<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: another nail in the coffin&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gapingvoid.com/2005/01/24/another-nail-in-the-coffin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/01/24/another-nail-in-the-coffin/</link>
	<description>&#34;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:04:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hamish</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/01/24/another-nail-in-the-coffin/#comment-3983</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1216#comment-3983</guid>
		<description>As answers go, it is a very good one.  For example, the classic adage:  &quot;Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted, but I don&#039;t know which half...&quot;  turns into: &quot;half the people who were retained to generate successful sales leads for me didn&#039;t get paid.&quot;
The one drawback is that if you hand off the exposure and revenue generation to an external aggregator and handler, then you might find your brand in odd places.
&quot;Come join with us in prayer in the Roman Catholic church...&quot; on a condom, or an advert for food on a toilet roll.  &quot;Feeling emptier now, come to Sainsburys and stock up!&quot;
So then you go to a portal that you trust and they do it for you...  Oh, wait a minute, that would be Google again, wouldn&#039;t it.  Damn.
Get my drift?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As answers go, it is a very good one.  For example, the classic adage:  &#8220;Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted, but I don&#8217;t know which half&#8230;&#8221;  turns into: &#8220;half the people who were retained to generate successful sales leads for me didn&#8217;t get paid.&#8221;<br />
The one drawback is that if you hand off the exposure and revenue generation to an external aggregator and handler, then you might find your brand in odd places.<br />
&#8220;Come join with us in prayer in the Roman Catholic church&#8230;&#8221; on a condom, or an advert for food on a toilet roll.  &#8220;Feeling emptier now, come to Sainsburys and stock up!&#8221;<br />
So then you go to a portal that you trust and they do it for you&#8230;  Oh, wait a minute, that would be Google again, wouldn&#8217;t it.  Damn.<br />
Get my drift?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nickeson</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/01/24/another-nail-in-the-coffin/#comment-3982</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nickeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1216#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>To the disintermediator go the spoils.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the disintermediator go the spoils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Ruscica</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/01/24/another-nail-in-the-coffin/#comment-3981</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Ruscica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1216#comment-3981</guid>
		<description>The big winners will be ad-bitrageurs.  To understand why, read Moneyball, by Micheal Lewis.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big winners will be ad-bitrageurs.  To understand why, read Moneyball, by Micheal Lewis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ForwardMarkets</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/01/24/another-nail-in-the-coffin/#comment-3984</link>
		<dc:creator>ForwardMarkets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1216#comment-3984</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Dichotomies of Blogs&lt;/strong&gt;

In a recent conversation on Johnnie Moore’s blog, the rhetorical question “What is a blog?” was raised by David Burn.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Dichotomies of Blogs</strong></p>
<p>In a recent conversation on Johnnie Moore’s blog, the rhetorical question “What is a blog?” was raised by David Burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martino Mingione</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2005/01/24/another-nail-in-the-coffin/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>Martino Mingione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=1216#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>I work with a number of different companies (some on the agency side of advertising, some media providers, and some technology companies).  I am convinced of two things:
1. That Madison Avenue agencies will begin in 2006 to understand that television advertising is changing because of new consumer devices, and
2. That 5 years out, agencies will be buying new forms of video advertising and buying it more like how the Internet functions -- that is, one-on-one advertising, a million impressions at a time.
Since these topics are vast and my whole career is focused on that upcoming revolution, I am keeping my posting brief.  But the answer to your question is: YES, the agencies will change in the upcoming years and NO, they do not &quot;get it&quot; in masse, yet.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with a number of different companies (some on the agency side of advertising, some media providers, and some technology companies).  I am convinced of two things:<br />
1. That Madison Avenue agencies will begin in 2006 to understand that television advertising is changing because of new consumer devices, and<br />
2. That 5 years out, agencies will be buying new forms of video advertising and buying it more like how the Internet functions &#8212; that is, one-on-one advertising, a million impressions at a time.<br />
Since these topics are vast and my whole career is focused on that upcoming revolution, I am keeping my posting brief.  But the answer to your question is: YES, the agencies will change in the upcoming years and NO, they do not &#8220;get it&#8221; in masse, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->