Archive for June, 2005

June 30, 2005

useful imprecision

zzzzzz7654129.jpg
Sig con­ti­nues to argue the case for buil­ding tags “imprecisely”:

Accept impre­ci­sion as a given fact of life, focus on how to make the impre­ci­sion use­ful.
Go iffy and volu­mi­nous on the “crea­tion” side, let iffy-tags-interception deli­ver the pre­cise results and full know­ledge on the “see­ker” side. Avoid costly trai­ning. Avoid miss­pent time on stan­dards dis­cus­sions. Let unders­tan­ding be an easier task.
Let free-tagging plus iffy-tags-interception free crea­ti­vity, right brains and spontaneity.

So I’m gues­sing if you want your tag to be adap­ted by others, it beho­ves you to make tags that are easy for others to adapt. Digi­tal Dar­wi­nism, Baby.
I’m still wai­ting for Hamish to blog about this.
[Disc­lai­mer: Sig and I work together.]

london marketing soiree

BAR seth godin2.jpg
The Lon­don Mar­ke­ting Soi­ree with Seth Godin [my favo­rite mar­ke­ting writer/guru] is less than 2 weeks away.
Please sign up if you’re coming [166 have so far].
[SPEAKING OF SETH:] Here’s a won­der­fully salient thought from him:

I don’t think I’m being harsh… I

last chance for the blogger’s wine freebie

zzzzazzdggg50.jpg
[car­toon cour­tesy of The Hugh­train]
Today (June 30th) is the last day the “Blogger’s Wine Free­bie” will be open. [DETAILS HERE.]
About 100 UK blog­gers sig­ned up, which is fan­tas­tic.
We’re plan­ning to do a simi­lar U.S. free­bie when Stormhoek launches in the Sta­tes later this year.
I wrote the follo­wing in the let­ter that’s accom­pan­ying the free­bies:

OK, so what’s the point of all this? Sure, I sup­pose giving out a few bott­les to some blog­gers could poten­tially be quite good PR, etc etc. Maybe a few of you will blog about it. Maybe not. You never know.
But in the back of my mind I’m thin­king there might be something lar­ger going on here.
What if, say, not one or two of you end up blog­ging about it, but a cou­ple of dozen? What will be the rip­pling effect?
Will the idea-virus spread far enough that sud­denly, ins­tead of one or two peo­ple kno­wing about the wine, sud­denly tens of thou­sands of smart, con­nec­ted peo­ple in the UK know about it, and are tal­king about it?
Is that enough to launch a natio­nal brand?

I hap­pen to think it is enough. Maybe not with this brand per se, but one day it’ll hap­pen. And then God knows what the tra­di­tio­nal ad agen­cies will do with themselves.

June 29, 2005

take back jerusalem

zzzzzz7654251.jpg

grokster goes global

From Ben Ham­mers­ley: “Dec­la­ring filesha­ring ille­gal across the net because it

“no, i’m not keeping up with your blog”

From David Wein­ber­ger:

I would like to. I really would. I like it and I like you.
But we’re now well past the point where any of us can keep up with all the blogs worth rea­ding from the peo­ple worth kee­ping up with. Even with an aggre­ga­tor.
I just can’t do it any more.

I see David’s been rea­ding my mind again.

recenty overheard:

Two blog­gers drin­king beers.

Blog­ger One: “Adver­ti­sing is fuc­king dead.”
Blog­ger Two: “Man, adver­ti­sing is so fuc­king dead it’s no lon­ger even that fun to read about how fuc­king dead it is.”

Yep. And “Death of Adver­ti­sing” is no lon­ger that inte­res­ting to write about, either.
The world has moved on etc.

June 28, 2005

personal ontology

zzzlokjib16.jpg
Yes­ter­day we had “Prime Tags”.
Today we have “Per­so­nal Onto­logy”.
From For­ward Markets:

An onto­logy as defi­ned by dictionary.com is:

“An expli­cit for­mal spe­ci­fi­ca­tion of how to repre­sent the objects, con­cepts and other enti­ties that are assu­med to exist in some area of inte­rest and the rela­tionships that hold among them.”

A per­so­nal onto­logy by exten­sion is simply one per­sons onto­logy as oppo­sed to a glo­bal, all encom­pas­sing onto­logy (e.g. the kind of grand unif­ying and res­tric­ting taxonomy-like struc­ture that Sig is rai­ling against). A per­so­nal onto­logy on the other hand is more rele­vant to the individual.

I’m assu­ming this to mean: as with the blo­gosphere and links, if you give peo­ple tags, the orga­ni­sa­tion will build itself.
And if the orga­ni­sa­tion builds itself, then why do we need SAP telling us what to do?
Hamish? Sig? Feedback?

June 27, 2005

prime tags?

zzzzsteak08.jpg
Sig Rinde talks about tags. And he has crea­ted a new gizmo that allows you to play with his ideas:

Even with tags we easily become overwhel­med and would require some data-structure to find our way. Tech­no­rati follows 1.3 million tags now!
Every per­son on this pla­net has a tag; name or social secu­rity num­ber etc. 6.45 billion of them.
This expe­ri­ment:
Uses mul­ti­ple tag choi­ces to choose and find.
And so what?
Using mul­ti­ple tags, about 20 tags would cover the 1.3 million single-use tags at Tech­no­rati.
Using mul­ti­ple tags, about 33 tags could give a uni­que iden­tity to every per­son in the whole world.
(Quite a few years since I stu­died sta­tis­tics, believe I’m in the ball­park, but any­body out there who could corro­bo­rate?)
And 20 – 30 tags are less cum­ber­some to navi­gate than 1.3 million, or 6 billion!
Mul­ti­ple tags can replace any sin­gle tag, howe­ver uni­que that is.
You’re tag­ged with your name. That does not say much, does it? Unless I know you of course.
Now try mul­ti­ple tags. Add 10 tags, red hair, tall, birth­place etc. and you may be one of 153,000 with exact same tag set. Add yet another one that says more about you, say ‘Ita­lian speaking’ — voila, you got only 9,675 indi­vi­duals with the same tags. Add one more, now 634 iden­ti­cals. Add two more and ‘high­ligh­ting’ exactly those 14 tags gives one return; you.
Ditto for plants, ditto for file struc­ture on your com­pu­ter, goodbye fol­ders and search. Etc.
Add that a set of tags gives imme­diate (and com­plete!) infor­ma­tion about the object. Far beyond what a two dimen­sio­nal sys­tem may give (First and middle name, family name, does not give much infor­ma­tion that).
And that is what know­ledge is all about. Expand on that.
Time for a remake of Carl von Linn

June 26, 2005

complex selling

zzzzaxxzzz02.jpg
My old friend Hamish, a top SAP finan­cial soft­ware con­sul­tant, has been rif­fing lately on what he calls “Com­plex Selling”:

Unders­tan­ding the Mar­ket
Unders­tan­ding the Offe­ring
Fin­ding likely cus­to­mers
Pros­pec­ting
Ini­tial dis­cus­sions
Enga­ge­ment
Mana­ging the Sales process 

blogging this?

zzzzzz7654249.jpg

links etc.

[BLOGGERS:] Take the M.I.T. Weblog Sur­vey.
[VERY COOL:] “Chic­ken car­toons on sticky notes.”
[Thanks to Ale­xoid for the link.]

[DITTO:] “Open Source Beer”. Great pod­cast, too.
[DITTO:] “Open Source T-shirts”. One guy in France making 36K Euros (ca. $43K USD) a month.

everybody wants to be more creative

zzzzazzdggg06.jpg
[More thoughts on “How To Be Crea­tive”:]
Every­body wants to be more crea­tive than they already are.
I didn

brit blogs etc.

zzzzzz7654140.jpg
Finally back home in Cum­bria after almost 3 weeks of being away. Wow.
It’s been a long time coming, but it seems like the Bri­tish blog­ging scene is finally star­ting to reach cri­ti­cal mass. Barely a day goes by without someone on my radar screen telling me about something inte­res­ting (i.e. as in “com­mer­cially inte­res­ting”) going on.
The guy to watch in this space is Alis­tair Shrimp­ton, who runs the UK branch of Six Apart. Very little hap­pens without him kno­wing about it first.
He’s coming to the Lon­don Mar­ke­ting Soi­ree on July 11th, so look out for him there.
[Spea­king of Lon­don:] Looks like I’ll be spen­ding a lot more time in Lon­don. A lot more.

June 23, 2005

the “i was there” factor

zzzzzz7654188.jpg
Human beings want to be part of something.
We want to be able to say “I was there”.

I was there when Moses came down from the moun­tain.
I was there when Jimi Hen­drix pla­yed The Star Span­gled Ban­ner.
I was there when the Ame­ri­cans libe­ra­ted Paris.
I was there when the Red Sox won the World Series.
I was there when Apple relea­sed their first per­so­nal com­pu­ter.
I was there when Starbuck’s ope­ned their first store in Seattle.
I was there when Saul Bellow was sig­ning books at Bar­nes & Noble.

When peo­ple talk about your pro­duct five, ten, twenty years from now, will they be saying “I was there”? Does your pro­duct have the “I was there” fac­tor?
If not, should you be worried?
[Thanks to Evelyn for star­ting me thin­king about this.]

June 20, 2005

what’s their angle?

zzzzzz7654103.jpg
[FROM A RECENT MEMO TO A CLIENT:]
Back in the old days, you hired an ad agency to tell your product’s story. Some of them would do a good job– enga­ging com­mer­cials, beau­ti­ful pho­to­graphy, exo­tic loca­tions, sexy peo­ple, cle­ver tagli­nes etc etc.
Nowa­days, you have to be smar­ter than that. You don’t want the kind of high-production sto­ries that come out of ad agen­cies– you want the kind of sto­ries that ordi­nary peo­ple can tell.
Ordi­nary peo­ple actually aren’t that dif­fe­rent than ad agen­cies i.e. they’re only going to tell your story if there’s something in it for them. With ad agen­cies, it’s easy– they just want the large wads of cash. Ordi­nary peo­ple want something else. Sta­tus. Cool fac­tor. Peace, Love and Hap­pi­ness. Wha­te­ver.
For­get your “pro­duct bene­fit” for a second. Ins­tead, just ask your­self, when somebody’s telling your story to other peo­ple, what’s in it for them? What’s their angle?
Worth thin­king about.

a brand is a narrative

zzzzzz7654154.jpg
A brand is a narra­tive. We use them to paper over the narra­tive gaps in our own lives– to fill in the mis­sing plot points in the auto­bio­graphi­cal movies ever­yone has got pla­ying in their heads.

June 18, 2005

advertising creative wanted

zzzzazzdggg76.jpg
A friend of mine is loo­king to hire a London-based, junior crea­tive who’s good at both graphic design and copyw­ri­ting. A sense of humor is also a defi­nite plus.
If any­body knows anyone who fits the desc­rip­tion, feel free to drop me an e-mail and I’ll pass it along. Thanks.

great brand

bizcard9876.png
Wel­come to Madi­son Ave­nue etc. etc.
[Thanks to Loic for taking the pic.]

random

yyyylkgjut04.jpg
[OFFICIAL:] The Stormhoek wine free­bie offer is open till the end of June. We send the wine out in early July. Feel free to sign up if you haven’t already.
[UPDATE:] The Lon­don Mar­ke­ting Soi­ree on July 11th now has 127 sign-ups. I’m gues­sing the final num­ber will be around the 200-Mark, with about two thirds actually sho­wing up on the night.
[MEANWHILE:] It’s been nearly two weeks since I’ve been home. I’m loo­king for­ward to get­ting back to my desk next week and get­ting some pro­per wri­ting done again, not just the usual “I’m blog­ging this” run­ning com­men­tary, which is what I mostly end up doing when I’m tra­ve­lling etc.

June 17, 2005

euroblogs

zzzmkghilkj26.jpg
Loic Le Meur has a nice over­view of The Euro­pean Blo­gosphere.
This was built as a wiki for the talk he gave at Reboot last week.
[On the sub­ject of Euro­blogs:] One big issue I kept on hea­ring from a lot of the Danish blog­gers at Reboot was whether or not it was a good idea to write in English.
Obviously, English is the lin­gua franca of the inter­net, and if you decide to write in your non-English native ton­gue then your rea­dership is going to remain quite limi­ted. Loic sol­ves the pro­blem by wri­ting in both English and in French, but like he told me per­so­nally, that can be a real pain.
I have no opi­nion one way or the other. Local is good. So is glo­bal. Depends on what you’re trying to acheive.

June 15, 2005

anybody want free wine? (cont.)

aaa12345404.jpg
Yep, my Stormhoek wine free­bie offer is still open. Any Bri­tish blog­ger over 18 years old is wel­come to par­take.
Like I said before, the wine is still in South Africa. As soon as it’s ship­ped to the UK I’ll let you know etc.
I’ll be wor­king more on the Stormhoek blog over the next few weeks etc etc etc.
Here’s an idea I like pla­ying with: Buil­ding brands for 1% of the cost it takes the com­pe­ti­tion. Not half, not a quar­ter, but 1%.
Is that pos­si­ble? Hell, even if you’re doing it for under 5%, it’s enough to get the big boys to pay atten­tion. And buy you out at a later date for obs­cene amounts of money.
A few months ago I was wri­ting a lot on one of my favo­rite sub­jects, “The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand”. I guess this is the kind of stuff I’m tal­king about.
[SPEAKING OF GLOBAL MICROBRAND:] English Cut just made it to Num­ber Four Goo­gle Search for “Savile Row”. Hello, Long Tail.
I spoke ear­lier about the impor­tance of get­ting English Cut on to Page One of Goo­gle. “If you have the best tai­lor in the world but he isn’t on Goo­gle, does it mat­ter?” etc.
Shit. This is huge.

wednesday in london

zzzzzz7654131.jpg
Still in Lon­don. Here all week.
This is what is currently on my radar.

1. English Cut. Got a call from Tho­mas over in the US. He had a really good visit both in New York and San Fran­cisco. He’s now wrap­ping up the US trip in Chi­cago. We sold a lot of suits. Next visit we might add Hous­ton to the list.
I’m down in Lon­don, trying to move the ready-to-wear con­ver­sa­tion for­ward with pos­si­ble sup­pliers. Maybe there’s a mar­ket for chea­per English Cut suits (say, $400 – 800 ins­tead of $3000 – 4000). Maybe there isn’t. Same goes with English Cut shirts, ties, cuf­flinks etc. We’ll see.
2. Wines and spi­rits. I’m wor­king on the Stormhoek brand, plus another 5 wine & spi­rit brands, which I’ll go public with later.
3. Thin­gamy soft­ware. Those of you at Reboot who got to meet Sig Rinde– he and I are wor­king on something together.
4. The book pro­po­sal. That’s coming along nicely.
5. A com­mer­cial Hughtrain/blogging pro­ject, which I’ll unveil later.

OK, so what do these various pro­jects have in com­mon? Not much, except I star­ted all of them for basi­cally ZERO money [Tom and I got English Cut up n’ run­ning for about $500. That kinda thing].
I’m star­ting to think– if your busi­ness plan needs a lot of star­ting capi­tal, it’s pro­bably pretty flawed.

June 13, 2005

monday in london

zzzzazzdggg64.jpg
I’m in Lon­don for the next day or two. Had lunch with Neil McIn­tosh of The Guar­dian. About to go grab a pizza etc.
Seems like the Reboot pre­sen­ta­tion ever­yone is tal­king about is the one Ben Ham­mers­ley gave, and right­fully so.
I was sit­ting in the font row, he said, smugly.
Also, I thought Dr. Weinberger’s talk was pretty darn tootin’.

June 11, 2005

london marketing soiree july 11th

zzzzzz7654206.jpg
A lot of peo­ple here at Reboot have been asking me about the
Lon­don Mar­ke­ting Soi­ree
with Seth Godin on July 11th.
So far the num­ber of sign-ups has reached 94. Wow. That’s a lot.
Reboot is very groovy. Every seems very friendly, laid back and very, very smart.
[SUNDAY UPDATE:] Back in Lon­don. Had a great time in Copenha­gen. Great to meet so many insa­nely smart and inte­res­ting people.

June 10, 2005

in copenhagen

zzzhhhccc10.jpg
I’m blog­ging this live from Reboot in Copenha­gen.
It’s very cool stuff.
UPDATE: Doc Searls’ Reboot pho­tos. And here are all the Flickr pics tag­ged “Reboot.”

June 9, 2005

english cut on NPR

Tho­mas is being inter­vie­wed by NPR tonight.
If you’re an English Cut fan, you can stream the show live at http://www.wgbh.org, and sub­mit ques­tions, by either calling 877 673 6767 or lea­ving com­ments before, or even during the hour on the Radio Open Source blog.
The show is broad­cas­ting via Public Radio in Bos­ton, Seattle and Salt Lake City at 7pm EST. Very cool.
I’m wri­ting this from the hotel in Copenha­gen, having just arri­ved in the country an hour ago to attend Reboot 7.0. See some of you tonight at “The Poet’s Bar”, I hope.

June 8, 2005

the english cut wars (cont.)

zzzbambam07.jpg
A recent com­ment I made:

Gor­don, you iden­ti­fied the flaw in the “Don’t do it” argu­ment [i.e the argu­ment that English Cut should not diver­sify into anything other than bes­poke Savile Row suits].
I have never once refe­rred to suits as “luxury” items [whe­reas Gor­don did, tellingly]. A suit is a suit is a suit. You wear them, for the same rea­son you wear anything else– to cover up one’s naked­ness, to pro­tect one­self from the ele­ments, and to iden­tify your­self among your group.
Yeah, bes­poke suits are by far the best route, in terms of qua­lity. But they cost a lot of money and take weeks to make. So time and money are the big oppor­tu­nity costs– for both sup­plier and cus­to­mer.
So, let’s say you don’t have a lot of time or money. What com­pro­mi­ses are you willing to make, as a cus­to­mer? And what com­pro­mi­ses is English Cut willing to make, as a sup­plier?
At least with English Cut, you and I can hope­fully have an infor­med, two-way con­ver­sa­tion about this (like you are doing now bwah ha ha ha…). Try doing that with Armani.

This is get­ting fun.

london geek dinner– afterword

zzzzsteak43.jpg
Here is everything you need to know about how the Lon­don Geek Din­ner went, inc­lu­ding many pho­tos.
Thanks for every­body who came. Lots of inte­res­ting folk there. The con­cen­sus seems to be that it went off suc­cess­fully. Robert Sco­ble said it was by far the big­gest geek din­ner he’d ever been to, which I guess is saying something.
There’s an old saying, “A host never enjoys his own party.” As the orga­ni­ser of the party, I can relate. I don’t get to talk to anyone for nearly long enough. I was just rushing around, just trying to intro­duce myself to as many peo­ple as pos­si­ble, trying to be as socia­ble as I could, making sure ever­yone was being loo­ked after. It’s not something I’m par­ti­cu­larly good at, but I tried my best.
But it was great seeing seeing peo­ple again, and finally get­ting to meet a lot of blog­gers for the first time, whose work I con­si­der myself a fan of.
Robert made a great speech. During the ques­tion and ans­wer ses­sion, the thought occu­rred to me… As someone who doesn’t work for Mic­ro­soft, I tend to view what Robert’s doing there in mainly exter­nal terms– how blog­ging affects the “Porous Mem­brane” bet­ween Mic­ro­soft and the outside world.
But of course, large com­pa­nies have PLENTY of inter­nal mem­bra­nes as well. Though part of me has always sus­pec­ted it to be the case, Robert’s speech made it much clea­rer to me that Robert’s work is chan­ging Mic­ro­soft INTERNALLY is by far the big­ger story.
Sure, we blog­gers think the world of Robert and his work. But having tal­ked to Robert, it seems a lot of peo­ple at Mic­ro­soft are far from happy.
Basi­cally, the are seven layers of mana­ge­ment bet­ween Bill Gates and Robert Sco­ble. Obviously he’s being pro­tec­ted by upper levels. But what about the layers in bet­ween? Think of all the wee inter­nal fief­doms and hie­rachies Robert’s work must be threa­te­ning.
I ima­gine trying to keep track of all the fief­doms in a com­pany the size of Mic­ro­soft is a bit like trying to keep track of pee in a swim­ming pool. That being said, I find the impli­ca­tions that a lowish-level emplo­yee can make such a huge, tan­gi­ble dif­fe­rence to one of the lar­gest com­pa­nies in the world utterly stag­ge­ring.
Don’t you?

June 7, 2005

in london

yyyylkgjut.jpg
In Lon­don, currently just han­ging out until tonight’s Geek Din­ner with Robert Sco­ble. Roughly 200 peo­ple. Jeeze Louise.
Meanwhile, the Lon­don Mar­ke­ting Soi­ree with Seth Godin on July 11th has just top­ped 60 sign-ups, which is also pretty ama­zing. Still a month to go etc.
Then I’m off to Copenha­gen the day after tomo­rrow for Reboot 7.0, then back in Lon­don on Sun­day.
Busy Hugh.

June 5, 2005

my first podcast

zzzzazzdggg13.jpg
[MY FIRST PODCAST:] Seventy-six frea­kin’ minu­tes of me rab­bi­ting on about blog­ging, reboot 7.0 and what­not. Thanks to Nicole Simon for doing the inter­view.
[THINGAMY:] If you don’t know Sig or his work, you wouldn’t know what the heck he was on about in this post.
But I have the snea­king sus­pi­cion he’s made a real breakth­rough with his new soft­ware, Thin­gamy.
Go read the tea lea­ves and let me know what you think.

“it’s your turn to wear the shirt”

zzzbambam30.jpg
Recent let­ter from a gaping­void reader:

Dear Hugh,
Last month I got my gaping­void “Mis­ta­kenly” t-shirt in the mail [see the car­toon above].
I have a small but suc­cess­ful busi­ness which employs about 20 peo­ple.
When I first got the shirt I sho­wed it around the office and every­body loved it. And now, when anyone is having a really bad day at work, we make them wear the shirt.
When anything bad hap­pens to some­body… some­body for­gets to place an order, a cus­to­mer bawls them out, some­body loses an impor­tant docu­ment, a prin­ter mes­ses up a job or wha­te­ver, we tell them, “It’s your turn to wear the shirt.”
So it looks like your shirt has become this little cult object in our office. Very cool.
Yours,
K.J.
Lon­don UK

That’s one sick puppy. But I like him already.

all your base they belong to english cut etc

Tho­mas was inter­vie­wed about a month ago by CNN. Dave Par­met, English Cut’s PR guy in New York, kindly just sent me the segment’s online transc­ript.
Big Media has its uses, occasionally…

the english cut wars (cont.)

zzzzazzdfff06.jpg
The English Cut Wars con­ti­nue. In the com­ments I add:

When you talk with a good, honest Savile Row tai­lor about pri­ces, what he does is allow you options.

For

hardcore marketing disruption

yyyyyyy765055.jpg
Just added this to Stormhoek.com:

Just heard: Biben­dum, the very fancy res­tau­rant in London’s famous Miche­lin Buil­ding (awar­ded two Miche­lin stars, not bad), has star­ted ser­ving Stormhoek Ros

the english cut wars have begun

hjsdert24.jpg
Nice little mar­ke­ting spa­rring match brea­king out bet­ween me and Paul Robin­son in the com­ments of a recent post:

PAUL: What are you now saying? That you want to sell crap. You are, by defi­ni­tion of your own mar­ke­ting, your OWN WORDS, pro­po­sing to sell com­plete and utter crap. Because you know, that’s what sca­ling is all about after all. To hell with everything we’ve just said, let’s just pile up some sweatshop goods and sell them for a huge mar­kup. Sure, we spent the last six months telling the world that qua­lity is worth paying for, but if they can’t afford it, what the hell? We’ve got kids to put through college, and who care about the cus­to­mer?! NOT US!
Seriously, do this, you’ll see your busi­ness die within weeks. You will be heral­ded as two-faced liars. It’ll kill English Cut, per­ma­nently. You can’t have two mar­ke­ting cam­paigns that con­tra­dict each other. If you must have two sales chan­nels, let them com­ple­ment rather than con­flict — take a leaf out of Tesco’s book re: Value vs. Finest.

HUGH: Five points:
1. I never said off-the-peg was crap. I said desig­ner label was crap, for the money they’re asking. Big dif­fe­rence.
As Tho­mas said in one of his posts:

“Luc­kily for suit lovers everywhere, with modern tech­no­logy there are now some really good ready-to-wear, manu­fac­tu­red suits being made, star­ting at only a few hun­dred pounds. Fifty years ago, suits that were both good and cheap did not exist. The tech simply wasn’t there.”

Also:

“For the money, the Bri­tish high street retai­ler, Marks & Spen­cer makes as good a suit as anyone. I rate them highly.”

M&S suits are around the 

my job

zzzzzz7654248.jpg

free group

zzzzzz7654247.jpg
NB: The Lon­don Mar­ke­ting Soi­ree with Seth Godin on July 11th already has 30 peo­ple sig­ned up.

anybody want free wine?

BAR stormhoek2.jpg
My Stormhoek wine free­bie offer is still open. Any Bri­tish blog­ger over 18 years old is wel­come to par­take.
The wine is still in South Africa. As soon as it’s ship­ped to the UK I’ll let you know.
I’ll be wor­king more on the Stormhoek blog over the next few weeks.
[NOTE TO SELF:] So far 46 blog­gers have sig­ned up to receive a free bottle. Is a few free sam­ples and a cou­ple of well-executed blog posts enough to suc­cess­fully launch a natio­nal brand? If it is, then a lot of ad agen­cies can kiss their sorry-ass busi­ness models goodbye.

bbc podcasts

The BBC World Ser­vice is star­ting to pod­cast, using RSS etc. Rock on.

June 4, 2005

think different

zzzzzz7654246.jpg

June 3, 2005

“european civilisation has sown the seeds of its own decline and fall”

From Gerard Baker of The Times, Lon­don:

The Anglo-Saxon eco­no­mies, in res­ponse to their own eco­no­mic cri­ses of the 1970s, had pre­pa­red them­sel­ves for this new world with pain­ful but neces­sary reforms.
But Europe loo­ked inward, not out­ward. Ins­tead of focu­sing on what was needed 

london marketing soiree, july 11th

aaa12345687.jpg
Seth Godin and I are arran­ging a Lon­don Mar­ke­ting Soi­ree on July 11th.
Please tell your adver­ti­sing and mar­ke­ting friends.
Seth doesn’t want a late night, so it won’t be a full-on din­ner like the Lon­don Geek Din­ner on June 7th. It’ll be a cash bar, nib­bles and Seth will give a talk.
Seth, in my hum­ble opi­nion, is the grea­test mar­ke­ting brain alive. He’s cer­tainly one of my heroes.
[NB:] Kudos to Lloyd Davis for set­ting up the wiki.
[NOTE TO SELF:] What’s the deal with all these social func­tions I’m sud­denly organizing?

June 2, 2005

english cut ready-to-wear

zzzzwdbhu03.jpg
I’m fin­ding two main issues about selling Savile Row suits:

1. I’d say well over 90% of English Cut fans either can’t afford $3000 suits, or aren’t inc­li­ned to spend that kind of money on them.
2. Bes­poke suits don’t scale. Tom can make 3 – 5 a week, and that’s it.

So we’re loo­king at ways of going into the ready-to-wear mar­ket.
No, we’re not thin­king of selling $1200 desig­ner label stuff. That stuff is junk; it’s a ripoff.
Right now English Cut is making the best suits in the world in the $3,000 dollar range. We want to do the same in the $500 – 600 price range. Not too cheap, not too expen­sive.
It’s a poten­tially huge mar­ket. A lot of suits at that price range are made by peo­ple who don’t know what they’re doing– watch out for how­lers like 3 but­tons on the cuffs, “keyhole” but­tonho­les on the lapels etc. It all looks tacky, because it is.
We’re going after the sharp, clas­sic English cut. Soft yet autho­ri­ta­tive lines, strong cloth designs (e.g. clas­sic “Fuck-you pins­tri­pes” etc.). All the little details done pro­perly (like, FOUR but­tons on the cuffs, like they do it on Savile Row).
And then line exten­sions. Shirts, ties, cuf­flinks etc. All carr­ying the “English Cut” label. Or one idea I like a lot: busi­ness casual for our many U.S. West Coast rea­ders.
Think Ralph Lau­ren, only sma­ller and shar­per.
[Fac­toid:] John Viz­zone, chief desig­ner of Ralph Lau­ren Pur­ple Label, doesn’t just wear his own clothes. I’m actually not sure if he wears Pur­ple Label him­self, either. I do know he wears Savile Row. Same with Cal­vin Klein. When Tom wor­ked at Ander­son & Shep­pard, he cut for them both.
[NB:] If we do this, we’ll still be giving the full-on, obs­ce­nely expen­sive bes­poke Savile Row treat­ment, of course.

June 1, 2005

Dutch say ‘No’ to EU constitution

Voters in the Nether­lands have overwhel­mingly rejec­ted the pro­po­sed Euro­pean Union cons­ti­tu­tion.

Exit polls sug­gest 63% voted “No” in the refe­ren­dum. Prime Minis­ter Jan Peter Bal­ke­nende, who urged a “Yes” vote, says he will res­pect the result.
The BBC’s William Hors­ley in Brus­sels says the ballot has pro­bably deli­ve­red a death blow to the cons­ti­tu­tion, at least in its pre­sent form. 

The Nether­lands was, like the recently-voting “Non” France, a foun­ding mem­ber of the Euro­pean Union. The fact that 2 of the 6 foun­ding mem­bers of the EU have said “No” in the last few days is, to “Jerusalem-singing” Euros­cep­tics like myself, delight­fully humo­rous.
Gosh. Peo­ple reject a half-baked, cal­ci­fied moc­kery of cons­ti­tu­tio­nal law, and Big Media is genui­nely sur­pri­sed. Again, I find it humorous.

untitled

zzzzzz7654244.jpg

the adventures

zzzzzz7654243.jpg