March 17, 2005

the tao of undersupply

aaa12345693.jpg
The t-shirt thing is coming together nicely. Plan­ning on launching circa first week in April.
Tal­king to my manu­fac­tu­rer– a very smart fellow– about busi­ness issues in gene­ral.
We both con­cur that the big­gest pro­blem in the Wes­tern world is over­supply.
For every mid-level mana­ging job ope­ning up, there’s sco­res of peo­ple willing and able. For every com­pany nee­ding to hire an ad agency or design firm, there’s dozens out there, willing and able. For every per­son wan­ting to buy a new car, there’s tons of car makers and dea­lers out there. I could go on and on.
I could also go on about how many good peo­ple I know are caught in over­sup­plied mar­kets, and how every day they wake up, fee­ling chi­lled to the bone with dread and unease. Adver­ti­sing and media folk are clas­sic exam­ples.
So maybe the thing is to is get into “The Tao of Under­supply”.
If only 100 peo­ple want to buy your wid­gets, then just make 90 wid­gets. If only 1000, make 900. If only 10 million, make 9 million. It isn’t roc­ket science, but it takes dis­ci­pline.
It also requi­res you to stop making the same stuff as other peo­ple. Doing that requi­res ori­gi­na­lity and inven­tion.
Like it said in “How To Be Crea­tive”, don’t try to stand out from the crowd, avoid crowds alto­gether. Again, it isn’t roc­ket science.
That why all the t-shirts will be limi­ted edi­tion. Actually, I think everything I make from now on will be limi­ted edi­tion in one way or another.
What about your stuff?

12 Responses to “the tao of undersupply”

  1. Some 25 years back I went into the publishing busi­ness — with almost zero ini­tial capi­tal. So what to do? Ins­tead of having tons of books prin­ted which would only have blown up our inven­tory, we offe­red subsc­rip­tions to limi­ted edi­tions. When orders were in and the publi­ca­tion dead­line was due, we only had to pro­duce so and so many copies (just slightly more than subsc­ri­bed to ser­vice fresh orders).
    This not only saved us tons of capi­tal, it was actually a whole lot more luc­ra­tive, too: no inte­rest on inven­tory, lower admi­nis­tra­tive overhead, etc. We actually made a lot more pro­fit that way because of course those limi­ted edi­tions were quite pri­cey (about 4 times the regu­lar price of books in this par­ti­cu­lar mar­ket). And yes, this was stuff not avai­la­ble anywhere else and quite attrac­tive to our tar­get group.
    After a while, we had lots of subsc­ri­bers who’d blindly order almost anything whe­ne­ver we announ­ced it — obviously collec­tors, maybe some peo­ple spe­cu­la­ting on appre­cia­tion of pro­duct value due to its scar­city. Plus, perhaps, the greed fac­tor at play to some extent …
    The most inte­res­ting part was that this approach actually tends to *create* a mar­ket rather than simply ser­vi­cing one. The slo­gan “Invent your own mar­ket” was very much to the point here.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Yes Ralph, I think we’re both rea­ding from the same page.
    And that’s a very good point– a cus­to­mer base moti­va­ted pri­ma­rily by greed cer­tainly shifts pro­duct fas­ter than just about anything.

  3. Vy Blog says:

    The Tao of Undersupply

    Hugh says maybe it’s smart to dif­fe­ren­tiate your­self by undersupplying.

  4. Jeremy Heigh says:

    Good thought Hugh.
    Reminds me of recent thoughts about bill­boards (there

  5. Love this post … but I am strug­gling to apply it to situa­tions where you don’t make ‘wid­gets.’
    If I am an ad agency, how do I make less of ‘brand X’ or wha­te­ver it is that I offer?
    If I am an indi­vi­dual with a cer­tain set of skills and abi­li­ties, how do I limit the supply and the­re­fore inc­rease the demand?

  6. hugh macleod says:

    John K, I sup­pose the ans­wer would be to get enough clients where you have to turn work away on a regu­lar basis.

  7. There Was a Goo­gle­fight. I Lost.

    Ouch. Not really even a fight (damn you Hugh). This is totally googly dude. Thanks to Aaron over at Con­fes­sions of a Brand Evan­ge­list for this fun little nugget.

  8. Huw says:

    I did something simi­lar with my pho­to­graphs a few years back. With a small mar­ket, I chose an even sma­ller num­ber of pro­ducts, limi­ted edi­tions with the mini­mum run of one of them being just 7. It wor­ked for as long as I was doing it.
    But I got bored selling and lost inte­rest in making the ima­ges in the first place. I stop­ped selling and got back my love of taking pho­to­graphs. I’m ‘richer’ now!
    Your post also put me in mind of Huc­kle­bery Fin, who mana­ged to get Tom Saw­yer to finish his work on a fence by crea­ting an irre­sis­tably exc­lu­sive opportunity.

  9. Michael says:

    I am here for the first time ever. I did not read the article. I just wan­ted to tell you that you have one rea­der more here. See the next com­ments for what I like espe­cially at gapingvoid!

  10. Roy says:

    What about our com­pany? We are selling envi­ron­men­tally friendly bio­de­gra­da­ble pac­king mate­rials. I don’t think we can say to a cus­to­mer who wants to buy 1 million that we only can pro­duce or deli­ver only 900.000. If we do that, we are out of busi­ness, and we want to stay in.
    And — regret­tably — we are not big enough to say that we only want 9 (not 10) cus­to­mers.
    Any­way — have a nice wee­kend, you gapingvoids.

  11. dykstraNet says:

    Fin­ding Things del.icio.us Style

    One of the great things about del.icio.us is the pla­ces it helps you stum­ble upon. Not only is it a great place to store your own links, but you can see the com­mu­nity that is lin­king the same things that you are. Then you start stum­bling upon interest…

  12. Beware of Oversupply

    Another great post on gaping­void: 100 Suits.Over the last cou­ple of days I’ve been thin­king about this one idea I’ve had for English Cut. The idea is basi­cally limi­ting our out­put to 100 suits a year. That’s roughly 2 suits