January 14, 2005

red bull

zzzzazzdggg78.jpg
From The Inde­pen­dant, 6th January 2005 (paid subsc­rip­tion only).
A lengthy pro­file on Die­trich Mateschitz, the billio­naire foun­der of famed Aus­trian soft drink, Red Bull.
Die­trich is a bit like the Aus­trian equi­va­lent of Steve Jobs or Richard Bran­son. Red Bull to him is all about crea­ti­vity, pas­sion and energy. Like Apple or Vir­gin, his com­pany is very gung-ho.
You get the fee­ling that the jour­na­list wri­ting the piece, Sholto Byr­nes is ungra­ciously rolling his eyes the whole time. In the last para­grah he wri­tes:

Red Bull may have given Die­trich Mateschitz wings– but for flights of fancy, perhaps. As I walk out of his lair into the Salz­burg snow I won­der how many of Mr. Red Bull’s emplo­yees ever stop and remind them­sel­ves that behind all the gran­di­lo­quent monu­ments and sta­te­ments of high intent lie one sim­ple fact: it is, after all, only a fizzy drink.

Ah, yes, the inte­re­pid and enligh­te­ned repor­ter indi­rectly remin­ding the phi­lis­tine greedheads to keep it in pers­pec­tive, what with far big­ger, worthier things to pon­der e.g. World Peace, Greenhouse Gases, Third World Debt yak yak yak…
Wha­te­ver. Any sch­muck can write fancy words about something huge. Not every­body can start with a wee idea scrib­bled on the back of a cock­tail nap­kin and turn it into something huge. That is the difference.

10 Responses to “red bull”

  1. Gee, seems like Sholto just wants to take the fun out of everything. Perhaps we should all just remem­ber that the human body, for all of its mag­ni­fi­cence and splen­dor, is just a blood making machine.
    I agree with you. The intre­pid souls who can go take a thought to breakth­rough are those who are fue­led by their zest for life. Unfor­tu­na­tely, they’re also easy tar­gets for cynics. Dream on…

  2. Guyo says:

    Well yes, but…Dietrich Mateschitz’s idea came pre-scribbled — he visi­ted the Orient and bought the rights to sell an exis­ting energy drink called “Red Bull” in the West.He then twea­ked the ingre­dients and added the fizz.
    No doubt though there is an unsung but other­wise wealthy ad exec somewhere that jot­ted “red bull gives you wings” on a paper napkin.

  3. AH says:

    Nonethe­less, Red Bull is very ins­pi­ring. It really doesn’t mat­ter whether Herr Mateschitz bought the for­mula to Caffeine-Gonzo, or paid someone to invent it. The sim­pli­city of the com­po­nents is breath­ta­king.
    Hi-adrenaline drink
    +
    Slo­gan and stylish-graphic con­sis­tent and clever-metaphor mes­sage.
    That is all.
    OK, at least one thing in everyone’s con­cep­tual uni­verse has wings. With the reduc­tio­nist atti­tude of the jour­na­list, it’ll hit its little head on a rock and expire in the grass. Other than life-saving pro­ducts (and even to get the atten­tion for them), Frame is All. It is part of the fun we have cho­sen to have as a com­mer­cial cul­ture, and stan­ding around in black turt­le­necks spoi­ling the fun is not a growth industry I will buy a dead tree (even with its name spe­lled right) to support.

  4. Mark says:

    Why shouldn’t Red Bull’s mar­ke­ting sch­tick get the same scru­tiny as any other company’s? I don’t unders­tand the dis­dain for this repor­ter when cyni­cal mis­trust of mar­ke­ting, esp. effu­sive talk ala “Love­marks,” is what this site is all about.
    You per­so­nally like the pro­duct and the intan­gi­bles (like ver­bage) surroun­ding it are somehow great mar­ke­ting? You don’t like the pro­duct and all of it is bullshit?
    Seriously, I’d like to unders­tand the dif­fe­rence if there is something I am missing.

  5. hugh macleod says:

    Scrutiny’s a good thing, Mark, worry not.
    Howe­ver… [Insert Bri­tish Big Media Jour­na­lism Rant here]. ;-)

  6. Ben says:

    Great remarks, Hugh. …I tip my can of Red Bull to you!

  7. mamagiggle says:

    Hugh Rock!
    Start at the bot­tom and lick your way up the wall of that Cor­po­rate archi­tec­ture! ahem I mean, um, what did I mean.…
    Oh yeah, the thing I like about Red Bull’s cam­paign is that there is an ele­ment of empo­wer­ment in it and if someone drin­king it was pre­ten­ding at the same time to be gro­wing wings than perhaps they might actually be recon­fi­gu­ring their psyche’s to leave off the obs­tacle bullshit at kick down them mutha f(shhh.…)walls..
    So a wee drink with a little effort might go a long way.
    Too bad it tas­tes like shhh! Sorry.

  8. Dave says:

    After all, Star­bucks is just beans and water…
    Look ever­yone! I can be pro­found too!

  9. Brett says:

    Tas­tes like shhh? You’re not adding enough vodka.

  10. mamagiggle says:

    duh…zzz that make it bet­ter?
    Mix them che­mi­cals, stimulants/sedatives why not, cock­tail nap­kin ahoy!