May 22, 2005

joi feels the strain

zzzzazzdggg30.jpg
(A car­toon I drew last year, ins­pi­red by Joi’s hec­tic life.)
Joi Ito is fee­ling the strain of main­tai­ning a well known and highly-regarded blog:

Of course, this is just a rehash of an old dis­cus­sion of collap­sing con­texts, but I find myself strug­gling with this blog­gers block more and more these days. I find myself han­ging out on the IRC chan­nel chat­ting about things that in the past I would be blog­ging about. I defi­ni­tely feel like my blog is going [from] edgy to broad and boring.

My two cents:
1. Every blog­ger who’s been doing it for a while will have the same con­ver­sa­tion even­tually. Like I said recently, some­ti­mes real life takes over etc. Joi’s just being brave by brin­ging it up in public.
2. The good news is, “Blog Bur­nout” is rela­ti­vely easy to fix, because it’s usually not a symp­tom of blog­ging per se, but of blog­ging too often. So the cure is very sim­ple: Blog less. Take your time, post less often, and put more thought in bet­ween pos­tings. Your rea­ders will adjust to the new pace even­tually, and if they don’t, who cares? Rea­ders who are hos­tile to natu­ral change are pro­bably not the kind of rea­ders you want to hold on to, anyway.

10 Responses to “joi feels the strain”

  1. I don’t unders­tand the dilemma really.
    A blog is a com­mu­ni­ca­tions tool. A blog has an audience. A long­time blog­ger gene­rally has a good idea who that audience is. Thus, the blog­ger should know what needs and inte­rests the audience has.
    Joi is con­cer­ned that he is slip­ping into tri­vial mun­dane per­so­nal tri­via.
    Well, this is the #1 Pro­blem with All Blogs, from my research.
    Nar­cis­sism without any redee­ming vir­tue. Not funny. Not uni­que. Not biza­rre. Not ins­truc­tive. Not Valua­ble to Any­body.
    Blogs will die from this disease. Watch.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Everything dies, Ste­ven ;-)

  3. frosty says:

    As someone get­ting ready to start his first real blog, I’ve been thin­king about this a bit lately too.
    The down­side of just blog­ging less is that peo­ple peo­ple will (maybe) drop by less often. That might or might not be a pro­blem, depen­ding on what you’re trying to accom­plish with the blog.
    Gaping Void is my favo­rite blog at the moment, and I check it at least once every day I’m online, but it’s some­ti­mes disap­poin­ting to find no new posts or something like “Gone to Lon­don.” But I know it’s not Hugh’s only gig, and it’s his show, and I come back later. Sort of like drop­ping by your favo­rite pub and fin­ding it empty.
    Poli­ti­cal blogs pro­bably suf­fer less from this, since there’s always something to write/rant about every day, and if that’s your thing it’s easy to get wor­ked up about it.
    Since I’m not plan­ning a poli­ti­cal blog, I’m wor­king on stra­te­gies to keep a steady stream of inte­res­ting posts without making it into a chore. As with all stra­te­gies requi­ring self-discipline, this is risky…

  4. daniel says:

    “Blog­ging about blog­ging about blog­ging about blog­ging about blog­ging about bog­ging about.…”
    » Nar­cis­sism without any redee­ming vir­tue. Not funny. Not uni­que. Not biza­rre. Not ins­truc­tive. Not Valua­ble to Any­body.
    Blogs will die from this disease. Watch.
    <
    I thought nar­cis­sism was the pre­cise cause of blogging’s popularity?!

  5. daniel: nar­cis­sis­tic self-disclosure is fun for friends and family to read. Period. Unless it’s weird, high lite­rary talent (Kafka, Proust, Heming­way, Dic­kens, etc.), very funny, or con­tains actual insight that can bene­fit others.
    Per­so­nal tri­via dri­vel is rui­ning many of the pio­neer and for­merly inno­va­tive blogs, esp. busi­ness blogs.
    “I went to XYZ Con­fe­rence!”
    “My vaca­tion plans” etc. have no real value in a biz or mktg. blog.
    Would you ans­wer the phone if every time it rang it was the same boring per­son, freind or family mem­ber even, who ratt­led on and on and on about him­self, never let­ting you get a word in edge­wise?
    I don’t know why Joi feels like his blog may be boring his audience, but I like Joi and I applaud him for having the guts to address this issue.
    I hope he figu­res out what to do. “Blog what you know, Joi” I told him.
    Blog less? Yes, this could alie­nate rea­ders who think you’re not as devo­ted to your blog, you’re run­ning out of steam, etc.
    Very inte­res­ting topic here.

  6. I think the tyranny of daily blogg entries should die, unless you’re an SEO maniac or are one of the very few crea­tive and pro­li­fic minds.
    My motto is blog when you’ve got something you want to say. Don’t blog when you haven’t.
    The beauty of RSS feeds means that even if you have a blog­ging hia­tus, rea­ders will know when something new pops out of your brain onto the elec­tro­nic page.

  7. hugh macleod says:

    I agree with Alex. I think stic­king to a daily quota “because the rea­ders demand it” is silly.
    A lot of good blog­gers don’t post very often.
    [NOTE TO SELF: If you try to keep up with Sco­ble or Jar­vis, you will lose]

  8. Nicole says:

    If you have a per­so­nal blog — and not a blog on a spe­cial topic — then the main thing this blog is about is — sur­prise — you.
    And if you have the fee­ling as if you can’t be your­self on your blog, then there is something wrong with you. Or you just have to admit that you are afraid of loo­sing audience.
    It is a blog about you and not everything should be public? Okay, but then there is no pro­blem why you would not blog everything.
    Because other­wise it would be a fake blog. If you want to be cle­ver, smart wha­te­ver on your blog, and it is not the real you, then it will be hard work to main­tain your cha­rac­ter blog.
    As for the com­men­ters, he is tal­king about: You can’t have a cake and eat it. If someone does not like the fact that Joi is pos­ting about his tra­ve­lling but still wants to read because he could miss something — sorry. His pro­blem, not Joi’s.
    Perhaps Joi should turn of com­ments for a while? Every­body has a blog today so if they really would care about something, they can talk about it in their blogs & com­ments. :)

  9. Tur­ning off com­ments in most cases is idio­tic.
    Some blogs have disa­bled com­ments due to com­ment spam or other legi­ti­mate rea­sons.
    But to turn off com­ments because you don’t like what your rea­ders are saying, because you disa­gree with them? Idio­tic and disho­nest.
    No offense Nicole, I’m not attac­king you, but think about what makes a blog dif­fe­rent and far bet­ter than a regu­lar web site.
    Blogs are about (are capa­ble of) fast and timely inte­rac­tion with an audience.
    Joi is asking if he should more care­fully craft his posts. I say Yes, we all should be more care­ful, more com­pe­tent, more rele­vant, more use­ful to our audien­ces.
    We must look very clo­sely at exactly what Joi is asking.
    Most are just brushing his con­cerns aside and blab­be­ring mind­lessly about “be your­self, do your own thing, screw the readers”…which is chil­dish and counter-productive.
    Joi isn’t won­de­ring if he should aban­don authen­ti­city. He’s won­de­ring if he should do bet­ter research, inc­lude less mun­dane tri­via, and pro­vide more value to his rea­ders.
    I say “Go for it.”
    Yet I have never cri­ti­ci­zed or com­plai­ned about Joi Ito’s blog.

  10. Der Lang­wei­ler. Der Angeber.

    Mit mei­nen Sor­gen um mein Blog bin ich nicht ganz alleine: Joi Ito’s Web: Beco­ming boring. Sor­gen? Ja. Der Grund, warum ich hier seit Mona­ten so wenig blogge, ist nicht…