June 8, 2005

london geek dinner– afterword

zzzzsteak43.jpg
Here is everything you need to know about how the Lon­don Geek Din­ner went, inc­lu­ding many pho­tos.
Thanks for every­body who came. Lots of inte­res­ting folk there. The con­cen­sus seems to be that it went off suc­cess­fully. Robert Sco­ble said it was by far the big­gest geek din­ner he’d ever been to, which I guess is saying something.
There’s an old saying, “A host never enjoys his own party.” As the orga­ni­ser of the party, I can relate. I don’t get to talk to anyone for nearly long enough. I was just rushing around, just trying to intro­duce myself to as many peo­ple as pos­si­ble, trying to be as socia­ble as I could, making sure ever­yone was being loo­ked after. It’s not something I’m par­ti­cu­larly good at, but I tried my best.
But it was great seeing seeing peo­ple again, and finally get­ting to meet a lot of blog­gers for the first time, whose work I con­si­der myself a fan of.
Robert made a great speech. During the ques­tion and ans­wer ses­sion, the thought occu­rred to me… As someone who doesn’t work for Mic­ro­soft, I tend to view what Robert’s doing there in mainly exter­nal terms– how blog­ging affects the “Porous Mem­brane” bet­ween Mic­ro­soft and the outside world.
But of course, large com­pa­nies have PLENTY of inter­nal mem­bra­nes as well. Though part of me has always sus­pec­ted it to be the case, Robert’s speech made it much clea­rer to me that Robert’s work is chan­ging Mic­ro­soft INTERNALLY is by far the big­ger story.
Sure, we blog­gers think the world of Robert and his work. But having tal­ked to Robert, it seems a lot of peo­ple at Mic­ro­soft are far from happy.
Basi­cally, the are seven layers of mana­ge­ment bet­ween Bill Gates and Robert Sco­ble. Obviously he’s being pro­tec­ted by upper levels. But what about the layers in bet­ween? Think of all the wee inter­nal fief­doms and hie­rachies Robert’s work must be threa­te­ning.
I ima­gine trying to keep track of all the fief­doms in a com­pany the size of Mic­ro­soft is a bit like trying to keep track of pee in a swim­ming pool. That being said, I find the impli­ca­tions that a lowish-level emplo­yee can make such a huge, tan­gi­ble dif­fe­rence to one of the lar­gest com­pa­nies in the world utterly stag­ge­ring.
Don’t you?

12 Responses to “london geek dinner– afterword”

  1. Jim Wilde says:

    Good for you! I atten­ded the geek fest in NYC with only half as many peo­ple, so to play host to over 200 fine blog­ger is a cha­llenge to say the least.
    You’re spon on with, “…large com­pa­nies have PLENTY of inter­nal mem­bra­nes as well. And during Robert’s sppech it sud­denly daw­ned on me– how Robert’s work is chan­ging Mic­ro­soft INTERNALLY is by far the big­ger story.”
    I’ve been tryin to tell ya that is what we are doing with  — Ideas­cape.

  2. Per­cep­tion is the ulti­mate long tail

    I’m on my way to Den­mark for Reboot after spen­ding the day with IBM and some very smart people.

  3. Shin­dig!

    Some notes from my din­ner with the blog­gers and assor­ted hangers-on last night, hos­ted by Robert Sco­ble (who may think I’ve been stal­king him at these gathe­rings, having shown up at one in New York last month) and Hugh Mac­Leod: [Sco­ble, a corn­fed Ameri…

  4. -- says:

    hugh: thanks for the heads up, i had a good time at the lon­don event. met some good peo­ple, had some good conversations …

  5. Robert doesn’t need pro­tec­tion. He is doing things that flow with the Mic­ro­soft way not against it. Yes, it is stag­ge­ring that a lowish-level emplo­yee can make such a huge, tan­gi­ble dif­fe­rence to one of the lar­gest com­pa­nies in the world. But Mic­ro­soft is no ordi­nary large com­pany. The belief that a lowish-level emplo­yee can make a dif­fe­rence is why I joi­ned Mic­ro­soft and why I stay at Microsoft.

  6. mundens says:

    Mic­ro­soft _isn’t_ one of the lar­gest com­pa­nies in the world. Don’t be another of those that mis­ta­kes their influence for actual size.
    It may be one of the most influen­tial, and it is defi­ni­tely one of the most over­va­lued, but it is nowhere near the size of the world’s lar­gest com­pa­nies.
    As an exam­ple, Microsoft’s entire tur­no­ver for a year is less than IBM’s gross pro­fit, and IBM is not one of the worlds lar­gest com­pa­nies either, at least not in the top ten!

  7. Pro­tec­tion not neces­sary.
    I”ll ima­gine MS to be dif­fe­rent to many com­pa­nies YET peo­ple are not.
    You always have peo­ple liking to open up things, and others to keep things clo­sed down, all in their own rights and w/ good rea­sons.
    If you”re pla­ying strongly in one field, peo­ple in “the other” field might feel their prin­ci­ples ot be strongly threa­te­ned.
    Only “good” com­mu­ni­ca­tion can alter this.
    EnjoyLife&ShareIt,
    Mar­cus M Sommer

  8. Piers says:

    Hugh,
    just wan­ted to say thanks for orga­ni­sing it. Should have come over and said it on the eve­ning but it was great fun!
    Thanks

  9. Monkeymagic says:

    My name is not Robert

    Went off to the geek din­ner on Tues­day night with 200 or so other peo­ple and had a great time. It was held just of Tra­fal­gar Square at a Tex-Mex venue, and I get the fee­ling the poor peo­ple downstairs…

  10. Lon­don Geek Dinner

    It was great to hear about the Lon­don Geek Din­ner and to hear Robert Sco­bel talk about blogging.

  11. how do you spell s.c.o.b.l.e.

    gaping­void: lon­don geek din­ner– afterword

  12. anthurium says:

    anthu­rium

    You can also check the sites in the field of send flo­wer online