May 9, 2005

the porous membrane: why corporate blogging works.

zzzzzz7654229.jpg
The other day some­body asked me to explain why cor­po­rate blog­ging works. Sure, we know it’s the hot new thing and peo­ple are paying atten­tion to it (inc­lu­ding big media)… but why?
Why does it work? Seriously.
So I drew the dia­gram above.
1. In Clue­train par­lance, we say “mar­kets are con­ver­sa­tions”. So the dia­gram above repre­sents your mar­ket, or “The Con­ver­sa­tion”. That is demar­ka­ted by the outer circle “y”.
2. There is a sma­ller, inner circle “x”.
3. So the entire mar­ket, the “con­ver­sa­tion” is sepe­ra­ted into two dis­tinct parts, the inner area “A” and the outer area “B”.
4. Area “A” repre­sents your com­pany, the peo­ple suppl­ying the mar­ket. We call that “The Inter­nal Con­ver­sa­tion”.
5. Area “B” repre­sents the peo­ple in the mar­ket who are not making, but buying. Other­wise know as the cus­to­mers. We call that “The Exter­nal Con­ver­sa­tion”.
6. So each mar­ket from a cor­po­rate point of view has an inter­nal and exter­nal con­ver­sa­tion. What sepe­ra­tes the two is a mem­brane, other­wise known as “x”.
7. Every company’s mem­brane is dif­fe­rent, and con­tro­lled by a host of dif­fe­rent tech­ni­cal and cul­tu­ral fac­tors.
8. Ideally, you want A and B to be iden­ti­cal as pos­si­ble, or at least, in sync. The things that A is pas­sio­nate about, B should also be pas­sio­nate about. This we call “align­ment”. A good exam­ple would be Apple. The peo­ple at Apple think the iPod is cool, and so do their cus­to­mers. They are alig­ned.
9. When A and B are no lon­ger alig­ned is when the com­pany starts get­ting into trou­ble. When A starts saying their gizmo is great and B is telling every­body it sucks, then you have serious misa­lign­ment.
10. So how do you keep misa­lign­ment from hap­pe­ning?
11. The ans­wer lies in “x”, the mem­brane that sepe­ra­tes A from B. The more porous the mem­brane, the easier it is for con­ver­sa­tions bet­ween A and B, the inter­nal and exter­nal, to hap­pen. The easier for the con­ver­sa­tions on both side of mem­brane “x” to adjust to the other, to become like the other.
12. And nothing, and I do mean nothing, pokes holes in the mem­brane bet­ter than blogs. You want porous? You got porous. Blogs punch holes in mem­bra­nes like like it was Swiss cheese.
13. The more porous your mem­brane (“x”), the easier it is for the inter­nal con­ver­sa­tion to inform and align with the exter­nal con­ver­sa­tion, and vice versa.
14. Not to men­tion it makes misa­lign­ment, if it hap­pens, a lot easier to repair.
15. Of course this begs the ques­tion, why have a mem­brane “x” at all? Why bother with such a hie­rarchy? But that’s another story.
[AFTERTHOUGHT:] And yes, this works with inter­nal blogs as well, poking holes in the mem­bra­nes that sepe­rate peo­ple within a cor­po­rate cul­ture; alig­ning “the con­ver­sa­tion” inter­nally etc.
The other advan­tage of inter­nal blog­ging is that it orga­ni­ses con­ver­sa­tion into a long-term mana­gea­ble form. Two peo­ple sha­ring ideas via blogs is a lot more per­ma­nent, viral and use­ful for the com­pany than two peo­ple sha­ring the same infor­ma­tion over by the water­coo­ler.
[AFTERTHOUGHT:] Poking holes in mem­bra­nes sub­verts hie­rarchies. Avast, ye scur­vies etc.
[UPDATE:] Just added this post to The Hugh­train.

78 Responses to “the porous membrane: why corporate blogging works.”

  1. Gary Potter says:

    Beau­ti­ful, abso­lu­tely perfect.

  2. A Sabre Geek says:

    Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Works

    Ever won­der why cor­po­rate blog­ging works? Hugh Mac­Leod at gaping­void has it nai­led. I’m calling this the Cliff Notes ver­sion of all the cor­po­rate blog­ging books now in work. Over sim­pli­fi­ca­tion? Perhaps.….

  3. why cor­po­rate blog­ging works

    Hugh The other day some­body asked me to explain why cor­po­rate blog­ging works.

  4. Jon Husband says:

    Great pro­vo­ca­tive post .. and here’s a guy who’s put some meat on those bones.
    http://www.commoncraft.com/archives/001040.html
    Using Blogs and Wikis for Cus­to­mer Support

  5. gaping­void: why cor­po­rate blog­ging works.

    NOTE: This also works for edu­ca­tio­nal blog­ging. Climb on the edu­train. Link: gaping­void: why cor­po­rate blog­ging works.. why cor­po­rate blog­ging works. zzzzzz7654229.jpg The other day some­body asked me to explain why cor­po­rate blog­ging works. Sure, we kn…

  6. whe­reas pr and mar­ke­ting types have his­to­ri­cally refe­rred to various assi­mi­la­tion and per­cep­tion stra­te­gies as optics, these emer­gent comin­glings will hen­ce­forth be known osmo­tics.
    I’m not sure why that dia­gram reminds me of grade seven sex ed. You know the sperm and egg thing. But still, that’s my pecu­liar brain misa­lign­ment. No big­gie. Good point all the same.

  7. You for­got to draw the line repre­sen­ting all the law­suits brought by A against B for tal­king about their pro­ducts in ways that didn’t suit them. A good exam­ple would be Apple. (And Microsoft).

  8. Career Path says:

    Hugh says cor­po­rate blog­ging works

    What blog­ging does and does best is to pre­pare the ground and make it ready for every other kind of con­ver­sa­tion you have with customers.

  9. On Cor­po­rate Blogging

    gaping­void: why cor­po­rate blog­ging works. A very inte­res­ting and sim­ple assess­ment of why cor­po­rate blog­ging is cool. Cool for the com­pany. Cool for the cus­to­mer. So here we are…just a bunch of cool-as-cool-can-be-cucumbers.…

  10. Eric Jarvi says:

    "why cor­po­rate blog­ging works"

    Well, here we are, run­ning circ­les around each other in a ven dia­gram on a site named the gaping void:…

  11. Microsoft’s Inner Monologue

    Today I read this on The Gaping Void. It’s a very inte­res­ting take on cor­po­rate blog­ging. Basi­cally they’re…

  12. Ahh, now I know what I do: poke holes in the mem­brane! By the way, it only takes a $350 cam­cor­der to blow some pretty big holes in it. Doing that daily over at http://channel9.msdn.com

  13. Changing Way says:

    Why Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Works

    Hugh pre­sents a neat theory of why cor­po­rate blog­ging works. His main ingre­dients are: the vene­ra­ble con­cept of align­ment bet­ween orga­ni­za­tion and envi­ron­ment; and the newer con­cept of mar­ket as con­ver­sa­tion. In this post, he ser­ves up the theory with …

  14. Why cor­po­rate blog­ging works…a riff

    I have to hand it to my man Hugh at Gapingvoid.com — he can sum up the spicy essence in clear cartoonery.…

  15. Stephen says:

    Great expla­na­tion!

  16. Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Explained

    There is a suc­cinct yet tho­rough expla­na­tion of why cor­po­rate blog­ging works.

  17. Marc says:

    Though not anything near “cor­po­rate”, Ray-Way Pro­ducts gets it:
    http://www.rayjardine.com/campfire/index.shtml

  18. Why cor­po­rate blog­ging works

  19. Nice one, I call it ‘Outside>In’ ins­tead of ‘Inside>Out’…more here…http://www.webpronews.com/enterprise/marketing/wpn-16-20050419OpenSourceMarketingGoesOutsideIn.html

  20. Cor­po­rate Blogs — Ins­tru­ment For Con­ver­sa­tion Alignment

    Any­way, great model from Hugh. Now we’re wai­ting for your ideas on why inter­nal cor­po­rate blog­ging works!

  21. Ross says:

    “nothing, pokes holes in the mem­brane bet­ter than blogs”, of course other chan­nels that create com­mu­ni­ca­tion through the mem­brane (like Scoble’s video camera) also help create even more holes, the more the merrier!

  22. Teblog says:

    Blog­ging benefits

    A friend is having real dif­fi­culty unders­tan­ding the point of blog­ging. While sho­we­ring this mor­ning, I tried to reflect on the chan­ges that have hap­pe­ned to me since I star­ted get­ting seriously invol­ved towards the end of last year. My

  23. Tim Aldrich says:

    Cool — the hokey-cokey theory of cor­po­rate blog­ging. Look for­ward to seeing further unbund­ling of these ideas

  24. RSS BLOGGER says:

    Warum funk­tio­nie­ren Cor­po­rate Blogs tats

  25. Jim Wilde says:

    Hi Hugh,
    Agree who­lehear­tedly with the idea of internal/external blogs  — Ideas­cape —  to pro­mote more con­ver­sa­tions. I think enter­prise blogs will help create can­dor in the work­place and help more orga­ni­za­tions move to a loose hie­rarchy.
    On the other hand, busi­nes­ses have too many so-called experts that fear the dis­se­mi­na­tion of ideas.

  26. Cor­po­rate Blogging

    “Ideally, you want A and B to be iden­ti­cal as pos­si­ble, or at least, in sync. The things that A is pas­sio­nate about, B should also be pas­sio­nate about. This we call “align­ment”. A good exam­ple would be Apple. The peo­ple at Apple think the iPod is cool,…

  27. Hugh, this the most suc­cinct expla­na­tion I have ever come across. It’s a thing of beauty.
    It’s not hard to unders­tand why many cor­po­rate peo­ple feel threa­te­ned by this way of thin­king. It’s just too flat, too direct. It will be very inte­res­ting to be part of the muckracking…

  28. David Topping says:

    Cus­to­mer feed­back, 1 to 1 mar­ke­ting, Cus­to­mer rela­tionship mana­ge­ment, expec­ta­tion mana­ge­ment. For all of these things Blogs can be a tre­men­dous addi­tion to a company

  29. One Degree says:

    Fil­te­red: Links for May 10, 2005

    Click through for today’s online mar­ke­ting links.

  30. George Coles says:

    [AFTERTHOUGHT:] Poking holes in mem­bra­nes sub­verts hie­rarchies. Avast, ye scur­vies etc.
    Cor­po­rate blog­ging is not a dis­rup­tive, chao­tic act. It is a fil­ter. The com­pany con­trols what esca­pes. Unless you are tal­king about a sup­po­sedly unsanc­tio­ned blog like mini­mic­ro­soft.
    How can infor­ma­tion pur­po­se­fully dis­se­mi­na­ted by an orga­ni­za­tion sub­vert any hei­rarchies inhe­rent in that cor­po­rate structure?

  31. Blogspotting says:

    Why Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Works

    Gaping­void has a very sim­ple, ele­gant expla­na­tion called Why Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Works. It explains the dyna­mics of cor­po­rate blog­ging and how it can help both the cus­to­mers and the com­pany. Mar­ke­ting too often seems to be trying to con­vince people…

  32. Blogspotting says:

    Why Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Works

    Gaping­void has a very sim­ple, ele­gant expla­na­tion called Why Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Works. It explains the dyna­mics of cor­po­rate blog­ging and how it can help both the cus­to­mers and the com­pany. Mar­ke­ting too often seems to be trying to con­vince people…

  33. Why cor­po­rate blog­ging works…the membrane

    Why cor­po­rate blog­ging works…the membrane

  34. Russell says:

    Wow. So 15 points cram­med full of trendy jar­gon to basi­cally say that it impro­ves the flow of infor­ma­tion bet­ween com­pa­nies and cus­to­mers? Rive­ting stuff…
    Or have I mis­sed the irony?

  35. Tom L says:

    You mis­sed the irony, Dilbert.

  36. It’s the Blogs, Stupid

    “Blog­ging is for­cing firms like ours to shut up and lis­ten.”  says Mike Manuel in the latest inter­view pos­ted over Naked Con­ver­sa­tions, for­merly the Red Couch.

  37. steve says:

    the X mem­brane not pou­rous, but porous. Just trying to make com­mu­ni­ca­tion easier…

  38. hugh macleod says:

    Thanks Steve. Yeah, my spe­lling sucks.
    [NOTE TO SELF:] When is MT going to intro­duce a damn spell checker?

  39. john says:

    Exce­llent post — but in light of my rea­ding of Sherky promp­ted by one of your ear­lier posts, I ques­tion whether it’s pos­si­ble for the con­ver­sa­tions to be acti­vely “orga­ni­sed into a more mana­gea­ble form.” This is what fake cor­po­rate blogs try to do and for which they are rightly dec­ried.
    Secondly, doesn’t the loca­tion and porous­ness of the cor­po­rate mem­brane vary accor­ding to the par­ti­cu­lar con­ver­sa­tion that is occurring.

  40. In Case You Know Someone Who Still Doesn’t Get It

    … show them this

  41. Digital Hive says:

    What is the internet?

    Clearly, there are many ans­wers to this question.

  42. Hugh

    Mon­sieur Hugh, the pro­fane pun­dit of all things Hugh­train has a good post on why cor­po­rate blog­ging works — with graphics no less. ‘Tis all about per­mea­ting mem­bra­nes ‘twould seem. I’d try to explain it but then I’d have to

  43. Al Dean says:

    Nice, memo­ra­ble illus­tra­tion and inte­res­ting posts… clearly a blog is a tool that lends itself to more than just Cor­po­ra­tions.
    Request: regar­ding the after thought… would anyone share pointers/bkms for the novice org that has an intra­net but no inter­nal blogs… inte­res­ted in explo­ring the viral water­coo­ler con­ver­sa­tion approach

  44. Cristan Yang says:

    I recently pic­ked up the whole blog thing and really had a hard time trying to figure out how it works. To me it still see­med pretty vague and dan­ge­rous to expe­ri­ment without being sure of the pos­si­ble impli­ca­tions the audience and the tran­prency of the blog­gers emo­tions. A recent expe­ri­ment ended up with http://www.kibow.blogspot.com as a pre­li­mi­nary trial to get res­ponse from the neprho­logy com­mu­nity (our mar­ke­ting tar­get audience) and the gene­ral public.
    To keep the kind of con­ver­sa­tion bet­ween A and B as con­sis­tent as can be, both have to be equally trans­pa­rent and frank espe­cially from the cor­po­rate blog­gers. It is also impor­tant for the cor­po­rate blog­ger to be open and honest ins­tead of using blogs as another form of publi­city to rei­te­rate the company’s sales speech. Trying to be poli­ti­cally correct and diplo­ma­tic about cri­ti­cal issues brings rise to con­tro­versy and attacks by the rest of the blo­gosphere after which the com­pany loses cre­di­bi­lity in this realm. Yet it is hard to find the balance point bet­ween trans­pa­rency and con­fi­den­tia­lity. This issue has pro­bably been dis­cus­sed a million times over yet I seem to find no pana­cea for it. the expla­na­tion using poro­sity gives a clear pic­ture of this yet seems vague on its actual appli­ca­tion. One com­ment I would like to make howe­ver is that poro­sity is both ways… the less you reveal or less truth­ful to the public, pro­bably the less accu­rate the res­ponse as well… after all… we have all been trai­ned how objec­tive mar­ke­ting mes­sa­ges and even news nowa­days can be…
    As for the suc­cess of my little blog­ging adven­ture, I should be upda­ting its pro­gress and results on gai­ning clo­ser com­mu­ni­ca­tion and feed­back again. Perhaps after blog­ging the next thing is to figure how to publi­cise my blog to the right tar­get audience. After all, no eye­balls means no feedback…

  45. Inter­nal, Exter­nal Busi­ness Conversations

    Hugh wri­tes a great post about why busi­ness blogs can help orga­ni­za­tions improve cus­to­mer con­nec­tions. (Upda­ted to later illus­trate that the con­cept is rele­vant in intra-organizational dis­cus­sions as well.) The metaphor is that there is a mem­brane that…

  46. Jon Husband says:

    Res­pon­ding to:
    Request: regar­ding the after thought… would anyone share pointers/bkms for the novice org that has an intra­net but no inter­nal blogs… inte­res­ted in explo­ring the viral water­coo­ler con­ver­sa­tion approach
    Al, in my opi­nion, the approach(es), archi­tec­ture of the blogs and the dyna­mics that you might *coach* towards would depend upon the pur­pose of the inter­nal blogs and the issues being addres­sed by blog­ging inter­nally (beyond what might already be addres­sed by the intra­net).
    But that’s just one person’s opinion.

  47. How cor­po­rate blog­ging and knowledge

    Hugh Mac­leod has drawn a very sim­ple pic­ture what has lots of words to go with it that desc­ri­bes the beauty of cor­po­rate blog­ging.
    So where is the know­ledge bit?
    By brea­king through the mem­bra­nes that Hugh dis­cus­ses help the ove­rall communication…

  48. jbr says:

    cou­ple of things…better term for this may be “blogmosis” — the sha­ring of infor­ma­tion bet­ween a customer/corp blog. pr and mar­ke­ting types can have osmo­tics.
    secondly, these mem­bra­nes are not one size fits all. dif­fe­rent cus­to­mers will need dif­fe­rent conversation/sharing. that’s the beauty of a great corp blog­ging strategy…there can be a mul­ti­tude of blogs for various cus­to­mers. blogs can be the ulti­mate in cus­to­mer per­so­na­li­za­tion. depen­ding on the busi­ness, each cus­to­mer will have a blog spe­ci­fic to their needs and more impor­tantly, the peo­ple who need to con­verse with them. any good enter­prise blog soft­ware pac­kage will allow for mul­ti­ple blogs that can only be acces­sed by “subsc­ri­bed” cus­to­mers.
    this may be a bit too nuts and bolts, but it seems an impor­tant dis­tinc­tion. a cor­po­rate blog is unli­kely to be a sin­gle site dedi­ca­ted to all cus­to­mers. there will be a wide variety of blogs reflec­ting the needs of various cus­to­mers. at least, that’s my view from within the cor­po­rate confines.…

  49. Rockster says:

    Having spent a good chunk o’ my life stud­ying stra­te­gic mana­ge­ment theory and how it works or doesn’t in real life…
    I’ve conc­lu­ded that most orga­ni­za­tions: a) don’t *really* want to get the feed­back that would show them that their current stra­tegy isn’t wor­king (perhaps more pre­cise: don’t really want to *work* to to get that feed­back); and, b) don’t know what to do with it if they do get that feed­back.
    It’s the same old story… this is why CEO’s have “Yes Men.”
    I pre­fer the metaphor that the firm’s stra­tegy should be seen as a theory, and that theory should be as rigo­rously tes­ted as any hypothe­sis a scien­tist would test.

  50. sig says:

    Rocks­ter, could not agree more to “stra­tegy should be seen as a theory, and that theory should be as rigo­rously tes­ted”!
    Add the Busi­ness Model to that and “every day, every minute” and dyna­mics would be requi­red all over — just like real life should be :-)
    Sta­tic is boring and deadly, dyna­mic is life itself.