January 17, 2005

microsoft needs to play more

zzzbambam32.jpg
So ear­lier I ask Microsoft’s Robert Sco­ble what their next “big idea” is.
Robert comes back to me, saying the ans­wer is to “Sell what we got.“
That’s not a “big idea”, Robert. That barely qua­li­fies as an “idea”.
A cou­ple of months ago, I loo­sely defi­ned “Crea­ti­vity” as “that place where work and play become the same thing”.
Mic­ro­soft lacks a cer­tain play­ful­ness. Their arch rival, Apple doesn’t [Of course Apple does have other issues etc].
Apple calls their new OS “Tiger”. Micor­soft calls their new OS “Mic­ro­soft Win­dows XP Media Cen­ter Edi­tion 2005″.
Man, already it’s begin­ning to bore me, and I don’t even know what it does yet.
Apple has the “New­ton”. MS has “Mic­ro­soft Win­dows Tablet PC Edi­tion.“
There ya go, boring me again.
Apple has the iPod. Mic­ro­soft has the iRi­ver H320 Digi­tal Music Pla­yer.
Boring boring boring boring boring.…
Look, I really don’t need 50 bullet points to know I want something. I just need to be shown a little leg. I can get all the details later, back at the hotel room etc.
Back in the good ol’ days, a rising stock price gave MS emplo­yees all the play­ful­ness they nee­ded. But now, sadly, it has to come from somewhere else.
Where’s that play­ful­ness going to come from? It ain’t coming from Bill Gates. That’s not his style, let’s not kid our­sel­ves.
Then from where? From whom? Serious question.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

25 Responses to “microsoft needs to play more”

  1. Today I met a researcher at Mic­ro­soft who is wor­king on curing HIV. You’ll meet him in a cou­ple of weeks on Chan­nel 9.
    Is that boring? I don’t think so.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Heh. I would cer­tainly NOT call that boring, Robert ;-)
    You’re the most “play­ful” thing Microsoft’s got going at the moment, I believe.
    I just think more would be good. That was the whole point of this post. Would you not agree?

  3. /pd says:

    Robert, seriously… do we think that MSFT will cure HIV and aids ??? our XP/ W2K os need cons­tant upda­tes and its crashes most often and most venu­ra­ble to virus.. let alone HIV !!
    When will I put our brother or a sis­ter on HIV/AIDS cure from MSFT ?? God For­bid , even if this is true, that MSFT comes out with a cure !! Robert, I am utterlly dis­ma­yed by the fact that you will even think of com­men­ting such facts/ or for­war­ding loo­king sta­te­ments in the face of evan­glism.. and I mean per­so­nally ..lets for­get MSFT !!!!
    I will blog this …

  4. Actually, Robert, that is boring.
    But then good work is. And good to see MS is attac­king a virus it might be able to get a handle on.
    What will this cure be called…? Over to you Hugh.
    And btw, Hugh, when are you going to rea­lize that you are amongst the three to four per cent of the popu­la­tion that think/believe that work is /should be/can be play­ful?
    97% of the popu­la­tion are dullards that live the bullet point lifestyle. You think those account types exist just in adver­ti­sing? These are the meat pup­pets living in the middle of meats­pace.
    What’s Mic­ro­soft to do? Lead the meat elseh­were? Call their next big idea “Sheepher­der”?
    Hey wolf bait, come to poppa.
    Let’s be real.

  5. Kinja says:

    Robert way to avoid the ques­tion and say a really bonehea­ded rubish sta­te­ment. VERY MICROSOFT OF YOU!

  6. How to create a new Mic­ro­soft pro­duct — first, choose a name…

  7. richard says:

    Wor­king on curing HIV? That’s great. I ima­gine the only thing dela­ying release to manu­fac­tu­ring is coming up with a pro­fi­ta­ble licen­sing scheme.

  8. Ron says:

    Please tell me. Mic­ro­soft has grown to domi­nate their mar­ket (soft­ware) at a speed and tota­lity unseen in busi­ness his­tory — with none of their pro­ducts (Excel, Win­dows, Word etc) ever being the first-to-market or lea­ding edge offe­rings. Why do they need to be the hol­der of the “Next Big Idea”?
    In the past 15 years Apple has always been the “Idea” com­pany — but who rules the tech­no­logy mar­ket now?
    The New­ton was a flop and no lon­ger exists — Tablet PC’s are now being used in many “real” busi­ness appli­ca­tions, ie it is no lon­ger a play thing or con­cept.
    The Palm­pi­lot is still the handheld mar­ket lea­der but at hi-tech res­tau­rants and warehou­ses where a handheld is use­ful as part of a busi­ness appli­ca­tions — most of the time the MS plat­form is being used.
    I think they have got their big idea — “domi­nate the mar­ket with other people’s designs”.

  9. Deter­mi­ned Detrac­tor No 1

    Hugh at Gaping Void is the ulti­mate cyni­cal voice about the world of mar­ke­ting and is a per­fect exam­ple of a power­ful deter­mi­ned detractor.

  10. anu says:

    Hmmm..
    Mic­ro­soft Win­dows XP Media Cen­ter Edi­tion 2005 tells me exactly what I need to know about the pro­duct.
    Tiger tells me nothing. LC345dF-A45 as a name would give me as much infor­ma­tion. Let’s cast our minds back at IBM with their play­ful Warp desig­na­tion. Oooh..cool name.
    The idea that play­full­ness can be arti­fi­cially gene­ra­ted by naming con­ven­tions is pretty lame, to be honest, espe­cially for someone who seems to des­pise exis­ting and con­ven­tio­nal mar­ke­ting and adver­ti­sing struc­tu­res.
    As for MSFT’s big idea, I thought it was “deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, deve­lo­pers, ” as I read on someone’s blog recently. Frankly, who cares what MSFT’s big idea is as long as they give other peo­ple the tools to create lots of little ones.
    Oh, and the Gates Foun­da­tion is now an impor­tant source of fun­ding for HIV/AIDS research. I know that’s sepa­rate from MSFT, but it wouldn’t sur­prise me if there were researchers doing inte­res­ting stuff in this field within MSFT.

  11. Stefan says:

    Mic­ro­soft used to play more… some blo­gosphere buzz even pro­vi­des pho­to­graphic proof of that. Check http://blog.monkeymethods.org/2005/01/bill-gates-strikes-pose-for-teen-beat.html :o )

  12. rob burke says:

    (The com­ments here have taken a slightly dif­fe­rent direc­tion, but – ) in regards to play­ful naming con­ven­tions, I think Microsoft’s “inter­nal” names for pro­jects can be pretty play­ful. Indigo and Ava­lon are cool names (methinks). And heck, Longhorn itself is named after a pub at a Cana­dian ski resort~!

  13. hugh macleod says:

    That’s great, Rob Burke… but why only inter­nal play­ful­ness? What kills it off by the time it reaches folk like me?
    I’m a big fan of “exter­nal play­ful­ness”, in case you hadn’t noti­ced ;-)

  14. Mic­ro­soft is Cor­po­rate Cor­po­rate Cor­po­rate. (sung to the tune of Fat­boy Slim’s Cali­for­nia)
    I bet they think people’s idea of fun on the wee­kend is sit­ting around at home wea­ring com­pany golf shirts and making cor­po­rate pre­sen­ta­tions for their upco­ming week at work.

  15. memer says:

    I’m one of Moffat’s three per­cen­ters, but unfortunately’s play’s not the thing. The (not-so) Sof­ties are gynor­mous cuz they play to big bid­niz and big bid­niz don’t play.
    Con­su­mers play. Busi­ness “just works.”

  16. eric says:

    Anu,
    There’s no need for the PS dis­tinc­tions when you only have one desk­top and one ser­ver OS. They could call Tiger “OS X for Pro­fes­sio­nals, Home Users, 64 bit pro­ces­sing, Media, and More” but it is, de facto, all of these.
    At MS’s web page, I count seven ver­sions of the OS just under the XP hea­ding. Whether their tar­ge­ted focus of OS’s is a bet­ter move than Apple’s is deba­tea­ble, but it cer­tainly requ­ries the long-winded callouts in the pro­duct name.

  17. chris says:

    I dunno, Bill Gates looks pretty play­ful here:
    http://blog.monkeymethods.org/2005/01/bill-gates-strikes-pose-for-teen-beat.html
    Now THERE’S a “Tiger”…
    (yeah yeah, I’m sure everyone’s seen it already ;-)

  18. Brad: for fun I wear Apple and Fire­fox t-shirts to work.
    Really, I do. I’ll take a pic­ture sometime.

  19. /pd says:

    Robert : Thanks for the rebut­tal offering.

  20. anu says:

    Eric,
    Maybe, but what does the word Tiger tell you when com­pa­red to Panther and Jaguar ? Is it an ear­lier ver­sion, or a later ver­sion ? It’s a mea­nin­gless word in this con­text, but I guess some peo­ple get suc­ked into thin­king that form=function.
    Hugh is pro­bably not a fan of Ron­seal pro­duct naming con­ven­tions either — eg Ron­seal Wood Var­nish, as oppo­sed to Ron­seal Leo­pard, which would be a much more play­ful name.
    Takes more than a name to delight me.

  21. Joy says:

    To even worry about the idea of ‘work/playfulness’ means you’re in a fairly small cohort. Most folks in the world are just trying to earn a living.

  22. hugh macleod says:

    Most folks in the world live on less than $5 a day, if you want to be REALLY brutal.

  23. Fun quo­tes via GapingVoid.com

  24. If you think Mic­ro­soft uses silly pro­duct names, you’re in good company

    I’ve ran­ted before about Mic­ro­soft pro­duct names, so it’s nice to see that I’m in good com­pany:
    CNET…