­wing up the tra­di­tio­nal mar­ke­ting and adver­ti­sing lands­cape fore­ver. A chance to see how far we can stretch the power of the blogosphere.

The inter­net and the blo­gosphere pro­ved years ago that you don’t need to hire an ad agency or Big Media to mass mar­ket digi­tal and digital-related pro­ducts. But what about non-digital?
What is actually pos­si­ble? Where is the edge?
Shall we find out?
[Atten­tion Bri­tish Shop­pers:] btw Stormhoek is currently avai­la­ble at Thresher’s, Sainsbury’s and ASDA.
[Yes, it’s true:] We’re going to be brin­ging Stormhoek to Our Social World in September.

more bloggie goodness

yyyyyyy765058.jpg
Nick Rey­nolds got his bottle of Stormhoek in the mail today:

I’ll get back to you when I’ve drunk the stuff but I can tell you that I haven’t been this exci­ted about tas­ting a new bottle of wine in quite a while.

Mar­ke­ting Dis­rup­tion etc.
[Some more lin­klove here etc.] Yes, James H. Tur­ner, we are indeed loo­king into launching the idea-virus in the Sta­tes. Watch this space etc.
[PS:] Does anyone have a photo of the brochure that came with the bottle? If so, could you pos­sibly e-mail it to me or send me the link? Thanks.
[PHOTO:] Cool pic of bottle & brochure here. Thanks, Woffle.

“wine blogging as marketing disruption”

BAR stormhoek2.jpg
Paul Goo­di­son notes his Stormhoek Wine Free­bie has arri­ved:

And follo­wing Hugh’s pro­mise of sam­ples I can con­firm today that I have a very exci­ting loo­king bottle sat besi­des me. I got bottle 24 of 75 — unfor­tu­na­tely not really a collec­tors item as the Stormhoek pro­mise is about fresh­ness and drin­king the wine at the peak of its fresh­ness (i.e. rela­ti­vely soon!) The inser­ted lea­flet from Hugh entit­led “Wine Blog­ging as Mar­ke­ting Dis­rup­tion” howe­ver could well enter that cate­gory :)
Any­way thanks to Hugh, Orbi­tal Wines and Stormhoek — will report back on how I found the wine, because I am of course a per­son whose wine recom­men­da­tions you trust… aren’t I? What do you mean, ‘No!’?

The lea­flet Paul speaks of reads like this:

“Wine Blog­ging as Mar­ke­ting Dis­rup­tion”
Hiya,
Thanks for sig­ning up for your free bottle of Stormhoek. I hope you like it.
OK, so what’s the point of all this? Sure, I sup­pose giving out a few bott­les to some blog­gers could poten­tially be quite good PR, etc etc. Maybe a few of you will blog about it. Maybe not. You never know.
But in the back of my mind I’m thin­king there might be something lar­ger going on here.
What if, say, not one or two of you end up blog­ging about it, but a cou­ple of dozen? What will be the rip­pling effect?
Will the idea-virus spread far enough that sud­denly, ins­tead of one or two peo­ple kno­wing about the wine, sud­denly tens of thou­sands of smart con­nec­ted peo­ple in the UK know about it, and are tal­king about it?
Is that enough to launch a natio­nal brand?
If it isn’t, well, no great loss. We will have got­ten some PR out of it, and maybe a few long-term Stormhoek cus­to­mers out of the blo­gosphere.
But if it is, then I’m thin­king, Holy Shit, what we’re doing might put a lot of tra­di­tio­nal ad agen­cies out of busi­ness. Seriously.
We’re tal­king serious mar­ke­ting dis­rup­tion.
But as a mar­ke­ting blog­ger, I’m star­ting to believe that all mar­ke­ting should be serious mar­ke­ting dis­rup­tion.
Of course I can’t do it by myself. I need your com­pli­city if it’s going to work. No com­pli­city, no idea-virus. I can’t just write a big media com­pany a che­que and make the mar­ke­ting pro­blem go away. Those days are gone.
What do you get out of it? A free bottle of wine and a chance to play a part in scre­wing up the tra­di­tio­nal mar­ke­ting and adver­ti­sing lands­cape fore­ver. A chance to see how far we can stretch the power of the blo­gosphere.
This is only an expe­ri­ment. Luc­kily we have a wine com­pany crazy enough to have let me talk them into it. So we’ll see what hap­pens. Rock on.
“FRESHNESS MATTERS.“
Those two words sum up the heart and soul of Stormhoek.
Con­trary to popu­lar belief, most wines do not improve with age. Sure, the great wines of Bor­deaux and the Bur­gun­dies often do, as do cer­tain others, but these are not the wines that most of us are buying most of the time.
A grape pic­ked straight off the vine is one of the freshest taste expe­rien­ces ima­gi­na­ble. It’s juicy, inten­sely fruity, often aro­ma­tic, and held in balance by a streak of zippy, bra­cing aci­dity. This abun­dant frui­ti­ness is something that wine­ma­kers, over the last three deca­des, have wor­ked hard to cap­ture and pre­serve in their wines.
30 years ago, most white wines were dull, lac­king in fruit, and low in alcohol. This was lar­gely the result of a gaping void (heh) bet­ween what vine­yard owners and wine­ries wanted

thanks, doc!

aaa12345999901.jpg
Doc Searls gives Thin­gamy a men­tion:

What mat­ters most is who is coming up with it. As usual with cool things that hap­pen natu­rally on the Web, it’s not the big ven­dors or other usual sus­pects. It’s indi­vi­duals, trying to make sense of the world.
Dollars, of course, will come later.

If you want to know more about Thin­gamy, Sig’s the guy to talk to etc.
[NOTE TO SELF:] How does this affect “The Porous Membrane”?

July 21, 2005

welcome to the flatlands

zzzzzz7654219.jpg
Robert Sco­ble says being lin­ked to by an A-Lister ain’t what it used to be.

Weather for­ces are cons­tantly wea­ring down the moun­tains. You can see these for­ces from a plane. Mount St. Helens is half blown away. Most of that mate­rial ended up in the flat­lands.
Same with traf­fic on the Web. The “big” sites like Slash­dot are losing traf­fic to the flat­lands. On Sun­day I got something like 15,000 visits from a front-page link on Slash­dot. I remem­ber when such a link used to be worth 40,000 to 100,000 visi­tors.
Where did that traf­fic go? My theory is that it’s sprea­ding out to the flat­lands.
So, how do you get noti­ced in a flat­lands world? Do something inte­res­ting and let your friends who blog know about it. Every link is a vote for whether or not your stuff is interesting.

Hell, it’s hard enough rea­ding ever­yone who deser­ves to be read, let alone lin­king to ever­yone who deser­ves to be lin­ked. I wish I had an ans­wer.
[BONUS LINK:] Jeremy Zawodny from Yahoo! asks, “Has blog­ging peaked?”

oh, fucking hell…

Another bomb blast in Lon­don. Not as serious as the last one, it seems.
Tom and I are in Cum­bria, so we’re fine.
More: “One per­son was inju­red at Warren Street. There were reports the inju­red per­son may have been hol­ding a ruck­sack con­tai­ning the detonator.”

global microbrands etc

hjsdert03.jpg
From Trend­watching: The Nou­veau Niche.

Con­su­mers are more indi­vi­dua­li­zed than ever, expec­ting every good, ser­vice and expe­rience to be addres­sing their uni­que and oh so impor­tant sel­ves. Gone are the tra­di­tio­nal demo­graphic seg­ments, the dis­tinct con­su­mer clas­ses: this is all about being MASTERS OF THE YOUNIVERSE. Gone too are the days when, as Busi­ness­Week so elo­quently put it; “the ideal was not merely to keep up with the Jone­ses, but to be the Jone­ses.” In a NOUVEAU NICHE world, where the demise of ins­ti­tu­tions and their sti­fling con­ven­tions has unloc­ked latent hyper indi­vi­dua­li­za­tion, where it is all about ‘me’ (for bet­ter or worse), where being spe­cial will lend con­su­mers sta­tus, to be mass is now every consumer’s night­mare. Wit­ness GRAVANITY, wit­ness MASSCLUSIVITY. Even the few mass objects of desire that still manage to unite large groups of con­su­mers — iPods, Nokia hand­sets, or the Mini Coo­per — are likely to be cus­to­mi­zed and per­so­na­li­zed the moment they leave the warehouse, web­site or store.
Con­su­mers are also more expe­rien­ced than ever. They expertly cut through the crap, ignore adver­ti­sing, and know which qua­lity and price levels are fair. They acti­vely hunt for the best of the best, [my ita­lics] and the best of the best is often NOT mass. (The only mass they’re willing to put up with is the stuff they don’t really care about and can get on the cheap at Aldi or Wal­Mart). As Chris Ander­son, author of the exce­llent Long Tail article points out, the only rea­son mass used to equal ‘hit’, had to do with the now out­da­ted per­cep­tion that if something sells well, it must cer­tainly be good.

Yep, I can relate. Last February (before English Cut had taken off) I wrote:

We have gone beyond the tip­ping point. We are not blog­ging because it’s cool or hip. It’s now mostly about sur­vi­val.
We have ente­red an age where anyone who wants to make a living above mini­mum wage will have to get used to the idea of buil­ding and owning their own “glo­bal mic­ro­brand”. If you’re not blog­ging already, I would start. Seriously.

Re. All this sort of stuff I like to write about– blogs, English Cut, The Hugh­train, Seth Godin and his Pur­ple Cow, the slow death of Madi­son Ave­nue and Big Media, The Clue­train, etc etc:
It’s all con­nec­ted. In the last week or so English Cut got e-mails from peo­ple wan­ting appoint­ments, from all over: Dubai, Japan, San Fran­cisco, Washing­ton, Atlanta, New York, India, etc.
It’s all about The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand. English Cut is my way of expres­sing it. But had it not been suits, had I not had a friend who was a Savile Row tai­lor, it would’ve been something else.

July 20, 2005

one very cool pillbox

yyyyyyy765056.jpg
It turns out that one of English Cut’s cus­to­mers also knows a hard­core dia­mond cutter/master jewe­ler, Paul Hat­ton.
Next thing you know, our cus­to­mer is telling Paul all about blogs and what­not.
Next thing you know, I get a phone call.
Next thing you know, I’m buil­ding yet another blog for a mas­ter English crafts­man.
Ladies and Gent­le­men, please go check out “Hard Dia­mond”.
Thank you.

July 19, 2005

tag-only blogware etc. etc.

zzzmkghilkj07.jpg
Sig’s got a new plaything for all you geeks out there:

Tags, not Trees
Take my new tree-structure-free gizmo out for a test drive:
What is it?
Wha­te­ver you want it to be: Navigation-free web­site. Tags-only blog. Complicated-to-simple data­base. Active resource pic­ker. Know­ledge and lear­ning base. File sys­tem. Wha­te­ver. An expe­ri­ment for the heck of it.
Basi­cally a dif­fe­rent approach to orga­nise data, fin­ding data, and trans­fe­rring know­ledge.
An exam­ple of no-tree-structure-at-all. Ana­ta­xo­nomy in practice…

NB: This gizmo has no com­mer­cial appli­ca­tion, or at least, it was built without a busi­ness model in mind. Like Sig says, he just built it for the heck of it.
What sayest thou?
[UPDATE:] Den­nis in Sig’s com­ment sec­tion refe­rred to it as “Blog + Wiki= Colla­bo­ra­tive Soft­ware v2.0″
[UPDATE:] Really good com­men­tary from Doc Searls: “Poli­ti­cally, tags are The People’s Direc­tory.“
[Disc­lo­sure: I work with Sig and his soft­ware com­pany, Thin­gamy.]

July 18, 2005

london geek dinner

Ben Met­calfe [backstage.bbc.co.uk] & Lee Wil­kins are wor­king together on get­ting none other than [drum roll, please] Jeremy Zawodny of Yahoo! to par­ti­ci­pate in a spe­cial Geek Din­ner.
Jeremy is here in Lon­don to speak at the Open Tech 2005 con­fe­rence which takes place on Satur­day July 23rd 2005.
I’m not invol­ved with orga­ni­sing this one. Lee’s a pal of mine, so I’m just sprea­ding the love etc.

update on missing person

image9865.jpg
On June 8th, the day after the Lon­don bom­bings, I got an e-mail which I imme­dia­tely pos­ted on gaping­void:

Hi Hugh
A colle­gue of mine is mis­sing after yesterday’s blasts. Her name is Monika Suchocka. She has blonde hair, blue eyes and is around 170cm (5.57 foot) tall. The last we heard from her was a text mes­sage saying she was get­ting on a bus.
If you could please post a link to my article on her or email some peo­ple in Lon­don, it would be most help­ful. We are really worried.
Thank you for your time.
http://www.rjb.za.net/archives/2005/07/08/missing-person-london/
Regards
Ray Booysen

I recei­ved the follo­wing e-mail just now:

Hi Hugh
We found out on Fri­day that Monika was a vic­tim of the bomb blast. She was on the Pica­dilly line train that was tar­ge­ted.
Thank you for your thoughts and help you gave.
Regards
Ray

Sad. Very, very sad.

the three ages of slavery

zzzzzz7654255.jpg

July 17, 2005

book proposal (version # 657)

zzzzzz7654209.jpg
“How To Be Crea­tive“
A book by by Hugh Mac­Leod
[As regu­lar gaping­void rea­ders will know, I’m hoping to turn “How To Be Crea­tive” into a book. This is my latest attempt to write the book pro­po­sal, as I see it in its finished form. Apo­lo­gies in advance if you’ve already seen a lot of this before.]
In 2004 I wrote a post on my blog called “How To Be Crea­tive”. Its pre­mise was very sim­ple:

“So you want to be more crea­tive, in art, in busi­ness, wha­te­ver. Here are some tips that have wor­ked for me over the years.”

It really wasn’t so much a How-To laundry list, “The 7 Steps Of Highly Effec­tive Crea­ti­ves” etc. It was more of a series of medi­ta­tions on the les­sons I had lear­ned the hard way over the years, as I tried to bridge the nearly impos­si­ble gap of making an OK living without let­ting my soul die from the inside out.
Somehow it ended up stri­king a chord with a lot of peo­ple. Lots of peo­ple ended up rea­ding it (I’m gues­sing seve­ral hun­dred thou­sands). It went viral, to put it mildly. Later it ended up as a PDF file on Seth Godin’s ChangeThis.com. At last count it was the third most down­loa­ded PDF on the site, top­ping mani­fes­tos writ­ten by peo­ple far more famous and talen­ted than me, like Tom Peters or Guy Kawa­saki.
Like I said, it hit a nerve.
Most of the Change This mani­fes­tos were writ­ten by peo­ple to be read by their peers. Peo­ple in their thir­ties and for­ties, inte­res­ted in the same kind of business-orientated sub­jects, wha­te­ver. Mine wasn’t. Mine was writ­ten for peo­ple far more youn­ger than me– kids just lea­ving college, or folk who haven’t been in the real world very long, just loo­king to figure things out for the first time. Kids who want to do the same as me when I too was just star­ting out– stay alive spi­ri­tually while still being able to func­tion in an adult world, without being eaten alive or tur­ned into robots.
A few months later I star­ted get­ting peo­ple from the publishing world asking me if I would be inte­res­ted in tur­ning it into a book. Of course I would, who wouldn’t? So they asked me to write a book pro­po­sal. This is what you’re rea­ding now.
[RSS READERS: CLICK HERE TO READ THE WHOLE THING.]

(more…)

how to be creative (latest version)

zzzzzz7654237.jpg
[This is my latest rew­rite of “How to Be Crea­tive” [Older ver­sion is here]. 12,000 or so words, plus lots of car­toons. The book’s text will be quite short, divi­ded into four parts, but there will be plenty of car­toons to look at, bet­ween 150 – 300 of them. The book pro­po­sal is here.]

“So you want to be more crea­tive, in art, in busi­ness, wha­te­ver. Here are some tips that have wor­ked for me over the years.”


PART ONE: AN INTRODUCTION, OF SORTS.
Before we get star­ted, three points:

1. “Crea­tive” is one of those anno­ying words that means little, simply because it means so many dif­fe­rent things to dif­fe­rent peo­ple. I make no claim to have a bet­ter defi­ni­tion of “crea­tive” than anyone else.
The best wor­king defi­ni­tion of crea­tive I have is “When work and play become the same thing”.
When that hap­pens, you’re in flow. When you’re in flow, things are crea­ted.
Perhaps there are bet­ter defi­ni­tions of “crea­tive” out there. Does it mat­ter? Not really. What mat­ters is that you find your own defi­ni­tion. You don’t need mine. I don’t need yours.
2. The crea­tive drive is like the sex drive. We all have it, and because what we do on this earth affects other peo­ple, we have to be care­ful what we do with it. Because to use it unwi­sely can screw up your life.
I am not here to tell you how to be more crea­tive than you already are. God/The Universe/Whatever made you crea­tive, just like he/she/it made all of us. Tap­ping into it is a per­so­nal jour­ney– other peo­ple can only help you so much. That being said, I think once you’ve got­ten the itch to do something crea­tive, there are a lot of land mines and pit­falls that are best avoi­ded. All I can do is tell you what has wor­ked for me over time.
I used to asso­ciate “crea­ti­vity” with all that youth-generated sexy stuff: fun, gla­mo­rous jobs, being hip, being arti­si­tic and mee­ting women. As I get older and I see how the world is chan­ging away from the Big Media Indus­trial Com­plex towards something much more per­so­nal, com­pli­ca­ted and frac­tal, I start equa­ting it more with mass eco­no­mic sur­vi­val.
3. Quit­ting your job at the phone com­pany to become a musi­cian is no dif­fe­rent than quit­ting your job at the phone com­pany to start your own accoun­tancy firm. It’s just the human spi­rit trying to bet­ter itself. The dif­fe­rence bet­ween art and com­merce is arti­fi­cial. What mat­ters is not what indi­vi­dual path you have cho­sen, but that you stay on it; that you become the per­son you were born to be.

[RSS READERS: Click here to read the whole thing.]
(MORE…)

(more…)

July 16, 2005

hey robert, what’s the deal with longhorn opm?

zzzzzz7654120.jpg
From Fred Wil­son:

This is the first time I have heard of this OPM stuff and I need to do more research before I truly believe that Mic­ro­soft is really going to do something this dumb, but there it is.
All the great RSS stuff that is coming in Longhorn won’t help me a bit because if I have to live with this, I won’t be using Longhorn.

Robert, do you know anything about this?
[UPDATE:] Turns out Robert has already writ­ten about it here. [Thanks to Gabe for the tip-off].
And in the com­ments below Robert says:

It sounds lame to me too, but then it’s not the first time we [i.e. Mic­ro­soft] have done DRM.

spread the word!

zzzmkghilkj19.jpg
7/7 Memo­rial Ser­vice, Manches­ter, July 19th

Dear Hugh,
I am invol­ved in orga­ni­sing a per­for­mance of Faure’s Requiem in Manches­ter on Tues­day 19 July 2005 at 7.30pm at St Ann’s Church in the city cen­tre [Address Details Here]. The idea is that it should be an eve­ning of remem­brance for the vic­tims of the Lon­don bom­bing last week and a ges­ture of soli­da­rity from Manches­ter (who’ve expe­rien­ced the horror first hand) to Lon­don. As well as the requiem there will be an organ reci­tal of Nim­rod from Elgar’s Enigma varia­tions.
We are rel­ying hea­vily on word of mouth to spread the word and encou­rage peo­ple to attend to make it a spe­cial eve­ning.
If you could men­tion it in your blog, we would be very gra­te­ful; simi­larly if you know of anyone else who would be willing to publi­cise the eve­ning, that would be exce­llent.
Regards,
Caroline

If anyone knows any­body in Manchester/England etc., please can you for­ward them the link to this page? Thanks.

July 15, 2005

english cut podcast

zzzzzz7654118.jpg
From English Cut:

Also, my tai­lo­ring collea­gue Jonathan Quear­ney and I met up with mar­ke­ting mavens John­nie Moore and James Cher­koff in Lon­don recently, where they inter­vie­wed us for a podcast.

I was very plea­sed with this. Like Tom’s ear­lier Chris Lydon inter­view on US Public Radio, this kind of stuff adds more dimen­sion to “Brand English Cut” etc.
Kudos to John­nie Moore for making it happen.

stormhoek samples

BAR stormhoek2.jpg
This just arri­ved in my Inbox:

Dear Hugh,
We have an office-full of pre-release Stormhoek sam­ples, so we hope to
finally send out the Blog­gers’ free­bie sam­ples at the begin­ning of next week.
Could you pos­sibly for­ward me the names and addres­ses of the reci­pients?
I need to pro­duce labels for said sam­ples, is there any mileage do you think in making each one a per­so­na­li­sed label?
Hope all is well at your end.
Andrew

Hope­fully Geoff will let me supply free wine at the Our Social World con­fe­rence in Sep­tem­ber.
I think mar­ke­ting to blog­gers is a no-brainer, although gran­ted, it’s still early days.
[UPDATE:] Just sent the list to Stormhoek. Please watch your mail­box if you’ve sig­ned up. And please let me know if you haven’t recei­ved anything by August 1st.

the future is “boutique”?

zzzmkghilkj39.jpg
A nice thought from Cate­rina, which of course got me thin­king about how it all fits in with English Cut:

As I was saying to Andy the other day, the mar­ket­place used to be a human place, where peo­ple exchan­ged the goods they’d grown or made, and each exchange was an exchange bet­ween peo­ple. Now there are super­mar­kets and Wal­mart, and I had a con­ver­sa­tion with a clerk at Bor­ders who said that they were going to replace him with a sys­tem whe­reby your goods were tallied by an RFID rea­der as you wal­ked out the door. There’s something dif­fe­rent about kno­wing the peo­ple who make your clothes and grow your food, and I think that this will be an enor­mous force going forward.

One thing I’m noti­cing is an inc­rease in the word “bes­poke” being used around the blo­gosphere. Is that partly English Cut’s doing? Maybe, maybe not. Perhaps it’s just a word my radar is more attu­ned to, now that I’ve got­ten into the tai­lo­ring busi­ness.
[Spea­king of tai­lo­ring:] A few weeks ago I was mes­sing around with the idea of going into the ready-to-wear (i.e. chea­per) end of the busi­ness.
I have to say I’m losing enthu­siasm for the idea. Two main rea­sons:

1. It chea­pens the brand. Of course it does.
2. A wee voice tells me that it is far easier to sell one $3000 suit than it is to sell ten $300 suits.

Something worth thin­king about, in any business.

July 14, 2005

“our social world”, september 9th in cambridge, uk

Got back to Lon­don from Paris this mor­ning…
Just when I was about to post something about how fric­kin’ tired I am get­ting of all this tra­ve­lling, along comes another con­fe­rence I will be atten­ding. Looks like a good one:

Spea­kers include:

Ben Ham­mers­ley is a jour­na­list, wri­ter, explo­rer and an errant deve­lo­per and explai­ner of seman­tic web tech­no­logy.
Loic Le Meur Exe­cu­tive VP & Mana­ging Direc­tor of Europe, Six Apart, the Com­pany behind Type­Pad and Mova­ble Type
Jason Cala­ca­nis Engadget(Building a blog busi­ness)
Ross May­field CEO Social Text (Ten­ta­tive)
Max Nie­derho­fer, co-founder of 20six(The Ludi­city of Blog­ging Com­mu­ni­ties)
Me!
Simon Grice CEO Miden­tity, Per­so­nal Digi­tal Iden­tity — the next para­digm shift
Tom Coa­tes BBC Radio and Music Inte­rac­tive
Euan Sem­ple BBC Direc­tor Know­ledge Mana­ge­ment Solu­tions
Colin Donald Broad­band Stars (UK

July 13, 2005

are we hardwired to hierarchy?

zzzzzzz08.jpg
One of the main argu­ments we use to ratio­na­lize moro­nic and soul-destroying hie­rarchies in our work­place is that we’re bio­lo­gi­cally pro­gram­med that way i.e. it is in our gene­tic makeup to create moro­nic, soul-destroying “tree struc­ture” hie­rarchies, and to orga­nize things accor­dingly.
“It is scien­ti­ficly deter­mi­ned that I be moro­nic and sou­less” etc.
As a card-carrying mem­ber of the Madi­son Ave­nue “Fuck You” school of mar­ke­ting, I can cer­tainly relate. And I ima­gine, so can lots of peo­ple rea­ding this.
Sig begs to differ:

tree-structures, are we hard­wi­red?
If I say “Book” and “42”, what comes to your mind? Some “Hitchhi­king” perhaps?
What with “Umbre­lla” and “Film”? Any film tit­les coming to mind?
Add “Nanny”, “Flying”… would that be “Mary Pop­pins”?
See? Your brain is quick and natu­rally wired to inter­cept iffy tags!
Neverthe­less, I often hear that tree-structures are neces­sary and that we are hard-wired for tree-structure orga­ni­sing: Hie­rarchies, fol­ders…
That I would argue, humbly of course, is bogus.
Would “Film > Bri­tish loca­tion > Female lead > Dis­ney > Family > etc.” trig­ger “Mary Pop­pins!” as promptly?
Nah, didn’t think so…
We’re natu­rally inc­li­ned to tag impre­ci­sely and freely — and locate any object or sub­ject inter­cep­ting those tags. Fast, effi­cient and without trai­ning. And without any quest for stan­dards.
In other words, we need no clas­sic tree struc­tu­red data sor­ting. We would be bet­ter off without.

[DISCLOSURE:] Sig and I are wor­king together on a mostly sec­ret pro­ject. Even if what we’re doing is pro­ved wrong, well, at least we had fun trying. And if we prove to be even par­tially right, then… Holy Fuck. Holy Fuc­king Fuck. Holy Fuc­king Fuc­ked Fuck.
Indeed.

in paris

zzzzzz7654150.jpg
Last wee­kend I was in the South of France. 2 nights ago I was in Lon­don, doing the Lon­don Mar­ke­ting Soi­ree with Seth Godin. Today I am in Paris, typing this from my usual inter­net cafe in Mont­par­nasse.
The Lon­don Din­ner was very, very cool. I’d seriously recom­mend you clic­king on the link etc.
Thanks Seth, for making it such a won­der­ful eve­ning for all con­cer­ned.
[NOTE TO SELF:] Your life is just too fric­king weird these days.

July 9, 2005

english cut on public radio

When my busi­ness part­ner and Savile Row tai­lor, Tho­mas Mahon was last in Ame­rica, he was inter­vie­wed by Chris­topher Lydon on Public Radio, namely, on a show called “Radio Open Source”. The MP3 down­load is here.
Pretty darn cool.

how to lose x-hundred million dollars for no good reason

Jeff Jar­vis, one of my heroes and favo­rite blog­gers has been having quite a run-in with Dell.
And the mains­tream media has pic­ked up on it.
When I first read how Dell res­pon­ded to it, the first two words that came to mind were “Oh, Dear.“
“Dell is dead,” a friend told me today. “I first sen­sed that four years ago, when they stop­ped being a tech­no­logy com­pany and star­ted being a mar­ke­ting com­pany.“
PS: when I say “Bran­ding Is Dead”, that’s what I’m tal­king about. Get­ting too metapho­ri­cal about one’s pro­duct kills companies.

July 8, 2005

missing person e-mail

VERY URGENT: I just found this e-mail in my inbox:

Hi Hugh
A colle­gue of mine is mis­sing after yesterday’s blasts. Her name is
Monika Suchocka. She has blonde hair, blue eyes and is around 170cm
(5.57 foot) tall. The last we heard from her was a text mes­sage saying
she was get­ting on a bus.
If you could please post a link to my article on her or email some
peo­ple in Lon­don, it would be most help­ful. We are really worried.
Thank you for your time.
http://www.rjb.za.net/archives/2005/07/08/missing-person-london/
Regards
Ray Booysen

Can anyone help?

better msn messenger on mac?

zzzzlllloooo10.jpg
Hey Robert,
My friend, Sigurd‘s son, Edward, wants to know why the new neato MSN Mes­sen­ger is only avai­la­ble for Win­dows, and not Macs.
Since I don’t regu­larly use either MSN or Macs, I have no idea why not. I assume it’s because you guys in Red­mond care more about Win­dows than Macs, which is per­fectly unders­tan­da­ble.
But still, you guys have an oppor­tu­nity here to make a new customer/fan/maven with a very switched-on 14-year-old, so I thought I’d throw you guys a bone.
Besi­des that, part of my post-Cluetrain sch­tick thinks it would be kinda neat to believe that, thanks to the power of blogs, the opi­nion of a young chap in Southern France could actually get on the radar screen of the groovy cats in Red­mond, without a lot of fuss.
Any insights or new pro­duct deve­lop­ment news from you or your collea­gues would be much appre­cia­ted etc etc.
Thank you in advance!
Yeah, I know. Ten years ago this would have qua­li­fied as an insane idea. No lon­ger. You know that; I know that. We live in inte­res­ting times etc.
Say Hi to Mar­yam for me!
Hugh
PS: It’s now offi­cial: I hate French key­boards. If I were French I’d pro­bably hate them less. C’est la vie.

terrorists etc.

image12345695.jpg
Thanks to every­body wri­ting in to ask me if I’m alright. Yes, I’m fine.
My heart goes out to those who were killed and inju­red. It is all so utterly appa­lling.
Yes­ter­day was totally surreal.
Yes­ter­day mor­ning I was wal­king down Earl’s Court Road in Lon­don (2 – 3 miles away from the bombs) when the bombs went off. I was caught up in the impen­ding com­mu­ting chaos in that usual, well man­ne­red Bri­tish way. Nobody, inc­lu­ding me, knew what was going on. I just thought it must be a strike or a big-time tech­ni­cal SNAFU.
So, around 5pm I get a phone call from an Ame­ri­can friend.
“Are you OK???“
“Yes, I’m fine,” I say. “I’m currently in Can­nes, drin­king a beer on an 63 metre yacht.“
It was a very cool yacht. On the fore­deck was a trap door, under­neath which was a large sto­rage com­part­ment where they keep the heli­cop­ter.
The aft deck had both a heli­pad and a jac­cuzzi.
Nice boat etc.
Somehow I mana­ged to go from terro­rist inci­dent to big Medi­te­rra­nean yacht in a sin­gle day. Though the Lon­don Under­ground and buses weren’t wor­king, somehow the Brits mana­ged to keep the trains to Gat­wick Air­port run­ning and the pla­nes flying.
A tes­ta­ment to the Bri­tish atti­tude that life must go on.
Somehow I mana­ged to get to Vic­to­ria on foot, catch the train to the air­port and catch my plane on time.
I only found out about the true nature of the Lon­don events when my Ame­ri­can friend pho­ned me on the yacht, yes­ter­day eve­ning. Funny how one loses track of world events when tra­ve­lling.
Strange day, indeed.
No, I can’t tell you who the yacht belon­ged to.
I’m currently wri­ting this from the South of France. I find the last 24 hours too surreal to really write about the poli­tics of terro­rism in Europe in any mea­ning­ful way. Terro­rist inci­dent + 63 metre yacht= Way too much infor­ma­tion for my tiny little brain to absorb in 24 hours.
This mor­ning I pho­ned some friends of mine in Lon­don. Life seems to be retur­ning to nor­mal, as best as can be expec­ted. I find how the Brits are reac­ting to it more reas­su­ring, than I find Al Queda’s actions not reas­su­ring, if that makes any sense.
I’m back in Lon­don on Mon­day. See you then.

July 6, 2005

blogvertising (cont.)

aaa12345698.jpg
This made my day:

Blog­ver­ti­sing
Hugh Macleod’s blog, gapingvoid.com, teaches blog­ver­ti­sing by exam­ple. You think he’s tal­king expli­citly about blog­ver­ti­sing or maybe making crass com­men­tary on society. Then you rea­lize that you want to buy some Stormhoek wine and a English Cut $3000 tai­lo­red suit. You just got sold to. I’m still not sure how I feel about that. All I do know is that I want a new suit.

Thanks, Tony; this actually made me laugh out loud (for all the right rea­sons).
I’m not always sure how I feel about it, either. “Blog­ver­ti­sing” is still a work in pro­gress, as is any form of com­mer­cial blog­ging enter­prise.
My M.O. is still the same as it has always been, the same as what most blog­gers do with their stuff– throw dif­fe­rent ideas out there, and see which ones stick. Make it up as you go along etc etc.
If you try something and it fails, you’re going to get flak. If you try something and it suc­ceeds, you’re going to get flak. Wel­come to the Human Race etc.
All you can do, of course, is keep thro­wing new stuff out there. And that’s the fun of it.

July 4, 2005

being a slave

zzzzzz7654254.jpg

rss

zzzzzz7654253.jpg