February 6, 2005

blog as if your life depended on it

zzzlokjib09.jpg
From Tom Peters:

Blog As If Your Life Depen­ded On It!
Blog­ging, I firmly believe, is the pre­mier emer­gent marketing-brandbuilding-lovemarkcreating tool of our times! It is the pre­mier way to have intimate-engaging-informative-WOWing “con­ver­sa­tions” with Clients and pros­pects! This all goes dou­ble for small enter­pri­ses and niche enter­pri­ses; and goes tri­ple for the Pro­fes­sio­nal Ser­vi­ces; and works won­ders in the Public Sec­tor as well.
Do you see Blog­ging in these exal­ted lights? If not, why not? Please … Blog-As-If-Your-Professional-Success-Depended-On-It.
(Hint: I think it does.)

I com­ple­tely agree. “We have gone beyond the tip­ping point. We are not blog­ging because it’s cool or hip. It’s now mostly about sur­vi­val yak yak yak…”
Blog­ging isn’t that hard, you know. Any­body can do it. And most peo­ple I know pro­fes­sio­nally are smart and lucid enough to do it well.
I’m seeing two pro­blems hol­ding them back:

1. Get­ting them to actually keep at it. They want the thing to magi­cally write itself. 

Tom Peters tries to bypass this pro­blem by paying other peo­ple to help write his stuff. I’m not sure if I would recom­mend this approach. Peo­ple come to your blog to hear what you have to say, not to hear what your under­lings have to say.

2. Expec­ting the blog to behave like an old-style website.

Like a tra­di­tio­nal, Flash-enabled, bell & whistle web­site, they pay the web­mas­ter a wad of cash, they write a few pages of stuff, and sud­denly they expect the world to beat a path to their door.
It doesn’t work that way. What works is wri­ting bet­ter stuff, more often, and doing it for lon­ger than the next guy.
The rea­son Jeff Jar­vis’ blog is one of the most widely read in the world is exactly for those rea­sons:

–He’s been doing it lon­ger than most.
–The qua­lity of his wri­ting is bet­ter than most.
–The quan­tity of his out­put is grea­ter than most.

And the same is true for every other “A-Lister” on my list.
Con­ti­nuity. It’s all about con­ti­nuity.
[My two cents:] If you really, really want your blog to be read by a lot of peo­ple, you’re going to have to be pre­pa­red to put in the kind of sus­tai­ned effort it takes to get a published book out, before you start seeing the kind of results you’re hoping for.
How much effort would it take to write a bes­tse­ller on a sub­ject you know a lot about? That’s about ballpark.

7 Responses to “blog as if your life depended on it”

  1. Nia says:

    Good advice on a day in which I’m con­si­de­ring to stop blog­ging after about 3 months.

  2. mamagiggle says:

    Hugh, my life does depend on it!!!
    Thanks
    Cheers, BSIYF

  3. My two cents: That would be about five hours a day. Every day. For the rest of your life. That’s a bit too much for some peo­ple, espe­cially if their busi­ness isn’t web­cen­tric. If you’re wor­king in The Long Tail, that’s then not an option. You must blog. Not, is desi­ring to win Wim­ble­don without pla­ying ten­nis.
    Can’t disa­gree with what holds peo­ple back. I’d add though — a fear of inti­macy. Seriously. You’re wor­king a sma­ller room. This isn’t broad­cast. It’s a cock­tail party. You’re jug­gling four or five con­ver­sa­tions, mixing drinks, and kee­ping you’re eye on the babe in the cor­ner.
    As well: the power thing. Taking back power, power that you have han­ded over to experts — the media­tors — is hard. It goes against your trai­ning. Blog­ging is plum­bing.
    And the con­trol thing. Blog­ging is a threat. Blog­ging under­mi­nes cer­tain power struc­tu­res — those based in the socio­pathol­gi­cal scien­ces, while crea­ting another enti­rely dif­fe­rent set. Men­tion blog­ging to cer­tain types and you get some extreme reac­tions. I find at least.
    And the num­bers thing? False pro­mise, Hugh.
    It’s not eye­balls. Get over it.

  4. tonygoodson says:

    Tom Peters’ non-Blog!

    Hey Hugh beat me to exactly what I was going to say, which is that I’m get­ting more and more weary of other peo­ple blog­ging on Tom Peters’ blog.

  5. hugh macleod says:

    Depends whose eye­balls we’re tal­king about, Brian ;-)

  6. blog: reloa­ded

    every­body speaks about blog­ging.
    wyborcza (a major polish daily news­pa­per) has
    a half page articly about ira­nian blog­gers (stu­pid one, unfor­tu­na­tely).
    blog­gers say: blog as if your life depend on it
    (also here).
    there is no choice, you’ve gotta blog.
    p

  7. blog: reakty­wacja

    wszyscy mówią o blo­go­wa­niu.
    wyborcza ma arty­kuł na pół strony o irańs­kich blo­ge­rach
    (nies­tety dość głupi).
    blo­gerzy piszą: blo­guj jakby twoje życie zależało od tego
    (także tutaj).