May 26, 2005

blogvertising: “advertising is dead” reason #8647

hjsdert07.jpg
Long-time rea­ders of gaping­void will remem­ber from early 2004, when I spent a lot of time tal­king about my friend, Dave MacKenzie’s film “Young Adam”.
Dave has a new movie coming out, and Yours Truly will soon be blog­ging about that one as well, you lucky duc­kies.
Back when I was wri­ting about Youg Adam, I was pla­ying around with the idea of “blog­ver­ti­sing”… using a blog a way to spread com­mer­cial ideas (as oppo­sed to com­mer­cial mes­sa­ges– and yes, there’s a huge dif­fe­rence).
Sure, I was deligh­ted to be hel­ping my friend pro­mote his new movie. But the “Blog­ver­ti­sing” idea utterly fas­ci­na­ted me, and that’s what made me really get into high gear for Dave.

My audience reads my car­toons for free, in exchange they let me drone on about my friend’s movie. It’s not a bad deal. Besi­des, all the Young Adam plugs are clearly mar­ked with a wee icon on the top. So it’s easy enough for folk to skip over– it’s rela­ti­vely non-intrusive.
“Blog­ver­ti­sing” is a for­mat that’s not limi­ted to the drea­ded 30-second TV com­mer­cial, the beyond-useless web­page ban­ner ad, the overc­row­ded maga­zine page, the half-second flash of bill­boards, or the des­pi­sed junk-mail paper moun­tain. Yeah, as some­body who’s been watching adver­ti­sing clo­sely for over a decade, I think it’s pretty huge.
The only issue is how much does it cost to get the demographically-correct eye­balls to log onto gapingvoid.

Then this year other pro­jects came along. First English Cut, then Thin­gamy, and then Stormhoek.
While none of these three exam­ples are tech­ni­cally paying me “to blog”, I have a busi­ness inte­rest in seeing each one of these pro­jects suc­ceed. Ergo I find them genui­nely inte­res­ting. Ergo I write about them. Ergo my rea­ders hear about them. Ergo it helps get the ideas out. Ergo this helps drive the busi­nes­ses for­ward.
Sud­denly it occurs to me… besi­des my pet car­toon pro­jects (t-shirts, books etc), this is basi­cally all I’m doing for a living these days. For all intents and pur­po­ses, I’m a pro­fes­sio­nal blog­ver­ti­ser.
I’ve been thin­king hard about blog­ver­ti­sing for a while. I really like the busi­ness model. Why?
In a word– “Overheads”.

1. A blog­ver­ti­sing capaign needs three things: an enga­ging blog­ger, an inter­net con­nec­tion, and the cost of get­ting eye­balls in front of the home­page.
2. A tra­di­tio­nal adver­ti­sing cam­paign needs all sort of expen­sive stuff. Besi­des the expen­sive media and the insa­nely expen­sive pro­duc­tion (they only REALLY want to sell you TV, let’s stop kid­ding our­sel­ves), it has to pay for an adver­ti­sing agency, the agency’s pay­roll (with all those lovely back-room jobs), the agency’s rent on the fancy office in down­town Manhat­tan, the fancy desig­ner fur­ni­ture that fills the office etc etc.
3. The latter’s final list is very long and all of it is insa­nely expen­sive. And unlike the blog­ver­ti­sing overheads, none of it is get­ting any cheaper.

There’s another three points to con­si­der:

1. There has to be authen­ti­city and genuine align­ment, or else it won’t work. What the adver­ti­ser is doing and what I’m doing has to be somehow in sym­pa­tico, or else it’s just like tra­di­tio­nal adver­ti­sing– use­less, over­pri­ced, inte­rrup­tive, hucks­te­ring slush.
2. Jux­ta­po­sing my ideas with the advertiser’s ideas inform both par­ties’ agen­dae, so the whole beco­mes grea­ter than the sum of its parts. Wor­king with gaping­void made English Cut more fer­tile, and vice versa. Same with Thin­gamy and Stormhoek with myself. Two plus two equals five etc.
3. This allows me to actually test The Hugh­train in real life, not just write about it in theory.

So if you’re an adver­ti­ser, perhaps you’d like to com­pare the cost of kee­ping me alive, ver­sus the cost of mee­ting the pay­roll of your ave­rage ad agency. Do the math, then maybe drop me an e-mail if you want to dis­cuss this idea further. Rock on.

24 Responses to “blogvertising: “advertising is dead” reason #8647”

  1. SugarBank says:

    Blog­ver­ti­sing, Sex with Cows and the Death of Disco

    cum­cand Gapingvoid.com, is not por­no­graphic but sounds as if it should be, and has some pithy thoughts on blog­ver­ti­sing. Des­pite being a made up word, and most of them taste like a mouth­ful of menthols, vine­gar and cork to me,

  2. jbr says:

    see­king clarification.…if a com­pany was savvy enough, they could pay you a fee to blog­ver­tise for them on your site? that is the gist of this? kinda of a more per­so­nal blo­gads cam­paign?
    sounds rea­so­na­ble to me and likely, way more cheap than hiring a tra­di­tio­nal service.

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Yes, jbr, that’s pretty much it.

  4. Hugh
    The only pro­blem I see with the model right now is that there aren’t nearly enough blogs as good as yours to give adver­ti­sers even 1/100th of the mes­sage impres­sions they’d like to have. The blog­ging num­bers will cer­tainly inc­rease, although mana­ging a sizea­ble cam­paign could pro­duce quite a man-hours issue.
    Perhaps that’s a new campaign-management tool model.

  5. Schmoe says:

    You think you’re so cle­ver for taking adver­ti­sing so much further and crea­ting ‘con­ver­sa­tions’. It only sounds cle­ver because you’re pre­ten­ding it’s adver­ti­sing when it’s actually PR.

  6. Shelley Noble says:

    Hugh, I’ve given this a lot of thought over the last seve­ral months thanks in large part to you and I have to say you’re mis­sing the chief, key, wor­ka­ble point so far.
    I’m very clear now that the only way the blog ideas, mes­sa­ges, or pro­ducts that those repre­sent can be res­pon­ded to is if, and only if, they genui­nely mean something to the blog­ger. And not just a ves­ted “inte­rest in their suc­cess.” I have conc­lu­ded that it is the authen­tic pas­sion, care, and enthu­siasm of the blog­ger that is the magic fac­tor here that for­ces the rea­der to engage. If anyone ever tal­ked about a com­pany, per­son, or object for sale that they really did not sup­port tho­roughly rea­ders would a.) know it and b.) not care about it.
    Con­ver­sely, if any of my, note the pos­ses­sive term, blog­gers sha­red something that they them­sel­ves res­pond to I would be highly likely to res­pond in kind as well. This is simply because what mat­ters to one with sha­red values and beliefs logi­cally mat­ters to another.
    Let me throw out an idea for you to con­si­der in the deve­lop­ment of your mecha­nism for this, what if there were a Goo­gle like auto-sort for all rea­ders? What if my pro­file said; female, early for­ties, slightly whac­ked out, new-agey, Californian-American, into art, quantum-philosophy, and fine Shia­tsu, etc. And what if the ini­tial sort of my likes and ideas were codi­fied to create a cate­gory sys­tem whe­reby blog­gers would be sent out to my com­pu­ter on an audi­tion of sorts to see whether they floa­ted my boat? If not, there would be a further win­no­wing down sort from the millions of blogs until I con­nec­ted to those that were a wow for me.
    Now, this is natu­rally being done in a mid-tech way right now by my simply chec­king out all the blog links of my daily blog­gers and fin­ding those that share in the good stuff I like.
    Any­way, you are onto it all. I heard the figure was 2 million new blogs going live each month in the US. Seems we’re going to need some sort of a fil­ter pronto. Do you see any value in crea­ting such a mas­si­vely suc­cess­ful pro­duct yourself?

  7. hugh macleod says:

    I hear what you’re saying, She­lley.
    I don’t think I’m mis­sing this key point you speak of.
    I take “genui­nely mea­ning­ful” as a given. But how it mani­fests itself is deba­ta­ble, or at least, fluid.

  8. hugh macleod says:

    [Wow!] …2 million new blogs a month is A LOT.
    I won­der if it’s true or not. No mat­ter, I’m sure the number’s insa­nely huge, regardless.

  9. What’s that thin­gamy thingy? It looks pretty much like vapor­ware, with NO conc­rete infor­ma­tion at all, just bla bla bla.
    And Stormhoek? That web­site shows your blog, so where’s the “real” pro­duct?
    I’m not sure if blog­ver­ti­sing will work at any real scale, since you say your­self that it must not appear com­mer­cial, but honest.

  10. hugh macleod says:

    “I’m not sure if blog­ver­ti­sing will work at any real scale…”
    You being unsure is usally a good sign, Ulrich ;-)

  11. Roy says:

    If your blog­ver­ti­sing is to suc­ceed you’ll have to be sure that the con­tents reach the right tar­get group.
    For ins­tance; How many Nor­we­gian rea­ders do you have? (I’m asking this ques­tion because I have something in my mind..)

  12. john says:

    adver­ti­sing is dead
    blog­ver­ti­sing = adver­ti­sing on blogs
    ergo
    blog­ver­ti­sing is still­born
    or is that too cyni­cal? Surely peo­ple read blogs to con­si­der and dis­cuss ideas and in doing so per­mit the author to send them ideas and occas­sio­nally recom­men­da­tions. As soon as money impin­ges on the recom­men­da­tions that the author makes, then the whole rela­tionship has chan­ged and it beco­mes inte­rrup­tive marketing.

  13. Barb says:

    I read recently that while Gene­ra­tion X has great dis­dain for adver­ti­sing, Gene­ra­tion Y doesn’t. Every­body is part of the buying and selling of goods. If you impart genuine know­ledge about something inte­res­ting, then where’s the beef?

  14. Sam Sugar says:

    I’m with Hugh. Blog­verts are tes­ti­mo­nials, not ads. Blogs per­so­na­lity encou­ra­ges us to trust the peo­ple who write them (if we don’t we tend to stop rea­ding). Blog­verts will fail the more con­cious they become. Hugh’s good at it because he only pushes pro­ducts he like — Ogilvy (what a hero) — did the same thing.
    It’s the Apple effect — peo­ple rave because they actually like the pro­duct. Blog­ver­ti­sing shit won’t work unless the blogger’s cre­ti­nous enough to like rub­bish.
    Doing it for money will simply under­mine the blog.

  15. On blog hype…I didn’t quite make my point

    …or why you shouldn’t blog tired at 10:30 PM.  Last night I felt com­pe­lled to write about Paul’s post – this should’ve been a war­ning sign – and this …
  16. Qumana Blog says:

    On blog hype…I didn’t quite make my point

    …or why you shouldn’t blog tired at 10:30 PM.  Last night I felt com­pe­lled to write about Paul’s post – this should’ve …
  17. On blog-vertising, Juan Cole, almost gets it.

    lg_cole_j.jpgI pic­ked up from C|Net yes­ter­day this really good article by Juan Cole on blog adv…
  18. Qumana Blog says:

    On blog-vertising, Juan Cole, almost gets it.

    lg_cole_j.jpgI pic­ked up from C|Net yes­ter­day this really good article by Juan Cole on blog adv…
  19. Blog­ver­ti­sing

    Hugh McLeod has begun an inte­res­ting con­ver­sa­tion on what he calls “blog­ver­ti­sing,” which is what he calls his day job.
    For blogs to be a suc­cess­ful mar­ke­ting tool, they have to main­tain a uni­que and enga­ging per­so­nal voice, honesty and enthusiasm…

  20. gaping­void: Sprea­ding Com­mer­cial Ideas Car­toons on Busi­ness Cards

    Today’s Feed of the Day — gaping­void — is one of the bet­ter exam­ples of how blog­ging and RSS make it easier to access inte­res­ting con­tent in a very niche world. Perhaps best known as the Hugh Macleod’s home for car­toons drawn on the back of busi­ness ca…

  21. Bazaarz says:

    Blog­ver­ti­sing — it takes two years — says Hugh

    Hugh pro­vi­des more insight into his approach to mar­ke­ting Stormhoek. Now he belie­ves:  Although it’s still too early to ans­wer that ques­tion defi­ni­ti­vely, my gut tells me, the blog­ver­ti­sing model works. But I think it takes two years. Two years…

  22. Bazaarz says:

    Today’s Links

    Today has been a very busy day researching around Hugh’s blog­ver­ti­sing model of which more tomo­rrow. In the mean­time, I’ve lashed together some links rea­ders might find inte­res­ting: Jac­ques Chi­rac has no clue Not many will disa­gree there One Into…

  23. Bazaarz says:

    Blog­ver­ti­sing payback

    Hugh McLeod rai­ses a great ques­tion to me around the ROI ques­tion: “If you find any ROI, do let me know. I know a CEO nee­ding to buy some.” The ans­wer is sim­ple — look to your own clients. During…

  24. Blog­ging & ROI

    gapingvoid.comThe Holy Grail of Busi­ness Blog­ging: ROI [da: blogthenticity.com]BlogVertising [da: bazaarz.com]Blogvertising, adver­ti­sing is dead [da: gapingvoid.com]Blogvertising: adver­ti­sing young Adam [da: gapingvoid.com]Corporate Blogs: Mea­sure Thei