May 21, 2005

our grandparents had laurel and hardy

zzzzazzdggg60.jpg
Steve Rubel wri­tes a thought­ful post about the recent “Blog­ging Bac­klash” going on.

What eMar­ke­ter totally neglec­ted to talk about, howe­ver, is what the oppor­tu­nity is for the com­pa­nies that do decide to be brave and take the plunge. For example…

Sig­ni­fi­cant com­pe­ti­tive advan­tage –you could become the lou­dest voice
in a chan­nel where your com­pe­ti­tors are absent
Press and con­su­mers read blogs — either willingly (RSS/bookmarks) or unwi­llingly (Goo­gle); like it or not they influence purcha­ses
Blog­ging ain’t going away. The con­ver­sa­tion is going to go on without you. Be there or be square.
Blogs are a cost-effective mar­ke­ting tool that helps sma­ller and mid-sized com­pa­nies gene­rate more atten­tion. Just look at Stony­field Farms.

Blog bashing doesn’t phase me too much– I actually find it rather enter­tai­ning. What can I say? It’s rather fun watching peo­ple being wrong, again and again, for the same “I have a dum­bass suit & tie job in a big com­pany ergo I must be terribly impor­tant” rea­sons.
Our grand­pa­rents had Lau­rel and Hardy. We have blog bashers.
[BONUS LINK:] IBM makes its blog­ging policy public. It seems they are acti­vely encou­ra­ging their 320,000 emplo­yees to start their own blogs. Rock on.

5 Responses to “our grandparents had laurel and hardy”

  1. Hugh, a clue, and blogging

    I met a CEO two days ago who told me blog­ging was just as bad as email and web sur­fing from the pers­pec­tive of was­ting com­pany time. He was thin­king of put­ting out a policy on this stuff.

  2. JTH says:

    Hugh
    May have pos­ted simi­lar com­ment before — if so sorry for lapse of memory
    Blog bashing (esp by such as NYTi­mes) brings the image of the “wic­ked witch of the west” from Wizard of Oz…
    To wit … “I’m Mel­ting… I’m Mel­ting”
    Maybe the flick “Grem­lins” when the cute and fuzzys get wet ?
    Turn into not so cute’s
    Keep up the good work(s)
    BTW — will con­ti­nue to pass your stuff along to those that I’m trying to “edu­cate”
    Ciao
    JTH

  3. In many many cases:
    CEOs are arro­gant. They are stub­born. They are stu­pid. They are over­paid. They are lac­king com­pas­sion and social skills. They have few spi­ri­tual values. They are corrupt and sel­fish.
    No won­der blog­ging is taking a while to catch on in the stuffy self-impressed phony cor­po­rate world.
    The 9 Blog Core Values I’ve for­mu­la­ted are con­trary to the essence and prac­ti­ces of many cor­po­ra­tions.
    Busi­ness lea­ders show how stu­pid they are by not “get­ting” what a blog is.
    They want others to lead the way. They want exam­ples, not theory.
    Exam­ples are for mediocre dum­mies. Theory is for pio­neers and innovators.

  4. Chan­ging Habits

    I was just loo­king over my news feeds it seems that everything falls into just a few buc­kets: video­blogs (almost enti­rely by indi­vi­duals, with occas­sio­nal colla­bo­ra­tive out­bursts, dtlq.vlog, momentsho­wing, ryanne, bac­kin­blakk, sec­ret vlog injec­tion and…

  5. The Big­ger Pic­ture for Enter­prise Blogs

    All this noise about blog­ging in PR/marketing is mis­sing the big­ger pic­ture — blog­ging inter­nally. Our grand­pa­rents had Lau­rel and Hardy, Gaping­void, Hugh — &quo