May 30, 2005
clay shirky on tagging
More words from The Master: “Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags.“
What I think is coming instead are much more organic ways of organizing information than our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units — the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging — free-form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints — seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
Pay attention, Sig.
"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter.
A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.].
A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.








Where Software and Business Coexist
In case you haven’t noticed from the conglomeration of topics that I post about, I am interested in software and business (and marketing, Nashville, open-ness, …). I subscribed to a new feed whose tagline is “Business, Software, Management & more”.
I like David Weinberger’s statement at JOHO the Blog that the way we are organizing too much information is by creating more information.
Now you also inform us that information needs more information added to it so we can formulate the information by which we need to be informed.
If the human mind was simple enough to understand, we’d be too simple to understand it. I guess I’m too stupid to understand how stupid I am.
:^)
Irony irons it all out I ran to tell Ron.
Ohh, I am, I am paying attention…
Tagging, grouping, linking, organising — iffy stuff to get right in theory, even more so in real life. So being practical chaps we’re practically having fun testing twists to the practice. Maybe it’ll work, maybe not. Then we’ll try some more… and more of the different… then one day, perhaps