June 29, 2005

“no, i’m not keeping up with your blog”

From David Wein­ber­ger:

I would like to. I really would. I like it and I like you.
But we’re now well past the point where any of us can keep up with all the blogs worth rea­ding from the peo­ple worth kee­ping up with. Even with an aggre­ga­tor.
I just can’t do it any more.

I see David’s been rea­ding my mind again.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

5 Responses to ““no, i’m not keeping up with your blog””

  1. Blog over­load!

    “I would like to. I really would. I like it and I like you.
    But we’re now well past the point where any of us can keep up with all the blogs worth rea­ding from the peo­ple worth kee­ping up with. Even with an aggre­ga­tor.
    I just can&#8217…

  2. I sup­pose he’s been rea­ding all of our minds. It’s so true what he says…

  3. Blo­gi­cide? — drow­ning in excellence

    The pro­blem When I star­ted blog­ging two years ago, I found a few friendly blog­gers who wel­co­med me to the blo­gosphere and I slowly added links to other friendly or inte­res­ting bloggers.Within a few months I found myself spen­ding more and more time read…

  4. IMHO says:

    Kee­ping up with blogs

    David Wein­ber­ger has pos­ted an appo­logy for not kee­ping up with rea­ding blogs of friends. He sta­tes I will read your blog on occa­sion, either because I’ve been thin­king of you or because something remin­ded me of you. Maybe it’ll be because you sent me …

  5. Keith Handy says:

    How is rea­ding your mind any less time-consuming than rea­ding your blog?
    In fact, mind-reading would take a hell of a lot lon­ger because there’s no qua­lity con­trol filtering.