February 5, 2005

who the hell cares

hjsdert15.jpg
One of the more unfor­tu­nate things about ente­ring the adver­ti­sing pro­fes­sion at a young age, is that it inva­riably turns you into a com­pul­sive “Trend Watcher” within nano­se­conds.

So when you hear that Holly­wood is now tur­ning out a dis­pro­por­tio­na­tely high num­ber of movies based on comic book superhe­roes, ins­tead of a rea­so­na­ble, nor­mal reac­tion (i.e. Who the hell cares), you find your­self going, “Gosh! That’s so inte­res­ting!”
Or when you hear that unma­rried New Yor­kers are sta­ying in more, opting for home-cooked din­ners in lieu of trendy bis­tros and res­tau­rants, ins­tead of a rea­so­na­ble, nor­mal reac­tion (i.e. Who the hell cares), you find your­self going, “Gosh! That’s so inte­res­ting!”
Or when you hear that the major Ame­ri­can TV net­works are spen­ding more money on Rea­lity TV, less money of sit­coms, ins­tead of a rea­so­na­ble, nor­mal reac­tion (i.e. Who the hell cares), you find your­self going, “Gosh! That’s so inte­res­ting!”
Or when you hear that the more Euro­pean car adver­ti­sing is using more and more arty, black & white pho­to­graphy, ins­tead of a rea­so­na­ble, nor­mal reac­tion (i.e. Who the hell cares), you find your­self going, “Gosh! That’s so inte­res­ting!”
Or when you hear that Cele­brity Divorce is on the ups­wing, ins­tead of a rea­so­na­ble, nor­mal reac­tion (i.e. Who the hell cares), you find your­self going, “Gosh! That’s so interesting!”

And you find that every­body else is doing it too, inc­lu­ding the folk with the high sala­ries and big cor­ner offi­ces that you, your­self covet.
So you start emu­la­ting them. Don’t have a clue what to say in the mee­ting? Men­tion the unma­rried New Yor­kers.
Don’t have an idea for the ad? Pitch some parody thing where the movie superhero arri­ves on the scene toting the client’s pro­duct.
Don’t know what to say to the client who thinks you drop­ped the ball on the new cam­paign? Sug­gest arty black & white pho­to­graphy.
Just so long as every­body in the office thinks your “fin­ger is on the pulse”, it doesn’t mat­ter how good your ideas are, how effec­tive your thin­king is, you find your­self being sho­we­red with money, favor and sta­tus. And high reward is addic­tive.
So to feed your addic­tion, you stop thin­king. You start watching. Har­der than ever.
You read all the maga­zi­nes, you watch all the TV shows, it doesn’t mat­ter how utterly bad they are. Your life beco­mes an orgy of mains­tream popu­lar cul­ture. You begin feas­ting on it like a hungry ani­mal. It doesn’t mat­ter that the client’s busi­ness is going down the pan, what mat­ters, dam­mit, is that Brad and Jen­ni­fer are still remai­ning the best of friends and in regu­lar con­tact.
Of course, the minute you step off this tread­mill, the minute you start thin­king about real peo­ple with real needs, wants and pro­blems, you’re dead. No more cor­ner offi­ces and 1965 Jaguar E-Types for you, Nosi­rree.
But like they say, who the hell cares.

5 Responses to “who the hell cares”

  1. Laren says:

    We are most cer­tainly not sta­ying home more. At least I’m not, and we all know what I trend­set­ter I am …

  2. Marshall McLuhan said the medium is the mes­sage. Some­ti­mes, a spe­ci­fic mes­sage beco­mes a medium.
    Comic book movie con­ver­sions are so com­mon now that they become a medium. Cele­brity divor­ces become a medium through which cele­bri­ties or jour­na­lists make a sta­te­ment.
    This can create a whole mess of cog­ni­tive dis­so­nance; Kathy Lee Gifford’s attempts to avoid pro­se­cu­tion for owning sweatshops became the medium for a secon­dary mes­sage of how bad sweatshops were, for example.

  3. Jon Husband says:

    Accor­ding to the book “McLuhan for Mana­gers — New Tools for New Thin­king” by Mark Fede­ra­man and Derrick de Kerckhove, two of his acoly­tes:
    “In McLuhan’s world a Medium is anything that extends our mind. It could be a tech­no­logy or gad­get. It could be a new pro­cess. Anything we create or build, anything we con­ceive, any expres­sion of human­kind is a McLuha­nes­que Medium. Media — more than one Medium — can be conc­rete and tan­gi­ble or they may be abs­tract and intan­gi­ble. .….. What we con­ven­tio­nally con­ceive of as the media — the press, rado, tele­vi­sion, and so forth — are exam­ples of McLuhan’s per­cep­tion of Media, extenn­ding our eyes and ears to the world, expan­ding the reach of voi­ces and the influence of ideas” (pp. 23 – 24).
    So .. for exam­ple, Hugh’s cards, the Hugh­train, Hugh­Marks are beco­ming Mediums.
    Let’s keep on kee­ping on … cog­ni­ti­vely (and emo­ti­vely) dis­so­cia­ting the cor­ner offi­ces and E-type owners from what’s really going on. they’ll get it soo­ner or later .. as H. has said, it’s gonna soon become a mat­ter of survival.

  4. John Smith says:

    it’s really how much of your soul that you wanna sell to the devil. then again, you’re either part of the pro­blem or the solution

  5. Pegasus News says:

    Bela­ted bullets

    Pos­ting the past week has been emba­ras­singly light, a pro­blem com­poun­ded by a Type­Pad glitch over the wee­kend. Busy, but inte­res­ting times. Here’s what we’ve been rea­ding over the past week: Jour­na­lism is not stenography.