December 22, 2004

malaysia

zzzzazzdggg56.jpg
I’ve been asked to go to Mala­ya­sia early next year and give a workshop on The Hugh­train.
Seems like a biz model is deve­lo­ping, des­pite my best efforts to make it not hap­pen.
What I’m fin­ding about about being a “mar­ke­ting blog­ger”: It’s not enough to go “Hey, I’m in mar­ke­ting! I think blogs are cool!”
Deli­ve­ra­bles. It’s all about deli­ve­ra­bles…
I’m inte­res­ted in hea­ring from other “mar­ke­ting blog­gers” how the whole blog­ging thing is chan­ging (or not) and evol­ving (or not) the pro­duct they are offe­ring their clients. Any­body?
[NOTE TO SELF:] I’m trying to start a con­ver­sa­tion here. I’m not exactly sure which one.

10 Responses to “malaysia”

  1. campester says:

    What I’m fin­ding about about being a “mar­ke­ting blog­ger”: It’s not enough to go “Hey, I’m in mar­ke­ting! I think blogs are cool!”
    dang it — there goes another career dream up in smoke.

  2. Jen Lemen says:

    okay, i’ll bite. i’m not sure exactly what the blog is doing to my pro­duct (in this case a zine) but i feel like there’s a lot of poten­tial rela­tionships there that haven’t been bro­ken open. that if i can somehow get over myself in the blog­ging part of it and see it more as faci­li­ta­ting a con­ver­sa­tion about some values that are espou­sed in my zine that the future publi­ca­tions will natu­rally become more colla­bo­ra­tive and not just a one way con­ver­sa­tion.
    the poten­tial is there, but there’s something i’m mis­sing to really make it unfold. maybe it’s as sim­ple as tal­king back or tal­king per­so­nally to inc­lude the peo­ple who sup­por­ted the art.
    but this might not be the con­ver­sa­tion you’re loo­king for at all. ;)
    just a thought.

  3. NP says:

    Hugh, first time pos­ter long time rea­der.
    I am not a “mar­ke­ting blog­ger” but what does that really mean. Mar­ke­ting is so everywhere now-a-days.
    I did howe­ver throw my opi­nion in the ring. Which is… Mar­ke­ting is already attached to each pro­duct. The mar­ke­ting depart­ment just might not know about it yet.
    So the next gen of mar­ke­ters can­not afford to be sca­red to go to the mixer and talk up chatty cus­to­mer.
    The pro­duct they use to offer isn’t a pro­duct any­more.. it’s a by-product now.
    Blog­ging isn’t just another tool in the qui­ver of mar­ke­ting… it is the quiver.

  4. Piers Fawkes says:

    Inte­res­tingly I got emplo­yed in my new job because of my blog(s). The firm was inte­res­ted in me because of my point of view and the way I was reaching out to peo­ple and so they wan­ted to do the same. I said, I could help them do that.
    When I joi­ned I rea­li­sed that it wasn’t super easy to help the firm create a blog. Here are some rea­sons:
    * Who wri­tes. Yeah, I am a sup­por­ter of the ‘let your emplo­yees blog’ move­ment (http://www.psfk.com/2004/10/robert_scoble.html) — but the % of emplo­yees willing to do that is small and nor­mally web-centric folk. Will these give a fair repre­sen­ta­tion of our firm’s POV?
    * Time. You work for a small firm and you’re busy suppl­ying the clients — it’s dif­fi­cult to stop and look ahead/outward.
    * Reward. The ROI isn’t exactly tan­gi­ble, espe­cially short term. How do you con­vinvce your boss to give you 20% of your time for blog­ging.
    * POV 1. How and what I write on PSFK may not be totally appro­priate for a pro­fes­sio­nal ser­vi­ces firm. I am rash, emo­tio­nal. I read something and I react with a post.
    * POV 2. There are so many blogs out there with POV on the mar­ke­ting sector(s) — what’s going to make your company’s dif­fe­rent? And how are you going to keep it dif­fe­rent? This is a crea­tive and resource cha­llenge.
    * Blog­ging is not only about blog­ging. It’s about com­mu­nity, it’s about sha­ring, it’s about com­men­ting, lin­king and all those other things we do to keep it rum­bling on.
    * Up to the minute. There is a corre­la­tion re. how the most popu­lar blogs are the most fre­quently upda­ted.
    Any­way — a few thoughts. I have a long list of mar­ke­ting blogs I revie­wed here if it helps anyone: http://www.psfk.com/2004/10/adragsadblogsar.html
    Piers

  5. “I’m trying to start a con­ver­sa­tion here. I’m not exactly sure which one.”
    Excellent…me too. Care for a sin­gle­malt? I’m having a dou­ble, btw.
    So. From an exter­nal van­tage point, you’ve done a helluva job and *nai­led* the head­line. In this case, the head­line is the Hugh­train Mani­festo itself and its sundry parts. The head­line is great. It’s gathe­red our atten­tion and pulled us into wan­ting to know the rest of the story. Your bri­lliant head­line has tap­ped into emo­tion, even in the absence of a plan for con­ti­nuing for­ward. Now, it appears that your cus­to­mers — and your­self — are saying “what’s next?” There is, in your words, “a good, robust phi­lo­sophy,” but phi­lo­sophi­sing doesn’t pay the bills.
    Once the phi­lo­sophi­sing is done, it’s about e-x-e-c-u-t-i-o-n.
    It’s about having a track record. Get­ting shit done. Fle­xi­bi­lity. Doing what you said you were going to do, when you said you were going to do it.
    In fin­ding this reso­nance, you’ve found a cor­ner of the Hugh­train that needs sho­ring up. Your pros­pects are saying (or you are anti­ci­pa­ting them saying): “Inte­res­ting! This Hugh­train Mani­festo doesn’t suck, and it sounds like you might be a good guide to this new, unchar­ted terrain we’re ente­ring. We’re thin­king about choo­sing you as one of our gui­des. So…where are you going to take us?”
    [Q: “What’s the dif­fe­rence bet­ween a snow­boar­der and a snow­board ins­truc­tor?”]
    [A: “About a week.”]
    One of your other com­men­ters has sta­ted: “If a com­pany is clued in they won’t need you. If they’re clue­less, they won’t want you. You need the half-clued. And if you’re half good, they’ll be clued-in quick…Work with no client for no more than three months.”
    I could not agree with this pre­mise any more. And I could not agree with the recom­men­da­tion any less.
    *gets up, pours two more drinks, hands one to Hugh*
    As far as a deli­ve­ra­ble goes, a “clue” is pretty hard to quan­tify. It’s even har­der for some mid­le­vel cor­po­rate type to jus­tify spen­ding money on, at any price. That’s not the ugly part, howe­ver. The ugly part is…if you are selling your­self for $500 (or even $3K) a pop, you’re in for misery for the next bunch of years, unless you get really lucky…and you may. You’ve got a helluva lot of buzz right now. But selling your time doesn’t give you any leve­rage, in the lite­ral sense of the word. Doc Searls, David Wein­ber­ger, and the rest of the Clue­train clue gai­ned leve­rage by digi­ti­zing their ideas. They tur­ned their insights into a tan­gi­ble, repli­ca­ble thing that is an entity.
    A deli­ve­ra­ble, if you will.
    If the above rings true for you, your deci­sion is bet­ween the follo­wing options:
    1) Sell your time, but do it in a way that is repli­ca­ble, unders­tan­da­ble, and deli­vers pre­dic­ta­ble results.
    Exam­ple: (caveat lector…self-referential…) One of the things that our com­pany does is win/loss analy­sis for our clients. We have con­ver­sa­tions with cus­to­mers that our clients can’t have them­sel­ves, since we are addres­sing a touchy sub­ject that requi­res a neu­tral, exter­nal third party. Not unlike your pro­po­sal for what you’d like to do with Hugh­train, we are, in essence, selling “time.” What we’ve done, howe­ver, is detai­led out the full pro­cess, sha­red it, and put it out there for the world.
    http://www.cerado.com/solutions01.asp
    Now, we’ve spent a ton of time deve­lo­ping this, refi­ning it, and pro­ving it. And then we put it out there, in the plain light of day. Any one of our cus­to­mers could take this and do it them­sel­ves. Hell, any one of our *com­pe­ti­tors* could take this and try to do it. Why did we take that risk? Because we know that what we do is exe­cute, pre­dic­tably, and get the job done. And our cus­to­mers have our back.
    If you’re going this route, the recom­men­da­tion is to out­line exactly what you’re going to do, when and how you’re going to do it, and show exam­ples. If you have (sani­ti­sed) exam­ples from pre­vious folks with whom you’ve wor­ked, great! If not, make some up, clearly label them as fic­tio­nal (but repre­sen­ta­tive) and use those.
    2) Dis­till the Hugh­train into something tan­gi­ble.
    This can be the thoughts them­sel­ves (a la the Clue­train book). This can be a soft­ware or ser­vice that ena­bles com­pa­nies to recast them­sel­ves with grea­ter Hugh­ness (e.g. part­ner with one of the blog or wiki pro­vi­ders, come up with some Hugh­train tem­pla­tes, help cus­to­mers unders­tand how to use what you’ve crea­ted to illus­trate and com­mu­ni­cate the huma­nity and human poten­tial that exists within their orga­ni­za­tions, and charge based on a por­tion of the wiki/blog hos­ting provider’s fee).
    This could be a Hugh­train desk calen­dar, with a car­toon a day. There are a million options.
    But, when this con­ver­sa­tion is done, you need to figure out what *you* want to do. Then put together a plan to get there. Then go.

  6. david says:

    *pours him­self a dou­ble of Makers Mark*
    As far as I can tell there are three kinds of mar­ke­ting blogs.
    The first kind are mar­ke­ting stuff. After all — whether we’re in PR, adver­ti­sing, wha­te­ver — that’s what we all do for a living. Sell crap.
    The second kind are blogs about blogs, spe­ci­fi­cally using blogs to do the act of mar­ke­ting. That’s Steve Rubel — very use­ful and helps in sho­wing the nubes among our fellows who need to ‘get it.’ And helps us learn the ‘stan­dard prac­ti­ces’ such as they are.
    The third — and this is where you come in — are blogs about mar­ke­ting itself. About the ideas and not about the exe­cu­tion of the ideas. Which is ama­zingly use­ful since I come here every mor­ning and go ‘so that’s what’s been bug­ging me about Client X…’ The pro­blem as you put it is that ideas are not very .… product-able. If that makes sense.
    The ques­tion — as Chris­topher puts it — is what do you want to do with this? Write a book? Grow up to be Seth Goo­din? Let a thou­sand Hugh­flo­wers bloom among the ad, pr and mar­ke­ting agen­cies of the free world?
    Figure that out and then do it.…

  7. Alex Lam says:

    Woah, cool­ness!
    Hope­fully I’ll be there when you are there. : )
    Who’s the Malay­sian group?

  8. Beth says:

    Hugh, I love the ideas you have, the wri­ting you do. You and Jeff Jar­vis ins­pire me. I got to tal­king with a docu­men­tary film direc­tor about blog­ging and busi­nes­ses and such. He encou­ra­ged me to start up a con­sul­ting busi­ness, and so that’s what I’m going to try to do. So far it’s me and a web­site that needs some work — blmbusinessblogs.com.
    So much of what I’m rea­ding about busi­nes­ses and blog­ging has to do with mar­ke­ting, but I see a need for them as an inter­nal com­mu­ni­ca­tion tool as much or more than for mar­ke­ting.
    Your com­ments on power the other day were inte­res­ting. I think those ideas go hand in hand with those same peo­ple being afraid of trans­pa­rency. It’s an idea I need to mull over some more.
    Who knows what’ll hap­pen. I’m going to try to con­quer my beau­ti­ful city of Aus­tin, there are so many cool small busi­nes­ses that would really bene­fit from both inter­nal and exter­nal blogs.
    You rock! BTW, we IM’d once about Mr. Hell and other various topics. My g/f is still jealous!

  9. aaron wall says:

    >I’m inte­res­ted in hea­ring from other “mar­ke­ting blog­gers” how the whole blog­ging thing is chan­ging (or not) and evol­ving (or not) the pro­duct they are offe­ring their clients. Any­body?
    I crea­ted an ebook about my topic and used mova­ble types fea­tu­res to lock it as the #2 post. Other than that I keep my site fairly free of too much adver­ti­sing and it does alright (it cer­tainly pays the rent and hos­ting fees).
    I think with how ori­gi­nal and use­ful your con­tent is the book idea is an obvious good call. You may want to pro­vide both a phy­si­cal book and an ebook on your blog. Another thing you have built up a lot of with your honesty and expres­sive beha­viour is trust. You pro­bably never really want to sell that out, but there are pro­bably some addi­tio­nal ways you can extract value from that without being a sellout.
    Also, as a pretty cool pro­mo­tio­nal bit perhaps you could inc­lude some of your cards with the first hun­dred orders or something? That would get the early adop­ters to really push your stuff for you.

  10. Jon Husband says:

    Marc Can­ter will likely have a whole bunch of stuff over at his blog http://marc.blogs.it about the blog­ging pro­gram ini­tia­ted at Mar­qui in which blog­gers are paid a monthly retai­ner and in return blog (fre­quency not known to me) about Mar­qui … pre­su­mably mainlky about blog­ging for Mar­qui and not being who­red out for Mar­qui .… there’s been a fair bit about it zip around blo­gland, too.
    I’m not sure they’ll have much data yet in terms of the impact on pro­file and sales, but they should have a fair bit about what an early try at orga­ni­zed “mar­ke­ting” using a num­ber of blog­gers looks like, what was invol­ved in deve­loing it, the ratio­nale for it, and o on.