December 23, 2004

hughtraining

mnjipo02.jpg
Dave Par­met left a nice wee com­ment in a recent post:

The third [type of mar­ke­ting blog]- and this is where you come in — are blogs about mar­ke­ting itself. About the ideas and not about the exe­cu­tion of the ideas. Which is ama­zingly use­ful since I come here every mor­ning and go ‘so that’s what’s been bug­ging me about Client X…’ The pro­blem as you put it is that ideas are not very .… product-able. If that makes sense.
The ques­tion — as Chris­topher puts it — is what do you want to do with this? Write a book? Grow up to be Seth Goo­din? Let a thou­sand Hugh­flo­wers bloom among the ad, pr and mar­ke­ting agen­cies of the free world?
Figure that out and then do it.…

1. Well, I have a pro­duct. Or at least I think I do. Almost ready to go public.
2. I’m not realy inte­res­ted in doing “merch”: books, T-shirts, prints, blog­cards etc.
Sure, I’ll do them, but more of a fun, money-making hobby than something desig­ned to pay for my reti­re­ment.
3. “He let a thou­sand Hugh­flo­wers bloom among the ad, pr and mar­ke­ting agen­cies of the free world” wouldn’t be a bad thing to have on one’s gra­ves­tone, Methinks.
4. The Hugh­train is not roc­ket science. “We humans want to believe in our own spe­cies; and we want peo­ple, com­pa­nies and pro­ducts in our lives that make it easier to do so” is not roc­ket science. To me, it’s just com­mon sense.
The hard part is not in belie­ving it. The hard part part is actually doing it. Yeah, my stuff sounds great in a mee­ting. But the ave­rage client is not atually that inte­res­ted in the subs­tance of it. The ave­rage client is far more inte­res­ted in us mar­ke­ting types fin­ding cle­ver, short-term ways of making The Old Lies work bet­ter than they have been of late.
But for how long…?

4 Responses to “hughtraining”

  1. Andreas says:

    In my expe­rience, what the client is inte­res­ted in is wha­te­ver makes the client look good to his or her own bos­ses. In most cases that is, ulti­ma­tely, shif­ting the client’s kit.
    [Note: This is in the post dot com bub­ble burst world. Before 2002 things were mar­kedly dif­fe­rent.]
    The way that kit is shif­ted is of little to no inte­rest to the majo­rity of the clients I’ve wor­ked with in recent years. Sure, they like to use the latest buzz­words, sure they like to be seen as mar­ke­ting gods but if the results ain’t there they panic and run.
    As you’ve said before, it’s all about deli­ve­ra­bles now.

  2. Brock Tice says:

    I’ve been rea­ding a lot of Stephen Covey latey, so for­give me, but it seems like what the Hugh­train is get­ting at is that cor­po­ra­tions need to be more like peo­ple. Inte­res­ting since they are legally con­si­de­red to be peo­ple, but any­way, a real rela­tionship with a cus­to­mer can­not be built on quick fixes and ‘per­so­na­lity’, but rather must come from cus­to­mers appre­cia­ting the true prin­ci­ples prac­ti­ced within said com­pany.
    I’m willing to wager you’ve read the Seven Habits, but as I’ve just been revie­wing it I’ll expound. It reminds me of the ‘emo­tio­nal bank account’ that Covey speaks of. I’ll use my rela­tionship with Apple as an exam­ple. In a rela­tionship, the two par­ties invol­ved each have an emo­tio­nal bank account with the other. By exe­cu­ting deeds of good will for each other, the emo­tio­nal bank accounts on either sides are built up. Apple does this in a variety of ways, but the big­gest thing to me is when my power­book fai­led. While, gran­ted, it’s not great that the hard­ware fai­led, first someone who knew what they were tal­king about cour­teously step­ped me through a few checks to make sure that the pro­blem requi­red sen­ding the machine in. Then, they had a box out to me by the same day, in the after­noon. I ship­ped it to them that eve­ning, it was gone for one solid day, and it came back fixed the next mor­ning. Their tur­na­round has gene­rally been the same the few times I’ve had to do this. This is done at great expense to Apple. Could they use chea­per, slo­wer ship­ping? Sure. But, they recog­nize that part of the deal when you lay down the money for a pre­mium piece of hard­ware is that they keep it up and run­ning for the dura­tion of the warranty, with mini­mal down­time. They do everything they can to miti­gate the pro­blem.
    When peo­ple aren’t just loo­king to push kit out the door, when they are inte­res­ted in buil­ding their emo­tio­nal bank account with their cus­to­mers, that’s when you’ll begin to see cus­to­mer loyalty again.
    Sorry, I kind of wan­de­red. This isn’t really my area of exper­tise. Do you kind of unders­tand what I’m get­ting at?

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Perhaps, Brock, though it’s easy to push the “rela­tionship” metaphor too far… I’m seeing lots of that already.
    Inti­macy doesn’t really scale, at the end of the day…

  4. david says:

    The ave­rage client is inte­res­ted in doing exactly enough to look good, not rock the boat and not get fired.
    Figure out a way to move that rock and the world will beat a path to your door.