February 4, 2005

the ignorance premium

zzzzsteak03.jpg
I LOVED Hamish’s recent quip in the com­ments:

That is cer­tainly the style of the current Ame­ri­can Anglo Empire [he was refe­rring to this car­toon]. The rest of the world has more to play for, and con­se­quently may be exe­cu­ting the real deal just a little bit har­der.
In the immor­tal words spo­ken by Mar­tin Sheen in the deeply fla­wed but still bri­lliant Apo­calypse Now, “Char­lie [The Viet­Cong] didn’t need R+R, he just wan­ted a bowl of rice and little bit of rat meat.”

It occurs to me that a worr­yingly large chunk the peo­ple in the Anglo-American middle class basi­cally make their living from char­ging an “Igno­rance Pre­mium”.
Know diddly-squat about tai­lo­ring? Then you’re more likely to pay that extra $300 for that Armani, less likely to save $600 from going with the old man in Chi­na­town.
But then English­Cut comes along… sud­denly the con­ver­sa­tion avai­la­ble to most peo­ple gets much smar­ter.
Know diddly-squat about tech? Then you’re more likely to go with the $400 iPod, less likely to go with the $250 Microsoft-powered alter­na­tive.
But then Robert Sco­ble comes along.… and sud­denly the con­ver­sa­tion about per­so­nal ste­reos gets much smar­ter.
Sud­denly the Igno­rance Pre­mium is deva­lued. Exactly.
With the Igno­rance Pre­mium, you’re paying extra for not kno­wing. Ins­tead of MICRO know­ledge, your basing your choice on the coo­ler, hip­per MACRO Brand Metaphor. Bran­ding is all about about being cool and hip, because bran­ding is all about prop­ping up the Igno­rance Pre­mium.
And have you noti­ced that Big Media makes their living selling adver­ti­sing to peo­ple like, for exam­ple, Armani and Apple?
And then a few days later, for exam­ple, you see a news clip on the TV, repor­ting on what’s hap­pe­ning with Armani at Fashion Week, or what’s hap­pe­ning with Apple at E-Tech?
And the same peo­ple who own the news chan­nel also own the maga­zi­nes that, for exam­ple, Armani and Apple adver­tise in?
Again, prop­ping up the Igno­rance Pre­mium.
Though I have no finan­cial invol­ve­ment or per­so­nal stake with English­Cut, my rea­sons for being inte­res­ted with Tho­mas Mahon and his bes­poke tai­lo­ring blog go WAY beyond hel­ping my friend out.
It’s about the MICRO Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tions abso­lu­tely wiping the floor with the MACRO Brand Metaphor/Ignorance Preium.
When I say “Bran­ding Is Dead”, that’s what I’m tal­king about. The Big-Media, celebrity-pimped desig­ner label is get­ting this cloc­ked clea­ned by phe­no­me­non like English­Cut. It’s watching the Igno­rance Pre­mium dying.
As with Robert Sco­ble, I see English­Cut as a petri dish for something MUCH big­ger. Sure, Scoble’s blog is much big­ger and more famous than English­Cut, but the teeth are just as sharp at a close range.
And yes, it’s still early days for all this stuff I rant on about, but really, seriously…
This why blog­ging matters.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

24 Responses to “the ignorance premium”

  1. simon tzu says:

    Hoo-Boy are you right on this one Hugh. I have just come from 3 weeks in India where there are millions of smart peo­ple willing to work for 1/10th of what peo­ple in the UK will. Most of the inte­res­ting work these days can be done remo­tely. This is a huge mar­ket imba­lance and like all mar­ket imba­lan­ces pre­sents fan­tas­tic oppor­tu­ni­tes for arbi­trage. One of the many rea­sons I’ll be moving to Bom­bay toward the end of the year.
    The sur­pri­sing thing is that more peo­ple are nit yet thin­king this way. When I was inter­vie­wing small tech com­pa­nies in Pune (100 peo­ple or less) for a little pro­ject of mine they told me that I was the only customer/potential cus­to­mer to have gone out to visit them and eva­luate them before comis­sio­ning work.
    They really appre­cia­ted that and I sus­pect I’ll get bet­ter pri­ces and ser­vice because of it. Oh and they gave me flo­wers — only in India.

  2. david parmet says:

    Hey… I love my iPod and it only cost $300!!!

  3. Hugh­train — The Igno­rance Premium

    A site that daily has something pos­ted on it that makes you go “Jesus yeah, that makes so much sense”. Hugh says “Know diddly-squat about tai­lo­ring? Then you’re more likely to pay that extra $300 for that Armani, less likely…

  4. Hugh­train — The Igno­rance Premium

    A site that daily has something pos­ted on it that makes you go “Jesus yeah, that makes so much sense”. Hugh says “Know diddly-squat about tai­lo­ring? Then you’re more likely to pay that extra $300 for that Armani, less likely…

  5. gaping­void: the igno­rance premium

    Link: gaping­void: the igno­rance pre­mium. A client of mind used to call this the ELF. Expe­rience Labor Fac­tor. This is the pre­mium char­ged the first time something new was done, as you really don’t know what it will end up costing.

  6. Timbo says:

    Actually, it seems that iPod owners – des­pite being part of the vast Hipper-Than-Thou Libe­ral Tech Cons­pi­racy – are actually “smar­ter,” Hugh.
    Why? (As I envi­sion you cran­king up your Dell in anti­ci­pa­tion of withe­ring retort…)
    Because the little gad­gets are EASIER TO USE and the SERVICE IS BETTER. Peo­ple who buy on price only deserve what they get: often sub-standard pro­ducts and crappy back-end ser­vice. And if you own a Mac, all the OS inte­gra­tion makes them so damn sticky.
    You’re abso­lu­tely right in a more glo­bal sense, though. I’m often frus­tra­ted when shop­ping for myself or my wife that I don’t really “know” if a pair of shoes or suit or pants is well made. That type of know­ledge has fallen by the way­side as we

  7. > The rest of the world has more to play for, and con­se­quently may be exe­cu­ting the real deal just a little bit har­der.
    That’s bull. The work ethic in the US is miss unders­tood. Let’s com­pare it to say Wes­tern Europe where most peo­ple get 6 weeks vaca­tion and work 30 hours per week. The US domi­na­tes the tech­no­logy mar­ket because of good ole hard work.
    If I buy an Armani ins­tead of going to China town, it is because I don’t have time to go all over town loo­king for a suit. I want something quick so I can get back to crea­ting value. There is value in con­vience.
    Capi­ta­lism works when you create something, not when you save all you can. Capi­ta­lism isn’t about bic­ke­ring for a bet­ter price on bea­ded nec­kles­ses. If you spent all day trying to get bet­ter pri­ces, when would you have time to draw on busi­ness cards? If you want a bet­ter stan­dard of living, invent goo­gle.
    BTW, the rea­son the iPod is win­ning is because it is a bet­ter pro­duct. If Mic­ro­soft is losing it isn’t because of lack of mar­ke­ting savy. Its not like I haven’t heard of their product.

  8. Barbara says:

    Blog­ging is an extre­mely inef­fi­cient means for “get­ting smar­ter.” Seth Godin made a list of what he con­si­ders his best, don’t-miss posts for 2004 and the count was like 24! Twenty-four out of hun­dreds! Not only do you have to kiss a million toads to find one good blog, you have to kiss a dozen bad posts for every good one within a blog.
    I’m sure Robert Sco­ble is a great chap, but am I going to read his blog every­day on the off-chance that he will talk about a pro­duct I might be inte­res­ted in purcha­sing? Hardly.
    Seems to me if “smar­ter con­ver­sa­tions” is the goal, blog­ging is a good start, but not the real solution.

  9. Jay says:

    I have 2 things to say:
    1) Way to go Hugh! I embrace the death of Bran­ding — it is out­da­ted and ove­rra­ted and I will dance on it’s grave hap­pily
    2) As evi­den­ced by all the com­ments from the loyal Ipod users — when some­body really loves a brand they get defen­sive — and take them­sel­ves WAY to seriously. Mellow out guys! it’s ok for some­body to have a dif­fe­rent opi­nion than you :) (I’m gonna get blas­ted for that one)

  10. Oh, there’s so much to com­ment on this juicy post. But I’ll be brief, I don’t think it is an Igno­rance Pre­mium — I think it is an Ego Premium.

  11. Katherine says:

    How much extra does not kno­wing have to cost me before it’s worthwhile to get smart? Sure, I can save $600 by fin­ding the tai­lor in Chi­na­town. But if the time I spend fin­ding him is worth more than $600, what have I really saved?

  12. Brian Eder says:

    > It occurs to me that a worr­yingly large chunk of the peo­ple in the Anglo-American middle class basi­cally make their living from char­ging an “Igno­rance Pre­mium”.
    It’s hard to argue with this point. In many ways it’s true, but then again that is the Ame­ri­can Way. The idea of a good pro­duct for a fair price see­med to fall (for the most part) to the way­side with our grand­fathers. It’s all about what the mar­ket will bear these days. In other words, “What can we get away with char­ging you?” I don’t know that this is dic­ta­ted by the middle class though?
    I like to think something’s chan­ging. I like to believe that our gro­wing voice in the blo­gosphere has something to do with it. I want to believe that the future of mar­ke­ting really is “about let­ting peo­ple know that they are part of something inte­res­ting” as Larry Weber so elo­quently sta­ted. That’s pro­bably more along the lines of what our fore­fathers were thin­king… e plu­ri­bus unum… from many comes one.
    Do peo­ple buy the iPod out of igno­rance, or because they believe that they are part of something inte­res­ting? I’d like to believe it’s more the lat­ter than the for­mer.
    I think igno­rance has been more a tool of the strong in the past. It has a strange rela­tionship to the tric­kle down theory. Just look at the his­tory of reli­gion for a good exam­ple. But, as infor­ma­tion gets more dis­tri­bu­ted it beco­mes a bit easier to fight the good fight.
    I’ve been self-employed for a good 12 years now. The big­gest battle for us has always been against big­ger com­pa­nies with dee­per poc­kets. Money has always been synony­mous with power. We were less hori­fied by the crash in the eco­nomy than a large cor­po­ra­tion because in a world where no one has money to throw around, ideas are king. That’s a place where we could com­pete.
    Repea­ting tired cliches like “igno­rance is bliss”… well that just per­pe­tua­tes the sta­tus quo.
    “The strong take from the weak, but the smart take from the strong.”

  13. Colleen says:

    I’ll do you one bet­ter, Hugh. I say your Igno­rance Pre­mium falls under the rubric of what I’ve dee­med “Asshole Tax”.
    Quo­ting myself from a post a cou­ple of months ago (talk about assho­les), “Essen­tially, you’re for­king over a pre­mium (tax) on top of what you’d ordi­na­rily pay because you: (a) did not orga­nize your time pro­perly; (b) remem­ber what you shouldn’t have for­got­ten; or © other­wise wan­tonly dis­re­gar­ded the plainly obvious

  14. hugh macleod says:

    No worries, Colleen… it’s OK to like Macin­tosh. Serio­suly. I don’t hold it against you. Truly.
    Ego Tax, Asshole Tax, Fuck­tard Tax, it’s all good…

  15. hugh macleod says:

    Of course, I could get really Buddhist about it and say “An Ego Pre­mium IS an Igno­rance Pre­mium, Grasshopper”…

  16. Timbo says:

    Hugh,
    Gotta love the emo­tion that flies whe­ne­ver you men­tion Mac/Apple/Microsoft/PC.
    (Or rather, per­cei­ved emo­tion. Why is The Other always thought of as “defen­sive” rather than “opi­nio­na­ted”?)
    I trust that you don’t throw those refe­ren­ces in there just to make us jump, though. Remem­ber, with great power comes great res­pon­si­bi­lity ;-)
    As for ego pre­mium, etc., don’t try and tell me that peo­ple who buy the “alter­na­tive” pro­duct don’t sprain their arms pat­ting them­sel­ves on the back for being so, well, damn alternative.

  17. hugh macleod says:

    “If I buy an Armani ins­tead of going to China town, it is because I don’t have time to go all over town loo­king for a suit. I want something quick so I can get back to crea­ting value. There is value in con­vience.“
    An Armani suit is no quic­ker than a Chi­nese Suit.
    But then, fair enough, you were too busy “crea­ting value” elsewhere to know that ;-)
    But oh yeah, the eco­no­mics of con­ve­nience is fas­ci­na­ting stuff.

  18. OK, I’ll bite…
    “Of course, I could get really Buddhist about it and say “An Ego Pre­mium IS an Igno­rance Pre­mium, Grasshop­per”…“
    Ah, if we are willing to be truly claim our igno­rance then we’d drop the Ego. But, nope, we’re all somewhere on the spec­trum of know-it-all.
    “Forgo everything that you have thought mea­ning­ful, sig­ni­fi­cant, up to now.” — Buddha

  19. The Igno­rance Premium

    My bac­klog of RSS feeds top­ped out at over 400 this week, a sure sign that my blog­ging has taken a back seat to other priorities.

  20. kadavy says:

    “If I buy an Armani ins­tead of going to China town, it is because I don’t have time to go all over town loo­king for a suit. I want something quick so I can get back to crea­ting value. There is value in con­vience.“
    Maybe I can demons­trate why get­ting an Armani isn’t any fas­ter.
    Old Way
    You: Who makes a good suit?
    Armani Adver­ti­se­ment: Armani
    New Way
    You: Who makes a good suit?
    Huge Net­work of Con­su­mers: Oh, there’s this great tai­lor in Chi­na­town. I got a suit from him. It fits per­fect, and I don’t have to worry about run­ning into some other clue­less jerk who got the same thing on sale at Macy’s over the wee­kend. He knows a ton about base­ball, too. Tell him I said “Hi.”

  21. The death of the Igno­rance Pre­mium. Or: “Why Blog­ging matters”

    Two exce­llent posts from Hugh Mac­leod that talk about the impact that smar­ter mar­kets are having when it comes to making purcha­sing decisons:

  22. hugh macleod says:

    “Capi­ta­lism works when you create something, not when you save all you can. Capi­ta­lism isn’t about bic­ke­ring for a bet­ter price on bea­ded nec­kles­ses. If you spent all day trying to get bet­ter pri­ces, when would you have time to draw on busi­ness cards? If you want a bet­ter stan­dard of living, invent goo­gle.“
    I totally agree with that, Chris.

  23. iGno­rance is bliss!

    Hugh: Know diddly-squat about tech? Then you’re more likely to go with the $400 iPod, less likely to go with the $250 Microsoft-powered alter­na­tive. Kathy: And I deci­ded that paying extra for my iPod is worth it (but it’s