April 1, 2005

hey, commodity boy!

zzzlokjib02.jpg
A fami­liar theme in various e-mail exchan­ges I’ve been having recently:

The Long Tail not­withs­tan­ding, if you’re in an ever-increasingly crow­ded mar­ket where the (A) the barriers to entry dec­rease with every pas­sing day and (B) your com­pe­ti­tion get youn­ger, hun­grier, sexier and chea­per than you by the hour, then I’d be con­cer­ned.
With the inter­net [not to men­tion, ummmm.… Wal­Mart, China etc etc], if you have to com­pete on price, you’re dead…

Make your pro­duct as freely avai­la­ble as pos­si­ble to the grea­test num­ber of peo­ple pos­si­ble? Hey, Com­mo­dity Boy, Fetch!!

6 Responses to “hey, commodity boy!”

  1. Rick Segal says:

    I should have done a track­back to this and the social cus­to­mer story, com­mo­dity boy. The com­ments below are ones that I pos­ted on Chris’s site but they really should have been pos­ted here or, as i said, in a track­back to both.
    “Inte­res­ting debate on over/under supply but here’s a cus­to­mer pers­pec­tive. I’m only inte­res­ted in get­ting the shirts from hugh that hugh picks out and makes and only the ‘limi­ted’ edi­tion. I could do the jpg thing and make my own but then there is nothing to the story when some­body asks me about the shirt. I’ll talk about hugh, the gaping­void, suits, blogs, etc. In my artic­les, talks to MBA wan­na­bees, it will get men­tio­ned.
    There is more to it then just the shirt.
    by way of another exam­ple. i have a collec­tion of Hard Rock polo shirts from the Hard Rocks around the world. I only get them from the pla­ces where I have been and orde­red food. I don’t have peo­ple get them for me nor do i buy them just in pas­sing nor do i even like them as gifts.
    If the hard rock offe­red all the shirts on a web­site for any store they had, I’d drop collec­ting them in a second because there is no story, no per­so­nal story around the those shirts.
    these days, it’s not about price or maybe even supply, rather it’s about buzz and the story behind wha­te­ver i’m buying.
    The key thing to watch? Assume Hugh gets two hun­dred peo­ple sig­ned up for the auto­ma­tic t-shirt fix. That’s the entire run. Now what?
    Do you have a wai­ting list for peo­ple to can­cel so you can get onto the list? Do you piss off 200 peo­ple by sec­retly making some extra? Do you ‘cop out’ in the name of greed/making money and make more while telling the ori­gi­nal 200 peo­ple, sorry, demand thing.
    If Hugh ends up with, call it, 100,000 active rea­ders of whom 10,000 are die hard fans and you have only 200 get­ting t-shirts with a 400 per­son wai­ting list to get into the queue for a t-shirt fix, I won­der how peo­ple will define that. Some pun­dits will say, goof­ball coulda made more money while others will do a case study on crea­ting buzz.
    and every­body will be right.”

  2. (cross­pos­ted to social­cus­to­mer)
    hugh: i hear what you’re saying; just want to make sure we’re both thin­king about the word “freely” in the same way. if “freely avai­la­ble” means “widely” avai­la­ble, then, well, it may-or-may-not com­mo­di­tize you. if a pro­duct is *truly* uni­que, wouldn’t it only be attrac­tive to a small, uni­que group of indi­vi­duals? but, to agree vio­lently with you, if the pro­duct is gene­ric, and widely avai­la­ble, and able to be “gene­ri­cally” purcha­sed, without the need for the cus­to­mer to think about what he or she is doing…yup. commodity-ville.
    “mea­ning” comes from what you put into it. if both sides (cus­to­mer and crea­tor) don’t have some skin in the game, the “mea­ning” is…well, mea­nin­gless.
    otoh, if “freely avai­la­ble” means “avai­la­ble at no or very very cost,” that’s not what i was tal­king about at all.
    (btw…the point that star­ted this whole dis­cus­sion was kathy sierra’s com­ment that she would have loved to have the “short tail” car­toon on a shirt when she was at eTech.)

  3. @Rick Segal:
    I think there’s a dif­fe­rence bet­ween Hard Rock Caf

  4. Niti says:

    I’d hazard a guess here that Hugh’s not keen on making a living selling t-shirts, so much as sprea­ding the virus, which this is. And brin­ging in the “Wuf­fie” point, in one sense, gapingvoid.com *is* freely avai­la­ble, I’d won­der how many peo­ple for­ward his car­toons, as I myself have done, and how much awa­re­ness spreads about hugh, gaping­void, hugh­train, et al lea­ding, one hopes, ulti­ma­tely to $$

  5. Com­mo­dity Boy is right!
    First ya got the guy who wants you to socia­lize the hugh­train, because of envy, whose idea to spread the meme is to put your cards on sheets, beds­preads, baloons and and clown­suits. Hell lets go all the way and silk screen your cards on the cloth bags that the US dona­tes food to star­ving peo­ple all over the world.
    Ya can do a cross license deal with tom, a tshirt with every bes­poke suit!
    Urich is pis­sed because he can’t get one at Wal­Mart.
    There are some serious pro­blems unders­tand sim­ple english.
    Idiots!!

  6. There are some serious pro­blems write sim­ple English, or even copy a name.
    It seems you don’t unders­tand the dif­fe­rence bet­ween having an order sys­tem and giving a T-Shirt you offer to ever­yone who asks (let’s say, that would be 334 peo­ple), and offe­ring something at Wal Mart.
    I was cri­ti­ci­zing what Rick Segal said: that selling more than 200 shirts would piss peo­ple off. What an eli­tist atti­tude is that? “I want to be the only one (with 199 others) who has that shirt; if there’s demand from 334 peo­ple ins­tead of 200, f*** them.” Sorry, but this is just crea­ting arti­fi­cial shor­tage of a pro­duct. Of course the situa­tion is totally dif­fe­rent for bes­poke suits, where supply is limi­ted by work capa­city! And Wal Mart is a whole dif­fe­rent issue, too.