<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the english cut wars (cont.)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gapingvoid.com/2005/06/08/the-english-cut-wars-cont-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/06/08/the-english-cut-wars-cont-2/</link>
	<description>&#34;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Rock</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/06/08/the-english-cut-wars-cont-2/#comment-6480</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1554#comment-6480</guid>
		<description>Hugh,
I think this is what you&#039;re talking about:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emh.co.kr/images/productivity_frontier.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.emh.co.kr/images/productivity_frontier.gif&lt;/a&gt;
(comes from a 1996 Michael Porter article &quot;What is Strategy?)
You&#039;re saying that there clearly are competitive positions &quot;on the frontier&quot; where a) English Cut can make a tradeoff that b) satisfies a new set of customers.  Being &quot;on the frontier&quot; means you are setting of best practice: no increase in quality can come without an increase in cost, no decrease in cost can come with a decrease in quality.
The interesting stuff happens when you are able to shift the curve out to the right, usually through new technology, but in a niche like yours, you could do things like substitute lower cost materials but use the same workmanship, or perhaps even scrimp a bit on workmanship but add to the experience... the effect is to shift the curve straight up - same costs, better quality.
It kind of all gets back to: are you the best or are you the cheapest?  In this case, it is a bit more subtle: are you the best, given a cost level, or are you the cheapest, given a quality level?
If you arrange to come to Calgary, I bet I can help you sell some expensive and some cheap...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh,<br />
I think this is what you’re talking about:<br />
<a href="http://www.emh.co.kr/images/productivity_frontier.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.emh.co.kr/images/productivity_frontier.gif</a><br />
(comes from a 1996 Michael Porter article “What is Strategy?)<br />
You’re saying that there clearly are competitive positions “on the frontier” where a) English Cut can make a tradeoff that b) satisfies a new set of customers.  Being “on the frontier” means you are setting of best practice: no increase in quality can come without an increase in cost, no decrease in cost can come with a decrease in quality.<br />
The interesting stuff happens when you are able to shift the curve out to the right, usually through new technology, but in a niche like yours, you could do things like substitute lower cost materials but use the same workmanship, or perhaps even scrimp a bit on workmanship but add to the experience… the effect is to shift the curve straight up — same costs, better quality.<br />
It kind of all gets back to: are you the best or are you the cheapest?  In this case, it is a bit more subtle: are you the best, given a cost level, or are you the cheapest, given a quality level?<br />
If you arrange to come to Calgary, I bet I can help you sell some expensive and some cheap…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabots Shell</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/06/08/the-english-cut-wars-cont-2/#comment-6482</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabots Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 05:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1554#comment-6482</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;London Geek Dinner Pr&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>London Geek Dinner Pr</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Byrom</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/06/08/the-english-cut-wars-cont-2/#comment-6479</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Byrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1554#comment-6479</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed meeting you. This photo of you is proving to be pretty popular &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardbyrom/18101423/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardbyrom/18101423/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed meeting you. This photo of you is proving to be pretty popular <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardbyrom/18101423/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardbyrom/18101423/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugh!!'s GreyMatter Honeypot</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/06/08/the-english-cut-wars-cont-2/#comment-6481</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugh!!'s GreyMatter Honeypot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1554#comment-6481</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Awesome evening at the Texas Embassy&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Awesome evening at the Texas Embassy</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Winstead</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/06/08/the-english-cut-wars-cont-2/#comment-6478</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Winstead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 23:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1554#comment-6478</guid>
		<description>This approach you&#039;re discussing sounds like a High-Low play from The Marketing Handbook. You can leverage a reputation/product with known high quality to sell a lower-priced product that still has good quality but less options.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This approach you’re discussing sounds like a High-Low play from The Marketing Handbook. You can leverage a reputation/product with known high quality to sell a lower-priced product that still has good quality but less options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/06/08/the-english-cut-wars-cont-2/#comment-6477</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1554#comment-6477</guid>
		<description>Forget Armani and M&amp;S - for me the benchmark to beat is the Endurance range from Ted Baker. It&#039;s the first suit that I feel good in, want to wear and it out performs the M&amp;S and low end bespoke I&#039;ve had. It even came with a free prize - I discovered the rather useful &#039;passport pocket&#039;, 12 months after owning it - no more passport panics at the airport. Didn&#039;t realise you should rtm for a suit. Make me a suit as good as the endurance and I&#039;ll buy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget Armani and M&amp;S — for me the benchmark to beat is the Endurance range from Ted Baker. It’s the first suit that I feel good in, want to wear and it out performs the M&amp;S and low end bespoke I’ve had. It even came with a free prize — I discovered the rather useful ‘passport pocket’, 12 months after owning it — no more passport panics at the airport. Didn’t realise you should rtm for a suit. Make me a suit as good as the endurance and I’ll buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

