April 30, 2005

re-invention

zzzzzz7654136.jpg
There’s a bit in The Hugh­train I’m quite fond of:

: There

7 Responses to “re-invention”

  1. John Curran says:

    For years I’ve been wor­king at the culture/technology coal­face (is that metaphor still valid?). I’ve used all sorts of approaches, fra­me­works and models to help but still don’t have one that I’m happy with. It’s something I’d like to take up again though.
    It all star­ted when I wrote user gui­des for tech­no­logy ‘solu­tions’. Most of the time I was expen­ding enor­mous amounts of effort desc­ri­bing things that users would find com­ple­tely alien (the same things see­med fine to C++ deve­lo­pers). Soon I rea­li­sed that the users never read the manuals any­way — so ins­tead of 200 pages I wrote 6 – 8 pages. The users read ALL the pages. They even asked where the rest of docu­ments were. By giving them less I’d caught their atten­tion. The pro­cess was hard work though — kno­wing what to leave out and what to put in requi­red a lot of thin­king about (though my fellow authors thought I was just taking the piss).
    To cut a lon­gish story short since that early groun­ding I’ve been pas­sio­nate about wor­king in that space BETWEEN peo­ple and tech­no­logy and of course the real issue isn’t usa­bi­lity or inter­face design or pro­cess design it’s the user cul­ture.
    Will keep an eye on the Culture/Technology debate.
    Love the sketches by the way — Brilliant!

  2. Paul Farnell says:

    That’s my favou­rite car­toon! Brilliant!

  3. Roman says:

    Hi Hugh
    I recently joi­ned a photo agency in Paris that does stock pho­to­graphy. This is an old busi­ness gently rein­ven­ting itself to all digi­tal.
    Clients still pre­fer good film to of poor digi­tal ima­ges and good human ser­vice ins­tead of cold inter­net. Busi­ness should rein­vent them­sel­ves on time but should not change for change’s sake.

  4. hugh macleod says:

    I agree, Roman. But… ;-)

  5. Colleen says:

    You sound like a good, Hege­lian dia­lec­tic in action to me. Love that. Go, Hugh!
    Seriously, this par­ti­cu­lar chunk of the Hugh­train works in the meta sense, as well (as does most of the Hugh­train, which is pro­bably why it reso­na­tes with so many peo­ple).
    Truly rein­ven­ting anything is always (well, okay – almost always) har­der than star­ting from scratch. Who was it who said “Begin­nings are always lovely”? Because it’s true true true. As I pos­ted on Evelyn’s site a bit ago, it’s far easier in many ways to be a great actor in the begin­ning than it is once the bloom is off the rose. It’s almost ine­vi­ta­ble that you will be encum­be­red by your tools and tech­ni­que before you mas­ter and inte­grate them into your pro­cess.
    And, to apply your para­digm more directly to gene­ral human endea­vor, doesn’t the clim­bing divorce rate speak in some way to the ease of star­ting anew vs. rene­wal?
    Of course, some things become mori­bund for good rea­son and should be dis­car­ded. But recyc­ling is such a nifty, neat pro­po­si­tion, I really think we should be doing more of it.

  6. Awe­some cartoon!

  7. stacey says:

    Very funny car­toon.
    T-shirt worthy?
    (Though I am an Ame­ri­can and and as such I refuse to shell out big bucks for high qua­lity pro­duct that wasn’t made cheap over­seas by eight year old girls.)