January 6, 2005

nanorevolution

8 Comments

zzzzzz7654157.jpg
I have no idea what this means.

8 Responses to “nanorevolution”

  1. Beck says:
    January 6, 2005 at 8:56 am

    Maybe you should ask this guy

  2. basil says:
    January 6, 2005 at 9:47 am

    hey maybe dra­wing on buis­ness cards is nano teck­no­logy
    hugh you are so way ahead of trends

  3. hugh macleod says:
    January 6, 2005 at 11:08 am

    Yes, I can already see the word “Nano” as one of those words soon to be “ren­de­red anno­ying by mar­ke­ting folks”.
    “Team, let’s have a nano­mee­ting!”
    “Team, we need to nano­fo­cus!”
    and so forth…

  4. brian moffatt says:
    January 6, 2005 at 12:01 pm

    mic­ro­mar­kets are nanoconversations

  5. Dave Wheeler says:
    January 6, 2005 at 1:54 pm

    Any full-blown revo­lu­tion must be made up of a whole lot of “nano­re­vo­lu­tions”… sort of like making the con­ver­sa­tions smar­ter, “One cus­to­mer at time”.

  6. hugh macleod says:
    January 6, 2005 at 2:23 pm

    Agreed, Dave. That was kinda my thin­king… “Nano-revolutions, lin­ked.”
    Etcetera.

  7. Hamish says:
    January 6, 2005 at 4:36 pm

    I would think that is the name of a Jaco­bite sup­por­ting Curry House in Scot­land.
    (Ged­dit.)
    Lock the doors with sello­tape, and lets to the stars.

  8. J says:
    January 7, 2005 at 10:56 am

    beware the nanobots