January 23, 2005

letter to a student

zzzzazzdggg61.jpg

Dear Hugh,
I came across your site a cou­ple of days ago whilst I have been fran­ti­cally loo­king for some pro­per advice for careers. I’m a final year stu­dent at Durham Uni­ver­sity [UK] stud­ying English Lit. I really want to get into copyw­ri­ting, but I’ve heard loads of con­flic­ting opi­nions.
Someone from DDB Lon­don told me I nee­ded to find a ‘desig­ner part­ner’ and work my way through design school… Someone who works in adver­ti­sing in Manches­ter told me copyw­ri­ting was exce­llent and worth the hard work.
I’m really enthu­sias­tic about crea­ti­vity in com­mer­cial sense and would love a career in adver­ti­sing where I can use my wri­ting skills and not just become another cor­po­rate whore. What worries me is that I’ll be a fresh faced gra­duate in july, and have none of the agency expe­rience which some job adverts spe­cify.
Am I expec­ted to have a ‘book’ [a port­fo­lio of sam­ple work]? I have obviously writ­ten before, but not exam­ples of the kind of work I would be expec­ted to pro­du­ced as a copyw­ri­ter. Could you give me some advice?
Any res­ponse would be greatly appre­cia­ted,
Louise

Dear Louise,
You don’t need a copywriter’s ‘book’.
You need a blog, with lots of pages on it like this one.
The Bri­tish adver­ti­sing scene is a joke. Dino­saurs with desig­ner labels. All get­ting ready to die. Fun to watch.
They had some glory days back in the 1970s and ‘80s. Those days are long gone. It’s been years since I saw a really inte­res­ting adver­ti­sing idea come out of a Lon­don crea­tive depart­ment.
Sure, they’re some some excep­tio­nal minds in the Bri­tish ad biz, but doing what?
The older I get, the more I think they’re using their God-given talent not to blaze inte­res­ting new trails, but to hang on to what they’ve already mana­ged to get away with, until some­body dis­co­vers the ruse.
They cer­tainly have no inte­rest in hel­ping out a young gra­duate like your­self. Nor do I think they could, not really, not long-term, even if they wan­ted to.
What I can ima­gine them doing is, feas­ting on your crea­ti­vity for a few years, wor­king you half to death for little reward, then thro­wing your under­paid, dried-out car­cass out the door the minute they find some­body youn­ger and chea­per to replace you with. That seems to be their stan­dard busi­ness model.
If I were a young gra­duate, about to throw my lot in with the Brits, it would only be for a year or two, maybe to get some real work expe­rience under my belt. But after a year, I’d be on the first plane out of there.
In the mean­time, get an “adver­ti­sing blog” together (Don’t know what one is? You’re rea­ding one), save up for a plane tic­ket, go tra­ve­lling for a bit, then land some inter­views when you get abroad. I’m par­tial to Asia, myself.
I will say this once again: you are was­ting your time with the Bri­tish adver­ti­sing scene. They are utterly clue­less. And they basi­cally make their money from nobody fin­ding this out (this inc­lu­des the peo­ple wor­king for them).
I’d head for the Sta­tes or Asia.
Hugh

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

19 Responses to “letter to a student”

  1. Roland says:

    Hey, Hugh,
    hm, and Ger­many is just the same old dino-story… though the dinos of Frank­furt, Ham­burg or Dus­sel­dorf are a little bit sma­ller than those in Lon­don ;-) But abso­lu­tely of the same type…
    yep, asia isn’t a bad idea to start…

  2. David Burn says:

    Since John­nie Moore just told me to “get real” in another com­ment string on this site, I’m thin­king about what it would actually take for any of us to do that. We all have our own sto­ries to tell and they are sha­ped by the lives we lead.
    For ins­tance, is it right to lead Louise astray? You know as well as I do Hugh, that she will need a book to a get a copywriter’s job in Lon­don or anywhere else.

  3. hugh macleod says:

    David,
    I am right.
    You are wrong.
    Life is unfair.

  4. David Burn says:

    The autho­rity has spo­ken.
    Please par­don my con­ven­tio­nal thin­king.
    p.s. Some­ti­mes it’s hard to tell who’s the big­ger smart ass, you or me.

  5. Nancy says:

    Louise,
    Either way be care­ful. Choose wisely, if that’s pos­si­ble. There are peo­ple out there who can rape your mind. Or as some might say, “f*** you over.” (Not to men­tion your body or soul).
    The scars are ugly.

  6. Shelley Noble says:

    No offense meant, but I have no grasp what the peo­ple so far are tal­king about. Who are you all invol­ving your­sel­ves with and for what rea­sons? Money? Fame? For­tune?
    Gran­ted I am hap­pily finan­cially dirt-poor, glad to be une­du­ca­ted, and either stu­pid or for­tu­nate enough to be able do what I want when I want with whom and for my own rea­sons.
    Blog­ging is great. Using this web to con­nect directly to many of the most talen­ted, regard­less of my poli­ti­cal or social sta­tus is a pro­foundly revo­lu­tio­nary act that hasn’t been lost on me.
    I believe basing career deci­sions on money/recognition for their own sake is a dead end, ulti­ma­tely a fruit­less pur­suit. Just my thoughts.

  7. f4r4i says:

    Louise,
    i grad­ded last year having spent 4 years on this strange course called media­lab arts from the uni­ver­sity of ply­mouth. I now find myself wor­king in a digi­tal mar­ke­ting agency / pro­duc­tion house in lon­di­nium: a com­mon des­ti­na­tion for the grads from my course.
    three weeks after i star­ted, i got a crazy new job title because some peo­ple had thrown in the towel. i was chuf­fed, as any grad would be, but soon found myself wor­king crazy hours, rehashing old cam­paigns and none the richer.
    later i dis­co­ve­red that the guys whose thread­bare shoes i was trying to fill had also star­ted at the com­pany as grads and were basi­cally tired of the whole “same old shit, just a dif­fe­rent brand” thing.
    i’ve only been doing this for 5 months, but i’m already fee­ling che­wed up, i’m still a broke mofo’ and i’ve already seen what the future holds for grads in this place. this idea recyc­ling and grad soul des­truc­tion that Hugh speaks of is not fic­tion, it’s my grim rea­lity, which is why for christ­mas I put down a depo­sit on a plane tic­ket for myself.
    asking rules. you’ve given your­self a chance to avoid get­ting burnt.
    godspeed

  8. Hey Louise: Kudos for asking the ques­tion. I loved what what Hugh said.
    The Blog of A Would-Be Copyw­ri­ter, warts and all, will be fun to read and may get you noti­ced… if (and only if, I sus­pect) you find it fun to write.
    And I’d also say, at end of the day, there are no rules.
    Lis­ten to lots of peo­ple if you like but in the end there’s no right ans­wer, only a choice that you get to make. Frankly, some­ti­mes this sucks but it’s also what makes life exci­ting.
    This mor­ning, my thro­wa­way advice is: life is com­plex and unpre­dic­ta­ble… try doing what feels like fun and see what hap­pens. Be wary of pre­dic­tions, your own and other people’s.
    And the best of Bri­tish (or whiche­ver natio­na­lity you pre­fer) luck to you!

  9. PS Lou­sie: feel free to email me at my blog if you’d like to chat further

  10. Hamish says:

    Hi Louise,
    I hope that you find what you are loo­king for, although I tend to think that Hugh is right. I would also throw the net a bit broa­der, and point out something that has struck me very for­ce­fully over the last cou­ple of deca­des. (I am 39.)
    When I left Uni­ver­sity I was spec­ta­cu­larly unem­plo­ya­ble, and so I did what grads did in those days, I loo­ked for someone who would teach me a skill. Now, way back then, i.e. the late eigh­ties, there were gra­duate trai­ning pro­gram­mes with the big cor­po­ra­tions that were actually worth doing. I joi­ned what is now KPMG to train to be an audi­tor, and left after three months because I hated it, and more impro­tantly, didn’t have the right atti­tude for it.
    I joi­ned one of the maga­zine publishers, trade and so on, and sold ad space, which is really bloody tedious as a job, but it paid the rent, and made me ask myself for real why would anyone give me money? Good ques­tion to think about an ans­wer to.
    Then I could see that this was going nowhere, it was the ulti­mate rack space, one body fell, and another drop­ped in without a hic­cup. You were given your box of cards and a phone, and expec­ted to figure out how to sell white paper with a cou­ple of afternoon’s trai­ning. So I joi­ned the gra­duate trai­ning proh­ram of one of the big IT com­pa­nies. And they took two years to traim me to do something use­ful, and I wor­ked at it, and within a cou­ple more years I left and have had a very suc­cess­ful career with a big ERP soft­ware ven­dor, mainly doing sales, and mainly on the back of what I learnt in the ad sales sweatshop.
    Now, here’s the point. Twenty years ago you trai­ned peo­ple up because it was the chea­pest and most effec­tive way to ensure that you had ski­lled and use­ful resource for the long term growth of the com­pany. Twenty years later, get this.
    1. There is no long term, the CEO’s next quar­ter is his/her last.
    2. Stea­ling some­body else is chea­per, and you can do it on demand. This is called right sizing
    3. In case the resource you need is scarce, remem­ber that the job mar­ket glo­bally has added around 100 million com­pe­tent peo­ple (Uni­ver­sity grads, expe­rience, speak English, have access to outside world) since around 1990.
    So, basi­cally, no-one has any inte­rest in telling you anything about how to do their job because they are already worried about kee­ping it, let alone telling anyone else how to do it. And so with very few excep­tions, the tra­di­tio­nal gra­duate entry points are clo­sed. This is what you need to over­come.
    How will you find the net­work that will get you into the right posi­tion? Who is it that you know, or will get to know that will take a per­so­nal inte­rest in get­ting you func­tio­nal in this busi­ness?
    If the ans­wer is no-one, then you need to go and find a busi­ness where the ans­wer is “someone”, and quick.

  11. mr D says:

    Hey Louise,
    I sus­pect that if you had a nifty blog like this one, you get hired in no time: http://www.houseofwigs.com/
    As the pur­ve­yor of a small web shop I can tell you that I get so many job appli­cants every week that I can only image the big shops are inun­da­ted with a fresh stack of pdfs each mor­ning — so good luck on that account.
    My advice would be, pay your dues, but get freelancing/consulting as fast you can; the more clients/bosses you have, the less it hurts when one of them ine­vi­tably downsizes…

  12. Suw says:

    Louise,
    Hugh is right. Get your­self a blog and then start wri­ting. The only way to get work as a wri­ter is to write, and rather than wai­ting for someone to gene­rously give you something to write about you should be going out there and fin­ding your own sto­ries. Doors don’t just open these days, they have to be pri­sed open with a crow­bar or, at times, blown open with high explo­sive. Blogs can do both.
    There are plenty of peo­ple who will tell you that a blog won’t get you work, but those peo­ple are either full of shit or stu­pid. These days, I get most of my clients either directly through or indi­rectly because of my blog and I am far from alone. Anyone who wants me to write for them has access to a huge archive of my wri­ting, and ins­tant insight into the sorts of things that inte­rest me, my per­so­na­lity and expe­rience. Of course, my port­fo­lio site helps in that it pro­vi­des copies of actual com­mis­sio­ned artic­les, but the blog allows peo­ple to dip into my mind and assess whether or not they want to work with me. Fre­quently, the ans­wer is ‘yes’.
    More impor­tant than dis­pla­ying my *cough* won­drously elo­quent gift to the world, blog­ging allows me to become a part of a com­mu­nity and that’s the real killer. You don’t get that from a book or clip­pings. You need the net­work — it’s how you meet your future clients, your future collea­gues and your future edi­tors.
    The old ways of paying dues don’t work so well any­more — too many peo­ple want to be wri­ters and are willing to work for nothing to do so. You have to cut to the chase and blog­ging is the best way to do that. If you want further advice about star­ting up a blog, feel free to email me at suw.charman [at] gmail.com as I’ve plenty of expe­rience get­ting peo­ple up and run­ning and advi­sing them on how to get the best from their blog.

  13. AdPulp says:

    Gue­ri­llas Adop­ted By Toronto Shop

    Bensimon-Byrne, a Toronto agency wor­king on Mol­son, Sco­tia Bank and Ottawa Rene­ga­des, among other accounts, have hired Bren­dan Watson and Jana Ran­jit­ku­mar as a crea­tive team. After mee­ting with David Rosen­berg, crea­tive direc­tor at Bensimon-Byrne, Bren…

  14. David Burn says:

    Suw, great advise for a bud­ding jour­na­list. Not so great for a bud­ding copyw­ri­ter. A copyw­ri­ter will need a killer book of spec ads that show­case her thin­king in a bran­ded con­text.
    I know Hugh thinks that a port­fo­lio is passe, and I can see what you think above, but please rea­lize that your blogs are built on a foun­da­tion. That is, you both have real world expe­rience (and a blog), so get­ting job leads from your blogs is a via­ble route.
    For someone ente­ring the ad biz, they can’t expect that their blog will attract the kind of atten­tion neces­sary for a crea­tive direc­tor to say, “Holy shit, this girl’s blog is so cool, I’ll over­look the fact she has no book.”

  15. hugh macleod says:

    (Dave is still wrong. Life is still unfair.)

  16. Dwight Little says:

    No, Hugh, David is right. Sorry.
    Any schmo with an Inter­net con­nec­tion can create a blog. Doesn’t mean they can create com­pe­lling crea­tive — assu­ming that’s not a con­tra­dic­tion in terms these days. When it comes to lan­ding a job, a blog is a gim­mick — nothing more.
    As for your ope­ning rant about “the English adver­ti­sing scene” is “a joke… get­ting ready to die,” well, perhaps you are correct. I still see some terri­fic work coming out of the UK, but what do I know?
    The ques­tion is, if adver­ti­sing as we know it is just a phone call to Dr. Ker­vor­kian away from kic­king the pro­ver­bial buc­ket, what do you pro­pose will take its place?
    You talk a lot about what’s wrong with adver­ti­sing, but you don’t seem to offer much in the way of spe­ci­fic alter­na­ti­ves — just a lot of vague pla­ti­tu­des.
    I don’t say this to be insul­ting. From rea­ding your pos­tings, you clearly have wit, talent and inte­lli­gence to burn (or David Burn, for that mat­ter). But I’m not seeing a lot of subs­tance.
    Just my opi­nion, of course.
    You are right about one thing, Hugh. Life is indeed unfair.

  17. hugh macleod says:

    Hey, Dwight, it’s OK to agree with Dave =)
    1. As far as the blog-book debate is con­cer­ned, sure, you could argue that perhaps an ave­rage book would beat out an ave­rage blog… but guess what? Ave­rage books and ave­rage blogs DO NOT INTEREST ME. I see either, I stop paying atten­tion. Right away. So do most peo­ple.
    The ques­tion for Louise, then, is what is she willing to do that is inte­res­ting to some­body else. Having never seen her work, I have no idea.
    But the ave­rage advice doled out to young’uns like her­self is 90% use­less.
    The advice Louise told me she’s recei­ved is utterly sha­me­ful. “Do what every­body else has been doing for the last 30 years.“
    Wrong Ans­wer.
    2. What do I see repla­cing the stan­dard ad agency model? Tons.
    The trou­ble for Madi­son Ave­nue, is these repla­ce­ments are being inven­ted by peo­ple other than the ad agen­cies.
    Goo­gle Adsense wasn’t inven­ted by Young & Rubi­cam. Mova­ble Type wasn’t inven­ted by Leo Bur­nett. The Clue­train Mani­festo wasn’t writ­ten by John Hegarty. I could go on for pages…
    It’s the old biz school maxim: the rail­road com­pa­nies didn’t get into air­li­nes. The horse and buggy com­pa­nies didn’t get into auto­mo­bi­les.
    What will replace the mono­lithic agency model? Another mono­lith? Or lots of dif­fe­rent little new models?
    I’m sorry if my blog doesn’t offer you enough subs­tance to satisfy your inte­llect. Find a blog that does, or write one your­self ;-)

  18. Dwight Little says:

    I didn’t say I didn’t enjoy rea­ding your blog, Mr. Mac­leod. Quite the con­trary: As I sta­ted before, your talent and inte­lli­gence are rea­dily appa­rent.
    Nor do I make any claims about the size of my own inte­llect. I am, in fact, as dense as the late Leo­nid Brezhnev’s eye­brows.
    My point was simply that you go on and on about the demise of tra­di­tio­nal adver­ti­sing. It’s all very enter­tai­ning and, for the most part, true.
    What seems to be lac­king is a clear arti­cu­la­tion as to what will replace it. It’s all well and good to take snide shots at Leo Bur­nett and Young and Rubi­cam. But what comes next?
    I also agree that 90% of the advice Louise will be get­ting is “use­less.” As a has-been who never was, I cer­tainly have nothing to offer her — except my heart­felt best wishes.
    But a blog alone won’t do the trick. Yeah, it’s dif­fe­rent. So is stan­ding on your head naked in the lobby of J. Wal­ter Thomp­son while reci­ting “Green Eggs and Ham” in Yid­dish.
    Gim­micks are fine for get­ting atten­tion — which, gran­ted, is cru­cial. But if you don’t have the subs­tance (there’s that word again) to back it up, you’re not likely to get hired.

  19. hugh macleod says:

    Well, I’m not sure if blogs are just “gim­micks”. But we can agree to disa­gree. I’m not sure if ‘books’ are all they’re crac­ked up to be, either. I haven’t upda­ted mine in years.
    I don’t think my com­ments about Leo’s or Y&R were snide. I’d say they were very per­ti­nent exam­ples of what I’m tal­king about.
    Any­way, I’ve moved this debate on to my most recent post. I’m clo­sing the com­ments on this post, Gang.