April 2, 2005

conflict of interest

zzzzazzdggg21.jpg
Tris, you made a few good points about Gour­met Sta­tion Blog, which I, for good or ill named as this week’s win­ner of “The Beyond Lame Award”.
Now that I know more about the story behind GSB, my atti­tude has sof­te­ned. This is due in no small part to the Pre­si­dent of GSB per­so­nally lea­ving a remark in my com­ments sec­tion (You see what a little honest con­ver­sa­tion can do? CEO’s, take note.).
But let’s face it, using stock pho­to­graphy of posed, fake, happy, smi­ling yup­pies ANYWHERE near the blo­gopshere is just asking for trou­ble.
Frankly, it just screams “pre­ten­tious”. And “pre­ten­tious” doesn’t get you the bene­fit of the doubt in the Blo­gopshere. It gets you “Beyond Lame Awards”, as GSB found out. Harsh but true.
Wha­te­ver. I’m sure GSB is a good com­pany with a great pro­duct run by nice peo­ple, even if their blog­ging pro­wess could use a refresher course. I sin­ce­rely wish them well.
But there’s a big­ger issue, which affects any­body trying to make a living in the ad busi­ness, to grea­ter or les­ser degrees.
The big­ger issue is that a lot of peo­ple and busi­nes­ses are now entrus­ting adver­ti­sing agen­cies to build their blogs for them. If your blog buil­ding is currently entrus­ted to an ad agency, I’d be REALLY care­ful, and REALLY ruth­less with them.
The fact is, ad agen­cies hate blogs. They utterly des­pise them, even if they tell you other­wise. They hate them because if done well, they’re cheap and they’re easy. Frankly, they’re in the busi­ness of selling you stuff that is neither.
They also hate blogs because blog­ging rewards authen­ti­city and punishes insin­ce­rity, whe­reas the ad agency busi­ness model does EXACTLY the oppo­site.
Blogs have a fun­de­men­tal con­flict of inte­rest with the eco­no­mics and ethics of run­ning a tra­di­tio­nal ad agency, and no slick, Cluetrain-savvy agency pitch is going to change that.
Seems to me GSB got caught in the crossfire.

16 Responses to “conflict of interest”

  1. Colleen says:

    »The fact is, ad agen­cies hate blogs. They utterly des­pise them, even if they tell you other­wise. They hate them because if done well, they’re cheap and they’re easy. Frankly, they’re in the busi­ness of selling you stuff that is neither.
    A-men.
    »They also hate blogs because blog­ging rewards authen­ti­city and punishes insin­ce­rity, whe­reas the ad agency busi­ness model does EXACTLY the oppo­site.
    That goes dou­ble for this.
    Of course, my dream is that the trans­pa­rency and authen­ti­city deman­ded by blog­ging will finally work out­ward and create change on a mas­sive scale in the offline world. I really believe that the tools of busi­ness aren’t inhe­rently evil, although they’re (sadly) fre­quently emplo­yed in the ser­vice of it.
    Yay, Hugh. May you bring together many smart patrons and beau­ti­ful suits.

  2. Hello Hugh,
    I agree. “Seems to me GSB got caught in the cross­fire.”
    I also agree with many of your points as to how some tac­tics are ripe for cri­ti­cism in the busi­ness blog­ging world. Know your envi­ron­ment. Know your audien­ces.
    Thanks for get­ting into the dis­cus­sion. I enjo­yed it. Always get a kick from the toons, too.
    All the best.
    Robert

  3. Andy Havens says:

    The great thing about authen­ti­city is that once it catches on, it’s pretty easy to fake.
    I’d love to believe that blog­ging is going to make the world a hap­pier, gree­ner, swee­ter, nicer, more play­ful, nif­tier, more joy­ful, friend­lier, trans­pa­rent place. I think that there’s way to little of all that great stuff. And, right now, the ease of use of blogs really does remove a num­ber of barriers that have kept inte­res­ted and pas­sio­nate peo­ple from get­ting their voi­ces heard in the past.
    But…
    What can be dis­co­ve­red by early adop­ters, embra­ced by pas­sio­nate belie­vers, done well by hobb­yists and civi­lians… can be craf­ted to a dia­mond sharp point by pro­fes­sio­nals.
    Have they got it right yet? Nope. It’s still too new. Same thing with the web back in the mid 90’s. Agen­cies were fum­bling around and trying to treat it like a cross bet­ween TV, a weird ATM and a remote con­trol. And, if you’ll remem­ber, lots of us hip techno trolls back then were stro­king our beards and going on about how the “old eco­nomy” folks were never going to “get the web.”
    Whoops. We were wrong. They did. It just took them awhile to adjust. We shoulda seen it coming. Because the same things hap­pe­ned when TV came in, and before that radio, and before that natio­nal maga­zi­nes. Every time, the folks who had the ini­tial “eureka!” were sure that the Old Guard would pass away. They never do. They even­tually catch on, hire some of the Eureka Kids, read a few books and, even­tually, get on the bus.
    I love Doug Rush­koff. And I espe­cially loved “Media Virus.” And when I got done rea­ding it, I star­ted put­ting it to work on my own mar­ke­ting cam­paigns for the cellu­lar com­pany I then wor­ked for. When his next book, “Coer­cion,” came out, I was stun­ned to find out that he was stun­ned to find out that mar­ke­ters, like me, had been put­ting his “Media Virus” work to work for our mar­ke­ting cam­paigns. Vot? Oh… Right… We weren’t sup­po­sed to “get it.” Viral media and meme­tics were tools that only peo­ple who’d been to raves were allo­wed to use. Nope. See GM’s “Saturn” cam­paign.
    So. Do I love blogs? You bet. Do I love that they can disin­ter­me­diate an entire class of jour­na­lists and media wonks who ordi­na­rily pro­vide nothing but an obfus­ca­ting film bet­ween the ori­gi­nal con­tent and the rea­der? Yes. Do I think blogs are neat? Yes. Do I hate blogs that are smarmy and badly done and are clearly trying to take advan­tage of that “new medium smell” in order to get atten­tion? Yes. Do I think that there are a bunch of blogs that should stop blog­ging because their con­tent is clearly ads and not blo­ge­rri­fic? Yes.
    But are blogs going to teach the world to sing? No. Are they going to end poverty? No. And are ad agen­cies going to figure out the right way to help their clients use blogs appro­pria­tely as part of a good, solid mar­ke­ting mix? You bet. How do I know?
    I’m already doing it with my clients.
    You can’t really fake authen­ti­city. I was kid­ding about that. But you can cer­tainly plan to be authen­tic and put some thought behind when, where and how to do it well. You can choose what sub­jects to blog on. You can edu­cate peo­ple on how to find sub­jects. And you can steer peo­ple away from cheesy clip pho­to­graphy.
    Blogs are a great medium. And in Ame­rica, all great media will even­tually be used for mar­ke­ting. C’est la vie. C’est la guerre.

  4. hyku | blog says:

    Blogs and Ad Agen­cies Do Not Mix?

    Is your ad agency or PR firm deve­lo­ping your blog? Here are some thoughts from Hugh McLeod (quick note: Hugh rather effec­ti­vely uses pro­fa­nity). The big­ger issue is that a lot of peo­ple and busi­nes­ses are now entrus­ting adver­ti­sing agencies…

  5. NevOn says:

    Fake blog chea­pens Dia­geo brand

    In wri­ting about how lame he thinks the Cap­tain Morgan’s Rum fake blog is, Joël Céré says: I think it is less bad than the Mazda expe­ri­ment as at least it allows for com­ments, and there are regu­lar pos­tings. Although

  6. Tom McMahon says:

    Why Ad Agen­cies Hate Blogs

    From Hugh MacLeod:The big­ger issue is that a lot of peo­ple and busi­nes­ses are now entrus­ting adver­ti­sing agen­cies to build their blogs for them. If your blog buil­ding is currently entrus­ted to an ad agency, I’d be REALLY care­ful, and

  7. Blog e agenzie

    Robert Sco­ble, il noto blog­ger che lavora per Mic­ro­soft, scrive un inte­res­sante post sul perch

  8. Mel says:

    “done well by hobb­yists and civi­lians… can be craf­ted to a dia­mond sharp point by pro­fes­sio­nals.”
    Yeah, just like those pro­fes­sio­nal adver­ti­sers pre­sent women and mino­ri­ties and gay and les­bian peo­ple in com­mer­cials. Those talen­ted pro­fes­sio­nals who show me, an edu­ca­ted woman, that I’d be hap­pier scrub­bing my bath­room until it gleams. I can’t wait to see how they repre­sent my femi­nist views bet­ter than I can. They can craft enough dia­monds to refill all the mines in Africa and I still won’t buy what they have to say. Ever.

  9. Dawn says:

    Yet another post about this sub­ject after I’ve already writ­ten two responses…that’s what I get for rea­ding from the bot­tom up.
    Glad you sof­te­ned your stand, Hugh, but let’s go back to the ori­gi­nal cen­tral issue. It wasn’t the pic­tu­res that peo­ple poin­ted to as “lame,” but the fact that the blog­ger was “fake.” As I said in my first post to the ori­gi­nal thread, I haven’t read the chef blog, so I don’t know if it’s good or bad, but I DO know that AUTHENTIC (which I agree with you is neces­sary) doesn’t neces­sa­rily mean REAL.
    Those are not REAL peo­ple in your gags…they are sym­bols of real peo­ple. Yet des­pite your very unrea­lis­tic dra­wing style, your comics have an extre­mely authen­tic voice, which is why they are so good and so liked. In fact, if you used pho­to­graphs of real peo­ple, the gags would lose a lot of punch and effec­ti­ve­ness!
    Then, too, I have read many blogs by “real” peo­ple who write in a very INauthen­tic voice.
    So I stand by what I’ve said. For­cing pre­con­cei­ved notions that blog­gers can’t be made up peo­ple is not Clue­train OR Hugh­train and just because a blog­ger isn’t a real per­son, the blog shouldn’t auto­ma­ti­cally qua­lify for your beyond lame award.
    Now your war­ning about ad agen­cies: good point!

  10. reflections says:

    gapes of wrath

    do you read gaping void? why the hell, not? you slac­kers. i have so many favo­ri­tes, but here are a few that just can’t be mis­sed… assho­les stu­pid fuck still an asshole oh fuck off nothing to say blog aid…

  11. Social Soft­ware for Social Enterpreneurs

    Lee publishes some details about the ses­sion on Social Soft­ware at the Skoll World Forum for Social Enter­pre­neurs, and points out 9 sim­ple hints for those who wants to get star­ted on social soft­ware. 1. Start a weblog and per­suade every­body invol­ved t…

  12. s says:

    Some agen­cies may hate blogs and by impli­ca­tion in your opi­nion, truth, but the good ones rea­lize that the win­ning stra­tegy for con­su­mer rec­ruit­ment, enga­ge­ment and long-term com­mit­ment comes from dra­ma­ti­zing the most rele­vant brand truths through a dia­lo­gue. That’s why brands and the good agen­cies like blogs. And, The Cap­tain, although fic­ti­tious, is clearly neither frau­du­lent nor mis­lea­ding in its blog. It’s clearly character-based and per­so­nally, I’ve found it enter­tai­ning. If truth enter­tains is it a les­ser truth?
    Cheers!

  13. hugh macleod says:

    “S”,
    Nice job remai­ning semi-anonymous, if not totally anony­mous. Yeah, I used to work in adver­ti­sing too. I know all about fear and para­noia.
    Who are these good ad agen­cies that you speak of? Name some names if you feel so con­fi­dent in your opi­nion.
    Tell me of the great work that they’re doing, on behalf of their clients. I would like to see it.
    Here’s a story. The Chief Mar­ke­ting Offi­cer of a very, very good, very famous US agency told me last week, “Our good ideas no lon­ger come from the copyw­ri­ters. They’re coming from the web geeks, the hac­kers and the techies.”
    Hope you’re not a copywriter.

  14. Ghost Blog­ging and Pseudo Blogs by Fic­ti­tious Enti­ties S-U-C-K.
    I still don’t get why the CEO or other spo­kes­per­son can’t be the authen­tic voice of the GS blog.
    That TA cha­rac­ter is a bad, a very bad, idea.
    Just my astute opi­nion.
    I was a direct mar­ke­ting copyw­ri­ter for years, inc­lu­ding work at Grey Adver­ti­sing in NYC.
    Luc­kily, I never in my career was asked to create a fake anything.
    Fic­tio­nal cha­rac­ters who “blog” are Beyond Ridi­cu­lous.
    A non-entity is dis­cus­sing non-events invol­ving make believe family and pre­tend friends, to com­mu­ni­cate a brand, a pro­duct, a com­pany?
    You’ve got to be bullshit­ting me.

  15. Stacy Brice says:

    Too funny. I read your ori­gi­nal post, Hugh, then trot­ted over to take a peek at Gour­mets­ta­tion.
    Blown away by the inauthen­ti­city, I wrote a little post of my own in which I said that, for me, the whole thing going on over at GS was a little smarmy and off-putting.
    The next day, I was sur­pri­sed and plea­sed to find that Donna Lynes-Miller pos­ted a nice com­ment to explain the whole thing and thank me for my feed­back.
    And today, I’m anno­yed to find that her com­ment to me is the same com­ment, ver­ba­tim, that she left for you. I won­der how many other blog­gers got the same exact thing?
    Maybe I’m a little bitchy, but wouldn’t one think she might have taken a moment to write something a bit more direc­ted to the source, rather than a can­ned res­ponse? Or did a fic­ti­tious cha­rac­ter (or emplo­yee) write her com­ments for her?

  16. Blog­ging poli­cies and guidelines

    Follo­wing a colla­bo­ra­tive effort by exis­ting blog­gers in our com­pany, we’ve just had our gui­de­li­nes for per­so­nal weblogs appro­ved and published to all our staff. I’m repro­du­cing the key extracts here for the refe­rence of others.