January 23, 2005

the corporate tipping point

pickuptruck345
Gene­ral Motors star­ting a blog cau­sed a real stir of exci­te­ment in the blo­gophere recently.
It wasn’t just that GM Vice Chair­man Bob Lutz was blog­ging, but that he was blog­ging pro­perly. Gosh, wow, he actually has a com­ment sec­tion and everything etc!
It’s not enough for some blog­gers just to “get it”, to carry on doing their thing, wri­ting away. No, the establishment-mainstream have to get it too. In their millions. In their tens of millions.
So the blo­gosphere waits for the corporate-mainstream “Tip­ping Point” to arrive, the point where blog­ging stops being the sup­po­sed realm of freaks, weir­dos, unem­plo­yed mar­ke­ting con­sul­tants, unpu­blished nove­lists, poli­ti­cal jun­kies and under­wor­ked cube dwe­llers, and starts being HUGE! An essen­tial pillar of any cor­po­rate stra­tegy and exe­cu­tion etc etc.
The GM blog sent a sig­nal that we might, might, might have reached the cor­po­rate tip­ping point (we reached the indi­vi­dual tip­ping point a while ago, methinks).
We want the cor­po­rate tip­ping point to arrive for two main rea­sons:

1. It vali­da­tes those of us who got in there early, who sta­ked a great piece of our long term cre­di­bi­lity and repu­ta­tion, who spent thou­sands of hours in the last few years wri­ting away, in the belief that this new medium was the future.
2. When the corporate-mainstream world finally “gets it”, we expect a flood­gate of demand from busi­nes­ses to open for peo­ple like us– peo­ple who can blog pro­perly, who have a repu­ta­tion in this sphere, who can steer these wealthy com­pa­nies down the strange path of this brave new world. Hello, Gravy Train. Hello, being able to make a living doing what you love, for a change.

The tip­ping point will arrive when two things hap­pen:

1. When the bos­ses are assu­red that it actually works, that the return on invest­ment is solid and mea­su­ra­ble.
2. When the bos­ses are assu­red that blog­ging won’t open a whole can of worms, that com­pa­nies won’t lose their grip on being able to make a buck for their shareholders.

But, like it says in “How To Be Crea­tive” about the world of busi­ness:

They’re used to dea­ling with you in a cer­tain way. They’re used to having a cer­tain level of con­trol over the rela­tionship. And they want wha­te­ver makes them more pros­pe­rous. Sure, they might pre­fer it if you pros­per as well, but that’s not their top prio­rity.
If your idea is so good that it chan­ges your dyna­mic enough to where you need them less, or God for­bid, THE MARKET needs them less, then they’re going to resist your idea every chance they can.
Again, that’s human nature.
GOOD IDEAS ALTER THE POWER BALANCE IN RELATIONSHIPS, THAT IS WHY GOOD IDEAS ARE ALWAYS INITIALLY RESISTED.

We already know that blog­ging works. But we also know that it con­flicts with some serioulsy well-entrenched busi­ness inte­rests: Big Media, Big Poli­tics, Big PR, Big Adver­ti­sing, Big ERP etc.
The idea that blogs have no ROI is ridi­cu­lous. The real issue is about whose terri­tory do blogs enc­roach on.

21 Responses to “the corporate tipping point”

  1. Hugh, do you really need the cor­po­rate world to

  2. hugh macleod says:

    I’m in two minds about it, John­nie. On one level I’m quite happy con­ti­nuing doing what I’m doimg, obli­vious to the outside world.
    On another level, the more the blo­gosphere has grown, the easier it has become for me to make a living. I’d be a fool not to notice the connection.

  3. David Burn says:

    Whose terri­tory do blogs enc­roach on? Exce­llent ques­tion.
    I’ve been saying for about two years now that bran­ded blogs and wikis repre­sent a new reve­nue stream for the agency busi­ness. Only very recently have any ears inside the agency biz per­ked up.
    It may take a bit lon­ger to rea­lize, but the ad biz will even­tually catch up/on. Mana­ging brand iden­ti­ties, in wha­te­ver form they may take, or media they may use, is the ad guy’s job. Having said that, blogs can clearly be admi­nis­te­red from inside a client com­pany, in which case enc­roach­ment is per­pe­tra­ted by the client itself, against their agency partners.

  4. Scott says:

    Hugh, I’m new to your blog and love it so for­give my nai­vete but how does blog­ging and the growth of the blo­gosphere make it easier for you to make a living?
    Thanks

  5. hugh macleod says:

    Well Scott, right now ALL of my current day-job client base con­sists of peo­ple who first came across me through rea­ding my blog.
    The more the blo­gosphere grew over the last 2 years, the fas­ter I arri­ved at this point.

  6. I rec­kon the mar­ke­ting gadfly in me doesn

  7. hugh macleod says:

    Don’t know if I agree, John. I think con­ver­sa­tions about making money can be authen­tic– both me, my clients and my non-client rea­ders need to eat.
    As long as your open about it, I don’t see a pro­blem.
    Perhaps your gadfly­ness might be a result of you having been in an industry which FUCKING LIES all the time. So you may equate tal­king busi­ness with FUCKING LYING. Heh.
    I can cer­tainly relate with that. I used to work for large agen­cies, don’t forget.

  8. David Burn says:

    Look at the other side of it John Moore (from the USA). If blogs help com­pa­nies become more authen­tic, or more honest, then the ine­vi­ta­ble move to cor­po­rate blogs can only be seen as a terri­fic development.

  9. Blogs

    Hugh talks about whether blogs have reached the tip­ping point:The blo­gosphere waits for the corporate-mainstream

  10. You’re still not satisf­ying your ear­lier query: when it comes to blogs what are the deli­ve­ra­bles? How will ROI become apparent?

  11. hugh macleod says:

    Steve, the “Deli­ve­ra­bles”? I have no idea. What are you inten­ding to deli­ver on your blog?
    Lies?
    Pom­pous Waf­fle?
    PR crap?
    Or do you intend to do something more inte­res­ting?
    The ball’s in your court, not the $3000-per-day asshole consultant’s.
    And as far as ROI is con­cer­ned, again, I have no idea. What are you actually willing to invest?
    Your own time, energy, and emo­tion?
    Or are you just hoping to hire some little cutey­pie part-time intern to futz around with the usal cor­po­ra­tes­peak on your company’s behalf?
    Frankly, if peo­ple don’t get blogs, I really don’t care. They can go buy Super­bowl ads ins­tead. And in 5 years they can explain to their spou­ses why they no lon­ger have jobs.
    That being said, the ROI/deliverable ques­tion will be ans­we­red like all ques­tions are ans­we­red in the blo­gosphere, when peo­ple start tal­king about it openly. It’s still early days, though.

  12. Kathy Sierra says:

    If blog­ging is on the verge of “tipping/crossing” (and it looks close), I’m wondering…what’s next? What comes *after* blog­ging? Where are the inno­va­tors and early adop­ters hea­ding once blogs jump into the fat part of the curve?

  13. The gadfly in me is con­cer­ned that

  14. hugh macleod says:

    John­Moore, blogs are no more immune from human folly than anything else.
    I think a lot of cor­po­rate bur­nouts got into blog­ging after dotbomb/9 – 11 as a refuge from the cor­po­rate world that had bur­ned them out…
    Now they’re seeing their refuge threa­te­ned by the cor­po­ra­tes dis­co­ve­ring them. AND THEY’RE NOT HAPPY!

  15. Hey, I’d just want to laugh out loud at David Burn’s sug­ges­tion that “Mana­ging brand iden­ti­ties, in wha­te­ver form they may take, or media they may use, is the ad guy’s job.”
    Show me a brand that gets blog­ging and show me the ad man who “mana­ges it for them”. C’mon David, get real.

  16. What if com­pa­nies sud­denly get it?

    So is Hugh saying that every blog­ger sec­retly wants to be a cor­po­rate PR per­son? But if every com­pany sud­denly gets it, then why would they need blog­gers? Isn’t the current value of blog­ging to bring a valua­ble coun­ter­point to…

  17. David Burn says:

    I assure you I’m as real as they come, John­nie.
    GM gets blogs. There are others, but none as pro­mi­nent.
    I never said ad men (or ad women) were doing the mana­ging of cor­po­rate, customer-facing blogs today. I did imply and I do believe that that’s about to change.

  18. The his­tory of Radio, TV, and the Web is simi­lar to this.
    Guglielmo Mar­coni digs up the vacuum tube, crea­tes wire­less tele­graphy, and cle­ver hobb­yists see the poten­tial and a mas­si­vely crea­tive boom follows, only to watch as “their” medium is co-opted by big money and sub­ver­ted to sell stuff.
    The same hap­pens when Philo Farns­worth starts trans­mit­ting pic­tu­res, and again when AOLo­sers are sud­denly let loose on the Inter­net in 1991.
    The same thing will hap­pen, is hap­pe­ning, to blogs.
    Blogs by the rich and famous will become more visi­ted than those by visio­nary thin­kers, the cle­ver will be co-opted by the wealthy to create cle­ver con­tent for their blogs, con­so­li­da­tion and regu­la­tion will prosc­ribe con­tent and the public debate currently enriched by blogs will become stul­ti­fied as the entrenched power base pla­ces boun­da­ries on the con­ver­sa­tion, steers the ques­tions and assu­mes an ans­wer.
    The best that we can hope for is that WE end up higher up in the hie­rarchy as a result of a first mover advan­tage. Or, rather, I can hope that HUGH ends up bet­ter off as a first mover advantage.

  19. Or maybe, Nathan, the blog is the medium that finally gets it right – and pre­vents that from happening.

  20. AdPulp says:

    Take This Blog And Shove It

    Yes­ter­day, I atten­ded Blog Walk 6.0, a con­fe­rence of sorts, where six­teen blog­gers from across the U.S. and Europe arran­ged them­sel­ves in small open space grou­pings to dis­cuss a wide variety of topics. How to make money from blog­ging was…

  21. Shawn Lea says:

    I think blogs will affect all areas. (And I also believe that it’s going to get har­der and har­der to sepa­rate PR, adver­ti­sing, mar­ke­ting, etc. — it’s all going to just be com­mu­ni­ca­tions, period.) And the rise of blogs will be both a bles­sing and a curse — while extra reve­nue for those trying to sell com­mu­ni­ca­tions to busi­nes­ses, for us in-house peo­ple it will just be one more duty added to the long list. And unless Lutz posts a little more loyally I don’t think he’s going to be the cor­po­rate tip­ping point. (He hasn’t pos­ted since Jan. 14th!)