June 3, 2005

“european civilisation has sown the seeds of its own decline and fall”

From Gerard Baker of The Times, Lon­don:

The Anglo-Saxon eco­no­mies, in res­ponse to their own eco­no­mic cri­ses of the 1970s, had pre­pa­red them­sel­ves for this new world with pain­ful but neces­sary reforms.
But Europe loo­ked inward, not out­ward. Ins­tead of focu­sing on what was needed 

10 Responses to ““european civilisation has sown the seeds of its own decline and fall””

  1. Bob says:

    Tho­mas Fried­man wrote a fas­ci­na­ting Op-ed piece in the NY Times today about this very topic.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Thanks Bob– I just added it to the post.

  3. JTH says:

    With seve­ral trips to Europe, busi­ness and vaca­tions, and with “some­ti­mes” busi­ness part­ner from Wien (Vienna), my conc­lu­sion is that Europe has become a “Dis­ney­Land” with full time occu­pants. Maybe beco­ming “Dis­ney­land” : the Old Folks Home.

  4. It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad.
    Ger­man poli­ti­cians (espe­cially the men­tio­ned ones) don’t have a clue, nor do the voters.

  5. Kars says:

    Dear Hugh,
    What is it you have against wes­tern europe?
    Just curious, a dutchman.

  6. Kai Ruhl says:

    Dear Hugh,
    You seem to view Europe as quite nega­tive, espe­cially from an eco­no­mic point of view. My ques­tion is, how come that Ger­many is the big­gest expor­ters of goods in the worlds, not the (by GDP 5 times big­ger) USA?
    Seems to me that the Euro­pean thing is not so bad, after all. And if you ask me which country in the world pro­vi­des the best living con­di­tions, I would still choose Ger­many. Even though 50% of my income go away for taxes, health­care, etc., I can still live VERY well with it, even more so if com­pa­red to the wealth of peo­ple in other coun­tries.
    Not to say that Europe does not have some serious pro­blems, but the eco­nomy is none of these. Unem­ploy­ment is, but this is not so much rela­ted to pro­duc­ti­vity as before indus­tria­li­sa­tion.
    Kind regards,
    Kai Ruhl

  7. hugh macleod says:

    Kai, if the high-unemployment model works for you, groovy.
    It all depends what com­pro­mi­ses a nation is willing to make.
    Gene­rally for most peo­ple, it is easier to live in denial than go through pain­ful chan­ges.
    But I’m not sure you’re doing your grandchil­dren any favors, either.

  8. Ben says:

    The US is ado­les­cent: full of self-righteous, gimme-gimme energy, with little time for tra­di­tion. You run fast, and look impres­sive, but you neither know nor care where you are going.
    Europe is older and wiser, and res­pects its own citi­zens and the rest of the world. We unders­tand that pro­gress takes time and care. While this approach may be expen­sive, its long term pro­duct is a stron­ger, healthier society.

  9. Kai Ruhl says:

    Hugh,
    You misun­ders­tood me. I simply wan­ted to state that the assump­tion “Europe is going down” is fla­wed. Also, that the assump­tion “the anglo-saxon eco­no­mic model or the current state the­rof is supe­riour” (due to its refor­med state or other rea­sons) is fla­wed.
    I men­tio­ned the unem­ploy­ment thing only to make the post a bit more balan­ced, it soun­ded a bit like “Euro-Troll” before. To rei­te­rate: The eco­nomy is obviously doing fine in Europe.
    Who or which country is doing its chil­dren a favor and which not is a ques­tion I can­not rea­so­nably decide. Each of the modern indus­trial regions has its pros and cons, and only time will tell.
    Kind regards,
    Kai