January 30, 2005

on the treatment of fans

zzzzmkoifhgu02.jpg
From Robert Sco­ble:

Per­so­nally, Dave, I’m very sorry. You have an awe­some site. I greatly appre­ciate what you’ve done for Mic­ro­soft and our cus­to­mers. We really need to treat our fan sites bet­ter than this. I don’t care what the con­tent was, we should call first and work on rela­tionships with our fans first.

Great mar­ke­ting advice. Look after your fans first. It’s so sim­ple it hurts.
Of course, I can hear the nay­sa­yers kvetching, “That works if you have something like Mic­ro­soft or Mer­ce­des. But what if it’s more pro­saic, like toi­let paper or sha­ving cream?”
Well, having been sent, aged 10, to a Scot­tish boar­ding school where they didn’t believe in soft & fluffy toi­let paper, where they belie­ved ins­tead in hard, crinkly, Army Sur­plus toi­let paper, I can truth­fully say that soft & fluffy toi­let paper fans do exist. Thank god for Proc­tor & Gam­ble, is all I can say.
And I’m a big fan of Noxema sha­ving cream.
Other pro­saic faves of mine:
Rowntree’s Fruit Gums. Utterly love them.
Diet Coke. Six cans a day, mini­mum.
Yorkshire Tea. Would be lost without it.
Kellogg’s Corn Fla­kes. Fabu­lous.
Gillette Mach 3 Razor. It’s made sha­ving SO MUCH easier. Really.
Head & Shoul­ders. Love that freaky blue color.
Of course I don’t expect Noxema or Kellogg’s to start paying me the same kind of atten­tion Mer­ce­des pays their cus­to­mers. That would be unpro­fi­ta­ble, not to men­tion rather spooky and weird.
But even with small, low-interest pro­ducts, you can tell whether the maker cares about your busi­ness or not, whether he cares about the cus­to­mer or not. The way it’s pre­sen­ted. The way it’s desig­ned. The way its “voice” expres­ses itself. The way it’s not crap. The way the price doesn’t seem to be exces­sive. The way the pac­ka­ging com­mu­ni­ca­tes self-worth.
Cheap or expen­sive, brands that “get it” give out a lot of cues. They give off cer­tain vibes. And it can’t be faked.
The Gillette Mach 3 gets it, as much as any Apple Macin­tosh.
Yorkshire Tea gets it, as much as any bottle of Moet & Chan­don.
Sure, it all sca­les dif­fe­rently in the mar­ket, but the pas­sion at the cen­ter is the same.
Which is why Proc­tor & Gam­ble is such a great com­pany. They make toi­let paper with more pas­sion than most artists make pain­tings.
If your pro­duct “gets it”, it’s going to have fans, I don’t care how “pro­saic” it is. Find out who they are and look after them first.
[SEE ALSO:] “Mar­kLove

14 Responses to “on the treatment of fans”

  1. Carl says:

    I don’t buy Kelloggs pro­ducts after hea­ring on our (New Zealand’s) radio that they were trying to get our food regu­la­tions chan­ged so they could import a par­ti­cu­lar pro­duct here. (May have been one of their corn­fla­kes.)
    I don’t know if they suc­cee­ded, but they should not have been trying, so no money from me to them.
    Marketing’s fine, but some of it’s there to mask a rea­lity the sellers don’t want the buyers to know about.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Agreed, Carl.
    Some­ti­mes life’s like that, whether you’re a sin­gle per­son or a large, inter­na­tio­nal brand.
    Some­ti­mes you have to play hard­ball ;-)
    My days of “Ordi­nary Peo­ple Good, Inter­na­tio­nal Com­pa­nies Bad” are long gone…

  3. Jack Cheng says:

    Hugh, I dunno if you’ve got­ten a chance to flip through that love­marks book yet, but the first 2/3 of it, where Roberts desc­ri­bes what a “love­mark” is, pretty much echoes most of what you’re saying here (empha­sis on “most”). If my memory ser­ves me correctly, he said the same thing about Head and Shoul­ders.
    And there’s nothing wrong with that, because the impor­tant part — the part love­mar­kers and the anti-lovemarkers diverge — is in what com­pa­nies should do about it.

  4. hugh macleod says:

    D’accord, Jack ;-)

  5. Hugh Mac­Leod: P&G Makes TP With a Passion

    Hugh insight­fully says: … Even with small, low-interest pro­ducts, you can tell whether the maker cares about your busi­ness or not, whether he cares about the cus­to­mer or not. The way it’s pre­sen­ted. The way it’s desig­ned. The way its…

  6. Josh Kaufman says:

    Hugh — you’re right about pas­sion and P&G… it’s ama­zing how exci­ted you can get about selling clea­ning pro­ducts or laundry deter­gent. Just wan­ted to let you know there’s someone on the inside who is hea­ring your “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tions” con­ver­sa­tion loud and clear. Keep up the great work!

  7. Dave says:

    6 cans of diet coke a day? You’ve got a serious addic­tion there.

  8. Thom Lawrence says:

    DO YOU HAVE A HUGE PENIS? WE HAVE HUGE PENISES TOO! BUY OUR RAZOR! I want to hear “hurts a lot fuc­king less” before I buy.
    Now I feel like I’ve mis­sed a rung on the lad­der somewhere, because I had hoped that in a post-Cluetrain/Hughtrain world, David Beckham would make a lot less money.

  9. Tony Goodson says:

    You’re begin­ning to sound like Kevin Roberts!!

  10. hugh macleod says:

    Jeez, Tony, I know. Maybe I should change my hea­der:
    “gaping­void. an ideas weblog.”

  11. Have any of the Love­marks ever said they are sorry?
    Apple, for ins­tance, is a love­mark (it’s in the book) but they sued their fans mul­ti­ple times.
    Us? Our law­yers get out of con­trol and I apo­lo­gize and clean up the mess.
    Why? Because I am on the Hugh­train!
    Or trying to be, anyway.

  12. hugh macleod says:

    I wouldn’t worry about “trying”, Robert… I’d say your streaks ahead of me, any­way.
    Tony Good­son said a GREAT thing about Love­marks here:
    http://tonygoodson.typepad.com/tonygoodson/2004/11/cluetrain_ours_.html
    “Clue­train smells right and feels like ours. Love­Marks doesn’t…”
    Beautiful.

  13. Randy says:

    The Mach3T Power sur­pas­ses the stan­dard Mach 3 or Mach 3 Turbo.
    Bit off topic, but still a use­ful FYI. I think.

  14. Hamish says:

    K-Tel Nose Hair Trim­mer. Never thought I’d need it, but now that I am get­ting old, sud­denly all this hair appears in weird pla­ces, and you need like spe­cia­li­sed ints­tru­ments to get rid of it. I guess all of human life is there. You start out as a gol­den youth ridi­cu­ling it, and then you find out you need it, and go through a phase of horrid alie­na­tion, before sett­ling into middle aged con­tent­ment that anyone thought of it.
    Now remem­ber, 75% of the glo­bal spend in first world coun­tries is con­tro­lled by women, mainly, with a sig­ni­fi­cant slice con­tro­lled by men over 50ish.
    I think that peo­ple tar­get­ted in the current adver­ti­sing, are iro­ni­cally the peo­ple that are the least eco­no­mi­cally attrac­tive. Howe­ver, adverts in Saga don’t win crea­tive awards.