March 17, 2005

history of english cut

Send to Kindle

zzzzzz7654200.jpg
[UPDATE: Big Kudo’s to Rober Sco­ble for lin­king to English Cut. Thanks, Robert!]
With all the English Cut busi­ness going crazy at the moment, it sud­denly made me think of all the feed­back I recei­ved about the idea of a blog­ging tai­lor, before I had con­vin­ced Tho­mas to start a blog, when I first broached the sub­ject with my rea­ders here and here:

“It seems to me that a blog is pretty inap­pro­priate as a web­site for a tai­lor. Perhaps it’s appro­priate to use a blog engine to main­tain his web­site, which will make it easier for him to main­tain the con­tent, but I fail to see why a tai­lor would want to keep an online diary as the online face of his busi­ness.“
“I guess what I’m afraid of is that we’re tal­king about a small niche mar­ket. Lots of peo­ple online like to talk about com­pu­ters, gad­gets, movies, and all kinds of things. Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t ima­gine that too many peo­ple have much to say about suits (as nice as they are, and as much as I’d like to be able to afford one)… If Tom starts a blog, and there’s no con­ver­sa­tion, that’s going to look kinda silly. Wouldn’t that be detri­men­tal to busi­ness?“
“I don’t hear that many peo­ple tal­king about suits, espe­cially online, and I’m don’t believe that star­ting a blog about suits will change that.“
“Peo­ple like Tom need a blog as much as a fish needs a bicycle… The typi­cal Savi­lle Row cus­to­mer is not a blog rea­der. He, in all likelyhood, doesn’t even know what a blog is. And even if he’d knew, why read about what one’s tai­lor has to say? He’s there to make suits, as long as he does that well he’ll have a mar­ket… Tom needs to offer supe­rior ser­vice and style to a mar­ket that tends to be extre­mely loyal to ‘their’ tay­lor, once that rela­tionship has been built.“
“Direc­ting a con­ver­sa­tion with your cus­to­mer base is a great idea. Assu­ming peo­ple fly to Lon­don to buy a hand tai­lo­red suit because they want to inti­mi­date their beta male coun­ter­parts is silly… 90% of the suits on Savile Row are good enough for the most disc­ri­mi­na­ting buyer. Its the buying expe­rience that will make one tai­lor more suc­cess­ful than another.“
“A blog­ging tai­lor is not what is nee­ded, howe­ver the con­cept of being the sub­ject of con­ver­sa­tion is. I’d have thought that, with Savile Row tai­lors and that ilk, word of mouth is the key in the bes­poke suit buying Alpha-male mar­ket. I just don’t think that blog­ging is the be-all ans­wer to that.”

It’s ama­zing to think that these com­ments are only a few months old. But that’s inter­net time for you.
So Robert, what did they say to you when you said you were going to start blog­ging about Mic­ro­soft from the inside?

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

21 Responses to “history of english cut”

  1. Dave says:

    The flaw in the above was where you said “The typi­cal Savi­lle Row cus­to­mer is not a blog rea­der.” Was the goal to get Savi­lle Row cus­to­mers to read the blog, or get the blog rea­ders to become Savi­lle Row cus­to­mers? I’ve recently had a rea­der of my blog post a com­ment about how much he’s lear­ned from the English Cut. If mar­kets are indeed con­ver­sa­tions, then giving peo­ple the voca­bu­lary to join in is by defi­ni­tion a market-expanding acti­vity. That’s the les­son I’ve taken out of your expe­ri­ment — it’s not about preaching to the crowd but about get­ting new peo­ple in the pews.

  2. So Hugh — do you have any figu­res on how blog­ging has impro­ved Tom’s busi­ness?
    (Extra busi­ness brought in by blog­ging) -
    (Cost of star­ting and main­tai­ning blog) = ?

  3. Reece says:

    Hi Hugh — another great post. I echo Dave’s blog’s reader’s view that English Cut is mas­si­vely edu­ca­tio­nal; not just about bes­poke suits, but also as a won­der­ful real-life exam­ple of Hugh­train mar­ke­ting. On that topic… I’m not sure if other rea­ders would be inte­res­ted in this (and maybe this is what we’re going to see with your move into Wine blog­ging), but I think more pers­pec­tive on how the Hugh­train
    ’metho­do­logy’ (if it can be called that) applies to less ‘uni­que’ busi­nes­ses would be infor­ma­tive. As an exam­ple, how could the Hugh­train be applied to an other­wise fairly stan­dard web hos­ting com­pany? Blog­ging seems to be a smart idea there (the pro­cess is indeed fas­ci­na­ting on many levels). But is that really all that’s nee­ded? It seems cer­tain busi­nes­ses are just a more natu­ral ‘fit’? Or is that a mis­ta­ken perspective?

  4. Sco­ble Gets His Own Gaping Void Cartoon

    Robert Sco­ble get his own car­toon by Gapingvoid’s Hugh MacC­leod. I might be wrong, but I think that’s the first time Hugh has used an actual person’s name in one of his car­toons. I’m a big fan, not just of…

  5. hugh macleod says:

    Why yes, Ste­wart.… the blog hasn’t brought in any new busi­ness at all, whe­reas set­ting it up cost a small for­tune ;-)

  6. Jay Sennett says:

    Who knew I wasn’t sup­po­sed to buy a bes­poke suit from a blog?
    Silly me! I have approached Tho­mas about making a suit (now I’m thin­king two) from rea­ding his blog.
    The bes­poke mar­ket is not about rich, alpha males. My wife and I are solidly middle-class. But we have no debt and own our house and live on about $2200 a month. That lea­ves quite a bit of money as dis­po­sa­ble income. Some of that money I choose to spend on bes­poke suits.
    The mar­ket for bes­poke suits is any per­son (why limit your­self to guys?) with cash to spend who wants to look good.
    Most Ame­ri­can white men (and quite a few women) I know dress like shit. Off the rack suits are made out of shit and fall apart fas­ter than shit. And this shit isn’t cheap, either. Upwards of $1000 in some cases. For another $1000 I can get a suit that is uni­que, made by an artist and fits me exactly.
    The English Cut story is an authen­tic one. Tho­mas’ con­ver­sa­tion is easy and friendly with no bullshit.
    Coming from a country that pro­du­ces and exports bullshit ad naseum I will gladly pay for the English Cut story.

  7. Dave says:

    Reece and Jay,
    There is a phe­no­me­non I call the “unfa­mi­liar cafe­te­ria fac­tor.” When you walk into a new cafe­te­ria style place, you never know which way to go through the line, where you pay, do you get the food your­self or ask someone to dish it for you, what? I’ve wal­ked out of pla­ces because it see­med like too much trou­ble to figure it all out while right next door was a res­tau­rant I already knew how to work.
    There are defi­ni­tely times when I have money in my poc­ket but the threshold to get me across to a purchase is enough to keep me out of a store. Not kno­wing exactly what you are doing and not relishing the pos­si­bi­lity fee­ling like a dunce for trying to shop there (not uncom­mon in high end sto­res in the USA) is a threshold big enough to often keep me out of a mar­ket.
    Sup­pose I was vaguely inte­res­ted in a bes­poke suit but didn’t feel like having someone look down their nose at my igno­rance and thus never bothe­red wal­king into a Savi­lle Row shop. Where Tho­mas has chan­ged the threshold is in two ways — 1) He has edu­ca­ted me enough to know the basics to start the pro­cess without fee­ling like a total dum­bass and 2) he has let me know that he per­so­nally and his par­ti­cu­lar busi­ness cares enough about me to get me to that point. Thus, me and my money in my poc­ket is gra­vi­ta­ting directly to him for my vir­gin bes­poke suit expe­rience.
    I’m a shlub and not in the mar­ket for this par­ti­cu­lar pro­duct (today), but I am smar­ter and more inte­res­ted because of the English Cut blog. In fact, I might one day enter the mar­ket for the pro­duct *because of* English Cut. The key here is that this is repli­ca­ble, and is par­ti­cu­larly use­ful in any busi­ness where this threshold exists, high­brow and low. Comic book shops, banjo sto­res, hothouse flo­wer nur­se­ries, etc. Any place where having the ins and outs explai­ned inc­rea­ses the odds of you ente­ring their store can poten­tially bene­fit from explai­ning to you how to become a customer.

  8. Jay Sennett says:

    Dave and Reece,
    Dave, you are right on when you say that Tho­mas explains to us how to become a cus­to­mer. This fact alone is one rea­son why Tho­mas’ blog works. He demys­ti­fies a here­to­fore upper-crust pro­cess. In doing so, he does two things for me: he earns my trust and unders­tan­ding. Now I know why he char­ges what he char­ges.
    Reece, I think a Hugh­train approach to a web pro­vi­der works. The con­ver­sa­tio­nal style is,again, key. Web nerds don’t edu­cate me on how to become a cus­to­mer (see Dave’s ear­lier points on this beha­vior). So I’d pro­bably switch my busi­ness to a pro­vi­der that makes all pro­ces­ses asso­cia­ted with web pages/blogs etc trans­pa­rent, treats me like an inte­lli­gent cus­to­mer and shows me how easy it is to be one of their customers.

  9. J.P. says:

    If you don’t think peo­ple are inte­res­ted in this online check out http://www.styleforum.net. This is all these guys talk about at were even fea­tu­red in the NYTi­mes. (Yes, I am “one of these guys”)

  10. Blog­ging = Kon­takte oder Wer braucht Pros­pekte, wenn es Blogs gibt?

    Hugh Mac­Leod kannte und mochte ich schon, bevor ich Blogs

  11. cynthia says:

    ques­tion: how would english cut have fared if its author did not have a friend who was a very well-known blog­ger plug­ging him?

  12. Actually I was blog­ging before I got to Mic­ro­soft.
    So, they sorta knew what they’d be get­ting before invi­ting me up.

  13. Eric E says:

    Hugh:
    I loved the tran­si­tion from the car­toon about get­ting Sco­ble to link, to the ques­tion at the end, to the com­ment by Sco­ble. A bri­lliant demons­tra­tion of the mix of humi­lity and hubris that makes your writing/cartooning so worthwhile. But the com­ments pooh-poohing The English Cut are even bet­ter. The nega­tive energy exu­ded by the nay­sa­yers is a les­son for us all to push through when we believe in something.

  14. hugh macleod says:

    Robert, I know you were blog­ging pre-Microsoft. I was thin­king more about your non-Microsoft peers’ reac­tion.
    Cynthia: Without me English Cut would never have exis­ted, with or without me plug­ging it.
    That being said, most of the traf­fic doesn’t come from gaping­void now… maybe it in the first week or two (late January), but it was really get­ting men­tio­ned on Boing­Boing (February 13th) that REALLY got the word around.

  15. hugh macleod says:

    Reece, Dave, Jay: Thanks for the com­ments. Some inte­res­ting points.
    The plan was never to turn blog­gers into Savile Row cus­to­mers, or vice versa.
    But a blog see­med to us the best way to get the infor­ma­tion “out there” in an enter­tai­ning and edu­ca­tio­nal way.
    Much bet­ter than the usual “Pro­vi­ding the finest tra­di­tions of Savile Row since 1911″ blether that most of his com­pe­ti­tors’ web­si­tes have.
    I’m seeing two things star­ting to hap­pen:
    1. We’re star­ting to get e-mails from already-serious buyers who say “I’ve been rea­ding your blog for a while, and would like to buy a suit from you.“
    2. We’re get­ting a lot of e-mails saying, “I’ve always wan­ted to buy Savile Row, but never knew exactly how to best go about it. Now I do, and would like to make you my first port of call.“
    Both are seriously good mar­kets to have a rela­tionship with.

  16. hugh macleod says:

    Eric, that’s very kind of you to say. Thanks =)

  17. hugh macleod says:

    Oh, Eric, another point:
    To be fair on the “nay­sa­yers”, the idea of a blog­ging tai­lor back then was pretty “out there”, even by blog­ging stan­dards. Heh.
    We didn’t know if it would work or not. One never does, of course.
    But when Tom first star­ted telling me about his job in detail, I was inva­riably telling him 50 times a day, “You should be telling peo­ple about this stuff! It’s utterly fas­ci­na­ting, dam­mit!“
    I think he star­ted the blog just to shut me up.

  18. Revie­wing the nay­sa­yers chee­red me up no end.
    As well as remin­ding me of my own abi­lity to get into the heady space of second gues­sing the uni­verse.
    What I keep (re)learning for myself is the value of trying stuff out over theorising.

  19. Dave says:

    John­nie, I think you’ve hit it. As bri­lliant as we all think we are, we’ve seen over and over again that many suc­ces­ses are things nobody thought would fly. At heart I’m an empi­ri­cist. No amount of theory and con­jec­ture will be as com­pe­lling to me as the act of thro­wing against the wall, and the stic­king the­reto or lack the­reof.
    Put another way via a quote from the Butthole Sur­fers — “It’s bet­ter to regret something you have done than regret something you haven’t done.“
    Hugh, it may not have been the ori­gi­nal plan but it ought to be the plan next time. “Hmm, there are peo­ple out there with money in the poc­ket and a vague pos­si­bi­lity of purcha­sing my thing/service/whatever but currently lac­king the impe­tus to do so. If I tell them what they need to know to unload that cash on me and enter­tain them while I do, perhaps they shall.”

  20. hugh macleod says:

    And to be fair on me, Dave, that was kinda the idea. “If I tell them what they need to know to unload that cash on me and enter­tain them while I do, perhaps they shall” etc. ;-)
    But, like I said, you never know if it will actually work or not until you try.

  21. How Does Your Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand Grow?

    Take one savvy tai­lo­rin the UK. Niche the offe­ring. Niche it again. Mix one manic, disaf­fec­ted drea­mer as mar­ke­ting ins­ti­ga­tor. Fold one open-to-happenstance PR type in NYC. Drop crumbs along the way. Yield one mid­night reader/writer in Loui­siana, who,…