March 27, 2005

the “beyond lame” award

zzzzazzdggg14.jpg
The “Beyond Lame” Award of The Week goes to… wait for it…
Hey, guess what, Cool Young Adults? The Cap­tain (of Cap­tain Mor­gan Rum fame) has star­ted a blog!
Nothing like drop­ping the name of a fake blog with your Cool Young Adult Friends to inc­rease the ol’ bat­ting ave­rage with the ladies, ya know?
To find out how this blog came into exis­tence, please refer to the car­toon above.
Yet another post-Cluetrain sui­cide pact bet­ween client and agency. Always a joy to behold.
[UPDATE:] Robert Sco­ble joins in the Cap­tain Mor­gan con­ver­sa­tion:

No com­ments? Lame. That tells us you don’t think we’re impor­tant enough to lis­ten to. No RSS? Lame. That tells us you don’t want connectors/sneezers/influentials to talk about you and you don’t want anyone to have a rela­tionship with you on THEIR TERMS. No real human author? That tells us that you aren’t pas­sio­nate or autho­ri­ta­tive about your pro­duct and you aren’t willing to get over your fear of tal­king with real customers.

All very true. But adver­ti­sers don’t come at it from a rela­tionship stand­point; to them it’s an issue of entit­le­ment.
“I’ve spent x-million dollars, Dam­mit, I am entit­led to x-million people’s undi­vi­ded atten­tion.“
And when they don’t get it, they blame the agency. And the agency willingly risks taking the rap in exchange for access to all that client money.
This is what often makes adver­ti­sing folk so (a) arro­gant and (b) para­noid. It’s an unhealthy combo.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

20 Responses to “the “beyond lame” award”

  1. Sean says:

    I pos­ted this about twenty times on “The Captain’s Blog”. God… has mar­ke­ting really sunk this low? Ah yes, it obviously has.
    “I don’t think anyone appre­cia­tes that some idiot mar­ke­ting direc­tor came up with such a horri­ble idea as “The Captain’s Blog”. Way to try and capi­ta­lize on exactly what ever­yone else is doing with their lives.
    Why don’t you find something ori­gi­nal to do, mar­ke­ting guys, or is that beyond the scope of your limi­ted inte­llects?“
    Also, I wan­ted to add that I love your art — espe­cially this latest post! I’m a long-time fan, first-time com­men­ter. Not like you need more sup­port but hey, thanks for kee­ping me laughing.

  2. The cap­tain will per­form a com­mu­nity ser­vice as some kid will get on the site, join the club, get the rum and get his silly ass killed.
    The parents will sue for millions and des­pite all the disc­lai­mers, pri­vacy sta­te­ments, and law­yerly impe­di­men­tia, They will win and make the cap­tain do a 9000 city tour for Mothers Against Drunk Dri­ving.
    Besi­des who want’s to use a pro­duct that makes you look like a spaz when you are trying to score?

  3. Beyond Lame.

    Hugh gives the “beyond lame” award to The Cap­tain, a blog from the folks who bring you Cap­tain Mor­gan Rum. What is even more lame (if it is indeed pos­si­ble to be further than beyond lame) is the fact that…

  4. Hall of Irre­le­vance: The Captain’s Blog

    In a mondo net­wor­ked world, nothing’s going to buoy your brand to whole new level of health like a fake blog autho­red by your mas­cot, right? Kids, here’s The Captain’s Blog. Try to con­tain your­self. It’s every bit as cool…

  5. Jonathan Cohen says:

    This isn’t a funny car­toon; this is just plain offen­sive.
    The impli­ca­tion is that homo­se­xual sex is demea­ning and something to be laughed at. I like your blog, Hugh, but this is not cool at all.

  6. thickslab says:

    I agree with Jonathan. This car­toon is the kind of thing one would expect from a ten year old. Not funny.

  7. Chris H. says:

    uuummm I think Hugh is saying that the ad industry is demea­ning and something to be laughed at, not gay peo­ple. As someone wo has wor­ked in a rela­ted field, I laugh my ass off whe­ne­ver I see this cartoon.

  8. Peter Orosz says:

    Jonathan: think metapho­ri­cal. Hugh is not tal­king about homo­se­xual rela­tionships bet­ween con­sen­ting adults here. Quite the con­trary.
    Also, it’s fuc­king funny.

  9. Keith says:

    For fif­teen years, I wor­ked in the ad biz – a snake pit of the big­gest assho­les on earth. The ad execs are socio­paths and total shits that will say and do anything.
    Hugh, the car­toon is right on. It also hap­pens to be my favo­rite. To anyone that is offen­ded by this car­toon; grow up. It’s an ele­gant com­ment on the ad biz.

  10. Vy Blog says:

    Cap­tain Mor­gan: beyond lame

    Hugh gives the

  11. thickslab says:

    Call me clue­less, but I fail to see how it does anything other than sug­gest that homo­se­xua­lity is something to be laughed at or deri­ded. Perhaps someone can explain the joke here to me.

  12. Jon says:

    I think the idea is these guys are not homo­se­xuals, but are doing this any­way. It’s punch comes from the thought that they’re NOT gay. This is about pros­ti­tu­ting one­self, not being gay.

  13. Geico Blog­ging

    With all the Hugh­train chat­ter about Cap­tain Mor­gan and his new, ridi­cu­lous blog, I thought I’d offer up a sug­ges­tion to a poten­tial blog­ger, Geico, before they start. Blog well, blog often, and for heaven’s sake, dont’ let the gecko blog. Oh wait, y…

  14. expat@large says:

    Um.
    Car­toon is very very funny. Not offen­sive. Much.
    Expla­na­tion for thicks­lab — For me, in order for the joke to work we have to assume that we have two HETEROSEXUAL guys admit­ting that are pre­pa­red to do things that would not be in their pre­fe­rred style of sexual encoun­ters, just for advan­ce­ment at their place of work — in fact given the sexual pre­da­tor types that take up adver­ti­sing (he said, get­ting into even dee­per ste­roty­pe­cas­ting) quite out of cha­rac­ter for what you’d expect. They are lite­rally pros­ti­tu­ting them­sel­ves, and doing things they wouldn’t ordi­na­rily do, for the sake of their adver­ti­sing careers. And, here’s another twist, they are admit­ting as such, bla­tantly, to each other, in public — the­reby saying that this sort of stuff is what goes on — dri­ves, in fact — the adver­ti­sing industry.
    So the car­toon is tur­ning the tables on what is our expec­ta­tion of their beha­viour, and making a com­ment on what the need for greed can to our sense of what cons­ti­tu­tes usual beha­viour.
    It’s called humour. Get your­self a sense of.
    And the car­toon is almost as funny when I explain it. Not.
    But — the pur­pose of the post: to hang it on “The Captain’s Blog” web­site actually falls flat, because, like I said, um.
    It is not a blog, howe­ver you stretch that defi­ni­tion. Doesn’t seem to even pre­tend to be a blog. Just an another pre-cluetrain adver­ti­sing site, using a PUN as a catch-all. (I sure wanna get pssed and run over some chil­dren on the street after vie­wing it.)
    Captain’s Log Captain’s Blog — ged­dit?
    I know you do. Others may not.
    E@L

  15. anon says:

    Good com­ment E@L. Further to your expla­na­tion, these two men being invol­ved in these acti­vi­ties is purely a power issue, not a sexual issue, regard­less of their sexual orien­ta­tion. Just as rape is a power issue, so is taking it up the ass and suc­king cock a sign of sub­mis­sion. When is rape not sex? When are these two guys’ acti­vi­ties not sex? Domi­nance is per­cei­ved as giving it, sub­mis­sion as taking it — whether straight or gay. His­to­ri­cally, straight men, and other spe­cies of males, have raped other men to con­firm their domi­nance over them. The penis is used as a power tool.

  16. Er, a car­toon you have to explain is a fai­lure as a car­toon.
    Aren’t car­toons sup­po­sed to be imme­dia­tely funny…without a lot of post-spectral, pre-deconstructionist analy­sis?
    I don’t see how the car­toon has anything to do with adver­ti­sing, but I do see that the car­toon is guilty of that which it alle­gedly is accu­sing “mar­ke­ters” of: wan­ting the tar­get audience to go along with their ill-considered pro­gram.
    Just my two million cents.

  17. Blog­ging Like a Dru­ken Sailor

    Cap­tain Mor­gan — the car­toon cha­rac­ter behind the rum — has star­ted a blog. Hugh Mac­leod sums up why it’s so lame. Follow the con­ver­sa­tion here.

  18. jeff says:

    The idea is unplea­sant to vete­ran blog­gers but it is a crea­tive idea nonethe­less. It is surely more crea­tive than sho­wing Brit­ney Spears drin­king pepsi, or sho­wing a bunch of alcoho­lics igno­ring the hot chick and figh­ting over beer ins­tead. I DO agree that it’s a big no-no for the esta­blish­ment to enc­roach into the blo­gosphere.
    Simi­lary, it was a big no-no when com­mer­cial inte­rests dis­co­ve­red the inter­net and star­ted using it.
    Peo­ple with a “pri­vate” club, don’t like the mains­tream coming in. The­re­fore the opi­nions are clou­ded and no one sees that the aderv­ti­sing idea to use a Blog is quite a crea­tive one after all (and look at all you tal­king about it — further dri­ving its popu­la­rity. I never would have heard about it if you blog­gers weren’t screa­ming about it.
    You are free publi­city and free RSS in a way, dri­ving lots of traf­fic to the “fake” blog.
    Cheers!

  19. Who is behind the Office Max blog?

    I just got lin­ked from the Office-Max blog. It seems to be some kind of cor­po­rate blog but there is no “about” page or any clue as to its author. There are fre­quent gra­tui­tous refe­ren­ces to visi­ting Office-Max which would…

  20. Bill Hicks says:

    “By the way if anyone here is in adver­ti­sing or mar­ke­ting… kill your­self. No, no, no it’s just a little thought. I’m just trying to plant seeds. Maybe one day, they’ll take root — I don’t know. You try, you do what you can. Kill your­self. Seriously though, if you are, do. Aaah, no really, there’s no ratio­na­li­za­tion for what you do and you are Satan’s little hel­pers, Okay — kill your­self — seriously. You are the rui­ner of all things good, seriously. No this is not a joke, you’re going, “there’s going to be a joke coming,” there’s no fuc­king joke coming. You are Satan’s spawn filling the world with bile and gar­bage. You are fuc­ked and you are fuc­king us. Kill your­self. It’s the only way to save your fuc­king soul, kill your­self. Plan­ting seeds. I know all the mar­ke­ting peo­ple are going, “he’s doing a joke… there’s no joke here wha­tsoe­ver. Suck a tail-pipe, fuc­king hang your­self, borrow a gun from a Yank friend — I don’t care how you do it. Rid the world of your evil fuc­king machi­na­tions. I know what all the mar­ke­ting peo­ple are thin­king right now too, “Oh, you know what Bill’s doing, he’s going for that anti-marketing dollar. That’s a good mar­ket, he’s very smart.” Oh man, I am not doing that. You fuc­king evil scum­bags! “Ooh, you know what Bill’s doing now, he’s going for the righ­teous indig­na­tion dollar. That’s a big dollar. A lot of peo­ple are fee­ling that indig­na­tion. We’ve done research — huge mar­ket. He’s doing a good thing.” Godam­mit, I’m not doing that, you scum-bags!
    Quit put­ting a godamm dollar sign on every fuc­king thing on this pla­net!
    “Ooh, the anger dollar. Huge. Huge in times of reces­sion. Giant mar­ket, Bill’s very bright to do that.” God, I’m just caught in a fuc­king web! “Ooh the trap­ped dollar, big dollar, huge dollar. Good mar­ket — look at our research. We see that many peo­ple feel trap­ped. If we play to that and then sepa­rate them into the trap­ped dollar…” How do you live like that? And I bet you sleep like fuc­king babies at night, don’t you?“
    /obligatory