Archive for May, 2005

May 31, 2005

name tag

zzzzzz7654242.jpg
I just desig­ned this name tag stic­ker for the Lon­don Geek Din­ner on the 7th.
Does anyone who’s coming own a good prin­ter? If so, would you mind prin­ting up some stic­kers and brin­ging them to the eve­ning? Just click on the image above to down­load the high-rez ver­sion. I’m gues­sing we’ll need around the 200-mark.
[cough] I actually don’t own a prin­ter.
[UPDATE:] The groovy cats over at backstage.bbc.co.uk have kindly agreed to supply the name tags. Thanks, though, to ever­yone else who offe­red.
[ALSO:] Does anyone who’s coming own a por­ta­ble amp and mike? Since there’s going to be so many of us, we’re plan­ning on having an after-dinner speech or two. If you can offer one for the eve­ning, please e-mail me. Thanks.
Robert, would you mind blog­ging this to help spread the word?

new blogcard designs

image12345691.jpg
I shall soon be adding a few new designs to the Blog­cards range.
Any requests?
[PS:] I’m also having all the “©gapingvoid.com” tags remo­ved from the front of the blog­cards (they’re still on a few of them, but not all). They look tacky.

May 30, 2005

joi ito’s print

zzzkjurhgu12.jpg
Joi Ito has com­mi­sio­ned me to turn his busi­ness card design (i.e. the car­toon above) into a sig­ned, limi­ted edi­tion of 50 fine art prints.
Sig­ned, num­be­red, large pos­ter size, heavy­weight paper. All that good stuff.
We first tal­ked about doing it over a year ago. Took us a while to get around to it. He was busy, I was busy, yada yada yada.
Thanks, Joi! This should be fun!

France rejects the European Constitution.

France says “Non” to the 250-odd-page, inte­llec­tually ban­krupt train wreck that is the EU Cons­ti­tu­tion (beta ver­sion). As France was one of the foun­ding six mem­bers of the Euro­pean Union (Bri­tain wasn’t), it’s big news.
Hey Guys, next time you draft a pro­po­sed cons­ti­tu­tion, try to keep it under 1000 words. If you can’t, it pro­bably means you haven’t really given it suf­fi­cient thought.
[UPDATE:] Jar­vis pipes in:

It’s about trying to turn Europe in to a faux nation. It’s about pro­tec­tio­nism. It’s about Europe thin­king it is a world pla­yer when it is no lon­ger. And it’s about a bad cons­ti­tu­tion that made up for in bureauc­racy what it lac­ked in vision.

The Europe pro­ject has been around for over 40 years. Not once in the last 10 years have I heard any big-time Europhile ever try to ans­wer the very sim­ple ques­tion: “What pro­blem is the current ‘Europe’ pro­ject actually trying to solve?“
Besi­des the pro­blem of Euroc­rats not having enough money, power or free­bies, that is.

boris on the bbc

Boris John­son, Con­ser­va­tive MP and mid-ranking celeb has a go at the Beeb:

Is this Bri­tain, my friends, or is this some Cen­tral Ame­ri­can dic­ta­torship, circa 1970? I can think of only one rea­son for having a tele­vi­sion in Oxfordshire, and that is so that I can refuse to pay Good­body his confounded

clay shirky on tagging

More words from The Mas­ter: “Onto­logy is Ove­rra­ted: Cate­go­ries, Links, and Tags.“

What I think is coming ins­tead are much more orga­nic ways of orga­ni­zing infor­ma­tion than our current cate­go­ri­za­tion sche­mes allow, based on two units — the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The stra­tegy of tag­ging — free-form labe­ling, without regard to cate­go­ri­cal cons­traints — seems like a recipe for disas­ter, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a sur­pri­sing amount of value from big messy data sets.

Pay atten­tion, Sig.

May 29, 2005

british blog rankings

The most linked-to Bri­tish blogs, accor­ding to Tech­no­rati.
I’m ran­ked Num­ber Three…

blogging and self-interest

zzzjzzzzjoiu05.jpg
[UPDATE: Good news– Loic Lemeur has kindly agreed to also appear on the panel.]
I’ve been asked to hold a panel dis­cus­sion at Reboot 7.0.
Here’s the plan:
Robert Sco­ble, Doc Searls, Loic Lemeur and me will inter­view each other.
The main focus will be: What makes for suc­cess­ful blog­ging.
By “suc­cess­ful”, I mean, blog­ging in such a way that trans­forms your life and career in a posi­tive way. That could mean money, or job, or social sta­tus, or per­so­nal stuff.
I have some ques­tions I’d like to ask Doc and Robert on this sub­ject. And hope­fully they’ll have a few zin­gers to send my way.
I’d also like to bring up a few con­ten­tious issues. What land­mi­nes to avoid etc. Ethi­cal issues etc. The poli­tics inv­lo­ved with blogs and kee­ping other blog­gers’ good­will intact.
We’ll do this for a bit, get things rolling then open up the dis­cus­sion with ever­yone in the audience.
There’s a lot of peo­ple out there asking the ques­tion, “OK, I know blogs work. And I know blogs work very well for other peo­ple. But I haven’t figu­red out how to get it to work FOR ME yet. Not like how I’d want to. What do I have to do to make it hap­pen?“
I find “blog­ging and self-interest” an end­lessly fas­ci­na­ting sub­ject. I’d like to use the panel to help bring that con­ver­sa­tion more out into the open.
I’ll see you in Copenha­gen.
[UPDATE:] Sco­ble gives it a men­tion.
[RELATED:] From Ross May­field: “Fear and greed is dri­ving Social Software.”

May 28, 2005

pussy

zzzzzz7654240.jpg

angel ted

zzzzzz7654239.jpg

nature abhors a vacuum

zzzzzz7654238.jpg
[Link to The Cluetrain.]

grosse fugue op.133

The BBC’s Radio 3 will be pla­ying every sin­gle last note of Beetho­ven bet­ween the 5th and 10th of June. Rock on.
Beetho­ven is it for me. All the other geniu­ses– Michae­lan­gelo, Mozart, Louis Arms­trong, Van Gough, Saul Stein­berg, Jane Aus­ten, Tols­toy, Sha­kes­peare, Eins­tein etc– are secon­dary.
We think we know his work. Da da da dum etc. But seriously, how many of us have actually lis­te­ned to Beethoven’s Ninth from begin­ning to end, in one sit­ting? It’s is a screa­ming hymn to huma­nity, triumphant and reflec­tive and lon­ging and una­po­lo­ge­tic, when absor­bed in its enti­rety.
Here’s a tip: a clas­si­cal musi­cian friend of mine once descr­ti­bed Track 1 on this CD, Grosse Fugue Op.133 as “the grea­test piece of music ever writ­ten, pla­yed by the grea­test string quar­tet in the world.” He was not far wrong. I first heard the recor­ding a few years before my friend gave me his glo­wing review.
Beetho­ven has been dead for over 150 years, and yet today it still sounds avant guarde, espe­cially in the hands of Arditti & Co.
The first time I heard it, I was blown away. Never, before or since, had a piece of music fried my head in such a mind-expanding moment of incan­des­cent luci­dity.
“I’m Beetho­ven. And you’re not.” Heh.
[PS: My other fave com­po­sers are Bach, Schu­bert, Faure and Janicek.]

i want to sing

zzzzzz7654237.jpg

london geek dinner (cont.)

zzzzzz7654236.jpg
The Lon­don Geek Din­ner on June 7th now stands at well over 150 peo­ple. Wow.
Robert Sco­ble and his wife, Mar­yam will be there, of course. Also loo­king for­ward to seeing a lot of blog­ging bud­dies again: Euan, Neil, Gia, Sig, Nevi­lle, Lee etc.
Loic Lemeur might make it but he [cough] hasn’t con­fir­med yet.
Lots of Mic­ro­soft peo­ple are coming. The place will be utterly swar­ming with them.
Then two days later we’re off to Reboot 7.0.
Looks like it’s get­ting busy ’round here.

May 27, 2005

blogger’s wine freebie 2345

aaa12345701.jpg

[UPDATED SEPTEMBER 22, 2005: The promo is now CLOSED. To see how other blog­gers reac­ted to recei­ving their wine free­bie, please visit the wiki.] [This page trans­la­ted into French here.]

In order to give you guys a bet­ter idea about what I’m doing with Stormhoek, I’ve been allo­wed to give out some free sam­ples.
Any­body want a free bottle of the pre-release 2005? Then you can find out what the whole “Fresh­ness” angle means first hand.
BAR stormhoek freebie.jpg
(Stormhoek bottle arri­ved in mail with Name and Indi­vi­dual Num­ber etc.)
Three things are needed.

1. You have to live in France [the UK and Irish free­bies are now clo­sed, sorry].
2. You have to be a blog­ger over 18 years old, with a regu­larly upda­ted blog at least 3 months old.
3. You have to send me an e-mail with the words “Blogger’s Wine Free­bie 2345″ in the title (the “2345” num­ber makes it easier to keep track of the e-mails and makes them har­der to get lost etc.).
Please inc­lude your full name, your blog URL, your mai­ling address (inc­lu­ding the country), and a writ­ten sta­te­ment that con­firms both that you’re over 18 and your date of birth.

You’re under no obli­ga­tion to blog about Stormhoek in exchange for the free bottle, of course. I just thought making it “Blog­gers Only” would be a neat idea.
But if you want to tell your friends and rea­ders about this free­bie offer over the next wee while, that would be really cool. Share the love etc. Thanks.
yyyyyyy765072.jpg
(gra­tui­tous pro­duct shot– hoo­ray!)
If some law­yer comes breathing down my neck, I reserve the right to change the con­di­tions of the offer.
It’ll be inte­res­ting to hear what the blo­gosphere has to say. I hope to hear from you. Thanks again.
[ENCORE:] To see how other blog­gers reac­ted to recei­ving their wine free­bie, please visit the wiki.

autoblogger

“Have you noti­ced how every one of my car­toons has been pretty much the same recently? Yep, Auto­Blog­ger can gene­rate graphics as well. Now go buy a $3000 suit.”

dvd hell

To all my hac­ker friends:
My dear mother came back from a trip to the US last week.
She brought back all these new DVDs.
Oh Dear! They don’t seem to work in the UK. Some kind of baked-in mar­ket pro­tec­tio­nism, no doubt.
Can anyone steer me in the right direc­tion for pos­sibly fixing this pro­blem? Can a DVD pla­yer be recon­fi­gu­red, or something?
Or is the pro­blem unfi­xa­ble, and DVD makers just plain evil?
Any help on this would be really appre­cia­ted. Thanks.

May 26, 2005

blogvertising: “advertising is dead” reason #8647

hjsdert07.jpg
Long-time rea­ders of gaping­void will remem­ber from early 2004, when I spent a lot of time tal­king about my friend, Dave MacKenzie’s film “Young Adam”.
Dave has a new movie coming out, and Yours Truly will soon be blog­ging about that one as well, you lucky duc­kies.
Back when I was wri­ting about Youg Adam, I was pla­ying around with the idea of “blog­ver­ti­sing”… using a blog a way to spread com­mer­cial ideas (as oppo­sed to com­mer­cial mes­sa­ges– and yes, there’s a huge dif­fe­rence).
Sure, I was deligh­ted to be hel­ping my friend pro­mote his new movie. But the “Blog­ver­ti­sing” idea utterly fas­ci­na­ted me, and that’s what made me really get into high gear for Dave.

My audience reads my car­toons for free, in exchange they let me drone on about my friend’s movie. It’s not a bad deal. Besi­des, all the Young Adam plugs are clearly mar­ked with a wee icon on the top. So it’s easy enough for folk to skip over– it’s rela­ti­vely non-intrusive.
“Blog­ver­ti­sing” is a for­mat that’s not limi­ted to the drea­ded 30-second TV com­mer­cial, the beyond-useless web­page ban­ner ad, the overc­row­ded maga­zine page, the half-second flash of bill­boards, or the des­pi­sed junk-mail paper moun­tain. Yeah, as some­body who’s been watching adver­ti­sing clo­sely for over a decade, I think it’s pretty huge.
The only issue is how much does it cost to get the demographically-correct eye­balls to log onto gapingvoid.

Then this year other pro­jects came along. First English Cut, then Thin­gamy, and then Stormhoek.
While none of these three exam­ples are tech­ni­cally paying me “to blog”, I have a busi­ness inte­rest in seeing each one of these pro­jects suc­ceed. Ergo I find them genui­nely inte­res­ting. Ergo I write about them. Ergo my rea­ders hear about them. Ergo it helps get the ideas out. Ergo this helps drive the busi­nes­ses for­ward.
Sud­denly it occurs to me… besi­des my pet car­toon pro­jects (t-shirts, books etc), this is basi­cally all I’m doing for a living these days. For all intents and pur­po­ses, I’m a pro­fes­sio­nal blog­ver­ti­ser.
I’ve been thin­king hard about blog­ver­ti­sing for a while. I really like the busi­ness model. Why?
In a word– “Overheads”.

1. A blog­ver­ti­sing capaign needs three things: an enga­ging blog­ger, an inter­net con­nec­tion, and the cost of get­ting eye­balls in front of the home­page.
2. A tra­di­tio­nal adver­ti­sing cam­paign needs all sort of expen­sive stuff. Besi­des the expen­sive media and the insa­nely expen­sive pro­duc­tion (they only REALLY want to sell you TV, let’s stop kid­ding our­sel­ves), it has to pay for an adver­ti­sing agency, the agency’s pay­roll (with all those lovely back-room jobs), the agency’s rent on the fancy office in down­town Manhat­tan, the fancy desig­ner fur­ni­ture that fills the office etc etc.
3. The latter’s final list is very long and all of it is insa­nely expen­sive. And unlike the blog­ver­ti­sing overheads, none of it is get­ting any cheaper.

There’s another three points to con­si­der:

1. There has to be authen­ti­city and genuine align­ment, or else it won’t work. What the adver­ti­ser is doing and what I’m doing has to be somehow in sym­pa­tico, or else it’s just like tra­di­tio­nal adver­ti­sing– use­less, over­pri­ced, inte­rrup­tive, hucks­te­ring slush.
2. Jux­ta­po­sing my ideas with the advertiser’s ideas inform both par­ties’ agen­dae, so the whole beco­mes grea­ter than the sum of its parts. Wor­king with gaping­void made English Cut more fer­tile, and vice versa. Same with Thin­gamy and Stormhoek with myself. Two plus two equals five etc.
3. This allows me to actually test The Hugh­train in real life, not just write about it in theory.

So if you’re an adver­ti­ser, perhaps you’d like to com­pare the cost of kee­ping me alive, ver­sus the cost of mee­ting the pay­roll of your ave­rage ad agency. Do the math, then maybe drop me an e-mail if you want to dis­cuss this idea further. Rock on.

english cut: four months on

image12345733.jpg
Last week on May 19th, English Cut tur­ned four months old.
Wow. It seems a lot lon­ger than that.
Tho­mas is going to the Sta­tes in two weeks, his second US visit under the “English Cut” ban­ner. Last time he mea­su­red his new cus­to­mers; this time they’ll be having their first fit­tings. The proof of the pud­ding is in the eating etc.
[My main obser­va­tion:] Though it’s nice to have had all this blogosphere-generated inte­rest (which directly led to a lot of new busi­ness), true value in tai­lo­ring is crea­ted by how many long-term clients you have. Regu­lar, repeat busi­ness over a stretch of many years.
No big media spike can replace that. So it’s still very early days. I rec­kon it’ll be at least three years before I’ll be able to know how vai­ble this busi­ness really is. But I’m optimisitic.

stormhoek: my latest gig

BAR stormhoek2.jpg
I was down South last week, atten­ding the Lon­don Inter­na­tio­nal Wine & Spi­rit Fair.
I’ve been asked by my buddy, Jason Kor­man of Orbi­tal Wines to start wor­king on their “Stormhoek” brand.
Stormhoek (pro­noun­ced “Storm-hook”) is a South Afri­can wine, and it’s very good stuff.
The Stormhoek sch­tick is “Fresh­ness Mat­ters”. I just wrote The Stormhoek Mani­festo. Go check it out.
[CAVEAT:] Though I’ve been asked to write the Stormhoek blog, I wouldn’t call myself a wine expert. But I’m hoping the blog won’t be about wine per se; more about the wine busi­ness etc.
Wha­te­ver. It’s early days. Let’s see what happens.

May 25, 2005

dramatic moment

zzzzzz7654235.jpg

May 24, 2005

a very radical advertising idea: business models that don’t suck.

zzzzzz7654113.jpg
From The New York Times: Adver­ti­sers get­ting less and less happy with their agen­cies’ pro­duct:

“In the 80’s, we used to fight with clients over crea­tive. In the 90’s, it was about stra­tegy. Now, it’s only about money,” said Jonathan Bond, co-chairman of Kirshen­baum Bond & Part­ners in New York.
[Thanks to Dave Par­met for the link]

That’s it in a nutshell. From crea­tive, to stra­tegy, to mere com­mo­dity within a few short years. The world evol­ving, fas­ter than the ser­vice they offer.
When I read this kind of stuff I am remin­ded of the words a glo­bal brand direc­tor a very large com­pany once told me about agen­cies: “Their busi­ness models suck and they’re expen­sive for what you get.“
I sup­pose the thing to do is have busi­ness models than don’t suck, that offer stuff that isn’t expen­sive. Sadly for Madi­son Ave­nue, peo­ple who make a lot of money in big agen­cies aren’t allo­wed to do that. Not if they want to keep their jobs.

May 23, 2005

book proposal (rewrite #471)

zzzmnjki17.jpg
“How To Be Crea­tive“
A book by by Hugh Mac­Leod
[As regu­lar gaping­void rea­ders will know, I’m hoping to turn <a href=”“How To Be Crea­tive” into a book. This is my latest attempt to write the book pro­po­sal, as I see it in its finished form. Apo­lo­gies in advance if you’ve already seen a lot of this before.]
In 2004 I wrote a post on my blog called “How To Be Crea­tive”. Its pre­mise was very sim­ple:

“So you want to be more crea­tive, in art, in busi­ness, wha­te­ver. Here are some tips that have wor­ked for me over the years.”

It really wasn’t so much a How-To laundry list, “The 7 Steps Of Highly Effec­tive Crea­ti­ves” etc. It was more of a series of medi­ta­tions on the les­sons I had lear­ned the hard way over the years, as I tried to bridge the nearly impos­si­ble gap of making an OK living without let­ting my soul die from the inside out.
Somehow it ended up stri­king a chord with a lot of peo­ple. Lots of peo­ple ended up rea­ding it (my best esti­mate is around half a million to the million mark). It went viral, to put it mildly. Later it ended up as a PDF file on Seth Godin’s ChangeThis.com. At last count it was the third most down­loa­ded PDF on the site, top­ping mani­fes­tos writ­ten by peo­ple far more famous and talen­ted than me, like Tom Peters or Guy Kawa­saki.
Like I said, it hit a nerve.
Most of the Change This mani­fes­tos were writ­ten by peo­ple to be read by their peers. Peo­ple in their thir­ties and for­ties, inte­res­ted in the same kind of business-orientated sub­jects, wha­te­ver. Mine wasn’t. Mine was writ­ten for peo­ple far more youn­ger than me– kids just lea­ving college, or folk who haven’t been in the real world very long, just loo­king to figure things out for the first time. Kids who want to do the same as me when I too was just star­ting out– stay alive spi­ri­tually while still being able to func­tion in an adult world, without being eaten alive or tur­ned into robots.
A few months later I star­ted get­ting peo­ple from the publishing world asking me if I would be inte­res­ted in tur­ning it into a book. Of course I would, who wouldn’t? So they asked me to write a book pro­po­sal. This is what you’re rea­ding now.
[RSS READERS: CLICK HERE TO READ THE WHOLE THING.]

(more…)

food for thought:

zzzzzz7654153.jpg
From an inter­view bet­ween The Holly­wood Repor­ter and Ame­ri­can Express Glo­bal Brand Direc­tor, John Hayes:

THR: And, of course, to every pro­ject you say yes to, you have to say no to dozens of others.
Hayes: Abso­lu­tely. There’s one other trend I think is worth noting — a few weeks ago, I asked a group to tell me about their favo­rite Star­bucks com­mer­cial.
THR: The point being, there are none.
Hayes: Some­body said, “Well, they’re on every cor­ner, they don’t need one.” But 10 years ago, they weren’t on any cor­ner. Brands are not being built on adver­ti­sing. You’re seeing this with more and more com­pa­nies. If you fly Jet Blue, you talk about the expe­rience. That’s how you build brands today, through experiences.

Thanks to Modern Mar­ke­ting for the link, and for also suppl­ying this doo­zie:

Howe­ver, old-school ad boys like Mark Wnek think that the ad industry will take all this in it’s stride, because as he sta­tes in today’s Inde­pen­dent, the web is really just a “can­vas for com­mer­cial mes­sa­ging”.
Wnek belie­ves that ad guys will just turn their skills effort­lessly from one medium to the next. After all, he points out, “Who will fill these can­va­ses in a way that exci­tes con­su­mers? The crea­tive ladies and gent­le­men who live in adver­ti­sing agen­cies, that’s who.”

I’d make a com­ment if I weren’t so dis­trac­ted by all the Scha­den­freude welling up inside me.

May 22, 2005

let me kiss

zzzzzz7654234.jpg

textbook hughtrain

zzzzsteak20.jpg
Seth Godin wri­tes about a pain­ter who really made his day.

Two months later, I get an email saying the pain­ting is ready and has been ship­ped. I send him a check, made out to his new name, on faith. A day later, a pain­ting arri­ves by Fede­ral Express. From Israel. With a handw­rit­ten invoice.
The pain­ting is terri­fic – even bet­ter than the ori­gi­nal. But more impor­tant to us is the story. Not sure what you can do with it, but thought you’d want to hear it.

I know exactly what to do with it, Seth. Cite it as text­book Hugh­train: “The mar­ket for something to believe in is infi­nite.“
Exactly.

“extreme business modelling”

zzznmkjh02.jpg
One of my favo­rite gaping­void posts was something I wrote last July, to do with pre­fe­rring my own busi­ness models, over other people’s:

The thing I like about gaping­void is it has allo­wed me to do my thing (for fun and yes, pro­fit) without having to marry myself to some­body else’s busi­ness model. Espe­cially some­body else’s LOUSY busi­ness model, which tra­di­tio­nal publishing basi­cally is.
The older I get, the less I like other people’s busi­ness models. I pre­fer my own busi­ness models, thank you very much.
This is what the inter­net is really about– this is what cau­ses the exci­te­ment. It’s all about giving more peo­ple con­trol over their own busi­ness models, not rel­ying on third par­ties to supply them. This is true in publishing, retail, adver­ti­sing, the law, you name it.

And I had simi­lar thoughts in “How To Be Crea­tive”:

11. Don’t try to stand out from the crowd; avoid crowds alto­gether.
Your plan for get­ting your work out there has to be as ori­gi­nal as the actual work, perhaps even more so. The work has to create a totally new mar­ket. There’s no point trying to do the same thing as 250,000 other young hope­fuls, wai­ting for a miracle. All exis­ting busi­ness models are wrong. Find a new one.

So it looks like Sig’s been doing some simi­lar thin­king with what I think is a very com­pe­lling idea, “Extreme Busi­ness Mode­lling”:

A few impor­tant aspects of extreme pro­gram­ming, eh, extreme business-modelling:
Write a user story. Explore the value for the cus­to­mer!
[Extreme business-planning spe­ci­fic: Acid test your pri­cing and mar­gins. If you could easily deli­ver at half the price of the com­pe­ti­tion, you may be good. If you’re pretty sure you can deli­ver at 1/10th you’ll have the lee­way to play really loose :) ]
The cus­to­mer (even the poten­tial one) is always avai­la­ble. Involve the cus­to­mer, use him, make him a part of the pro­cess.
Pair pro­gram­ming and collec­tive code ownership. Involve the cus­to­mer again, let him have ownership to your pro­duct!
Make fre­quent small relea­ses. Test one thing at a time, don’t get stuck with a half-baked and untes­ted com­plete plan.
Ite­rate and inte­grate often. Test and try, go back make bet­ter, test and try again, go back.
Leave opti­mi­sa­tion till last. When it gels, shape the last parts, refine when the basics are right!

He is tal­king about his soft­ware com­pany, of course, but the idea extends far beyond soft­ware.
Nothing wrong with extreme busi­ness mode­lling. Look at Wal Mart. Look at Dell. Look at the future that awaits most of us.
[Disc­lai­mer: Sig and I are doing some work together.]

free savile row suit

Tom’s giving away one of his old suits. We are being FLOODED with e-mails as a result.
Because the suits are desig­ned to last 10 – 20 years, it’s not uncom­mon to hand them down, usually to a son, grand­son, or if you’re a tai­lor, to your appren­tice. As Tom has none of the above, he just ran­domly deci­ded to offer it to one of his rea­ders.
Tom rec­kons the suit has about another 10 years of nor­mal wear left in it. Check it out if you’re interested.

joi feels the strain

zzzzazzdggg30.jpg
(A car­toon I drew last year, ins­pi­red by Joi’s hec­tic life.)
Joi Ito is fee­ling the strain of main­tai­ning a well known and highly-regarded blog:

Of course, this is just a rehash of an old dis­cus­sion of collap­sing con­texts, but I find myself strug­gling with this blog­gers block more and more these days. I find myself han­ging out on the IRC chan­nel chat­ting about things that in the past I would be blog­ging about. I defi­ni­tely feel like my blog is going [from] edgy to broad and boring.

My two cents:
1. Every blog­ger who’s been doing it for a while will have the same con­ver­sa­tion even­tually. Like I said recently, some­ti­mes real life takes over etc. Joi’s just being brave by brin­ging it up in public.
2. The good news is, “Blog Bur­nout” is rela­ti­vely easy to fix, because it’s usually not a symp­tom of blog­ging per se, but of blog­ging too often. So the cure is very sim­ple: Blog less. Take your time, post less often, and put more thought in bet­ween pos­tings. Your rea­ders will adjust to the new pace even­tually, and if they don’t, who cares? Rea­ders who are hos­tile to natu­ral change are pro­bably not the kind of rea­ders you want to hold on to, anyway.

May 21, 2005

new blog from tom peters

From everybody’s favo­rite biz­por­no­grapher, Tom Peters, comes a very pro­mi­sing new blog, TPWi­re­ser­vice. This comes only days after Tom announ­ced he was cut­ting back on the blog-writing bit. I’m gues­sing the two events are not unre­la­ted.
It’s got some really cool stuff on it. Con­grats to ever­yone invol­ved with it.

our grandparents had laurel and hardy

zzzzazzdggg60.jpg
Steve Rubel wri­tes a thought­ful post about the recent “Blog­ging Bac­klash” going on.

What eMar­ke­ter totally neglec­ted to talk about, howe­ver, is what the oppor­tu­nity is for the com­pa­nies that do decide to be brave and take the plunge. For example…

Sig­ni­fi­cant com­pe­ti­tive advan­tage –you could become the lou­dest voice
in a chan­nel where your com­pe­ti­tors are absent
Press and con­su­mers read blogs — either willingly (RSS/bookmarks) or unwi­llingly (Goo­gle); like it or not they influence purcha­ses
Blog­ging ain’t going away. The con­ver­sa­tion is going to go on without you. Be there or be square.
Blogs are a cost-effective mar­ke­ting tool that helps sma­ller and mid-sized com­pa­nies gene­rate more atten­tion. Just look at Stony­field Farms.

Blog bashing doesn’t phase me too much– I actually find it rather enter­tai­ning. What can I say? It’s rather fun watching peo­ple being wrong, again and again, for the same “I have a dum­bass suit & tie job in a big com­pany ergo I must be terribly impor­tant” rea­sons.
Our grand­pa­rents had Lau­rel and Hardy. We have blog bashers.
[BONUS LINK:] IBM makes its blog­ging policy public. It seems they are acti­vely encou­ra­ging their 320,000 emplo­yees to start their own blogs. Rock on.

jeff jumps ship

Jeff Jar­vis, one of my blog­ging heroes, just quit his job at Advance.net.
Am I sur­pri­sed? Not really. He’s always been a bit of a visio­nary. The Avance pro­duct never was. Of course, I’m sure he did his best to coax the com­pany along as far as he could, but there’s only so much you can do if some­body else is paying you a salary. This new gig of his (doing something for About.com) looks much more up his street.
Good luck, Jeffers!

british blogging

zzaaaaaaa02.jpg
Left Lon­don yes­ter­day. Got home late last night.
The Lon­don Geek Din­ner that Robert Sco­ble and I have orga­ni­sed on June 7th has top­ped 125 peo­ple. Wow.
It was going to be a sit-down affair. But the num­bers have got­ten so large it looks like it’ll have to be a buf­fet of some sort.
At the rate peo­ple are currently sig­ning up, it looks like we may very well have 200 peo­ple tur­ning up. Inci­den­tally, 200 is also the num­ber of peo­ple who atten­ded Les Blogs in Paris last month, to give you an idea. And Paris see­med like a lot of peo­ple at the time. It’s like this big blog­ging con­fab just self-created itself in a Lon­don res­tau­rant.
Lots going on with me these days. I met up with Alis­tair Shrimp­ton (Six Apart UK) for cof­fee yes­ter­day. We were tal­king about how much the UK (and Europe) was lag­ging behind Ame­rica in blog­ging terms. For exam­ple, how many Bri­tish CEO’s are blog­ging? How many “A-Listers” are Bri­tish? How many Bri­tish ad agen­cies are using blogs to alter the mar­ke­ting lands­cape? How many Brits are blog­ging to radi­cally improve their business’s for­tu­nes?
The Brits have a lot of catching up to do. But the­rein lies the oppor­tu­nity for Alis­taire, myself, and any­body else crazy enough to catch the blog­ging disease.

May 18, 2005

in london

zzzmkghilkj41.jpg
I’m in Lon­don at the moment, and it’s all quite busy. Blog­ging light till the wee­kend etc.
The geek din­ner in Lon­don with Robert Sco­ble on the 7th of June is nearly full. Please sign up ASAP if you’re coming, thanks.

May 16, 2005

the porous membrane (cont.)

zzzzzz7654229.jpg
[Each company’s mar­ket is divi­ded into two parts, (A) the inter­nal con­ver­sa­tion within the com­pany, and (B) the exter­nal con­ver­sa­tion with the outside world. The ideally porous “x-membrane” sepe­ra­tes the two.]
Recently I wrote about “The Porous Mem­brane– Why Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Works”. And I went on to talk about the porous “x-membrane”, the ima­gi­nary line that divi­des the con­ver­sa­tion about your pro­duct and mar­ket bet­ween your com­pany (A) and the outside world (B).

13. The more porous your mem­brane (“x”), the easier it is for the inter­nal con­ver­sa­tion to inform and align with the exter­nal con­ver­sa­tion, and vice versa.

I also said:

15. Of course this begs the ques­tion, why have a mem­brane “x” at all? Why bother with such a hierarchy?

Since then I’ve been spen­ding a lot of time thin­king about that. Exactly. Why divide the con­ver­sa­tion into two bits, A and B. Is it really neces­sary?
Could “Com­plete Align­ment” ren­der the x-membrane obso­lete?
And what about the sub-membranes? Mem­bra­nes that divide ‘A’ into litle sub­di­vi­sions? Must there be a mem­brane sepe­ra­ting, for exam­ple, accoun­ting from mar­ke­ting etc. etc.?
Food for thought etc. Meanwhile, I’m off to catch a train to Lon­don at lunch­time, where I’ll be till Fri­day. More later…

May 15, 2005

blog as if your life depended on it (for the next three months, anyway)

zzzzzz7654201.jpg
Back in February, I lin­ked to a rather encou­ra­ging post from Tom Peters:


Blog As If Your Life Depen­ded On It!

Blog­ging, I firmly believe, is the pre­mier emer­gent marketing-brandbuilding-lovemarkcreating tool of our times! It is the pre­mier way to have intimate-engaging-informative-WOWing “con­ver­sa­tions” with Clients and pros­pects! This all goes dou­ble for small enter­pri­ses and niche enter­pri­ses; and goes tri­ple for the Pro­fes­sio­nal Ser­vi­ces; and works won­ders in the Public Sec­tor as well.

So if Tom’s life depends on it, why did he decide to cut back on blog­ging, 3 months later? What, has Tom rever­ted to typi­cal “Do as I say, not as I do” con­sul­tants­peak?
Heh. Pro­bably not. I know where he’s coming from. Life is messy. Been close to giving up myself, more than once. Most blog­gers I know well have also said the same. Some­ti­mes real life takes over etc.
The rea­lity is, blog­ging is hard, even for famous busi­ness gurus like Tom. It’s like figure ska­ting– it looks easy, but it isn’t.
Expect a cor­po­rate bac­klash against blog­ging in about six months, once all the meat­pup­pets who read the recent Busi­ness­week front-pager start fin­ding this out the hard way.

May 14, 2005

recent conversation:

Friend: What’s the har­dest part about cor­po­rate blog con­sul­ting?
Me: Get­ting the client to rea­lise that the bug­gers don’t write themselves.

good conversations don’t care who start them

I’m not sure if I agree with Evelyn on this one:

Try put­ting your cus­to­mers and your ecosystem’s con­ver­sa­tions at the cen­ter of the hub — rather than your company’s. Even if it’s simply a con­cep­tual idea, it’ll radi­cally change the focus of your con­ver­sa­tion.
Mar­ke­ting is not all about get­ting out the com­pany story. Your cus­to­mers have sto­ries too.

Good con­ver­sa­tions don’t care who start them.

english cut u.s. tour june 9 – 16

US map small.jpg
English Cut is visi­ting three U.S. cities in June: New York, San Fran­cisco and Chi­cago.
Any­body fancy a $3000 suit?

May 13, 2005

gapingshirts

yyyyyyy765053.jpg
Robert Scoble’s gaping­void t-shirt arri­ved in the mail:

Just got home. I’m so exci­ted! My Gaping­Void shirt arri­ved. Mar­yam thinks it’s cool. Sorry, Mar­yam, you can’t steal my shirt. At least not until I wear it next week at the Syn­di­cate con­fe­rence.
I got the “was it good for you?” design.

Ditto for Nevi­lle Hob­son:

Hugh’s right — high qua­lity, well made and very nice indeed. I chose the “Was it good for you?” cartoon:

If you use Flickr, there’s a “gapingshirts” tag where you can upload pics of the shirts. Sebas­tian has already uploa­ded quite a few.
[SPEAKING OF SCOBLE:] The Lon­don Geek Din­ner orga­ni­sed by Robert and me is boo­king up REALLY fast. Please check out the details and reserve a place if you’re coming. Thanks.

May 12, 2005

from hierarchy to wirearchy

zzzzzz7654109.jpg
A real gem from Jon Hus­band from last June:

From Hie­rarchy to Wirearchy: Over­view
What do you do as a leader

sex is nasty

zzzzzz7654233.jpg

blogcards etc.

zzzbambam34.jpg
The car­toon above, “Wolf vs Sheep” is the design I have on my own per­so­nal blog­card. It’s what I hand out to peo­ple.
I just orde­red a new box, in time for the Lon­don geek din­ner with Robert Sco­ble on June 7th, and Reboot 7.0 right after that.
The wolf ana­logy has always sui­ted me. And with the whole Thin­gamy-Hugh­train sch­tick going on, it’s star­ting to suit me even more.
Avast, ye scur­vies etc.
[UPDATE:] Here’s the set menu for the geek din­ner. (Right-click to download)

May 11, 2005

nobody reads

zzzzzz7654232.jpg

beyond models:

zzzzzz7654168.jpg
From Sig: “We’re model buyers. We should be model buil­ders.“

Rigid models can­not truly repre­sent all of rea­lity for all, thus the models will always be wrong to les­ser or grea­ter extent.
If you want to make bet­ter use of the resour­ces, if you want a bet­ter place to work in, if you want to make great pro­fits, in short, if you want to be suc­cess­ful — rethink the given models. Nah, do one bet­ter:
Become a model builder.

A raging dis­cus­sion is hap­pe­ning in the com­ments– most of it way out of my depth:

In my view part of the bene­fit of the entrenched mana­ge­ment metho­do­lo­gies and mono­lithic stacks of soft­ware that are out there is that there is a huge 3rd party mar­ket of com­ple­men­tary solu­tions as well as a large num­ber of domain experts.
So what you really must be advo­ca­ting is an uber disin­ter­me­dia­tion tech­no­logy that somehow mira­cu­lously deli­vers unli­mi­ted cus­to­mi­za­tion and per­so­na­li­za­tion whilst simul­ta­neously gua­ran­teeing uni­ver­sal com­pa­ti­bi­lity and interoperability.

And Sig pipes in again:

As ‘most’ of your com­pe­ti­tors choo­ses the easy way out, the pre-packaged stuff, cop­ying their com­pe­ti­tion — a huge, really huge oppor­tu­nity appears:
A great chance to beat them all, bet­ter chance than any­time in his­tory perhaps? Change the rules by cha­llen­ging the set models, expe­ri­ment, try and test, be brave and become unique.

[NOTE TO SELF:] Stick to cartooning.

coolest thing ever

yyyyyyy765052.jpg
My Roberts Gemini-10 digi­tal radio arri­ved in the mail today. It is the most won­der­ful little box of high-quality retro joy. I love it.
That’s real leather it’s cove­red with, and the digi­tal sound qua­lity is ousts­tan­ding. Com­ple­tely static-free.
One of the advan­ta­ges of living in the UK is the BBC. They really have utterly fabu­lous radio, espe­cially if you like clas­si­cal music.

i should dump him

zzzzzz7654231.jpg

definition of ‘loser’

zzzzzz7654230.jpg

May 9, 2005

the porous membrane: why corporate blogging works.

zzzzzz7654229.jpg
The other day some­body asked me to explain why cor­po­rate blog­ging works. Sure, we know it’s the hot new thing and peo­ple are paying atten­tion to it (inc­lu­ding big media)… but why?
Why does it work? Seriously.
So I drew the dia­gram above.
1. In Clue­train par­lance, we say “mar­kets are con­ver­sa­tions”. So the dia­gram above repre­sents your mar­ket, or “The Con­ver­sa­tion”. That is demar­ka­ted by the outer circle “y”.
2. There is a sma­ller, inner circle “x”.
3. So the entire mar­ket, the “con­ver­sa­tion” is sepe­ra­ted into two dis­tinct parts, the inner area “A” and the outer area “B”.
4. Area “A” repre­sents your com­pany, the peo­ple suppl­ying the mar­ket. We call that “The Inter­nal Con­ver­sa­tion”.
5. Area “B” repre­sents the peo­ple in the mar­ket who are not making, but buying. Other­wise know as the cus­to­mers. We call that “The Exter­nal Con­ver­sa­tion”.
6. So each mar­ket from a cor­po­rate point of view has an inter­nal and exter­nal con­ver­sa­tion. What sepe­ra­tes the two is a mem­brane, other­wise known as “x”.
7. Every company’s mem­brane is dif­fe­rent, and con­tro­lled by a host of dif­fe­rent tech­ni­cal and cul­tu­ral fac­tors.
8. Ideally, you want A and B to be iden­ti­cal as pos­si­ble, or at least, in sync. The things that A is pas­sio­nate about, B should also be pas­sio­nate about. This we call “align­ment”. A good exam­ple would be Apple. The peo­ple at Apple think the iPod is cool, and so do their cus­to­mers. They are alig­ned.
9. When A and B are no lon­ger alig­ned is when the com­pany starts get­ting into trou­ble. When A starts saying their gizmo is great and B is telling every­body it sucks, then you have serious misa­lign­ment.
10. So how do you keep misa­lign­ment from hap­pe­ning?
11. The ans­wer lies in “x”, the mem­brane that sepe­ra­tes A from B. The more porous the mem­brane, the easier it is for con­ver­sa­tions bet­ween A and B, the inter­nal and exter­nal, to hap­pen. The easier for the con­ver­sa­tions on both side of mem­brane “x” to adjust to the other, to become like the other.
12. And nothing, and I do mean nothing, pokes holes in the mem­brane bet­ter than blogs. You want porous? You got porous. Blogs punch holes in mem­bra­nes like like it was Swiss cheese.
13. The more porous your mem­brane (“x”), the easier it is for the inter­nal con­ver­sa­tion to inform and align with the exter­nal con­ver­sa­tion, and vice versa.
14. Not to men­tion it makes misa­lign­ment, if it hap­pens, a lot easier to repair.
15. Of course this begs the ques­tion, why have a mem­brane “x” at all? Why bother with such a hie­rarchy? But that’s another story.
[AFTERTHOUGHT:] And yes, this works with inter­nal blogs as well, poking holes in the mem­bra­nes that sepe­rate peo­ple within a cor­po­rate cul­ture; alig­ning “the con­ver­sa­tion” inter­nally etc.
The other advan­tage of inter­nal blog­ging is that it orga­ni­ses con­ver­sa­tion into a long-term mana­gea­ble form. Two peo­ple sha­ring ideas via blogs is a lot more per­ma­nent, viral and use­ful for the com­pany than two peo­ple sha­ring the same infor­ma­tion over by the water­coo­ler.
[AFTERTHOUGHT:] Poking holes in mem­bra­nes sub­verts hie­rarchies. Avast, ye scur­vies etc.
[UPDATE:] Just added this post to The Hugh­train.

english cut in copenhagen

BAR copenhagen b&w.jpg
Copenha­gen is on my mind today for two rea­sons:
1. In a month I’m going there to par­ti­ci­pate in Reboot 7.0. A big blog­ging event, it should be lots of fun. And there will be a geek din­ner in Lon­don with Robert Sco­ble 2 days before, on June 7th.
2. English Cut is going to esta­blish a regu­lar sche­du­led tailor’s visit to Copenha­gen, every 4 – 6 weeks.
There’s a big Scan­de­na­vian tadi­tion for bes­poke. Mr. Ander­son, of Ander­son & Shep­pard fame was Swe­dish. And Mr Hal­berry, the man who trai­ned Tho­mas (arguably the grea­test tai­lor of the twen­tieth cen­tury, by the way) also had a Swe­dish family/connection. Besi­des that, flights from New­castle (our nea­rest air­port) to Copenha­gen are cheap and easy, cour­tesy of Easy­Jet.
Right now I’m just put­ting out fee­lers; it’s not offi­cal yet on the English Cut web­site. First on my list is to find a nice, pre­fe­rably small luxury hotel in Copenha­gen. One not unlike The Hotel Ben­ja­min, the hotel Tho­mas stays in when he’s in New York. Any sug­ges­tions?
Second on my list is figu­ring out how to get the Danish media inte­res­ted in the story. Any ideas?
So that brings it up to 5 ports of call: Savile Row (Lon­don), Paris, New York, San Fran­cisco and Copenha­gen. Last on my list is Milan, which will come later. 6 ports of call will be plenty.
Any­way, as always, if you know any Scan­de­na­vians with a sar­to­rial fetish, please spread the word. Thanks.