January 5, 2005

it’s doc’s world. we just live in it.

zzzkjurhgu21.jpg
From Doc Searls:

Worst metaphor in the his­tory of jour­na­lism: that wri­ting is “con­tent”. Let’s call wri­ting wri­ting. Or “edi­to­rial”. Or “speech”. Or “essay”. Or “prose”. Or wha­te­ver.
If it helps, remem­ber this: Con­tent can be regu­la­ted as con­tai­ner cargo in the ship­ping sys­tem we call com­merce. Meanwhile, Wri­ting is pro­tec­ted as speech by the First Amend­ment. Yes, I know there are excep­tions. But the dis­tinc­tion is real, and important.

“Con­tent” is like the word “Brand”. The very fact you’re using it means you’re hiding something.

3 Responses to “it’s doc’s world. we just live in it.”

  1. Hamish says:

    Amen. My other pet hate is the word con­su­mer rather than cus­to­mer. A cus­to­mer is an indi­vi­dual with pre­fe­ren­ces and choi­ces. A con­su­mer is a mar­ke­ting illu­sion that will somehow suck up your sad-shit pro­duct because eco­no­mi­cally they have a law of phy­sics need to buy your lowest com­mon deno­mi­na­tor unit shif­ter that you just fina­gled into the supply chain at Wal­mart.
    But then, I guess that’s what this blog is all about, right?
    Card­board spa­ceship time. Whoosh, whoosh.

  2. I don’t know. I think we’re all wrong. Again.
    Wri­ting is con­tent. Let’s face it.
    Espe­cially in jour­na­lism. Take those glo­riouis opi­nion lea­ders, the colum­nists. These are the wri­ters that add value to a news­pa­per.
    Per­so­nally, I see them as copyw­ri­ters wri­ting presc­rip­tive essays that fall in quite nicely with the Board’s POV. But that’s just me.
    You know the rot. Analy­sis. Pers­pec­tive. Insight. Pro­vo­ca­tive thin­king. Cau­ses vomit­ting here, but again. that’s just me.
    These are the real ads in a news­pa­per, this wri­ting. The heigh­te­ned op/eds.The Brand being The Way to Think/Be/LIve. Each colum­nist a pipe in the big pipe organ of pro­pa­ganda. Each column a note in the grand symphony.
    Peo­ple — the customers/consumers — are sus­pi­cious of anything that is free. Mar­kets prove this. What’s the catch, they ask?
    News is free. The­re­fore it is worth­less.
    Good wri­ting is behind the pay wall. It must have value because it’s hid­den.
    Wri­ting that is given away free is the­re­fore worth­less, value­less.
    Jour­na­lism that you don’t pay for has to be worth­less. Writing’s value lies in the pac­ka­ging. The cumu­la­tive effect of posi­tio­ning and asso­cia­tion. Infor­ma­tion worth get­ting is info worth paying for.
    No one has to pay to read the First Amend­ment. It is thus ren­de­red mea­nin­gless.
    Ame­ri­cans, if they’re serious about pro­tec­ting free speech, should put their Bill of Rights behind a pay wall.

  3. Pegasus News says:

    Bet­ter poin­ted bullets than poin­ted words

    Have some of both: News­pa­pers aren’t the only medium past their peak.